About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 185463, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/185463
Review Article

The Role of Astrocytes in the Regulation of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory Formation

Neuroscience Program, Skidmore College, 815 N Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA

Received 31 July 2013; Revised 7 October 2013; Accepted 5 November 2013

Academic Editor: Yann Bernardinelli

Copyright © 2013 Yusuke Ota et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Astrocytes regulate synaptic transmission and play a role in the formation of new memories, long-term potentiation (LTP), and functional synaptic plasticity. Specifically, astroglial release of glutamate, ATP, and cytokines likely alters the survivability and functioning of newly formed connections. Among these pathways, regulation of glutamate appears to be most directly related to the promotion of LTP, which is highly dependent on the synchronization of synaptic receptors through the regulation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Moreover, regulation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors, particularly AMPA receptors, is dependent on signaling by ATP synthesized in astrocytes. Finally, cytokine signaling is also implicated in regulating LTP, but is likely most important in plasticity following tissue damage. Despite the role of these signaling factors in regulating LTP and functional plasticity, an integrative model of these factors has not yet been elucidated. In this review, we seek to summarize the current body of evidence on astrocytic mechanisms for regulation of LTP and functional plasticity, and provide an integrative model of the processes.

1. Introduction

The long-term storage of information in the form of memory is one of the principal functions of the developed nervous system. The ability to utilize this information provides evolutionary advantages in adapting and responding to situations in a given environment. The method for the formation of memories and the process of functional specialization in the brain during development has been found to be mediated by both structural and functional plasticity, including long-term potentiation between neurons [1]. While much attention has been given to these processes on a neuronal level, less attention has been given to what role glial cells, particularly astrocytes, may have in the underlying mechanisms.

While astrocytes were formerly thought to serve mostly as housekeeping cells, they have recently gained attention as an integral part of the chemical synapse. In addition to their structural and metabolic roles, astrocytes are now thought to be heavily involved in synaptogenesis and in regulating the communication between already formed connections [2]. Several studies have demonstrated that astrocytes utilize both ionotropic and metabotropic systems in order to regulate neuron to neuron communication [35], and that they may have specific mechanisms for regulating the formation of memories. Here, we review recent evidence for the importance of astrocytes in both structural and functional synaptic plasticity, specifically long-term potentiation, the key chemical transmitters that are involved (Table 1), as well as the underlying mechanisms by which astrocytes may regulate these processes.

tab1
Table 1: Summary of receptors/signaling molecules and related mechanisms.

2. Glial Cells: Astrocytes

Glial cells are nonneuronal cells that are now believed to constitute 50% of the cells in the whole brain in humans and other primates [69], although other reports have suggested that glia may outnumber neurons 10 : 1 [1012]. Astrocytes, as their name suggests, appear to be star-shaped when Golgi stained or immunostained for glial fibrillary acidic protein [5]. However, the morphology and physiology of astrocytes differ depending on the type [13]. Typically, astrocytes have a complex structure that is highly branched with many small protrusions that contact the synaptic cleft [14, 15]. With their unique morphology, astrocytes form the blood brain barrier, have a role in ion homeostasis, and form the tripartite synapse [16]. The blood brain barrier is made up of capillary endothelial cells, vascular pericytes, and the perivascular endfeet of astrocytes. Together, they create a highly selective barrier that allows oxygen and hormones to permeate into the brain while preventing the passage of other molecules due to possible harmful effects.

Astrocytes also maintain homeostasis of various ions such as sodium, potassium, chloride, and hydrogen [17]. For instance, astrocytes play a critical role in regulating extracellular K+ levels. When the extracellular concentration of K+ is high, astrocytes uptake the ion using transporters or channels and transfer it to adjacent astrocytes via gap junctions by a process called spatial buffering [1821]. Due to this process, astrocytes prevent extracellular concentrations of K+ from reaching toxic levels.

In the tripartite conceptualization of the synapse, perisynaptic astrocytes are present along with the standard presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons [15, 2224]. Contact made by perisynaptic astrocytes with the synaptic cleft depends on the type and location of synapses [13, 15, 25]. In the hippocampus for instance, 64% of synapses are contacted by perisynaptic astrocytes at the synaptic cleft [26]. The intricate arborization and ramifications of astrocytes allow them to tightly enwrap the synaptic terminal in order to modulate synaptic processes [14, 15, 25]. Previous studies suggest that astrocytes respond to neurotransmitter release by increasing their intracellular calcium levels and controlling neuronal excitability through the release of gliotransmitters [2]. Based on findings that explain the functioning of the tripartite synapse, more attention has been given to the potential role of how astrocytes aid memory. In areas known for synaptic plasticity, such as the hippocampus, astroglial membranes appear to surround the majority of larger axo-dendritic synapses, and around 60% of all synapses in the hippocampus [27, 28]. In astrocytes that are part of a tripartite synapse, calcium peaks, which correspond to calcium oscillations tuned to neuronal activity, cause the proximal and distal release of glutamate from the astrocyte to neighboring neurons [5].

Excess glutamate is taken up by astrocytes and further regulated through a shunting cycle by which it is broken down into glutamine, repackaged, sent to the presynaptic-neuron, and finally converted back into glutamate [16]. Astroglial glutamatergic regulation is so widespread that it is estimated that only 20% of synaptic glutamate is taken up by transporters on the postsynaptic neuron, while the other 80% is processed by transporters such as the glutamate aspartate transporter (GLAST) on the membrane of the associated astrocyte [29]. Additionally, astrocytes have the ability to swell and shrink in size through the use of aquaporin channels, and this may allow them to reduce the leakage of neurotransmitters, increasing the active concentration in the synapse, and preventing spillover in the case of damage [30, 31]. However, transmitters can also be released through these channels when exposed to a hypotonic bath solution, ischemia, or a traumatic brain injury [3234]. Besides their role in signaling, astrocytes have also been implicated in controlling the development of the nervous system through factors such as axon guidance and synaptogenesis, as discussed below.

3. Plasticity in the Hippocampus

It is now well known that the hippocampus, located in the inferior temporal lobe, is responsible for the formation and storage of memory [35, 36]. The hippocampal structure has distinct functional areas implicated in memory formation, that is, the CA1, CA3, and the dentate gyrus. Various parts of the brain display some form of synaptic plasticity, but the hippocampus is one of the structures that has received much attention due to its overall functional importance.

Synaptic plasticity refers to experience mediated structural and functional changes to the connections between neurons that results in changes to neural circuits [3739]. These neural circuits are often developed (synaptogenesis) and strengthened through the reinforcement of some connections and the removal of others (synaptic stripping), which can occur in response to environmental experience. During early development, plasticity can occur through large scale dendritic and axonal conformational changes, and while these processes are observed in the adult mammalian brain, the scale on which they take place and the efficacy of regulatory processes involved are inhibited [40]. While less overall change is observed in the adult brain, early developmental plasticity in children, as well as memory formation and learning in adults, are both likely dependent on structural changes in the functioning of the synapse itself [4143]. Recent evidence shows that even small structural changes to the dendritic spines can drastically alter the overall output/input of synaptic protein receptors, which in adults is likely more important in determining neuronal activity than dendritic spine density [4143]. Due to a high concentration of synapses in the brain, tuning of activity could be accomplished through regulating synaptic function with relatively little conformational change, which is important in being able to learn and store large quantities of information without negatively impacting other signaling pathways.

The tuning of synaptic activity associated with functional plasticity, or changes in synaptic strength [44], has been demonstrated through the modulation of membrane receptors by enzymatic activity such as phosphorylation [39, 4547]. However, changes to the chemical environment within the synapse are likely more influential in the associated changes to neuronal firing and receptor concentrations. The changes in dendritic spines and synaptic activity in relation to plasticity have been found to be most closely linked to synaptic glutamate receptors and changes in both internal and external calcium in neurons [48]. It is consistently demonstrated that neuron-glia interactions are essential to this type of environmental regulation, with astrocytes being paramount in regulating signaling molecules such as glutamate which are particularly important in the plasticity and learning processes [49, 50]. As astrocytes are in part often responsible for regulating synapse formation and synaptic activity, there is a strong possibility that their activity plays an integral role in plasticity and learning.

Among the various forms of functional synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation (LTP) has received much attention in the hippocampus due to its role in memory [51]. LTP is the process of a long-lasting enhancement in synaptic strength. This was first observed in electrophysiological studies, using high-frequency stimulation (100 Hz) of neurons in the perforant pathway and recording the activity at the dentate gyrus [52]. Electrode recordings followed by tetanic stimulation exhibited a longer lasting excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) of the postsynaptic neuron in the dentate gyrus. The mechanism of LTP differs depending on the location of the hippocampus. For example, N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dependent LTP occurs at the Schaffer collateral region while NMDA receptor independent LTP is observed at the mossy fibers of the CA3 region [5357]. Despite various forms of LTP that occur in the hippocampus, NMDA receptor dependent LTP is heavily studied. Several studies blocking NMDA receptor activity showed impairment in different types of memory in mice, implicating NMDA receptors in memory formation [5861]. However, these studies do not indicate that LTP causes memory, as LTP may be an underlying process that helps form memory but does not directly cause it.

For NMDA receptor dependent LTP to occur, glutamate binding to NMDA receptors and depolarization of the neuron is required. Activation of NMDA receptors allows calcium to stimulate cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) release, causing a cascade of signaling mechanisms involving protein kinase A, cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), cAMP response element (CRE), mitogen activated protein kinase, and calcium calmodulin dependent protein kinase II [6264]. These factors lead to the upregulation of transcription. Therefore, synthesis of new proteins underlies the mechanism for long-term memory. While much attention has been given to the regulation of hippocampal neurons by these factors, there is a growing body of evidence that astrocytic support is more critical in the regulation and function of many LTP related compounds and mechanisms than previously thought.

4. LTP Associated Gliotransmitters

Astrocytes release and regulate several neuroactive molecules that can affect neuronal activity and modulate plasticity and LTP. These compounds (summarized in Table 1) include glutamate, ATP, cytokines, and several other key signaling molecules like D-serine, adenosine, and lactate [65]. Glutamate plays a key role in the regulation of synaptic activity and causes a response in astrocytes [66, 67]. Importantly, astrocytes actively sequester up to 90% of glutamate that is released into the extracellular space between neurons [68, 69]. Glutamate causes a wide range of effects in astrocytes via metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR), NMDA receptors, and α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors.

Although cortical astrocytes generally express functional NMDA receptors, this does not appear to be the case for hippocampal astrocytes [7072]. Hippocampal astrocytes do not exhibit activation upon standard NMDA receptor agonists [70, 72]. Functional AMPA receptors, on the other hand, are expressed by hippocampal astrocytes [73, 74]. Additionally, hippocampal astrocytes change the properties of their AMPA receptors during postnatal development. At the beginning stages of postnatal development, low levels of AMPA receptor currents were observed and significantly increased around P12 [75]. Immature astrocytes also had a prolonged activation of the AMPA receptor, which induced an influx of Na+ and Ca2+. As astrocytes matured, glutamate responses greatly increased as well.

Astrocytes are likely able to synchronize with neuronal activity and subsequently regulate glutamate transmission between neurons [7679]. For example, astrocytic glutamate release activates presynaptic NMDA receptors and promotes increased excitatory communication between neurons [80]. These NMDA receptors are also subjected to further regulation by endogenous concentrations of D-serine, which serves as a coagonist, specifically in the hippocampal region, suggesting its potential importance in new memory formation [8184].

In addition to the ionotropic glutamate receptors, astrocytes also use mGluRs. In the hippocampus, mGluR1 [85, 86], mGluR5 [87, 88], and mGluR3 [89, 90] are expressed and functionally important in astrocytes and the modulation of neuronal activity. However, astrocytes of 1-week-old mice, but not older mice, express high levels of mGluR5 [90]. Furthermore, astrocytes of adult mice did not exhibit an increase in Ca2+ when stimulated with an mGluR5 agonist. These results suggest developmental changes in the expression of mGluRs in astrocytes. Contradictory to the observations by [90], there has been research demonstrating mGluR5’s role in Ca2+ elevation in adults. Further research must be done to clarify these opposing findings.

Astrocytic activation can result in the release of gliotransmitters that can affect neuronal activity. Gliotransmitter release is Ca2+ dependent and involves the following mechanism. Astrocytes express a neurotransmitter receptor called G-protein coupled metabotropic receptor (GPCR). Specifically, the G-protein Gq, coupled to phospholipase C (PLC), is involved in elevating intracellular Ca2+ levels in astrocytes [91, 92]. When Gq is stimulated, PLC is activated to break down phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) [91, 92]. By breaking down PIP2, the endoplasmic reticulum can release stored Ca2+ to stimulate gliotransmitter release.

In gliotransmission, astrocytes release vesicles that are packed with gliotransmitters via the process of exocytosis. Astrocytes express proteins that are known to be involved in vesicle fusion such as soluble NSF attachment protein receptor (SNARE), synaptotagmin, complexin2, and Munc18a, which are critical for gliotransmitter release [5, 92]. For example, altering the SNARE complex resulted in a failure of glutamate release from astrocytes [93]. Glutamate release also requires vacuolar type of proton ATPase to exchange the proton gradient from the vesicular lumen with glutamate [94, 95]. The same mechanism was observed for D-serine in hippocampal astrocytes [94]. In addition, in hippocampal astrocytes, synaptic-like microvesicles (SLMV) were found with the R-type SNAP receptor (R-SNARE), which is known to govern exocytosis [5]. Together, these proteins that are expressed by hippocampal astrocytes package gliotransmitters for release.

Additionally, ATP signaling regulates Ca2+-dependent glutamate release via astrocytic P2Y receptors [96]. ATP released from astrocytes also interacts directly with pre- and postsynaptic neurons, serving to regulate their own glutamatergic transmission and to also enhance the concentration of AMPA receptors, which facilitates the release of neuropeptides including oxytocin and vasopressin [65]. Additionally, some of the ATP released by astrocytes is converted directly to adenosine, which can act as both an agonist and antagonist for specific K+ and Ca2+ channels [97].

Cytokines and chemokine receptors are also implicated in the regulation of Ca2+ stores, glutamatergic transmission, and synaptic plasticity as a whole. In astrocytes, the CXCR4-CXCL12 signaling axis has been implicated in both modulating glutamate exocytosis, and in causing the release of the cytokine TNF-α [98]. TNF-α is also linked to regulating both glutamate release and the insertion of AMPA receptors into neighboring neurons [99, 100]. Finally, cytokine signaling in astrocytes, as well as microglia, plays a role in the response to physically sensing pain and responding to damage, with chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) released from astrocytes having a strong regulatory effect on the activity of NMDA receptors [101].

Despite the evidence indicating the significance of Ca2+ in the release of gliotransmitters, there have been controversial findings that challenge this assertion. Some studies have observed that blocking Ca2+ in hippocampal astrocytes located at the CA1 region in situ does not change Ca2+ levels in neurons, change spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic current, result in astrocytic glutamate release, or NMDA receptor mediated slow inward currents in pyramidal neurons [102104]. These findings may suggest that a mechanism not dependent on Ca2+ release may lead to gliotransmitter release in astrocytes.

Although the gliotransmitters discussed above are important in regulating LTP, another crucial gliotransmitter to postsynaptic neurons is lactate. Memory formation is the result of a cascade of cellular and molecular processes and thus, to ensure the proper functionality of a neuron, astrocytes provide neurons with lactate, a usable form of energy [105107]. Through glycogenolysis, astrocytes convert stored glycogen into lactate and release it into the synapse through the MCT1 or MCT4 transporter [107]. The neuron is then able to take up lactate via an MCT2 transporter, which has been confirmed through blocking MCT2 with either 4-CIN or MCT2-oligodeoxynucleotides [106, 107]. Rats showed memory impairment in inhibitory avoidance and spatial memory tasks when glycogenolysis, MCT1, MCT4, or MCT2 were inhibited [106, 107]. Thus, it is clear that the metabolism of astrocytes is critical in hippocampal dependent memory.

5. Ephrin Signaling and Glutamate Transporters

Ephrin signaling, consisting of ephrin-As and ephrin-Bs, is known for its involvement in neural development by inhibiting axonal and dendritic growth via actin rearrangement [108114]. The interaction between ephrin-A3 and EphA4, which are expressed by astrocytes and dendritic spines of neurons, respectively, is involved in decreasing levels of GLAST and glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) for proper synapsing to occur [115118].

Astrocytes express both EphB receptors and ephrin-B ligands, ephrinB3 being the most active during LTP [119]. EphrinB3 enhances D-serine release by regulating serine racemase (SR), an enzyme responsible for the conversion of L-serine to D-serine, and an SR-interacting protein, protein kinase C (PKCα). Specifically, ephrinB3 downregulates PKCα in order to increase the interaction between SR and Protein Interacting with C-kinase (PICK1), causing D-serine release [119]. Moreover, ephrinB3 is able to bind to both EphB3 and EphA4 receptors [120]. By measuring D-serine levels in EphB3 and EphA4 knockouts in cultured astrocytes, both receptors were necessary for D-serine release [119]. Thus, while ephrin-A signaling regulates levels of GLT-1, ephrin-B signaling regulates levels of D-serine release for activation of NMDA receptors.

6. Cholinergic Signaling

Nicotine influences memory by inducing synaptic transmission at acetylcholinergic synapses [121123]. In Alzheimer’s disease, patients treated with nicotine had improved cognitive functioning [124]. Astrocytes express nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), implicating nicotine’s role in cholinergic dependent memory. This effect on memory is dependent on glutamatergic NMDA receptors, which requires binding of D-serine released by astrocytes [8183, 125]. As described previously, D-serine binds to NMDA receptors, allowing the influx of ions to induce LTP. Therefore, nicotine binding to the nAChR on astrocytes stimulates the release of D-serine by increasing internal calcium concentrations, allowing NMDA receptors on the postsynaptic neuron to induce LTP [123125]. Similar to nAChR, activation of muscarinic AChR (mAChR) also increases internal calcium concentrations [126128].

7. Other Receptors

7.1. Adenosine Receptors

There are other receptors thought to be involved in astrocyte-neuron communication. The adenosine A1 receptor is expressed on presynaptic neurons, and activation of the receptor activates the inhibitory metabotropic g-protein (Gi) pathway. Memory deficits in mice that underwent 6 hours of sleep deprivation were prevented by pharmacologically blocking the A1 receptor [129]. Furthermore, astrocytes modulate levels of adenosine during 12 hours of sleep deprivation in mice [130]. Interestingly, A1 receptor activation in astrocytes can also modulate sleep in a rodent model of inflammation [131].

7.2. Interleukin-1

The cytokine interleukin-1 (IL-1) also plays a key role in hippocampal dependent memory. Blocking activity of IL-1 receptors resulted in the poor performance of learning with the Morris water maze and fear conditioning, as well as reduced LTP [132135]. Although IL-1 receptors can be expressed by many cells, it is prominently expressed on astrocytes [136140]. IL-1 receptor knockout mice that did not express IL-1 receptors on astrocytes exhibit memory deficits that can be rescued with transplantation of neural precursor cells from wild-type mice that express IL-1 receptors [139]. The underlying mechanism of IL-1 has yet to be determined in the context of memory.

8. Discussion

Research on synaptic plasticity and memory has traditionally been neuron-centric, yet it is crucial to not ignore the astrocytic role in these processes since they are now known to modulate neuronal activity. Not only do astrocytes regulate the extracellular concentration of neurotransmitters, they also regulate the activity and expression of receptors on the postsynaptic neuron through gliotransmitter activity, and play a role in dampening activity and promoting the removal of nonadvantageous connections [141]. The evidence reviewed here shows that astrocytes have an ongoing role in the regulation of neuronal activity through the release of gliotransmitters and the expression of transporters/receptors on their extracellular surface. Based on these findings, we propose a mechanism of astrocyte-to-postsynaptic neuron interaction that supports the induction of LTP (see Figure 1). Here, the influx of intracellular Ca2+ caused by the activation of cholinergic receptors and mGluRs allows multiple gliotransmitters (e.g, glutamate, D-serine, TNF-α, and ATP) to be released. These gliotransmitters then bind to their respective receptor to regulate the influx of ions on the postsynaptic neuron, which causes a cascade of molecular mechanisms that initiate transcription. Ephrin B signaling may also contribute to gliotransmitter release by increasing intracellular Ca2+. Moreover, for the cellular and molecular changes of the postsynaptic neuron, lactate must be provided by astrocytes for energy to protect neurons from cytotoxic death, and GLT-1 regulates the extracellular glutamate concentration during the late phase of LTP.

185463.fig.001
Figure 1: Integrative model of postsynaptic glia-neuron communication during memory formation.

The purpose of the proposed mechanism is to represent how astrocytes may regulate the postsynaptic neuron during LTP. Behavioral studies used to determine that the role of astrocytes are known to be hippocampal dependent tasks. However, this by no means allows us to determine which part of the hippocampus the mechanism takes place in, nor the type of LTP. More importantly, there are various kinds of memory such as episodic memory, procedural memory, associative memory, and fear conditioned memory. Moreover, it is important to note that this model only examines astrocyte to postsynaptic terminal communication: it is well known that astrocytes are also able to modulate presynaptic terminal [142, 143].

Although we have explained detailed evidence of how astrocytes regulate the postsynaptic neuron, we must also consider how astrocytes affect activity of the presynaptic neuron as well. Hippocampal astrocytes are able to detect synaptic activity at distinct locations via mGluR5 and increase intracellular Ca2+ levels for a prolonged time span, which results in alteration of basal synaptic transmission [144, 145]. The mechanism also involves astrocytic release of purines to activate A2A receptors expressed by the presynaptic neuron. Calcium activity was also observed to not only be involved in gliotransmission, but neurotransmission as well. Synaptic transmission in neighboring synapses was reduced when blocking Ca2+ in astrocytes, suggesting the ability of astrocytes to modulate the activity of presynaptic neurons.

The engraftment of human astrocytes in mice enhances LTP and significantly increases the release of the cytokine TNF-α [146]. Since a xenograft of human astrocytes can functionally modulate the activity of mice neurons, it may be possible that a xenograft from another species would facilitate LTP if placed into a human patient. There is still much to research in glial neurobiology in order to fully understand the underlying mechanisms of neural networks that are involved in plasticity and memory. For instance, since astrocytes are physically connected with other astrocytes through gap junctions to form a glial syncytium, it is crucial to further examine how astrocytic signaling may regulate neuronal activity and therefore, underlie LTP. It is now clear that astrocytes play an important part in learning and memory, and continuing to elucidate astrocytic processes that are involved in learning and memory will help advance our understanding of the dynamic role of these glial cells in modulating LTP.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

All authors equally contributed to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Kriti Behari, Dr. Sarita Lagalwar, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that greatly improved the quality of this paper.

References

  1. S. J. Martin, P. D. Grimwood, and R. G. M. Morris, “Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 649–711, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. S. Bains and S. H. R. Oliet, “Glia: they make your memories stick!,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 417–424, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. B. Hamilton and D. Attwell, “Do astrocytes really exocytose neurotransmitters?” Nature Reviews, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–238, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. U. Lalo, A. Verkhratsky, and Y. Pankratov, “Ionotropic ATP receptors in neuronal-glial communication,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 220–228, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Volterra and J. Meldolesi, “Astrocytes, from brain glue to communication elements: the revolution continues,” Nature Reviews, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 626–640, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. A. C. Azevedo, L. R. B. Carvalho, L. T. Grinberg et al., “Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 513, no. 5, pp. 532–541, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. M. Dombrowski, C. C. Hilgetag, and H. Barbas, “Quantitative architecture distinguishes prefrontal cortical systems in the rhesus monkey,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 975–988, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Herculano-Houzel and R. Lent, “Isotropic fractionator: a simple, rapid method for the quantification of total cell and neuron numbers in the brain,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2518–2521, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. C. Hilgetag and H. Barbas, “Are there ten times more glia than neurons in the brain?” Brain Structure & Function, vol. 213, no. 4-5, pp. 365–366, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, and T. M. Jessell, Principles of Neural Science, Nerve Cells and Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2000.
  11. A. Nishiyama, Z. Yang, and A. Butt, “Astrocytes and NG2-glia: what's in a name?” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 207, no. 6, pp. 687–693, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Pakkenberg and H. J. G. Gundersen, “Total number of neurons and glial cells in human brain nuclei estimated by the disector and the fractionator,” Journal of Microscopy, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 1988. View at Scopus
  13. N. A. Oberheim, S. A. Goldman, and M. Nedergaard, “Heterogeneity of astrocytic form and function,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 814, pp. 23–45, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Derouiche, E. Anlauf, G. Aumann, B. Mühlstädt, and M. Lavialle, “Anatomical aspects of glia-synapse interaction: the perisynaptic glial sheath consists of a specialized astrocyte compartment,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 96, no. 3-4, pp. 177–182, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Reichenbach, A. Derouiche, and F. Kirchhoff, “Morphology and dynamics of perisynaptic glia,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 11–25, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Verkhratsky and A. Butt, Neuronal-Glial Interactions, in Glial Neurobiology: A Textbook, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2007.
  17. M. Simard and M. Nedergaard, “The neurobiology of glia in the context of water and ion homeostasis,” Neuroscience, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 877–896, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Holthoff and O. W. Witte, “Directed spatial potassium redistribution in rat neocortex,” Glia, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 288–292, 2000.
  19. P. Kofuji and E. A. Newman, “Potassium buffering in the central nervous system,” Neuroscience, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 1045–1056, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. K. Orkand, J. G. Nicholls, and S. W. Kuffler, “Effect of nerve impulses on the membrane potential of glial cells in the central nervous system of amphibia,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 788–806, 1966. View at Scopus
  21. W. Walz, “Role of astrocytes in the clearance of excess extracellular potassium,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 36, no. 4-5, pp. 291–300, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Araque, V. Parpura, R. P. Sanzgiri, and P. G. Haydon, “Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 208–215, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. M. Halassa, T. Fellin, and P. G. Haydon, “Tripartite synapses: roles for astrocytic purines in the control of synaptic physiology and behavior,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 343–346, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Santello, C. Calì, and P. Bezzi, “Gliotransmission and the tripartite synapse,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 970, pp. 307–331, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Matyash and H. Kettenmann, “Heterogeneity in astrocyte morphology and physiology,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 2–10, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. R. Witcher, S. A. Kirov, and K. M. Harris, “Plasticity of perisynaptic astroglia during synaptogenesis in the mature rat hippocampus,” Glia, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. A. Bushong, M. E. Martone, Y. Z. Jones, and M. H. Ellisman, “Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 183–192, 2002. View at Scopus
  28. R. Ventura and K. M. Harris, “Three-dimensional relationships between hippocampal synapses and astrocytes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 6897–6906, 1999. View at Scopus
  29. R. A. Swanson, “Astrocyte neurotransmitter uptake,” in Neuroglia, H. Kettenmann and B. R. Ransom, Eds., pp. 346–354, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2005.
  30. C. Iacovetta, E. Rudloff, and R. Kirby, “The role of aquaporin 4 in the brain,” Veterinary Clinical Pathology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 32–44, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. C. Papadopoulos and A. S. Verkman, “Aquaporin water channels in the nervous system,” Nature Reviews, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 265–277, 2013.
  32. H. K. Kimelberg, “Astrocytic swelling in cerebral ischemia as a possible cause of injury and target for therapy,” Glia, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 389–397, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. K. Kimelberg, S. K. Goderie, S. Higman, S. Pang, and R. A. Waniewski, “Swelling-induced release of glutamate, aspartate, and taurine from astrocyte cultures,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1583–1591, 1990. View at Scopus
  34. E. M. Rutledge and H. K. Kimelberg, “Release of [3H]-D-aspartate from primary astrocyte cultures in response to raised external potassium,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 7803–7811, 1999. View at Scopus
  35. M. C. W. Kroes and G. Fernández, “Dynamic neural systems enable adaptive, flexible memories,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1646–1666, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. B. Scoville and B. Milner, “Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 1957. View at Scopus
  37. L. F. Abbott and S. B. Nelson, “Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 11s, pp. 1178–1183, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Fu and Y. Zuo, “Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the cortex,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 177–187, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H.-K. Lee, “Synaptic plasticity and phosphorylation,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 810–832, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. Lehmann, A. Steinecke, and J. Bolz, “GABA through the ages: regulation of cortical function and plasticity by inhibitory interneurons,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2012, Article ID 892784, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. J. L. Chen and E. Nedivi, “Neuronal structural remodeling: is it all about access?” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 557–562, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. J. Harms and A. Dunaevsky, “Dendritic spine plasticity: looking beyond development,” Brain Research, vol. 1184, no. 1, pp. 65–71, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. Yuste and T. Bonhoeffer, “Morphological changes in dendritic spines associated with long-term synaptic plasticity,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 24, pp. 1071–1089, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. K. Okamoto, M. Bosch, and Y. Hayashi, “The roles of CaMKII and F-Actin in the structural plasticity of dendritic spines: a potential molecular identity of a synaptic tag?” Physiology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 357–366, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. Deisseroth, H. Bito, and R. W. Tsien, “Signaling from synapse to nucleus: postsynaptic CREB phosphorylation during multiple forms of hippocampal synaptic plasticity,” Neuron, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 89–101, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. A. Esteban, S.-H. Shi, C. Wilson, M. Nuriya, R. L. Huganir, and R. Malinow, “PKA phosphorylation of AMPA receptor subunits controls synaptic trafficking underlying plasticity,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 136–143, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. L. A. Raymond, W. G. Tingley, C. D. Blackstone, K. W. Roche, and R. L. Huganir, “Glutamate receptor modulation by protein phosphorylation,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 181–192, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. Lüscher, R. A. Nicoll, R. C. Malenka, and D. Muller, “Synaptic plasticity and dynamic modulation of the postsynaptic membrane,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 545–550, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. J. Allen and B. A. Barres, “Signaling between glia and neurons: focus on synaptic plasticity,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 542–548, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. D. Fields and B. Stevens-Graham, “Neuroscience: new insights into neuron-glia communication,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5593, pp. 556–562, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Citri and R. C. Malenka, “Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 18–41, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. T. Lømo, “The discovery of long-term potentiation,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 358, no. 1432, pp. 617–620, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. G. Barrionuevo, S. R. Kelso, D. Johnston, and T. H. Brown, “Conductance mechanism responsible for long-term potentiation in monosynaptic and isolated excitatory synaptic inputs to hippocampus,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 540–550, 1986. View at Scopus
  54. G. L. Collingridge, S. J. Kehl, and H. McLennan, “Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral-commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 334, pp. 33–46, 1983. View at Scopus
  55. E. W. Harris and C. W. Cotman, “Long-term potentiation of guinea pig mossy fiber responses is not blocked by N-methyl D-aspartate antagonists,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 1986. View at Scopus
  56. E. W. Harris, A. H. Ganong, and C. W. Cotman, “Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus involves activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors,” Brain Research, vol. 323, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. C. Malenka and M. F. Bear, “LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches,” Neuron, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. M. Bannerman, M. A. Good, S. P. Butcher, M. Ramsay, and R. G. M. Morris, “Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade,” Nature, vol. 378, no. 6553, pp. 182–186, 1995. View at Scopus
  59. I. Lee and R. P. Kesner, “Differential contribution of NMDA receptors in hippocampal subregions to spatial working memory,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 162–168, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. K. Nakazawa, M. C. Quirk, R. A. Chitwood et al., “Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5579, pp. 211–218, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. Z. Tsien, P. T. Huerta, and S. Tonegawa, “The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory,” Cell, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1327–1338, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. E. R. Kandel, “The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5544, pp. 1030–1038, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Mayford, S. A. Siegelbaum, and E. Kandel, “Synapses and memory storage,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 4, no. 6, 2012.
  64. E. Miyamoto, “Molecular mechanism of neuronal plasticity: Induction and maintenance of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 433–442, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. D. T. Theodosis, D. A. Poulain, and S. H. R. Oliet, “Activity-dependent structural and functional plasticity of astrocyte-neuron interactions,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 983–1008, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. H. Cornell-Bell, P. G. Thomas, and S. J. Smith, “The excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate causes filopodia formation in cultured hippocampal astrocytes,” Glia, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 322–334, 1990. View at Scopus
  67. S. R. Glaum, J. A. Holzwarth, and R. J. Miller, “Glutamate receptors activate Ca2+ mobilization and Ca2+ influx into astrocytes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 3454–3458, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. E. Bergles and C. E. Jahr, “Synaptic activation of glutamate transporters in hippocampal astrocytes,” Neuron, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1297–1308, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. D. A. Rusakov, K. Zheng, and C. Henneberger, “Astrocytes as regulators of synaptic function: a quest for the Ca2+ master Key,” Neuroscientist, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 513–523, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. F. Conti, S. DeBiasi, A. Minelli, and M. Melone, “Expression of NR1 and NR2A/B subunits of the NMDA receptor in cortical astrocytes,” Glia, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 254–258, 1998.
  71. U. Lalo, Y. Pankratov, F. Kirchhoff, R. A. North, and A. Verkhratsky, “NMDA receptors mediate neuron-to-glia signaling in mouse cortical astrocytes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2673–2683, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. Steinhäuser and V. Gallo, “News on glutamate receptors in glial cells,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 339–345, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. D. Fan, S. Y. Grooms, R. C. Araneda et al., “AMPA receptor protein expression and function in astrocytes cultured from hippocampus,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 57, pp. 557–571, 1999.
  74. M. Zhou and H. K. Kimelberg, “Freshly isolated hippocampal CA1 astrocytes comprise two populations differing in glutamate transporter and AMPA receptor expression,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 7901–7908, 2001. View at Scopus
  75. G. Seifert, M. Zhou, and C. Steinhäuser, “Analysis of AMPA receptor properties during postnatal development of mouse hippocampal astrocytes,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 2916–2923, 1997. View at Scopus
  76. M. Amiri, F. Bahrami, and M. Janahmadi, “Functional contributions of astrocytes in synchronization of a neuronal network model,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 292, pp. 60–70, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. M. Amiri, N. Hosseinmardi, F. Bahrami, and M. Janahmadi, “Astrocyte-neuron interaction as a mechanism responsible for generation of neural synchrony: a study based on modeling and experiments,” Journal of Computational Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 489–504, 2013.
  78. M. C. Angulo, A. S. Kozlov, S. Charpak, and E. Audinat, “Glutamate released from glial cells synchronizes neuronal activity in the hippocampus,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 31, pp. 6920–6927, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. L. K. Bekar, M. E. Loewen, K. Cao et al., “Complex expression and localization of inactivating Kv channels in cultured hippocampal astrocytes,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 1699–1709, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. P. Jourdain, L. H. Bergersen, K. Bhaukaurally et al., “Glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes controls synaptic strength,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 331–339, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. C. Henneberger, T. Papouin, S. H. R. Oliet, and D. A. Rusakov, “Long-term potentiation depends on release of D-serine from astrocytes,” Nature, vol. 463, no. 7278, pp. 232–236, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J.-P. Mothet, A. T. Parent, H. Wolosker et al., “D-serine is an endogenous ligand for the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 4926–4931, 2000. View at Scopus
  83. M. J. Schell, M. E. Molliver, and S. H. Snyder, “D-serine, an endogenous synaptic modulator: Localization to astrocytes and glutamate-stimulated release,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 3948–3952, 1995. View at Scopus
  84. M. Shleper, E. Kartvelishvily, and H. Wolosker, “D-serine is the dominant endogenous coagonist for NMDA receptor neurotoxicity in organotypic hippocampal slices,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 41, pp. 9413–9417, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. Bernstein, T. Behnisch, D. Balschun, K. G. Reymann, and G. Reiser, “Pharmacological characterisation of metabotropic glutamatergic and purinergic receptors linked to Ca2+ signalling in hippocampal astrocytes,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. E. Gibbs and D. N. Bowser, “Astrocytes and interneurons in memory processing in the chick hippocampus: roles for G-coupled protein receptors, GABA(B) and mGluR1,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1712–1720, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. Z. Cai, G. P. Schools, and H. K. Kimelbert, “Metabotropic glutamate receptors in acutely isolated hippocampal astrocytes: developmental changes of mGluR5 mRNA and functional expression,” Glia, vol. 29, pp. 70–80, 2000.
  88. R. J. Cormier, S. Mennerick, H. Melbostad, and C. F. Zorumski, “Basal levels of adenosine modulate mGluR5 on rat hippocampal astrocytes,” Glia, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 24–35, 2001.
  89. E. Aronica, J. A. Gorter, H. Ijlst-Keizers et al., “Expression and functional role of mGluR3 and mGluR5 in human astrocytes and glioma cells: Opposite regulation of glutamate transporter proteins,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2106–2118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. W. Sun, E. McConnell, J. F. Pare et al., “Glutamate-dependent neuroglial calcium signaling differs between young and adult brain,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6116, pp. 197–200, 2013.
  91. S. B. Achour, L. Pont-Lezica, C. Béchade, and O. Pascual, “Is astrocyte calcium signaling relevant for synaptic plasticity?” Neuron Glia Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 147–155, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. V. Parpura and R. Zorec, “Gliotransmission: exocytotic release from astrocytes,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 83–92, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. Q. Zhang, T. Pangršič, M. Kreft et al., “Fusion-related release of glutamate from astrocytes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 13, pp. 12724–12733, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. M. Martineau, T. Shi, J. Puyal et al., “Storage and uptake of D-serine into astrocytic synaptic like vesicles specify gliotranmission,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 3413–3423, 2013.
  95. A. Wilhelm, W. Volknandt, D. Langer, C. Nolte, H. Kettenmann, and H. Zimmermann, “Localization of SNARE proteins and secretory organelle proteins in astrocytes in vitro and in situ,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 249–257, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. P. B. Guthrie, J. Knappenberger, M. Segal, M. V. L. Bennett, A. C. Charles, and S. B. Kater, “ATP released from astrocytes mediates glial calcium waves,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 8, pp. 1078–1086, 1999.
  97. E. A. Newman, “Glial cell inhibition of neurons by release of ATP,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1659–1666, 2003. View at Scopus
  98. C. Calì and P. Bezzi, “CXCR4-mediated glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 224, no. 1-2, pp. 13–21, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. E. C. Beattie, D. Stellwagen, W. Morishita et al., “Control of synaptic strength by glial TNFα,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5563, pp. 2282–2285, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. Santello, P. Bezzi, and A. Volterra, “TNFα controls glutamatergic gliotransmission in the hippocampal dentate gyrus,” Neuron, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 988–1001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. Y.-J. Gao and R.-R. Ji, “Chemokines, neuronal-glial interactions, and central processing of neuropathic pain,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 56–68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. C. Agulhon, T. A. Fiacco, and K. D. McCarthy, “Hippocampal short- and long-term plasticity are not modulated by astrocyte Ca2+ signaling,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5970, pp. 1250–1254, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. T. A. Fiacco, C. Agulhon, S. R. Taves et al., “Selective stimulation of astrocyte calcium in situ does not affect neuronal excitatory synaptic activity,” Neuron, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 611–626, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. J. Petravicz, T. A. Fiacco, and K. D. McCarthy, “Loss of IP3 receptor-dependent Ca2+ increases in hippocampal astrocytes does not affect baseline CA1 pyramidal neuron synaptic activity,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 19, pp. 4967–4973, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. M. E. Gibbs and L. Hertz, “Inhibition of astrocytic energy metabolism by D-lactate exposure impairs memory,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1012–1018, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. L. A. Newman, D. L. Korol, and P. E. Gold, “Lactate produced by glycogenolysis in astrocytes regulates memory processing,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 12, Article ID e28427, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. A. Suzuki, S. A. Stern, O. Bozdagi et al., “Astrocyte-neuron lactate transport is required for long-term memory formation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 810–823, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. C. Bourgin, K. K. Murai, M. Richter, and E. B. Pasquale, “The EphA4 receptor regulates dendritic spine remodeling by affecting β1-integrin signaling pathways,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 178, no. 7, pp. 1295–1307, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. M. Hruska and M. B. Dalva, “Ephrin regulation of synapse formation, function and plasticity,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. R. Klein, “Eph/ephrin signaling in morphogenesis, neural development and plasticity,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 580–589, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. A. Martínez and E. Soriano, “Functions of ephrin/Eph interactions in the development of the nervous system: emphasis on the hippocampal system,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 211–226, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. K. K. Murai, L. N. Nguyen, F. Irie, Y. Yu, and E. B. Pasquale, “Control of hippocampal dendritic spine morphology through ephrin-A3/EphA4 signaling,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. P. A. Yates, A. L. Roskies, T. McLaughlin, and D. D. M. O'Leary, “Topographic-specific axon branching controlled by ephrin-As is the critical event in retinotectal map development,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 8548–8563, 2001. View at Scopus
  114. L. Zhou, S. J. Martinez, M. Haber et al., “EphA4 signaling regulates phospholipase Cγ1 activation, cofilin membrane association, and dendritic spine morphology,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 19, pp. 5127–5138, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. M. A. Carmona, K. K. Murai, L. Wang, A. J. Roberts, and E. B. Pasqualea, “Glial ephrin-A3 regulates hippocampal dendritic spine morphology and glutamate transport,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 30, pp. 12524–12529, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. L. E. Clarke and B. A. Barres, “Emerging roles of astrocytes in neural circuit development,” Nature Reviews, vol. 14, pp. 311–321, 2013.
  117. A. Filosa, S. Paixo, S. D. Honsek et al., “Neuron-glia communication via EphA4/ephrin-A3 modulates LTP through glial glutamate transport,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1285–1292, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. S. Paixao and R. Klein, “Neuron-astrocyte communication and synaptic plasticity,” Signaling Mechanisms, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 466–473, 2010.
  119. Z. Zhuang, B. Yang, M. H. Theus et al., “EphrinBs regulate D-serine synthesis and release in astrocytes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 47, pp. 16015–16024, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. C. T. Blits-Huizinga, C. M. Nelersa, A. Malhotra, and D. J. Liebl, “Ephrins and their receptors: binding versus biology,” IUBMB Life, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 257–265, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. C. M. Hernandez and A. V. Terry Jr., “Repeated nicotine exposure in rats: effects on memory function, cholinergic markers and nerve growth factor,” Neuroscience, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 997–1012, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. A. N. Placzek, T. A. Zhang, and J. A. Dani, “Nicotinic mechanisms influencing synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 752–760, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. G. Sharma and S. Vijayaraghavan, “Nicotinic receptor signaling in nonexcitable cells,” Journal of Neurobiology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 524–534, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. P. Newhouse, K. Kellar, P. Aisen et al., “Nicotine treatment of mild cognitive impairment: a 6-month double-blind pilot clinical trial,” Neurology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 91–101, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. M. López-Hidalgo, K. Salgado-Puga, R. Alvarado-Martínez, et al., “Nicotine uses neuron-glia communication to enhance hippocampal synaptic transmission and long-term memory,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, 2012.
  126. M. Navarrete, G. Perea, D. F. de Sevilla et al., “Astrocytes mediate in vivo cholinergic-induced synaptic plasticity,” PLoS Biology, vol. 10, no. 2, Article ID e1001259, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. M. K. Shelton and K. D. McCarthy, “Hippocampal astrocytes exhibit Ca2+-elevating muscarinic cholinergic and histaminergic receptors in situ,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 555–563, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. N. Takata, T. Mishima, C. Hisatsune et al., “Astrocyte calcium signaling transforms cholinergic modulation to cortical plasticity in vivo,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 49, pp. 18155–18165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. C. Florian, C. G. Vecsey, M. M. Halassa, P. G. Haydon, and T. Abel, “Astrocyte-derived adenosine and A1 receptor activity contribute to sleep loss-induced deficits in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory in mice,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 19, pp. 6956–6962, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. D. J. Hines, L. I. Schmitt, R. M. Hines, S. J. Moss, and P. G. Haydon, “Antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation require astrocyte-dependent adenosine mediated signaling,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 3, article e212, 2013.
  131. A. Nadjar, T. Blutstein, A. Aubert, S. Laye, and P. G. Haydon, “Astrocyte-derived adenosine modulates increased sleep pressure during inflammatory response,” Glia, vol. 61, pp. 724–731, 2013.
  132. A. Avital, I. Goshen, A. Kamsler et al., “Impaired interleukin-1 signaling is associated with deficits in hippocampal memory processes and neural plasticity,” Hippocampus, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 826–834, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. I. Goshen, T. Kreisel, H. Ounallah-Saad et al., “A dual role for interleukin-1 in hippocampal-dependent memory processes,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 32, no. 8-10, pp. 1106–1115, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. O. Ben Menachem-Zidon, I. Goshen, T. Kreisel et al., “Intrahippocampal transplantation of transgenic neural precursor cells overexpressing interleukin-1 receptor antagonist blocks chronic isolation-induced impairment in memory and neurogenesis,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2251–2262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. R. Yirmiya, G. Winocur, and I. Goshen, “Brain interleukin-1 is involved in spatial memory and passive avoidance conditioning,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 379–389, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. E. M. Ban, L. L. Sarlieve, and F. G. Haour, “Interleukin-1 binding sites on astrocytes,” Neuroscience, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 725–733, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. E. T. Cunningham Jr., E. Wada, D. B. Carter, D. E. Tracey, J. F. Battey, and E. B. De Souza, “In situ histochemical localization of type I interleukin-1 receptor messenger RNA in the central nervous system, pituitary, and adrenal gland of the mouse,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1101–1114, 1992. View at Scopus
  138. W. J. Friedman, “Cytokines regulate expression of the type 1 interleukin-1 receptor in rat hippocampal neurons and glia,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. O. Ben Menachem-Zidon, A. Avital, Y. Ben-Menahem et al., “Astrocytes support hippocampal-dependent memory and long-term potentiation via interleukin-1 signaling,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1008–1016, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. T. Toshihiro, D. E. Tracey, W. M. Mitchell, and E. B. De Souza, “Interleukin-1 receptors in mouse brain: characterization and neuronal localization,” Endocrinology, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 3070–3078, 1990. View at Scopus
  141. O. Pascual, K. B. Casper, C. Kubera et al., “Neurobiology: astrocytic purinergic signaling coordinates synaptic networks,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5745, pp. 113–116, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. J. W. Dani, A. Chernjavsky, and S. J. Smith, “Neuronal activity triggers calcium waves in hippocampal astrocyte networks,” Neuron, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 429–440, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. J. T. Porter and K. D. McCarthy, “Hippocampal astrocytes in situ respond to glutamate released from synaptic terminals,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 5073–5081, 1996. View at Scopus
  144. M. A. di Castro, J. Chuquet, N. Liaudet et al., “Local Ca2+ detection and modulation of synaptic release by astrocytes,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1276–1284, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. A. Panatier, J. Vallée, M. Haber, K. K. Murai, J.-C. Lacaille, and R. Robitaille, “Astrocytes are endogenous regulators of basal transmission at central synapses,” Cell, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 785–798, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. X. Han, M. Chen, F. Wang, et al., “Forebrain engraftment by human glial progenitor cells enhances synaptic plasticity and learning in adult mice,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 342–353, 2013.