Age-Dependent Switch of the Role of Serotonergic 5-HT<sub>1A</sub> Receptors in Gating Long-Term Potentiation in Rat Visual Cortex<i> In Vivo</i>

Gagolewicz, Peter J.; Dringenberg, Hans C.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6404082

Neural Plasticity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Abbreviations Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 6404082 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6404082

Age-Dependent Switch of the Role of Serotonergic 5-HT_1A Receptors in Gating Long-Term Potentiation in Rat Visual Cortex In Vivo

Peter J. Gagolewicz¹and Hans C. Dringenberg^1,2

Academic Editor: Preston E. Garraghty

Received18 Feb 2016

Revised15 Apr 2016

Accepted17 Apr 2016

Published10 May 2016

Abstract

The rodent primary visual cortex (V1) is densely innervated by serotonergic axons and previous in vitro work has shown that serotonin (5-HT) can modulate plasticity (e.g., long-term potentiation (LTP)) at V1 synapses. However, little work has examined the effects of 5-HT on LTP under in vivo conditions. We examined the role of 5-HT on LTP in V1 elicited by theta burst stimulation (TBS) of the lateral geniculate nucleus in urethane-anesthetized (adult and juvenile) rats. Thalamic TBS consistently induced potentiation of field postsynaptic potentials (fPSPs) recorded in V1. While 5-HT application (0.1–10 mM) itself did not alter LTP levels, the broad-acting 5-HT receptor antagonists methiothepin (1 mM) resulted in a clear facilitation of LTP in adult animals, an effect that was mimicked by the selective 5- receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (1 mM). Interestingly, in juvenile rats, WAY 100635 application inhibited LTP, indicative of an age-dependent switch in the role of 5- receptors in gating V1 plasticity. Analyses of spontaneous electrocorticographic (ECoG) activity in V1 indicated that the antagonist-induced LTP enhancement was not related to systematic changes in oscillatory activity in V1. Together, these data suggest a facilitating role of 5- receptor activation on LTP in the juvenile V1, which switches to a tonic, inhibitory influence in adulthood.

1. Introduction

Long-term potentiation (LTP), a form of brain plasticity characterized by a long-lasting increase in synaptic coupling of neurons, has been suggested as a candidate mechanism mediating processes of learning and memory in the nervous system [1, 2]. First characterized in the hippocampal formation [3], LTP has now been shown to occur at synapses throughout the nervous system, including cortical sensory areas such as the primary visual (V1), auditory, and somatosensory cortices [4–6]. In V1, LTP has been successfully induced under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, with work in slice preparations indicating that LTP is limited to a well-defined time window during early postnatal life, after which V1 synapses become resistant to LTP induction [7–12]. Interestingly, under in vivo conditions, LTP is readily induced in the fully matured V1 of adult rodents [13–15], indicative of some fundamental differences in the induction of LTP in V1 between in vivo and in vitro conditions.

An important aspect of LTP regulation lies in the role of various neuromodulators present in the extracellular environment. For example, acetylcholine (ACh) exerts a powerful, modulatory effect by enhancing LTP in V1, an effect that is apparent under both in vitro and in vivo conditions and for a number of different (e.g., weak and strong) LTP induction protocols [14, 16, 17]. A similar, facilitating effect on LTP is also seen with histamine application directly in V1 of rats in vivo [18], highlighting the importance of a variety of neuromodulators as gating mechanism for the induction of plasticity at cortical synapses [19–21]. The central serotonergic (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) system has also been implicated in the modulation of cortical synaptic plasticity. Serotonergic fibers originating in the dorsal and median raphe nuclei provide a dense innervation of the entire forebrain, including V1 [22–25]. The presence of 5-HT receptors in V1 has been confirmed by radioligand-binding experiments [26, 27] and in situ hybridization techniques [28], implying functionality of the 5-HT input to V1.

Previous work on the role of 5-HT in the regulation of LTP in V1 has yielded inconsistent results. In V1 slices obtained from kittens (40–80 days old), 5-HT application facilitated LTP induction in layer 4 neurons, effects that were absent in older (more than 120 days) animals [8, 9]. Similarly, in the immature rat V1 in vitro, LTP of layer 2/3 neurons elicited by layer 4 stimulation was impaired by 5-HT depletion or bath application of antagonists of 5- or 5-HT₂ receptors [29]. Together, these observations suggest a facilitating role for 5-HT in LTP induction in the immature V1, findings that have recently been extended to more mature (8–10 weeks old) rats [12].

Surprisingly, others have reported an inhibition of LTP in layers 2/3 of V1 slices obtained from juvenile rats following bath application of 5-HT [12, 30]. These results have led to the suggestion that the developmentally increasing serotonergic tone in V1 is responsible for the loss of LTP throughout cortical maturation [10, 31], at least under in vitro conditions (see above). However, it is unclear how to reconcile this assumption with data demonstrating serotonergic facilitation of LTP in the more mature V1 [12], as well as observations that both LTP and ocular dominance plasticity in V1 can be reinstated in adult rodents following treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine [11].

The above summary of prior work suggests that the role of 5-HT in the regulation of LTP in V1 is not fully understood and may also depend on the age and developmental status of the animal. Further, there is a clear lack of information regarding serotonergic effects on LTP assessed in the intact brain in vivo, which appears important, given the differences in LTP induction in the mature V1 between in vivo and in vitro preparations (see above). To clarify some of these unresolved issues, we examined the role of 5-HT and some 5-HT receptors in the induction of LTP in the V1 of juvenile and adult rats using intact, urethane-anesthetized animals, an experimental preparation that continues to express LTP well into adulthood [13–15].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

All procedures adhered to the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and were approved by the Queen’s University Animal Care Committee. Experiments were conducted on adult (300–550 g; >70 days old) or juvenile (190–240 g; mean age: 45 days, age range: 42–48 days) male Long-Evans rats (Charles River Laboratories, Saint-Constant, QC, Canada). The animals were housed in a colony room under a reversed 12 : 12-h light cycle (lights on at 19:00 h), with water and food access ad libitum. Each animal was used for only one experiment. All efforts were made in order to minimize animal suffering and the number of animals employed for these experiments.

2.2. Surgery

Each animal was deeply anesthetized with 2.0 g/kg urethane (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada), administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) as four doses of 0.5 g/kg each, given every 20 min. Additional 0.5 g/kg supplements of urethane were administered when necessary. Fifteen minutes prior to the start of surgery, the local analgesic bupivacaine (Marcaine; Hospira Healthcare Corporation, Montreal, QC, Canada) was administered subcutaneously to the skin and tissue along the incision line over the skull (two or three injections; total of 5 mg/kg). Throughout the surgical procedure and experiment, body temperature was monitored with a rectal thermometer and maintained at °C by means of an electrical heating pad and fleece insulating blankets surrounding the body.

After anesthesia induction, a rat was placed in a stereotaxic apparatus, the skull bone was exposed, and small holes were drilled overlying the following areas (all measurements taken from bregma and the skull surface): lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), anterior-posterior −4.1 mm, lateral +4.1 mm, and ventral −4.8 to −5.1 mm; V1, anterior-posterior −7.6 mm, lateral +3.6 mm, and ventral −0.8 to −1.2 mm. Two additional holes were drilled in the bone overlying the left and right cerebellum to secure jewelry screws, which served as ground and reference connections. A concentric, bipolar stimulation electrode (SNE-100; Rhodes Medical Instruments, David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA) was lowered into the LGN, while a monopolar recording electrode (125 μm diameter Teflon-insulated stainless steel wire) was placed in the superficial layers of V1. The final, ventral depth of both electrodes was adjusted to yield maximal amplitude field postsynaptic potentials (fPSPs) recorded in V1 in response to single-pulse LGN stimulation.

2.3. Electrophysiology

Stimulation of the LGN (single 0.2 ms pulses) was achieved by connecting the stimulation electrode to a stimulus isolation unit (ML 180 Stimulus Isolator; AD Instruments, Toronto, ON, Canada) providing a constant current output. The fPSPs in V1 were recorded differentially, with the recording electrode referenced against a screw in the bone overlying the cerebellum. The V1 signal was amplified (half-amplitude filters at 0.3 Hz to 1 kHz), digitized (10 kHz) by an A/D converter (PowerLab 4/s system running Scope software v. 3.6.5; AD Instruments), and stored for offline analysis.

For each rat, an input-output curve was established by stimulating the LGN at increasing intensities (0.1–1.0 mA in 0.1 mA increments) and the intensity yielding approximately 50–60% of the maximal fPSP amplitude was then used for the remainder of the experiment (see Figure 1).

Cortical fPSPs were recorded every 30 s until 30 min of stable baseline recordings were achieved (≤5% difference between successive data points for fPSPs averaged over 10 min epochs). Subsequently, theta burst stimulation (TBS) was delivered to the LGN, consisting of five single pulses (at 100 Hz) per burst, with bursts repeated at 5 Hz for a total of 10 bursts (pulse intensity and duration were the same as stated above). Recordings of fPSPs (every 30 sec) continued for 2 h following TBS delivery.

In all experiments, spontaneous electrocorticographic (ECoG) activity was also recorded through the same V1 electrode used for fPSP recordings. For the ECoG, the cortical signal was digitized (200 Hz), band-pass filtered (0.3–50 Hz), and analyzed offline for peak power in the main frequency bands (low delta, 0.5–1 Hz; delta, 1–4 Hz; theta, 4–8 Hz; alpha, 8–12 Hz; beta, 12–20 Hz; and gamma, 20–40 Hz). The ECoG was sampled (5 sec epochs) prior to the onset of fPSP baseline recordings and at the end of experiment, that is, 120 min after TBS.

2.4. Pharmacology

To investigate the roles of 5-HT and different 5-HT receptors, independent groups of animals received one of the following drug treatments: 5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (5-HT; 0.1 or 10 mM; Sigma-Aldrich); N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide maleate (WAY 100635; 1 mM; Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, MO, USA); 1-[10,11-dihydro-8-(methylthio) dibenzo(Z)[]thiepin-10-yl]-4-methylpiperazine maleate (methiothepin; 1 mM; Tocris Bioscience); 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT; 1 mM; Tocris Bioscience). WAY 100635 and 8-OH-DPAT act as potent 5- receptor antagonist and agonist, respectively [32–34], and 8-OH-DPAT also exhibits an affinity for 5-HT₇ receptors (see [35]). Methiothepin is a potent 5-HT₂ receptor antagonist but also acts as an antagonist at 5-HT₁, 5-, 5-, 5-HT₆, and 5-HT₇ receptors [36, 37]. All compounds were dissolved in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), consisting of 118.3 mM NaCl, 4.4 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO₄, 1.0 mM NaH₂PO₄, 2.5 mM CaCl₂, 22.1 mM NaHCO₃, and 10.0 mM glucose, with the exception of methiothepin, which was dissolved in either a mixture of aCSF and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; ), saline () or aCSF and distilled water (; there were no significant differences in LTP among these different vehicle solutions and rats were combined into a single methiothepin group).

Drugs were applied locally in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis. The dialysis probe (Mab 6.14.2, 15,000-Da cut-off polyether sulfone membrane, outer diameter 0.6 mm; S.P.E. Limited, North York, ON, Canada) was mounted immediately adjacent to the V1 recording electrode, with the probe tip extending approximately 1 mm past the electrode tip. Drug concentrations reaching the brain are estimated to be ~10% of the aCSF content within the vicinity of the probe membrane (about 1 mm; [38, 39]). The dialysis probe was connected to a 2.5mL Hamilton syringe using FEP microtubing (S.P.E. Limited). The syringe was driven by a microdialysis pump (CMA 402; CMA Microdialysis, Solna, Sweden) at a flow rate of 1 μL/min, with perfusion beginning 20 min prior to the acquisition of baseline fPSP recordings and continuing throughout the entire experiment.

2.5. Histology

At the conclusion of electrophysiological data acquisition, all animals received a supplementary dose (1.0 mL) of urethane and, after 5–10 min, were perfused through the heart with 0.9% saline (~50 mL) followed by 10% formalin (~100 mL). The brains were removed and stored in 10% formalin for a minimum of 24 h before sectioning (40 μm slices) with a cryostat. Slices were then mounted onto microscope slides and inspected with a digital microscope to verify electrode placements. Histological inspections and decisions on the accuracy of electrode placements were made by an experimenter who was blind to the results of individual animals. Data from inaccurate placements were omitted from this study (77 and 39 rats included and rejected due to missed placements, resp.).

2.6. Data Analysis

Cortical fPSPs were analyzed with Scope software (v. 3.6.5; AD Instruments). With the electrode configuration employed in the present study, fPSPs elicited in V1 consisted of a predominant, large amplitude, negative-going component. The amplitude of this component was automatically detected and computed with Scope software (using the Data Pad function) by measuring the voltage difference between the maximal fPSP negativity and the baseline voltage sampled immediately prior to the stimulation artifact. Once individual fPSPs were analyzed in this manner, they were averaged over successive 10 min intervals (i.e., 20 fPSPs/interval) and then normalized by dividing them by the average baseline (pre-TBS) amplitude of each animal. Amplitude data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and were analyzed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and followed up, where statistically appropriate, with Bonferroni post hoc tests or unpaired Student’s t-tests using SPSS software (v. 15.0; SPSS, Colorado Springs, CO, USA). The analysis was conducted with time (10 min averaging epochs) as the repeated/within-subjects factor and drug group as the between-subjects factor.

Five-second epochs of ECoG activity were analyzed using Chart software (v. 5.5.6; AD Instruments). For each epoch, spectral analysis was used to determine the % of total power contained in each of the following frequency bands: 0.5–1 Hz, 1–4 Hz, 4–8 Hz, 8–12 Hz, 12–20 Hz, and 20–40 Hz. Data from individual experiments were averaged across treatment groups and statistically analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS software.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of fPSPs in V1 Elicited by LGN Stimulation

In urethane-anesthetized animals, single-pulse stimulation of the LGN reliably elicited fPSPs in the ipsilateral V1 (Figure 1). In agreement with previous work using this experimental preparation [14, 15, 18], fPSPs were composed mainly of a large amplitude (up to 0.5 mV), negative component, with a latency to peak of 16–18 ms following LGN stimulation (Figure 1). These fPSPs appear to reflect, for the most part, excitatory current sinks originating in layers 2/3 of V1 [13].

3.2. Effects of Pharmacological Treatments on Baseline (Pre-TBS) fPSP Amplitude

Levels of LTP may be influenced by differences in baseline (i.e., prior to LTP induction) synaptic strength. Thus, we initially computed and compared the baseline amplitude of fPSPs in all experimental groups prior to the delivery of TBS to induce LTP. As shown in Figure 2, for all groups, baseline fPSP amplitudes were in the range of 0.37 to 0.47 mV. Application of the high concentration of 5-HT (10 mM) resulted in a modest, but significant (, -test) suppression of fPSP amplitude relative to rats receiving aCSF application in V1. None of the other pharmacological treatments produced a significant change in fPSP amplitude relative to the aCSF condition (Figure 2).

Figure 2

The effect of application (in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis; application started 20 min prior to the onset of recordings) of either aCSF (adult and immature animals), 5-HT (0.1 and 10 mM; adults), WAY 100635 (1 mM; adults and immature), methiothepin (1 mM; adults), or 8-OH-DPAT (1 mM; adults) on baseline (pre-TBS delivery) amplitude of fPSP recorded in V1. Each bar represents averaged fPSP amplitudes during 30 min (i.e., 60 fPSPs) of baseline recordings. The high concentration of 5-HT (10 mM) resulted in a significant (; -test) depression of fPSP amplitude compared to aCSF application. None of the other pharmacological treatments resulted in a significant change of fPSP amplitudes relative to aCSF application. indicates a significant (, -test) difference between the two groups.

3.3. Effect of 5-HT on LTP in Adult Rats

To determine the effects of 5-HT application on LTP, separate groups of adult animals received application of either aCSF or 5-HT at 0.1 mM or 10 mM. Application occurred locally in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis, with the dialysis probe situated immediately adjacent to the cortical recording electrode. During aCSF application (), TBS of the LGN reliably induced LTP, with fPSP amplitude increasing to % of baseline (Figure 3; all values reported here are averages of the last 30 min of the experiment, i.e., from 91 to 120 min after TBS delivery). During application of 0.1 mM () or 10 mM of 5-HT (), fPSP amplitude reached % and % of the baseline, respectively (Figure 3). These values appeared higher than those observed during aCSF application, but this difference did not reach statistical significance, as revealed by the ANOVA showing a significant main effect of time, but not of group (, ) or a time × group interaction (, ). Thus, under the present, experimental conditions, 5-HT did not exert a significant influence on LTP induction in the thalamocortical visual system of adult rats.

Figure 3

The effect of application (in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis) of either aCSF () or 5-HT (0.1 or 10 mM; and 7, resp.) on LTP following TBS (at arrow) of the LGN in urethane-anesthetized rats. Application of 5-HT did not result in any significant changes in LTP relative to rats receiving aCSF. Inserts depict typical fPSPs before (red) and after (blue) LTP induction for animals in the presence of 0.1 mM 5-HT (top), 10 mM 5-HT (middle), or aCSF (bottom; calibration bars indicate 0.5 mV vertical and 10 ms horizontal; each fPSP trace is an average of 30 min of continuous recording).

3.4. Effect of 5-HT Receptor Antagonists or a 5-HT_1A Agonist on LTP in Adult Rats

To examine a possible effect of 5-HT blockade on LTP, we initially applied the broad-acting 5-HT receptor antagonist methiothepin (1.0 mM) in a separate group of adult animals (). In these rats, TBS of the LGN resulted in an increase of fPSP amplitude to % of baseline during the last 30 min of the experiment (Figure 4). Given that methiothepin was dissolved in several, different vehicle solutions (see Section 2.4.) a new group of control rats was also examined (; consisting of aCSF/DMSO, ; saline, ; and aCSF/H₂0, ). In these rats, fPSP amplitude reached % of baseline during the final 30 min of the experiment (Figure 4). An ANOVA revealed that methiothepin enhanced LTP levels, as indicated by significant main effects of time (, ) and group (, ), as well as a significant time × group interaction (, ).

Figure 4

The effect of application (in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis) of either aCSF/vehicle (; see text for detail regarding this control group) or methiothepin (1 mM, ) on LTP following TBS (at arrow) of the LGN in urethane-anesthetized rats. Application of methiothepin resulted in a significant increase in LTP relative to control animals. Inserts depict typical fPSPs before (red) and after (blue) LTP induction in the presence of methiothepin (top) and control animals (bottom; calibration bars indicate 0.5 mV vertical and 10 ms horizontal; each fPSP trace is an average of 30 min of continuous recording). indicates a significant (, -test) difference between the two groups.

In order to further characterize the LTP enhancement seen with 5-HT receptor blockade, we tested the effect of V1 application of WAY 100635 (1 mM, ), a highly selective antagonist at 5- receptors [31, 32]. In this group of rats, TBS increased fPSP amplitude to % of baseline (Figure 5). This level of LTP was significantly higher than that in rats receiving application of aCSF (the same group as in Figure 3; % of the baseline, ), as indicated by the main effects of time (, ) and group (, ), and by a time × group interaction (, ).

Figure 5

The effect of application (in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis) of either aCSF (; same group as in Figure 3) or WAY 100635 (1 mM, ) on LTP following TBS (at arrow) of the LGN in urethane-anesthetized rats. Application of WAY 100635 resulted in a significant increase in LTP relative to control animals. Inserts depict typical fPSPs before (red) and after (blue) LTP induction in the presence of WAY 100635 (top) and aCSF (bottom; calibration bars indicate 0.5 mV vertical and 10 ms horizontal; each fPSP trace is an average of 30 min of continuous recording). indicates a significant (, -test) difference between the two groups.

Based on the results reported above, it appears that 5- receptors exert an inhibitory effect over LTP induction in the mature V1. To further examine the role of these receptors, we applied the highly selective 5- receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT in V1 (1 mM, ). In these animals, TBS elicited LTP, with fPSP amplitude reaching % of baseline during the last 30 min of the experiment (Figure 6). These values were not significantly different from those in rats receiving aCSF application (same group as in Figure 3), as indicated by a significant main effect of time (, ), but not of group (, ), and no significant time × group interaction (, ). Thus, blockade of 5- receptors facilitates LTP, but 5- receptor activation does not result in further inhibition of LTP, similar to the effects noted above with direct 5-HT application in V1.

Figure 6

The effect of application (in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis) of either aCSF (; same group as in Figure 3) or 8-OH-DPAT (1 mM, ) on LTP following TBS (at arrow) of the LGN in urethane-anesthetized rats. Application of 8-OH-DPAT did not result in a significant change in LTP relative to animals receiving aCSF. Inserts depict typical fPSPs before (red) and after (blue) LTP induction in the presence of 8-OH-DPAT (top) and aCSF (bottom; calibration bars indicate 0.5 mV vertical and 10 ms horizontal; each fPSP trace is an average of 30 min of continuous recording).

3.5. Effect of 5-HT_1A Blockade on LTP in Juvenile Rats

Considerable evidence from in vitro experiments suggest that 5-HT plays a role in developmental plasticity, including the timing and closure of the “critical period” for plasticity in the rodent V1 [8, 9, 12, 17, 23, 27, 29, 31]. Thus, we also investigated the effects of 5-H receptor blockade by WAY 100635 application (1 mM) in a group of juvenile animals (age range: 42–48 days). In juvenile control animals (; mean age 44 days) receiving aCSF application in V1, TBS resulted in LTP, with fPSP amplitude at % of the baseline during the final 30 min of the experiment (Figure 7). Surprisingly, in the presence of WAY 100635, juvenile rats (; mean age 44.9 days) showed reduced LTP, with fPSP amplitude at % of baseline during the last 30 min of the experiment (Figure 7). Levels of LTP in these two groups of juvenile rats were different, as highlighted by a main effect of time (, ) and a significant time × group interaction (, ), even though the main effect of group only approached statistical significance (, ). Together, these observations suggest that there is a developmental switch in the role of 5- receptors in regulating V1 plasticity, with 5- receptor activation promoting plasticity in the juvenile V1, while assuming an inhibitory role in V1 of adult, fully matured animals.

Figure 7

The effect of application (in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis) of either aCSF () or WAY 100635 (1 mM, ) on LTP following TBS (at arrow) of the LGN in juvenile (mean age 45 days, range 42–48 days), urethane-anesthetized rats. Application of WAY 100635 resulted in a suppression of LTP relative to animals receiving aCSF during four of the last five 10 min recording epochs relative to animals receiving aCSF. Inserts depict typical fPSPs before (red) and after (blue) LTP induction in the presence of aCSF (top) and WAY 100635 (bottom; calibration bars indicate 0.5 mV vertical and 10 ms horizontal; each fPSP trace is an average of 30 min of continuous recording). indicates a significant (, -test) difference between the two groups.

3.6. Effects of 5-HT and 5-HT Antagonists on the ECoG in V1

In addition to sampling evoked fPSPs, we also recorded ECoG activity in V1 to assess potential effect of 5-HT or drug application on spontaneous, oscillatory activity of the cortex. For all experiments, ECoG activity was assessed before the onset of baseline fPSP recordings (i.e., 20 min after the onset of drug application) and at the end of the experiment. In adult animals, the ECoG was dominated by large amplitude, slow oscillations, with peak power concentrated in the low delta (0.5–1 Hz) and delta (1–4 Hz) frequency bands, as determined by power spectral analyses (Figure 8). Power in all frequency bands (0.5–1 Hz, 1–4 Hz, 4–8 Hz, 8–12 Hz, 12–20 Hz, and 20–40 Hz) remained quite stable over the course of the experiment when aCSF was applied to V1 (Figure 8). Further, application of 5-HT, methiothepin, or WAY 100635 did not result in any significant changes in ECoG activity over the course of the experiment when compared with aCSF application (Figure 8; all group effects and group by time effects nonsignificant, ’s > 0.05).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 8

The effect of application (in V1 by means of reverse microdialysis; starting 20 min prior to the onset of recordings) of either aCSF, 5-HT (top; 0.1 and 10 mM), WAY 100635 (middle; 1 mM), or methiothepin (bottom; 1 mM) on electrocorticographic (ECoG) activity in V1 of adult, urethane-anesthetized rats. The ECoG was recorded and analyzed (5 sec epochs) by power spectral analysis before the onset of baseline recordings and at the end of the experiment. Throughout the experiment, ECoG activity was dominated by large amplitude, slow activity, with most power concentrated in the low delta (0.5–1 Hz) and delta (1–4 Hz) frequency bands. None of the pharmacological treatments resulted in a significant change in ECoG activity. Insert depicts typical ECoG activity in V1, with the shaded area representing a 5 sec epoch used for the analysis (group sizes the same as those in previous figures).

Similar observations were made for ECoG activity in juvenile rats, which also exhibited peak power in the low delta (0.5–1 Hz) and delta (1–4 Hz) frequency bands that was not significantly altered by application of WAY 100635 (data not shown). These data suggest that changes in spontaneous, oscillatory activity in V1 do not account for the effects of methiothepin and WAY 100635 to alter LTP in V1 following TBS of the LGN in urethane-anesthetized animals.

4. Discussion

The present set of experiments examined the role of 5-HT and 5- receptors in gating thalamocortical plasticity between LGN and V1 of juvenile and adult rats studied under urethane anesthesia. Application of 5-HT (0.1 to 10 mM) in V1 did not affect the induction or maintenance of LTP in adult animals under the present, experimental conditions. However, V1 application of the broad-acting 5-HT receptor antagonist methiothepin or the selective 5- receptor antagonist WAY 100635 resulted in a clear facilitation of LTP in adult rats, suggestive of a suppression of LTP by endogenous 5-HT release and 5-HT receptor activation. In contrast, WAY 100635 reduced LTP when tested in a group of juvenile rats (mean age 45 days). None of the pharmacological treatments that altered LTP induction exerted significant effects on baseline synaptic transmission (fPSP amplitude prior to LTP induction; note that 5-HT at 10 mM suppressed baseline fPSP amplitude but did not affect LTP). Similarly, none of the pharmacological treatments altered spontaneous ECoG activity recorded in V1 over the course of the experiment. Together, these results indicate that 5- receptors play an important, age-dependent role in gating plasticity in the thalamocortical visual system of rats, with 5- receptor activation facilitating LTP in juveniles, but inhibiting LTP in the brains of adult animals.

We were surprised that, in our experiments, 5-HT application exerted no detectable effect on LTP induction in V1. A considerable amount of in vitro work has shown that 5-HT can alter LTP in V1 slice preparations, even though there are considerable inconsistencies in the specific results among various studies. In V1 slices of kittens, 5-HT has been shown to enhance LTP recorded in layer 4, effects that were absent in slices obtained from adult animals [8, 9]. Depletion of 5-HT (in combination with noradrenaline depletion) has been shown to impair LTP in layers 2/3 of the immature rat V1 in vitro, an effect that was mimicked by application of either 5- or 5-HT₂ receptor antagonists [29]. Recently, these findings have been extended by showing that bath application of 5-HT enhances (in fact, reinstates) LTP in layers 2/3 of V1 of adult (8–10 weeks old) rats, confirming that 5-HT can exert a facilitating effect on the induction of long-lasting plasticity in V1 [12].

In clear contrast, other studies have indicated that 5-HT application results in a pronounced suppression of LTP at synapses between layers 4 and 2/3 of V1 of rats (3–5 weeks old), an effect that is mediated by both 5- and 5-HT₂ receptors [10, 30, 40, 41]. In fact, in V1 slices of 5-week-old rats, LTP could no longer be induced; however, acute bath application of the 5-HT receptor antagonist methysergide, acute 5-HT depletion, or neurotoxic ablation of serotonergic neurons restored LTP [10, 31]. A similar, inhibitory effect of 5-HT application has also been demonstrated for the induction of long-term depression in V1 in vitro [42]. Interestingly, 5-HT levels in V1 show a significant increase (up to 3.5-fold from 3 to 5 weeks of age) over postnatal development [10, 31]. These observations have led to the hypothesis that 5-HT, in concert with other neurochemical changes (particularly the maturation of GABAergic circuits [43, 44]), contributes to the loss of V1 plasticity over postnatal life, resulting in the closure of the “critical or sensitive” period of V1 development [10, 31, 42].

Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that the release of endogenous 5-HT exerts a tonic, inhibitory influence on LTP induction, at least in adult rats. Cortical 5-HT is detectable in urethane-anesthetized rats, even during periods of ECoG synchronization [45]. We speculate that, under the present conditions, this effect of endogenous 5-HT is maximal, making the application of exogenous 5-HT ineffective in further suppressing LTP. However, future studies using 5-HT-depleted animals are necessary to examine this hypothesis. The presumed, inhibitory effect of endogenous 5-HT is relieved by methiothepin and WAY 100635, indicative of a role of 5- receptors, even though we do not rule out the involvement of other 5-HT receptor types (e.g., 5-HT₇ receptors, which are blocked by methiothepin and have recently been implicated in processes of learning, memory, and synaptic plasticity [35]). In V1 slices of young (5 weeks old) rats, both 5- and 5-HT₂ receptors mediate the effect of 5-HT to suppress LTP induction [10, 40, 41]. It is noteworthy, however, that WAY 100635 and methiothepin application resulted in very similar levels of LTP enhancement, indicating that 5- receptor blockade alone is sufficient to result in a substantial disinhibition of LTP induction mechanisms under the present, experimental conditions.

In contrast to the enhancement of LTP in adult animals, application of WAY 100635 in juvenile animals (42–48 days) suppressed LTP, indicative of an age-related switch in the role of 5- receptors in gating V1 plasticity. A similar phenomenon has previously been described for direct 5-HT application, albeit in a direction opposite to that revealed by the current set of experiments. Park et al. [12] observed that, in V1 slices obtained from juvenile rats (5 week old), 5-HT suppressed LTP, while 5-HT enhanced LTP in slices of adult animals (8–10 weeks old). At present, it is not clear why this pattern contradicts the data obtained in our experiments. However, it is noteworthy that the effects noted by Park et al. were mediated by 5-HT₂ receptors [12], while out data clearly indicate a role for 5- binding sites in V1 (see above). Thus, it is possible that different receptors populations do, indeed, exert opposing effects on plasticity gating in V1, an assumption that requires a critical assessment with further investigations (also see [46] for a differential effect of 5- and 5-HT₂ receptor activation on inhibitory transmission in V1).

To the best of our knowledge, the current experiments are the first to assess the role of 5-HT in gating LTP in the rodent V1 under in vivo conditions. Work conducted in vitro clearly offers significant advantages in terms of delineating microscopic and mechanistic properties of synaptic transmission and plasticity, such as the concurrent analysis of changes in inhibitory and excitatory synapses in V1 during LTP induction [47]. At the same time, there appear to be some important differences between LTP studied in vivo compared to in vitro conditions. Numerous studies have shown that V1 synapses studied in vitro become increasingly resistant to LTP induction with postnatal maturation, and slices harvested from adult animals do not show LTP with standard induction protocols [7, 8, 10–12, 31, 48, 49]. In sharp contrast, LTP is readily induced and maintained in V1 when studied in adult, intact-animal (anesthetized) preparations [13–16, 18, 21]. Also of interest, protocols that effectively elicit LTD in V1 in vitro often fail to do so when tested under in vivo conditions [50, 51]. Thus, there clearly are some fundamental differences in the mechanisms and/or conditions that govern the induction of long-lasting plasticity at V1 synapses between in vitro and in vivo conditions, which might explain some of the apparent discrepancies among studies (see above). The use of tissue harvested from very young animals (20 days old or less), the routine use of some pharmacological agents in the bath solution (e.g., GABAergic antagonists), the removal of long-range (corticocortical, thalamocortical, and subcortical) projections, and the loss neuromodulatory inputs in slice preparations all introduce conditions that are very different from those present in vivo (see [52] for a detailed discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of electrophysiological work conducted in vivo and in vitro). These questions and discrepancies highlight the need for further work, in particular in intact animals, which preserve the anatomical connectivity and complex, physiological interactions among cortical and subcortical networks [52] that regulate activity and plasticity of synapses in V1 and elsewhere. Importantly, anesthetized and nonanesthetized preparations should also be compared to assess whether the systemic effects of urethane or other anesthetics alter the plasticity properties of V1 synapses [51, 52].

The results of the present experiments indicate that 5- receptors exert a tonic, inhibitory influence over LTP in adult animals but facilitate LTP in the juvenile V1. Prior work has shown that 5- receptors are located (albeit in different densities) on both interneurons and pyramidal cells of V1 [53]. Thus, direct effects on principal neurons and/or the modulation of inhibitory tone in V1 are likely candidate mechanisms for the effects noted in our experiments. The observation that 5- receptor activation can suppress NMDA receptor functions in principle V1 cells [54] suggests a relatively direct action, but this does not preclude an involvement of other mechanisms (e.g., disinhibition or changes in the excitatory-inhibitory balance [47, 53]) in the effects observed here.

For the present experiments, we employed drug concentrations that are higher than those used for typical in vitro experiments. There are several reasons why we decided to use these higher concentrations: (a) pharmacological agents were applied by means of reverse microdialysis; it is generally assumed that only about 10% of drug molecules will diffuse across the dialysis probe membrane and into the surrounding, neural tissue [38, 39]; (b) drugs applied under in vivo conditions by reverse dialysis (but also during direct infusions) undergo extensive degradation, due to interactions with the probe membrane and lipophilic molecules, as well as diffusion and continuous enzymatic breakdown [38, 55]. Thus, as has been pointed out by others [55, 56], there is a clear discrepancy in terms of effective drug concentrations when comparing experimental in vivo and in vitro approaches. Nevertheless, we do acknowledge that it will be important for future work to establish whether the effects reported here can be elicited with drug concentrations that are lower than those employed for the present set of experiments.

There is a growing body of evidence that 5-HT plays an important role in shaping plasticity of the developing and mature nervous system and that alterations in 5-HT transmission can result in neurodevelopmental and psychiatry disorders [57, 58]. Prior work has shown that LTP in V1, in addition to its important role in ocular dominance plasticity [6, 11, 59], may also mediate processes of visual (perceptual, recognition) learning and memory storage [59, 60]. Based on these hypotheses and the results of the present investigation, we anticipate that altering serotonergic transmission in V1 exerts profound, age-dependent effects on visual processing and learning. For example, blockade of 5- receptors in V1 may enhance perceptual learning in adults, when 5-HT acts to stabilize synaptic connectivity; opposite behavioral effects would be expected in juvenile animals, when 5- receptors act to facilitate plasticity induction in V1. Clearly, investigations that involve a combination of behavioral, pharmacological, and electrophysiological approaches are required to characterize the role of 5-HT in visual behavior and directly test some of the hypothesis stated above.

Finally, the modulatory effects of 5-HT on activity- and experience-dependent plasticity also are of relevance to the potential treatment of various nervous system disorders. For example, chronic treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor has been shown to reinstate ocular dominance plasticity (and LTP) in the V1 and allow recovery from amblyopic visual deficits in adult rodents [11], highlighting the therapeutic potential of serotonergic manipulations that alter the plasticity potential of cortical circuits (but see [61]). It remains to be established whether the effects following chronic, serotonergic manipulations relate to the role of 5-HT in acute plasticity gating described with the present set of experiments.

Abbreviations

Ach:	Acetylcholine
aCSF:	Artificial cerebrospinal fluid
ANOVA:	Analysis of variance
ECoG:	Electrocorticogram
fPSP:	Field postsynaptic potential
i.p.:	Intraperitoneal
LGN:	Lateral geniculate nucleus
LTD:	Long-term depression
LTP:	Long-term potentiation
SEM:	Standard error of the mean
SSRI:	Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
TBS:	Theta burst stimulation
V1:	Primary visual cortex
5-HT:	5-Hydroxytryptamine.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

References

T. V. P. Bliss and G. L. Collingridge, “A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus,” Nature, vol. 361, no. 6407, pp. 31–39, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Martin and R. G. M. Morris, “New life in an old idea: the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis revisited,” Hippocampus, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 609–636, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. V. P. Bliss and T. Lomo, “Long lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 232, no. 2, pp. 331–356, 1973.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tsumoto, “Long-term potentiation and long-term depression in the neocortex,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 209–228, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Bennett, “The concept of long term potentiation of transmission at synapses,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 109–137, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Malenka and M. F. Bear, “LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches,” Neuron, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Komatsu, K. Fujii, J. Maeda, H. Sakaguchi, and K. Toyama, “Long-term potentiation of synaptic transmission in kitten visual cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 124–141, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Kojic, Q. Gu, R. M. Douglas, and M. S. Cynader, “Serotonin facilitates synaptic plasticity in kitten visual cortex: an in vitro study,” Developmental Brain Research, vol. 101, no. 1-2, pp. 299–304, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Kojic, R. H. Dyck, Q. Gu, R. M. Douglas, J. Matsubara, and M. S. Cynader, “Columnar distribution of serotonin-dependent plasticity within kitten striate cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1841–1844, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-S. Kim, H.-J. Jang, K.-H. Cho et al., “Serotonin inhibits the induction of NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation in the rat primary visual cortex,” Brain Research, vol. 1103, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Maya Vetencourt, A. Sale, A. Viegi et al., “The antidepressant fluoxetine restores plasticity in the adult visual cortex,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5874, pp. 385–388, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-W. Park, H.-J. Jang, K.-H. Cho, M.-J. Kim, S. H. Yoon, and D.-J. Rhie, “Developmental switch of the serotonergic role in the induction of synaptic long-term potentiation in the rat visual cortex,” Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Heynen and M. F. Bear, “Long-term potentiation of thalamocortical transmission in the adult visual cortex in vivo,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 9801–9813, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
H. C. Dringenberg, B. Hamze, A. Wilson, W. Speechley, and M.-C. Kuo, “Heterosynaptic facilitation of in vivo thalamocortical long-term potentiation in the adult rat visual cortex by acetylcholine,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 839–848, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Gagolewicz and H. C. Dringenberg, “NR2B-subunit dependent facilitation of long-term potentiation in primary visual cortex following visual discrimination training of adult rats,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1222–1229, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bröcher, A. Artola, and W. Singer, “Agonists of cholinergic and noradrenergic receptors facilitate synergistically the induction of long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex,” Brain Research, vol. 573, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Kojic, Q. Gu, R. M. Douglas, and M. S. Cynader, “Laminar distribution of cholinergic- and serotonergic-dependent plasticity within kitten visual cortex,” Developmental Brain Research, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-C. Kuo and H. C. Dringenberg, “Histamine facilitates in vivo thalamocortical long-term potentiation in the mature visual cortex of anesthetized rats,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1731–1738, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Gu, “Neuromodulatory transmitter systems in the cortex and their role in cortical plasticity,” Neuroscience, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 815–835, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Gu, “Contribution of acetylcholine to visual cortex plasticity,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 291–301, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Dringenberg and M.-C. Kuo, “Cholinergic, histaminergic, and noradrenergic regulation of LTP stability and induction threshold: cognitive implications,” Experientia, vol. 98, pp. 165–183, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
G. C. Papadopoulos, J. G. Parnavelas, and R. M. Buijs, “Light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical analysis of the serotonin innervation of the rat visual cortex,” Journal of Neurocytology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 883–892, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Bennett-Clarke, N. L. Chiaia, R. S. Crissman, and R. W. Rhoades, “The source of the transient serotoninergic input to the developing visual and somatosensory cortices in rat,” Neuroscience, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 163–183, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Koh, M. Nakazawa, K. Kani, and T. Maeda, “Investigations of origins of serotonergic projection to developing rat visual cortex: a combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemical study,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 675–684, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Jacobs and E. C. Azmitia, “Structure and function of the brain serotonin system,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 165–229, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Rakic and M. S. Lidow, “Distribution and density of monoamine receptors in the primate visual cortex devoid of retinal input from early embryonic stages,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2561–2574, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
R. H. Dyck and M. S. Cynader, “Autoradiographic localization of serotonin receptor subtypes in the cat visual cortex: transient regional, laminar, and columnar distributions during postnatal development,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 4316–4338, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
D. E. Wright, K. B. Seroogy, K. H. Lundgren, B. M. Davis, and L. Jennes, “Comparative localization of serotonin1A, 1C, and 2 receptor subtype mRNAs in rat brain,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 351, no. 3, pp. 357–373, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Inaba, T. Maruyama, Y. Yoshimura, H. Hosoi, and Y. Komatsu, “Facilitation of low-frequency stimulation-induced long-term potentiation by endogenous noradrenaline and serotonin in developing rat visual cortex,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Edagawa, H. Saito, and K. Abe, “Serotonin enhibits the induction of long-term potentiation in rat primary visual cortex,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 983–997, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Edagawa, H. Saito, and K. Abe, “Endogenous serotonin contributes to a developmental decrease in long-term potentiation in the rat visual cortex,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1532–1537, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Forster, I. A. Cliffe, D. J. Bill et al., “A pharmacological profile of the selective silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Fletcher, E. A. Forster, D. J. Bill et al., “Electrophysiological, biochemical, neurohormonal and behavioural studies with WAY-100635, a potent, selective and silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 73, no. 1-2, pp. 337–353, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Middlemiss and J. R. Fozard, “8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin discriminates between subtypes of the 5-HT1 recognition site,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 151–153, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nikiforuk, “Targeting the serotonin 5-HT₇ receptor in the search for treatments for CNS disorders: rationale and progress to date,” CNS Drugs, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 265–275, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hoyer, D. E. Clarke, J. R. Fozard et al., “International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin),” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 157–203, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Bard, S. A. Kucharewicz, J. M. Zgombick, R. L. Weinshank, T. A. Branchek, and M. L. Cohen, “Differences in ligand binding profiles between cloned rabbit and human 5-HT(1Dα) and 5-HT(1Dβ) receptors: ketanserin and methiothepin distinguish rabbit 5-HT(1D) receptor subtypes,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 354, no. 3, pp. 237–244, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Benveniste and P. C. Hüttemeier, “Microdialysis: theory and application,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 195–215, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Oldford and M. A. Castro-Alamancos, “Input-specific effects of acetylcholine on sensory and intracortical evoked responses in the ‘barrel cortex’ in vivo,” Neuroscience, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 769–778, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Edagawa, H. Saito, and K. Abe, “5- ${HT}_{1A}$ receptor-mediated inhibition of long-term potentiation in rat visual cortex,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 349, no. 2-3, pp. 221–224, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Edagawa, H. Saito, and K. Abe, “The serotonin 5-HT₂ receptor-phospholipase C system inhibits the induction of long-term potentiation in the rat visual cortex,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1391–1396, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-J. Jang, K.-H. Cho, S.-W. Park, M.-J. Kim, S. H. Yoon, and D.-J. Rhie, “Effects of serotonin on the induction of long-term depression in the rat visual cortex,” Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 337–343, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Jiang, Z. J. Huang, B. Morales, and A. Kirkwood, “Maturation of GABAergic transmission and the timing of plasticity in visual cortex,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 126–133, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-J. Jang, K.-H. Cho, H.-S. Kim, S. J. Hahn, M.-S. Kim, and D.-J. Rhie, “Age-dependent decline in supragranular long-term synaptic plasticity by increased inhibition during the critical period in the rat primary visual cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 269–275, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Dringenberg, C. H. Vanderwolf, and P. A. Noseworthy, “Superior colliculus stimulation enhances neocortical serotonin release and electrocorticographic activation in the urethane-anesthetized rat,” Brain Research, vol. 964, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-J. Jang, K.-H. Cho, K. Joo, M.-J. Kim, and D.-J. Rhie, “Differential modulation of phasic and tonic inhibition underlies serotonergic suppression of long-term potentiation in the rat visual cortex,” Neuroscience, vol. 301, pp. 351–362, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Moreau, M. Amar, J. Callebert, and P. Fossier, “Serotonergic modulation of LTP at excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the developing rat visual cortex,” Neuroscience, vol. 238, pp. 148–158, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kato, A. Artola, and W. Singer, “Developmental changes in the susceptibility to long-term potentiation of neurones in rat visual cortex slices,” Developmental Brain Research, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kirkwood, H.-K. Lee, and M. F. Bear, “Co-regulation of long-term potentiation and experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in visual cortex by age and experience,” Nature, vol. 375, no. 6529, pp. 328–331, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Jiang, Y. Akaneya, Y. Hata, and T. Tsumoto, “Long-term depression is not induced by low-frequency stimulation in rat visual cortex in vivo: a possible preventing role of endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 3761–3770, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Hager and H. C. Dringenberg, “Assessment of different induction protocols to elicit long-term depression (LTD) in the rat visual cortex in vivo,” Brain Research, vol. 1318, pp. 33–41, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Steriade, “Similar and contrasting results from studies in the intact and slices brain,” in The Intact and Sliced Brain, M. Steriade, Ed., pp. 103–190, Bradford/MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
W. A. Moreau, M. Amar, N. L. Roux, N. Morel, and P. Fossier, “Serotoninergic fine-tuning of the excitation-inhibition balance in rat visual cortical networks,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 456–467, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Edagawa, H. Saito, and K. Abe, “Stimulation of the 5- ${HT}_{1 A}$ receptor selectively suppresses NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic excitation in the rat visual cortex,” Brain Research, vol. 827, no. 1-2, pp. 225–228, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Adell and F. Artigas, “In vivo brain microdialysis: principles and applications,” in In Vivo Neuromethods, A. A. Boulton, G. B. Baker, and A. N. Bateson, Eds., vol. 32 of Neuromethods, pp. 1–33, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Greenshaw, “Electrical and chemical stimulation of brain tissue in vivo,” in Neuromethods. In Vivo Neuromethods, A. A. Boulton, G. B. Baker, and A. N. Bateson, Eds., vol. 32, pp. 359–381, Humana Press, Totowa, N.J, USA, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Daubert and B. G. Condron, “Serotonin: a regulator of neuronal morphology and circuitry,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 424–434, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-P. Lesch and J. Waider, “Serotonin in the modulation of neural plasticity and networks: implications for neurodevelopmental disorders,” Neuron, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 175–191, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Cooke and M. F. Bear, “How the mechanisms of long-term synaptic potentiation and depression serve experience-dependent plasticity in primary visual cortex,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Section B: Biological Sciences, vol. 369, no. 1633, Article ID 20130284, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Cooke, R. W. Komorowski, E. S. Kaplan, J. P. Gavornik, and M. F. Bear, “Visual recognition memory, manifested as long-term habituation, requires synaptic plasticity in V1,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 262–271, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Beshara, B. R. Beston, J. G. A. Pinto, and K. M. Murphy, “Effects of fluoxetine and visual experience on glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic proteins in adult rat visual cortex,” eNeuro, vol. 2, no. 6, Article ID e0126-15.2015, 13 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Peter J. Gagolewicz and Hans C. Dringenberg. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1070

Downloads

778

Citations