About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Multiple Sclerosis International
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 423971, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/423971
Review Article

Potential Impact of B Cells on T Cell Function in Multiple Sclerosis

Departments of Neurology, Neurotherapeutics and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA

Received 13 October 2010; Accepted 13 January 2011

Academic Editor: Angelo Ghezzi

Copyright © 2011 Sara Ireland and Nancy Monson. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic debilitating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. The contribution of B cells in the pathoetiology of MS has recently been highlighted by the emergence of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that specifically depletes B cells, as a potent immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of MS. However, a clearer understanding of the impact B cells have on the neuro-inflammatory component of MS pathogenesis is needed in order to develop novel therapeutics whose affects on B cells would be beneficial and not harmful. Since T cells are known mediators of the pathology of MS, the goal of this review is to summarize what is known about the interactions between B cells and T cells, and how current and emerging immunotherapies may impact B-T cell interactions in MS.

1. Introduction

It has long been established that T cells are mediators of the pathology of multiple sclerosis (MS) in both murine models and patient studies [16]. Although, the impact of B cells and their antibody products in mediating the pathology of MS has long been considered [710], their contributions have been more recently highlighted by the demonstration that Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that specifically depletes B cells, was a potent immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of MS [11, 12]. More importantly, however, the efficacy of Rituximab in the treatment of MS patients is independent of secreted antibody since Rituximab does not affect plasma cell frequencies or serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antibody levels [13]. Thus, scientists in the field have refocused their attention on the possible roles of B cells in MS that are independent of their antibody secreting function. This paper summarizes the possible “antibody secretion-independent” roles of B cells on T cell activation and regulation, the relative impact of the B cell subpopulations on T cell activation and regulation, evidence that these mechanisms are altered in MS, and how current and emerging immunotherapies may impact B-T cell interactions in MS.

2. What Is known about the Consequences of B-T Cell Interactions?

It has long been assumed that B cells are unlikely to play a significant role as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the induction of effector T cells since human B cells are less potent APCs in vitro on a per-cell basis compared to dendritic cells [14]. However, in 1982, investigators published for the first time that human B cells could present antigens [15]. In fact, B cells are potent APCs in humans in vitro in the context of both alloantigen [16, 17] and exogenous-foreign-antigen [18] responses. Studies in mouse models in which the B cells cannot secrete antibodies have further highlighted the importance of antibody independent B cell responses [19, 20]. These results demonstrated that B cells are required for generating optimal primary and secondary T cell responses and are implicated as APC in a number of disease models in the mouse including rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes [2123].

More recently, it has been demonstrated that activated B cells are more effective in activating T cells than their resting or naïve counterparts in the mouse [2426]. This finding has been confirmed with human B cells as well, since human naïve B cell alloantigen presentation can be increased with CpG-ODN stimulation [27]. Antigen-specific B cell APC function can also be increased with CD40L stimulation [2731].

The most well-studied consequence of B-T cell interactions, however, is the induction of T cell tolerance or expansion of regulatory T cells [3234]. For example, in mice, antigen specific naïve B cells induce naïve T cells to proliferate and differentiate into regulatory T cells [35]. HEL-specific CD43− (naïve) B cells do not elicit T cell proliferation or IL-2 and interferon-gamma (IFNγ) secretion, suggesting that they induce T cell tolerance [36]. In mouse models, naïve B cells did not participate in T cell priming in vivo, implicating naïve B cells as a source of regulatory B cells [25, 37, 38].

However, few have examined the role of memory B cell antigen presentation in humans, which is a crucial consideration since memory B cells are antigen experienced. Our group demonstrated that memory B cells from healthy donors express sufficient levels of CD80 and HLA-DR to operate as antigen presenting cells to induce antigen specific T cell proliferation and IFNγ secretion [39]. Our group has also found that memory B cells from these same healthy donors also produce high concentrations of lymphotoxin- alpha (LTα) in comparison to their naïve counterparts. Another group demonstrated that memory B cells from healthy donors induce T cell proliferation in response to glatiramer acetate (GA), a peptide mimic of the neuro-antigen, myelin basic protein (MBP), with some indication that CD80 expression is important for this function [18]. In a separate study [16], it was demonstrated that resting memory B cells from healthy donors elicit robust allogeneic T cell proliferation that was significantly inhibited by anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 antibodies in contrast to naïve B cells, which were unable to stimulate allogeneic T cell proliferation. With the exception of these three studies, memory B cell antigen presentation in healthy donors has not been explicitly examined.

Memory B cells from treatment naïve RRMS patients, however, have the unique ability to present neuroantigens to autologous T cells and generate a proliferative response and IFNγ production [39]. Memory B cells from healthy donors are unable to support T cell proliferation and IFNγ production in response to neuroantigens. Taken together it appears that memory B cells might directly contribute to T cell activation by presenting neuro-antigens and secreting cytokines that enhance the Th1/IFNγ producing T cell subset. We are currently testing whether memory B cells from treatment-exposed RRMS patients maintain their capacity to incite T cell activation in a neuroantigen specific manner.

These findings have generated considerable interest in dissecting the mechanism of B-T cell interactions, especially as they relate to the antigen experience of B cells. The two primary antibody secretion independent ways that B cells potentially impact T cell activation or regulation are by (1) providing costimulatory signals through direct B-T cell interactions and (2) cytokine secretion. The following sections detail the primary surface molecules and secreted factors that are thought to contribute to T cell activation or regulation by B cells.

3. What Types of Surface Molecules Expressed by B Cells Could Be Influencing T Cell Function?

Figure 1 depicts aspects of the currently accepted model of important B-T cell interactions [40, 41]. Interactions between B7.1/B7.2 (CD80/CD86) expressed on B cells and their ligands and CD28 and CTLA4 expressed on T cells have long been studied in MS [42, 43], and much is understood regarding the influence of these interactions on T cell responses [4446]. In fact, circulating CD80+ B cells are increased during active relapse phases of MS, compared to patients in remission or controls [47], suggesting that this population may be involved during the active phase of the disease. Importantly, others have demonstrated that a subset of memory B cells, but not naïve B cells, express CD80 [16, 18] CD86 [16], and CD25, although this expression is not necessarily concurrent [18, 48]. The impact of CD80 expression on B cells and their ability to activate T cells is certainly of interest since the stimulation of memory T cells is CD28 independent [49].

423971.fig.001
Figure 1: Important co-stimulatory molecules in B-T cell interactions.

Interactions between MHCII, peptide, and the TCR are certainly central to effective B-T cell costimulation, especially in the context of MS, in which HLA-DR haplotypes have a strong association [5052]. T cell proliferation in the presence of CD19+ B cells (containing both naïve and memory B cells) activated with CD40L and antigen is reduced by ~60% in the presence of anti-HLA-DR antibodies [28].

Interactions between CD40 expressed on B cells and CD40 ligand (CD40L) expressed on T cells are also critical to mount an effective T cell response [53]. This consistent observation led to the development of anti-CD40L biologics to dampen T cell responses but became problematic due to the increase in thromboembolic events associated with these biologics, and the discovery that activated platelets express CD40L [54, 55]. Anti-CD40 agonists, however, are being developed for applications in tumor immunotherapy to mobilize T cells in patients with cancer [56]. Yet it is unclear what types of T cells are mobilized by CD40-activated B cells. This is a critical point to consider since purified B cells stimulated with one of these new CD40 agonists in combination with CpG (a TLR9 agonist) secreted high levels of both IL-6 and IL-10 [57, 58].

Interactions between OX40L expressed on APCs and OX40 expressed on T cells have profound effects on T cell responses. For example, Wang et al. have reported that co-culturing IFNγ-activated microglia from mouse brain tissue with murine CD4+ T cells significantly increased T cell proliferation, which was readily blocked by the addition of anti-OX40L in the cultures [59]. In humans, exposure of human T cells to OX40L prevents the development of IL-10-producing T cells [60] and IL-17 producing T cells [61]. Thus, biologics that block or enhance these interactions may be useful therapeutics for autoimmunity and infection, respectively, and are currently being considered for development in these arenas. However, the impact of OX40-OX40L ligation on B-T cell interactions has not been formally investigated.

4. What Types of Secreted Factors Produced by B Cells Could Be Influencing T Cell Function?

The influence of T cell derived cytokines in health and disease has dominated scientific literature for at least 2 decades. However, it has become apparent that activated B cells have a high capacity to produce both inflammatory and regulatory cytokines [92] (Table 1). For example, recent investigations have demonstrated that IL-10-producing B cells have an immunomodulatory role in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), which is the mouse model of MS [93, 94]. However, CD19+ B cell pools from MS patients have a diminished capacity to produce IL-10 [95, 96], suggesting that the inflammatory responses in MS patients may be partially attributable to a defect in IL-10 production by B cells. In vitro activation of purified naïve and memory B cells from the RRMS patient cohort used in our studies using CD40L (as was done by [96]), demonstrates that naïve B cells produced similar amounts of IL-10 reported by [66, 95, 97], but memory B cells did not produce appreciable amounts of IL-10 [39]. Interestingly, when we cultured naïve B cells with T cells in our B-T cell culture system, we did not observe appreciable T cell proliferation in response to neuro-antigens, suggesting that the amount of IL-10 produced by naïve B cells from RRMS patients may regulate T cell responses. In support of this concept, IL-10 treatment of CD4 T cells from patients with rheumatoid arthritis significantly decreased the numbers of Th17 cells in vitro [98].

tab1
Table 1: Cytokines produced by B cells.

So what pro-inflammatory cytokines do B cells generate that have a high likelihood of effecting T cell function in response to neuro-antigens? LTα and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are classic candidates of the TNF superfamily with similar structure [99, 100]. Their expression by B cells is required for germinal center formation [101] and the migration of antigen-loaded myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) to follicles [102]. LTα is also required for the generation of memory B cells and isotype switch [103]. LTα and TNF-α are readily produced by activated memory B cells from healthy donors [104], and T cells express receptors for these cytokines [105]. Furthermore, TNFα and LTα levels are increased in MS lesions and mediate oligodendrocyte toxicity in vitro [106]. B cells from RRMS patients showed increased LTα and TNFα and decreased IL-10 production in response to polyclonal stimuli (CD40L and BCR crosslinking) in the presence of a TLR9 agonist or IFNγ [107]. In fact, when CD19+ cells are removed in vitro from peripheral blood mononuclear (PBMC) cultures, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation is decreased and may be due to a lack of B cells secreting LTα and TNFα [107], which would support T cell proliferation.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and IL-6 are readily secreted by activated B cells as well [108], and there is certainly much excitement regarding the ability of TGFβ and IL-6 in combination to mediate Th17 cell activity since Th17 cells are central to the inflammation associated with EAE [1, 109114]. However, the classic role of TGFβ has been to induce tolerance in the immune system, and indeed, anti-TGFβ treatment of mice led to worsening of EAE disease and more severe clinical pathology in these mice [115]. TGFβ has been attempted ineffectively as a treatment for progressive MS [116]. In vitro recombinant TGFβ decreased neuroantigen-specific T cell frequency and IFNγ and IL-4 producing T cells from MS patients [117].

More recently, others have demonstrated that murine Th17 cells can be generated by either IL-6 alone or IL-6 in combination with TGFβ, but only those Th17 cells that had been generated with IL-6 alone are encephalitogenic [1]. IL-6 is increased in the CSF of other inflammatory neurological disorders including transverse myelitis (TM) and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) [118, 119], in the lesions of MS patients [120], and in some cases, correlates with relapse or general neurodegeneration in the progressive phase [121]. However, IL-6 is not increased in the CSF of MS patients and IL-6 levels do not correlate with other CSF parameters including oligoclonal bands, pleocytosis or IgG index [118, 122, 123]. Whether IL-6 is central to the generation of human Th17 cells remains under investigation [124, 125].

Even with confounding and often negative results of other studies in MS, it has been suggested to use the IL-6 receptor blocking antibody, Tocilizumab, as a therapeutic agent. Interestingly, IL-6 is increased after treatment of MS patients with IFNβ, suggesting that this pleiotropic cytokine might not play an inflammatory pathogenic role in MS as IL-6 can have both systemic and local effects [126]. Because this cytokine differs in its necessity for EAE, it might represent an insurmountable task to go to trial due to the uncertain/unpredictable nature of the outcome without predictive animal models.

5. What Is the Effect of Immunotherapy on B Cell APC Function in MS?

As discussed earlier in this paper, T cells from RRMS patients treated with Rituximab had a poor response to antigen stimulation, suggesting that the lack of B cells in the periphery of these patients has a profound impact on T cell activation. Interestingly, circulating memory B cells are also reduced in RRMS patients during mitoxantrone therapy [96] and IFNβ therapy [133]. IFNβ treatment decreases MBP-elicited IFNγ and TNFα, but also decreases IL-10 and increases IL-6 [134]. Another study demonstrated that IFNβ increases the expression of a phosphatase (SHP-1) that negatively regulates inflammatory T cell signaling from TNFα, IFNγ, IL-4, and IL-13 [135]. From these results, one may speculate that the effects of IFNβ on T cells modulate their responsiveness to cytokine signals, some provided by B cells. On the other hand, in vitro studies show that Th17 cells and associated cytokines (IL-23, TGFβ and IL-1β) were reduced, while anti-inflammatory cytokines produced by B cells and dendritic cells were increased. Reemerging B cells from RRMS patients treated with mitoxantrone therapy recovered the ability to produce IL-10 [107], but again, the impact of these IL-10-secreting B cells on neuroantigen-specific T cell responses was not tested. Table 2 lists other current and emerging therapies and their possible impact on B cell function and emphasizes the urgent need to investigate how these drugs may affect B-T cell interactions in the patients receiving them.

tab2
Table 2: Possible impact of established and emerging therapies for MS on B cell function.

In summary, the influence of B cells on T cell function is only beginning to be realized. Further investigations are required in order to fully comprehend the impact of current and emerging therapeutics on B cell responses, which in turn, may have profound impact on T cell function in autoimmune diseases such as MS.

References

  1. Y. Yang, J. Weiner, Y. Liu et al., “T-bet is essential for encephalitogenicity of both Th1 and Th17 cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 7, pp. 1549–1564, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. I. M. Stromnes, L. M. Cerretti, D. Liggitt, et al., “Differential regulation of central nervous system autoimmunity by T(H)1 and T(H)17 cells,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 337–342, 2008.
  3. M. Sospedra and R. Martin, “Immunology of multiple sclerosis,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, pp. 683–747, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. A. Naess and H. Nyland, “Multiple sclerosis. T lymphocytes in cerebrospinal fluid and blood,” European Neurology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 61–66, 1978. View at Scopus
  5. C. J. Hedegaard, M. Krakauer, K. Bendtzen, H. Lund, F. Sellebjerg, and C. H. Nielsen, “T helper cell type 1 (Th1), Th2 and Th17 responses to myelin basic protein and disease activity in multiple sclerosis,” Immunology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 161–169, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. M. El-behi, A. Rostami, and B. Ciric, “Current views on the roles of Th1 and Th17 cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. M. Sandberg Wollheim, “Immunoglobulin synthesis in vitro by cerebrospinal fluid cells in patients with meningoencephalitis of presumed viral origin,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 617–622, 1975. View at Scopus
  8. J. W. Prineas and R. G. Wright, “Macrophages, lymphocytes, and plasma cells in the perivascular compartment in chronic multiple sclerosis,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 409–421, 1978. View at Scopus
  9. R. P. Lisak, A. I. Levinson, B. Zweiman, and N. I. Abdou, “T and B lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 1975. View at Scopus
  10. T. Holmøy, “The discovery of oligoclonal bands: a 50-year anniversary,” European Neurology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 311–315, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. H. F. McFarland, “The B cell—old player, new position on the team,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 7, pp. 664–665, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. S. L. Hauser, E. Waubant, D. L. Arnold et al., “B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 7, pp. 676–688, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. H. F. Petereit, W. Moeller-Hartmann, D. Reske, and A. Rubbert, “Rituximab in a patient with multiple sclerosis—effect on B cells, plasma cells and intrathecal IgG synthesis,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 399–403, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. S. Corinti, D. Medaglini, C. Prezzi, A. Cavani, G. Pozzi, and G. Girolomoni, “Human dendritic cells are superior to B cells at presenting a major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted heterologous antigen expressed on recombinant Streptococcus gordonii,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1879–1883, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Issekutz, E. Chu, and R. S. Geha, “Antigen presentation by human B cells: T cell proliferation induced by Epstein Barr virus B lymphoblastoid cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 1446–1450, 1982.
  16. K. L. Good, D. T. Avery, and S. G. Tangye, “Resting human memory B cells are intrinsically programmed for enhanced survival and responsiveness to diverse stimuli compared to naive B cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 890–901, 2009.
  17. T. Holmøy and F. Vartdal, “Cerebrospinal fluid T cells from multiple sclerosis patients recognize autologous Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cells,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Bar-Or, E. M. L. Oliveira, D. E. Anderson et al., “Immunological memory: contribution of memory B cells expressing costimulatory molecules in the resting state,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 10, pp. 5669–5677, 2001. View at Scopus
  19. O. Chan, M. P. Madaio, and M. J. Shlomchik, “The roles of B cells in MRL/lpr murine lupus,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 815, pp. 75–87, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. O. Chan, M. P. Madaio, and M. J. Shlomchik, “The roles of B cells in MRL/lpr murine lupus,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 815, pp. 75–87, 1997.
  21. A. Crawford, M. MacLeod, T. Schumacher, L. Corlett, and D. Gray, “Primary T cell expansion and differentiation in vivo requires antigen presentation by B cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 6, pp. 3498–3506, 2006. View at Scopus
  22. S. K. O'Neill, M. J. Shlomchik, T. T. Glant, Y. Cao, P. D. Doodes, and A. Finnegan, “Antigen-specific B cells are required as APCs and autoantibody-producing cells for induction of severe autoimmune arthritis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 3781–3788, 2005. View at Scopus
  23. F. S. Wong, LI. Wen, M. Tang et al., “Investigation of the role of B-cells in type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse,” Diabetes, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2581–2587, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. E. Evans, M. W. Munks, J. M. Purkerson, and D. C. Parker, “Resting B lymphocytes as APC for naive T lymphocytes: dependence on CD40 ligand/CD40,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 688–697, 2000. View at Scopus
  25. J. I. Krieger, S. F. Grammer, H. M. Grey, and R. W. Chesnut, “Antigen presentation by splenic B cells: resting B cells are ineffective, whereas activated B cells are effective accessory cells for T cell responses,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 2937–2945, 1985. View at Scopus
  26. K. L. Rock, B. Benacerraf, and A. K. Abbas, “Antigen presentation by hapten-specific B lymphocytes. I. Role of surface immunoglobulin receptors,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 1102–1113, 1984. View at Scopus
  27. W. Jiang, M. M. Lederman, C. V. Harding, B. Rodriguez, R. J. Mohner, and S. F. Sieg, “TLR9 stimulation drives naïve B cells to proliferate and to attain enhanced antigen presenting function,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 2205–2213, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. C. T. Harp, A. E. Lovett-Racke, M. K. Racke, E. M. Frohman, and N. L. Monson, “Impact of myelin-specific antigen presenting B cells on T cell activation in multiple sclerosis,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 382–391, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. M. von Bergwelt-Baildon, J. L. Schultze, B. Maecker, et al., “Correspondence re R. Lapointe et al., CD40-stimulated B lymphocytes pulsed with tumor antigens are effective antigen-presenting cells that can generate specific T cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 4055–4056, 2004.
  30. R. Lapointe, A. Bellemare-Pelletier, F. Housseau, J. Thibodeau, and P. Hwu, “CD40-stimulated B lymphocytes pulsed with tumor antigens are effective antigen-presenting cells that can generate specific T cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 2836–2843, 2003.
  31. M. Von Bergwelt-Baildon, A. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, A. Popov et al., “CD40-activated B cells express full lymph node homing triad and induce T-cell chemotaxis: potential as cellular adjuvants,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 2786–2789, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. E. J. Fuchs and P. Matzinger, “B cells turn off virgin but not memory T cells,” Science, vol. 258, no. 5085, pp. 1156–1159, 1992. View at Scopus
  33. L. C. Chen, J. C. Delgado, P. E. Jensen, and X. Chen, “Direct expansion of human allospecific FoxP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells with allogeneic B cells for therapeutic application,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 4094–4102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  34. E. E. Eynon and D. C. Parker, “Small B cells as antigen-presenting cells in the induction of tolerance to soluble protein antigens,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 131–138, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Reichardt, B. Dornbach, S. Rong et al., “Naive B cells generate regulatory T cells in the presence of a mature immunologic synapse,” Blood, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 1519–1529, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  36. K. Attanavanich and J. F. Kearney, “Marginal zone, but not follicular B cells, are potent activators of naive CD4 T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 803–811, 2004. View at Scopus
  37. T. Kakiuchi, R. W. Chesnut, and H. M. Grey, “B cells as antigen-presenting cells: the requirement for B cell activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 1983. View at Scopus
  38. C. Pasare, V. Morafo, M. Entringer et al., “Presence of activated antigen-binding B cells during immunization enhances relative levels of IFN-γ in T cell responses,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 778–787, 1998. View at Scopus
  39. C. T. Harp, S. Ireland, L. S. Davis, et al., “Memory B cells from a subset of treatment-naive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients elicit CD4(+) T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ production in response to myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2942–2956, 2010.
  40. T. Honjo, F. W. Alt, and M. S. Neuberger, Eds., Molecular Biology of B cells, Elsevier Academic Press, London, UK, 2004.
  41. K. Yanaba, J. D. Bouaziz, T. Matsushita, C. M. Magro, ST. Clair, and T. F. Tedder, “B-lymphocyte contributions to human autoimmune disease,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 284–299, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  42. D. A. Dyment, G. C. Ebers, and A. D. Sadovnick, “Genetics of multiple sclerosis,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 104–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. J. Perrin, C. H. June, J. H. Maldonado, R. B. Ratts, and M. K. Racke, “Blockade of CD28 during in vitro activation of encephalitogenic T cells or after disease onset ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 1704–1710, 1999. View at Scopus
  44. L. Chen, “Co-inhibitory molecules of the B7-CD28 family in the control of T-cell immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 336–347, 2004. View at Scopus
  45. R. W. Stuart and M. K. Racke, “Targeting T cell costimulation in autoimmune disease,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 275–289, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  46. B. Salomon and J. A. Bluestone, “Complexities of CD28/B7: CTLA-4 costimulatory pathways in autoimmunity and transplantation,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 19, pp. 225–252, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  47. K. Genç, D. L. Dona, and A. T. Reder, “Increased CD80(+) B cells in active multiple sclerosis and reversal by interferon β-1b therapy,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 2664–2671, 1997. View at Scopus
  48. S. Amu, A. Tarkowski, T. Dörner, M. Bokarewa, and M. Brisslert, “The human immunomodulatory CD25+ B cell population belongs to the memory B cell pool,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. A. E. Lovett-Racke, J. L. Trotter, J. Lauber, P. J. Perrin, C. H. June, and M. K. Racke, “Decreased dependence of myelin basic protein-reactive T cells on CD28- mediated costimulation in multiple sclerosis patients,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 725–730, 1998. View at Scopus
  50. M. Comabella, D. W. Craig, M. Carmiña-Tato et al., “Identification of a novel risk locus for multiple sclerosis at 13q31.3 by a pooled genome-wide scan of 500,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 10, article e3490, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  51. D. A. Dyment, B. M. Herrera, M. Z. Cader et al., “Complex interactions among MHC haplotypes in multiple sclerosis: susceptibility and resistance,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 2019–2026, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. D. A. Hafler, A. Compston, S. Sawcer et al., “Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 9, pp. 851–862, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. G. A. Bishop and B. S. Hostager, “The CD40-CD154 interaction in B cell-T cell liaisons,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 14, no. 3-4, pp. 297–309, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. T. Boumpas, R. Furie, S. Manzi et al., “A short course of BG9588 (anti-CD40 ligand antibody) improves serologic activity and decreases hematuria in patients with proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 719–727, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  55. M. Mirabet, J. A. Barrabés, A. Quiroga, and D. Garcia-Dorado, “Platelet pro-aggregatory effects of CD40L monoclonal antibody,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 937–944, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  56. M. C. Levesque, “Translational mini-review series on B cell-directed therapies: recent advances in B cell-directed biological therapies for autoimmune disorders,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 198–208, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. E. L. Carpenter, R. Mick, J. Rüter, and R. H. Vonderheide, “Activation of human B cells by the agonist CD40 antibody CP-870,893 and augmentation with simultaneous toll-like receptor 9 stimulation,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 7, article 1479, p. 93, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  58. F. Gantner, P. Hermann, K. Nakashima, S. Matsukawa, K. Sakai, and K. B. Bacon, “CD40-dependent and -independent activation of human tonsil B cells by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1576–1585, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  59. Y. Wang, M. Li, M. Song et al., “Expression of OX40 ligand in microglia activated by IFN-γ sustains a protective CD4+ T-cell response in vitro,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. T. Ito, Y. H. Wang, O. Duramad et al., “0X40 ligand shuts down IL-10-producing regulatory T cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 35, pp. 13138–13143, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. J. Li, L. I. Li, X. Shang et al., “Negative regulation of IL-17 production by OX40/OX40L interaction,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 253, no. 1-2, pp. 31–37, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  62. K. Taga and G. Tosato, “IL-10 inhibits human T cell proliferation and IL-2 production,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 1143–1148, 1992.
  63. K. W. Moore, R. de Waal Malefyt, R. L. Coffman, et al., “Interleukin-10,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 11, pp. 165–190, 1993.
  64. K. W. Moore, R. de Waal Malefyt, R. L. Coffman, et al., “Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 19, pp. 683–765, 2001.
  65. M. Wagner, H. Poeck, B. Jahrsdoerfer et al., “IL-12p70-dependent Th1 induction by human B cells requires combined activation with CD40 ligand and CpG DNA,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 954–963, 2004.
  66. M. E. Duddy, A. Alter, and A. Bar-Or, “Distinct profiles of human B cell effector cytokines: a role in immune regulation?” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 6, pp. 3422–3427, 2004.
  67. Y. P. Rubtsov and A. Y. Rudensky, “TGFβ signalling in control of T-cell-mediated self-reactivity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 443–453, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  68. M. O. Li, Y. Y. Wan, S. Sanjabi, A. K. L. Robertson, and R. A. Flavell, “Transforming growth factor-β regulation of immune responses,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 24, pp. 99–146, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  69. M. Veldhoen and B. Stockinger, “TGFβ1, a “Jack of all trades”: the link with pro-inflammatory IL-17-producing T cells,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 358–361, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  70. E. Bettelli, M. Oukka, and V. K. Kuchroo, “T(H)-17 cells in the circle of immunity and autoimmunity,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 345–350, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  71. G. L. Warner, J. W. Ludlow, D. A. Nelson, A. Gaur, and D. W. Scott, “Anti-immunoglobulin treatment of murine B-cell lymphomas induces active transforming growth factor beta but pRB hypophosphorylation is transforming growth factor beta independent,” Cell Growth & Differentiation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 175–181, 1992.
  72. N. H. Ruddle, “Lymphoid neo-organogenesis: lymphotoxin's role in inflammation and development,” Immunologic Research, vol. 19, no. 2-3, pp. 119–125, 1999.
  73. K. Pfeffer, “Biological functions of tumor necrosis factor cytokines and their receptors,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 14, no. 3-4, pp. 185–191, 2003.
  74. M. Apostolaki, M. Armaka, P. Victoratos, and G. Kollias, “Cellular mechanisms of TNF function in models of inflammation and autoimmunity,” Current Directions in Autoimmunity, vol. 11, pp. 1–26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  75. G. Kollias, E. Douni, G. Kassiotis, and D. Kontoyiannis, “On the role of tumor necrosis factor and receptors in models of multiorgan failure, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 169, pp. 175–194, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. P. Scheurich, B. Thoma, U. Ucer, and K. Pfizenmaier, “Immunoregulatory activity of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α: induction of TNF receptors on human T cells and TNF-α-mediated enhancement of T cell responses,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 1786–1790, 1987.
  77. C. T. Harp, S. Ireland, L. S. Davis, et al., “Memory B cells from a subset of treatment-naive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients elicit CD4(+) T-cell proliferation and IFN-gamma production in response to myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2942–2956, 2010.
  78. G. Trinchieri, “Interleukin-12: a cytokine produced by antigen-presenting cells with immunoregulatory functions in the generation of T-helper cells type 1 and cytotoxic lymphocytes,” Blood, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 4008–4027, 1994.
  79. M. Romano, M. Sironi, C. Toniatti et al., “Role of IL-6 and its soluble receptor in induction of chemokines and leukocyte recruitment,” Immunity, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 315–325, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. J. Van Snick, “Interleukin-6: an overview,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 8, pp. 253–278, 1990.
  81. A. Kimura and T. Kishimoto, “IL-6: regulator of Treg/Th17 balance,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1830–1835, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  82. T. Hirano, S. Akira, T. Taga, and T. Kishimoto, “Biological and clinical aspects of interleukin 6,” Immunology Today, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 443–449, 1990.
  83. A. Billiau and P. Matthys, “Interferon-γ: a historical perspective,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 97–113, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  84. A. O'Garra, L. Steinman, and K. Gijbels, “CD4+ T-cell subsets in autoimmunity,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 872–883, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. M. A. Dayton, T. J. Knobloch, and D. Benjamin, “Human B cell lines express the interferon gamma gene,” Cytokine, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 454–460, 1992.
  86. Y. Pang, Y. Norihisa, D. Benjamin, R. R. S. Kantor, and H. A. Young, “Interferon-γ gene expression in human B-cell lines: induction by interleukin-2, protein kinase C activators, and possible effect of hypomethylation on gene regulation,” Blood, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 724–732, 1992.
  87. A. N. Theofilopoulos, R. Baccala, B. Beutler, and D. H. Kono, “Type I interferons (α/β) in immunity and autoimmunity,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, pp. 307–336, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  88. W. P. Arend, “The balance between IL-1 and IL-1Ra in disease,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 13, no. 4-5, pp. 323–340, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. A. Fontana, H. Hengartner, and E. Weber, “Interleukin 1 activity in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Rheumatology International, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 49–53, 1982.
  90. K. L. Isaacs, R. B. Sartor, and S. Haskill, “Cytokine messenger RNA profiles in inflammatory bowel disease mucosa detected by polymerase chain reaction amplification,” Gastroenterology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1587–1595, 1992.
  91. J. A. Hanten, J. P. Vasilakos, C. L. Riter et al., “Comparison of human B cell activation by TLR7 and TLR9 agonists,” BMC Immunology, vol. 9, article 39, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  92. S. M. Anderton and S. Fillatreau, “Activated B cells in autoimmune diseases: the case for a regulatory role,” Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 657–666, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  93. S. Fillatreau, C. H. Sweenie, M. J. McGeachy, D. Gray, and S. M. Anderton, “B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10,” Nature Immunology, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 944–950, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  94. M. K. Mann, K. Maresz, L. P. Shriver, Y. Tan, and B. N. Dittel, “B cell regulation of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells and IL-10 via B7 is essential for recovery from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 3447–3456, 2007.
  95. J. Correale, M. Farez, and G. Razzitte, “Helminth infections associated with multiple sclerosis induce regulatory B cells,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 187–199, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  96. M. Duddy, M. Niino, F. Adatia et al., “Distinct effector cytokine profiles of memory and naive human B cell subsets and implication in multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 10, pp. 6092–6099, 2007.
  97. D. P. D'Cruz, S. Mellor-Pita, B. Joven et al., “Transverse myelitis as the first manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus or lupus-like disease: good functional outcome and relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 280–285, 2004.
  98. Y. U. J. Heo, Y. B. Joo, H. J. Oh et al., “IL-10 suppresses Th17 cells and promotes regulatory T cells in the CD4+ T cell population of rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Immunology Letters, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  99. C. F. Ware, T. L. VanArsdale, P. D. Crowe, and J. L. Browning, “The ligands and receptors of the lymphotoxin system,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 198, pp. 175–218, 1995.
  100. R. M. Locksley, N. Killeen, and M. J. Lenardo, “The TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies: integrating mammalian biology,” Cell, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 487–501, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. Y. X. Fu, H. Molina, M. Matsumoto, G. Huang, J. Min, and D. D. Chaplin, “Lymphotoxin-α (LTα) supports development of splenic follicular structure that is required for IgG responses,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 185, no. 12, pp. 2111–2120, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. P. Yu, Y. Wang, R. K. Chin et al., “B cells control the migration of a subset of dendritic cells into B cell follicles via CXC chemokine ligand 13 in a lymphotoxin-dependent fashion,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 10, pp. 5117–5123, 2002.
  103. Y. X. Fu, G. Huang, Y. Wang, and D. D. Chaplin, “Lymphotoxin-α-dependent spleen microenvironment supports the generation of memory B cells and is required for their subsequent antigen-induced activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 5, pp. 2508–2514, 2000.
  104. Y. X. Fu, G. Huang, Y. Wang, and D. D. Chaplin, “B lymphocytes induce the formation of follicular dendritic cell clusters in a lymphotoxin α-dependent fashion,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 187, no. 7, pp. 1009–1018, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. C. F. Ware, P. D. Crowe, T. L. Vanarsdale et al., “Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor expression in T lymphocytes: differential regulation of the type I TNF receptor during activation of resting and effector T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 147, no. 12, pp. 4229–4238, 1991.
  106. S. R. Plant, H. A. Aknett, and J. P. Y. Ting, “Astroglial-derived lymphotoxin-α exacerbates inflammation and demyelination, but not remyelination,” Glia, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  107. A. Bar-Or, L. Fawaz, B. Fan et al., “Abnormal B-cell cytokine responses a trigger of T-cell-mediated disease in MS?” Annals of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 452–461, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  108. V. Pistoia, “Production of cytokines by human B cells in health and disease,” Immunology Today, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 343–350, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. C. T. Weaver, L. E. Harrington, P. R. Mangan, M. Gavrieli, and K. M. Murphy, “Th17: an effector CD4 T cell lineage with regulatory T cell ties,” Immunity, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 677–688, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  110. K. Kikly, L. Liu, S. Na, and J. D. Sedgwick, “The IL-23/Th axis: therapeutic targets for autoimmune inflammation,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 670–675, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  111. M. J. McGeachy, K. S. Bak-Jensen, Y. I. Chen et al., “TGF-β and IL-6 drive the production of IL-17 and IL-10 by T cells and restrain T-17 cell-mediated pathology,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1390–1397, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  112. E. Bettelli, Y. Carrier, W. Gao et al., “Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector T17 and regulatory T cells,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7090, pp. 235–238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  113. M. Veldhoen, R. J. Hocking, C. J. Atkins, R. M. Locksley, and B. Stockinger, “TGFβ in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells,” Immunity, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  114. A. Jäger, V. Dardalhon, R. A. Sobel, E. Bettelli, and V. K. Kuchroo, “Th1, Th17, and Th9 effector cells induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with different pathological phenotypes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 11, pp. 7169–7177, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  115. M. K. Racke, B. Cannella, P. Albert, M. Sporn, C. S. Raine, and D. E. McFarlin, “Evidence of endogenous regulatory function of transforming growth factor-β1 in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis,” International Immunology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 615–620, 1992.
  116. P. A. Calabresi, N. S. Fields, H. W. Maloni et al., “Phase 1 trial of transforming growth factor beta 2 in chronic progressive MS,” Neurology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 289–292, 1998.
  117. J. Link, B. He, V. Navikas et al., “Transforming growth factor-β1 suppresses autoantigen-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines but not of interleukin-10 in multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. A. Uzawa, M. Mori, M. Ito et al., “Markedly increased CSF interleukin-6 levels in neuromyelitis optica, but not in multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 256, no. 12, pp. 2082–2084, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  119. A. I. Kaplin, D. M. Deshpande, E. Scott et al., “IL-6 induces regionally selective spinal cord injury in patients with the neuroinflammatory disorder transverse myelitis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 2731–2741, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  120. C. Lock, G. Hermans, R. Pedotti et al., “Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 500–508, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  121. D. Maimone, S. Gregory, B. G. W. Arnason, and A. T. Reder, “Cytokine levels in the cerebrospinal fluid and serum of patients with multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. S. L. Hauser, T. H. Doolittle, R. Lincoln, R. H. Brown, and C. A. Dinarello, “Cytokine accumulations in CSF of multiple sclerosis patients: frequent detection of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor but not interleukin-6,” Neurology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1735–1739, 1990.
  123. M. A. Laurenzi, A. Siden, M. A. A. Persson, G. Norkrans, L. Hagberg, and F. Chiodi, “Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 activity in HIV infection and inflammatory and noninflammatory diseases of the nervous system,” Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 233–241, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  124. R. K. Benwell and D. R. Lee, “Essential and synergistic roles of IL1 and IL6 in human Th17 differentiation directed by TLR ligand-activated dendritic cells,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 178–187, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  125. H. W. Lim, J. Lee, P. Hillsamer, and C. H. Kim, “Human Th17 cells share major trafficking receptors with both polarized effector T cells and FOXP3+ regulatory T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 122–129, 2008.
  126. Y. Nakatsuji, M. Nakano, M. Moriya et al., “Beneficial effect of interferon-β treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis is associated with transient increase in serum IL-6 level in response to interferon-β injection,” Cytokine, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 69–74, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  127. J. M. R. Frade, M. Mellado, G. Del Real, J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos, P. Lind, and C. Martinez-A. C., “Characterization of the CCR2 chemokine receptor: functional CCR2 receptor expression in B cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 159, no. 11, pp. 5576–5584, 1997.
  128. K. A. Dzenko, A. V. Andjelkovic, W. A. Kuziel, and J. S. Pachter, “The chemokine receptor CCR2 mediates the binding and internalization of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 along brain microvessels,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 9214–9223, 2001.
  129. H. Nakajima, M. Sugino, F. Kimura, et al., “Increased intrathecal chemokine receptor CCR2 expression in multiple sclerosis,” Biomark Insights, vol. 2, pp. 463–468, 2007.
  130. J. W. Morgan, N. Kouttab, D. Ford, and A. L. Maizel, “Vitamin D-mediated gene regulation in phenotypically defined human B cell subpopulations,” Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 9, pp. 3225–3234, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. S. Chen, G. P. Sims, X. C. Xiao, Y. G. Yue, S. Chen, and P. E. Lipsky, “Modulatory effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D on human B cell differentiation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 1634–1647, 2007.
  132. O. Neuhaus, C. Farina, A. Yassouridis et al., “Multiple sclerosis: comparison of copolymer-1-reactive T cell lines from treated and untreated subjects reveals cytokine shift from T helper 1 to T helper 2 cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 13, pp. 7452–7457, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. M. Niino, M. Hirotani, Y. Miyazaki, and H. Sasaki, “Memory and naïve B-cell subsets in patients with multiple sclerosis,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 464, no. 1, pp. 74–78, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  134. C. J. Hedegaard, M. Krakauer, K. Bendtzen, P. S. Sørensen, F. Sellebjerg, and C. H. Nielsen, “The effect of β-interferon therapy on myelin basic protein-elicited CD4+ T cell proliferation and cytokine production in multiple sclerosis,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 80–89, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  135. G. P. Christophi, M. Panos, C. A. Hudson et al., “Interferon-β treatment in multiple sclerosis attenuates inflammatory gene expression through inducible activity of the phosphatase SHP-1,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 27–44, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed