Clinical Study

Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis

Figure 4

Cluster analysis using šµ 3 or šµ 4 in males. (a) Healthy male participants: clustering using šµ 3 only, cluster referring to lower memory functioning (9 cases) and cluster referring to higher memory functioning (11 cases). There is no overlap between these šµ 3 clusters. (b) Healthy male participants: clustering using šµ 4 only, cluster referring to lower memory functioning (5 cases) and cluster referring to higher memory functioning (15 cases). There is no overlap between these šµ 4 clusters. (c) MS male patients: clustering using šµ 3 only, cluster referring to lower memory functioning (48 cases) and cluster referring to higher memory functioning (51 cases). There is no overlap between these šµ 3 clusters. (d) MS male patients: clustering using šµ 4 only, cluster referring to lower memory functioning (59 cases) and cluster referring to higher memory functioning (40 cases). There is no overlap between these šµ 4 clusters. Cluster referring to lower memory functioningā€”white bars, cluster referring to higher memory functioningā€”gray bars. Each bar represents mean Ā± S.E.M.
312503.fig.004a
(a) Healthy male participants, šµ 3
312503.fig.004b
(b) Healthy male participants, šµ 4
312503.fig.004c
(c) MS male patients, šµ 3
312503.fig.004d
(d) MS male patients, šµ 4