Research Article
Face Recognition Using Double Sparse Local Fisher Discriminant Analysis
Table 2
The top recognition rates (%) and the corresponding dimensions on ORL database by different methods (mean ± std).
| | 2 trains | 3 trains | 4 trains | 5 trains | 6 trains |
| PCA | 71.63 ± 3.06 () | 79.14 ± 1.91 () | 83.87 ± 1.77 () | 86.85 ± 2.01 () | 89.94 ± 2.72 () | LDA | 75.87 ± 3.42 () | 85.96 ± 2.61 () | 91.54 ± 1.51 () | 93.85 ± 1.63 () | 95.63 ± 1.89 () | LPP | 78.78 ± 2.80 () | 86.25 ± 2.93 () | 90.46 ± 1.83 () | 94.40 ± 1.71 () | 95.94 ± 1.96 () | LFDA | 82.13 ± 3.19 () | 87.00 ± 2.97 () | 90.83 ± 1.73 () | 94.50 ± 1.90 () | 96.06 ± 2.74 () | SPCA | 71.16 ± 2.80 () | 78.50 ± 2.42 () | 84.04 ± 1.82 () | 86.80 ± 2.28 () | 90.56 ± 2.03 () | SLDA | 82.03 ± 2.82 () | 90.21 ± 1.85 () | 93.79 ± 1.26 () | 96.05 ± 1.83 () | 97.56 ± 1.12 () | SPP | 79.53 ± 2.22 () | 83.50 ± 2.08 () | 86.58 ± 2.10 () | 87.40 ± 2.63 () | 88.19 ± 3.19 () | DSNPE | 78.97 ± 3.47 () | 86.43 ± 1.92 () | 92.92 ± 1.59 () | 94.60 ± 1.96 () | 95.94 ± 2.29 () | DSLFDA | 81.16 ± 2.88 () | 90.25 ± 2.51 () | 94.38 ± 1.54 () | 96.65 ± 1.20 () | 97.88 ± 1.03 () |
|
|