Research Article
FSD-HSO Optimization Algorithm for Closed Fringes Interferogram Demodulation
Table 1
Comparison between GA and HSO optimization techniques. The demodulation method used in both cases was FSD.
| Interferogram | p-v deviation (radians) | rms deviation (radians) | % error (radians) | Time processing (seconds) | AG | HSO | AG | HSO | AG | HSO | AG | HSO |
| SI1 | 4.8740 | 4.8639 | 1.9526 | 1.9009 | 1.1729 | 0.1700 | 398.63 | 234.50 | SI2 | 3.0328 | 3.0031 | 1.3571 | 1.3043 | 2.1474 | 0.2123 | 444.83 | 247.13 | SI3 | 4.3100 | 4.3090 | 2.1649 | 2.1110 | 1.3505 | 0.1448 | 407.88 | 239.93 | SI4 | 4.9980 | 4.9980 | 2.7042 | 2.6344 | 1.2058 | 0.3984 | 5412.98 | 3026.59 | RI | 3.485 | 3.1491 | 1.346 | 1.3471 | 5.2806 | 1.5610 | 192.59 | 87.54 |
|
|