An Improved Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm Inspired from Cell Communication Mechanism

Table 4

Results for 50D functions.

Function	C	Range	Comparison	FOA	CFOA	PSO
	MN	[−600, 600]	Best	0.0049	0	0.2221
			Worst	0.8832	0.6784	0.3296
			Average	0.2576	0.0678	0.2755
			Std.Dev	0.0387	0.2145	0.0037
	UN	[−600, 600]	Best	48.5100	48.6213	274.4630
			Worst	178.0495	49.000	769.8354
			Average	119.8091	48.9517	508.4547
			Std.Dev	3.1920	0.1186	14.2781
	US	[−600, 600]	Best	0.8342	0	2.6038
			Worst	1.9000	0.0123	6.1062
			Average	1.3174	0.0012	3.5712
			Std.Dev	0.0388	0.0039	0.0949
	MN	[−600, 600]	Best	2.2758e − 004	0	0.0984
			Worst	0.0738	0	0.1868
			Average	0.0307	0	0.1401
			Std.Dev	0.0028	0	0.0030
	MS	[−600, 600]	Best	58.7561	0	179.2948
			Worst	248.6845	43.0351	264.6745
			Average	172.1425	8.2006	225.2831
			Std.Dev	6.3818	1.6426	2.6017
	MN	[−600, 600]	Best	0.0458	−8.8818e − 016	2.3402
			Worst	1.5043	1.3538	2.9950
			Average	0.8789	0.1354	2.5752
			Std.Dev	0.0687	0.4281	0.0209