Research Article
Face Recognition Using Double Sparse Local Fisher Discriminant Analysis
Table 2
The top recognition rates (%) and the corresponding dimensions on ORL database by different methods (mean ± std).
| | | 2 trains | 3 trains | 4 trains | 5 trains | 6 trains |
| | PCA | 71.63 ± 3.06
() | 79.14 ± 1.91
() | 83.87 ± 1.77
() | 86.85 ± 2.01
() | 89.94 ± 2.72
() | | LDA | 75.87 ± 3.42
() | 85.96 ± 2.61
() | 91.54 ± 1.51
() | 93.85 ± 1.63
() | 95.63 ± 1.89
() | | LPP | 78.78 ± 2.80
() | 86.25 ± 2.93
() | 90.46 ± 1.83
() | 94.40 ± 1.71
() | 95.94 ± 1.96
() | | LFDA | 82.13 ± 3.19
() | 87.00 ± 2.97
() | 90.83 ± 1.73
() | 94.50 ± 1.90
() | 96.06 ± 2.74
() | | SPCA | 71.16 ± 2.80
() | 78.50 ± 2.42
() | 84.04 ± 1.82
() | 86.80 ± 2.28
() | 90.56 ± 2.03
() | | SLDA | 82.03 ± 2.82
() | 90.21 ± 1.85
() | 93.79 ± 1.26
() | 96.05 ± 1.83
() | 97.56 ± 1.12
() | | SPP | 79.53 ± 2.22
() | 83.50 ± 2.08
() | 86.58 ± 2.10
() | 87.40 ± 2.63
() | 88.19 ± 3.19
() | | DSNPE | 78.97 ± 3.47
() | 86.43 ± 1.92
() | 92.92 ± 1.59
() | 94.60 ± 1.96
() | 95.94 ± 2.29
() | | DSLFDA | 81.16 ± 2.88
() | 90.25 ± 2.51
() | 94.38 ± 1.54
() | 96.65 ± 1.20
() | 97.88 ± 1.03
() |
|
|
