Research Article
Comparing the Efficacy of Excitatory Transcranial Stimulation Methods Measuring Motor Evoked Potentials
Table 1
Results of the repeated measurement ANOVAs.
| Stimulation (I ) | Stimulation (J ) | Middle difference (I-J ) | SEM | Sig.a |
95% confidence interval for the differencea | Upper | Lower |
|
Sham | atDCS |
−0.221* | 0.039 | 0.001 | −0.345 | −0.096 | iTBS | −0.197* | 0.047 | 0.008 | −0.346 | −0.048 | tRNS | −0.319* | 0.098 | 0.045 | −0.633 | −0.006 |
| atDCS | Sham | 0.221* | 0.039 | 0.001 | 0.096 | 0.345 | iTBS | 0.024 | 0.047 | 1.000 | −0.128 | 0.176 | tRNS | −0.099 | 0.092 | 1.000 | −0.393 | 0.195 |
| iTBS | Sham | 0.197* | 0.047 | 0.008 | 0.048 | 0.346 | atDCS | −0.024 | 0.047 | 1.000 | −0.176 | 0.128 | tRNS | −0.123 | 0.109 | 1.000 | −0.471 | 0.226 |
| tRNS | Sham | 0.319* | 0.098 | 0.045 | 0.006 | 0.633 | atDCS | 0.099 | 0.092 | 1.000 | −0.195 | 0.393 | iTBS | 0.123 | 0.109 | 1.000 | −0.226 | 0.471 |
|
|
The middle differencence is on the 0.05-level significance.
aBonferroni corrected sign.
|