Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM

<div>Performance characteristics of PMSM for <svg height="12.3655pt" id="M110" style="vertical-align:-3.40338pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.96212 48.8148 12.3655" width="48.8148pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M396 114C349 71 317 59 274 59C216 59 123 104 123 241C123 342 180 400 246 400C283 400 317 386 348 359C355 352 361 348 366 348C378 348 401 371 402 394C402 405 398 413 385 424C369 437 337 451 294 451H293C254 451 193 434 141 394C73 342 39 277 39 198C39 90 114 -12 243 -12C303 -12 371 31 415 90L396 114Z" id="g58-97"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="432" vert-adv-y="432"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,5.616,0)"><path d="M262 451C169 451 38 375 38 210C38 98 121 -12 261 -12C360 -12 481 64 481 227C481 351 386 451 262 451ZM249 414C337 414 385 320 385 204C385 70 333 25 272 25C189 25 134 117 134 241C134 355 189 414 249 414Z" id="g58-109"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="519" vert-adv-y="519"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,12.363,0)"><path d="M327 325C324 350 312 408 304 433C283 442 256 451 213 451C120 451 59 391 59 320C59 243 125 210 188 181C237 158 266 136 266 93C266 52 231 24 195 24C134 24 93 81 74 148L42 143C42 106 51 37 59 23C78 8 125 -12 177 -12C257 -12 345 35 345 127C345 198 292 234 216 264C171 283 131 305 131 348C131 387 156 416 195 416C243 416 277 378 297 317L327 325Z" id="g58-113"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="376" vert-adv-y="376"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,19.521,0)"><path d="M552 243C552 372 474 431 385 468C378 471 378 492 382 510L419 675L401 683L345 637L224 54C173 71 118 128 118 218C118 323 174 382 270 423L255 458C130 420 24 339 24 204C24 97 93 14 213 -8L188 -131C170 -220 197 -250 217 -257L224 -254L278 -7C427 -3 552 98 552 243ZM478 228C478 124 408 37 287 40L363 405C401 395 478 336 478 228Z" id="g50-243"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="576" vert-adv-y="576"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,30.685,0)"><path d="M556 331V384H55V331H556ZM556 140V193H55V140H556Z" id="g54-34"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="611" vert-adv-y="611"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,42.304,0)"><path d="M389 0V32C297 38 291 46 291 118V635C234 613 175 595 109 583V556L161 554C203 552 207 547 207 497V118C207 46 201 38 110 32V0H389Z" id="g50-50"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="487" vert-adv-y="487"></glyph.data></g></svg> control.</div>

Modelling and Simulation in Engineering

Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM

Figure 5