Different Visual Weighting due to Fast or Slow Vestibular Deafferentation: Before and after Schwannoma Surgery

Table 1

Effects of group, pre/post treatments, and vision on the stability during quiet and perturbed stance. Repeated measures GLM ANOVA analysis of how the quiet stance and perturbed stability were affected by main factors “group,” “pre/post” treatments, and “vision” alone and by the main factor interactions. The notation “<0.001” means that the value is smaller than 0.001. The values are presented within the squared parenthesis below the values.

		Group	Pre/post	Vision	Group x pre/post	Group x vision	Pre/post x vision	Group x pre/post x vision
Quiet stance	No vestibular function vs. vestibular function	0.546 [0.4]	0.777 [0.1]	<0.001 [61.3]	0.883 [0.0]	0.017 [6.2]	0.195 [1.7]	0.388 [0.8]
	No vestibular function vs. PREHAB	0.169 [2.0]	0.523 [0.4]	<0.001 [64.2]	0.425 [0.6]	0.147 [2.2]	0.952 [0.0]	0.606 [0.3]
	Vestibular function vs. PREHAB	0.644 [0.2]	0.667 [0.2]	<0.001 [99.3]	0.368 [0.8]	0.167 [2.0]	0.405 [0.7]	0.253 [1.4]
Vibratory perturbation	No vestibular function vs. vestibular function	0.537 [0.4]	0.479 [0.5]	<0.001 [70.3]	0.010 [7.4]	0.474 [0.5]	0.181 [1.9]	0.271 [1.3]
	No vestibular function vs. PREHAB	0.002 [10.6]	<0.001 [20.2]	<0.001 [70.6]	0.903 [0.0]	0.784 [0.1]	0.470 [0.5]	0.654 [0.2]
	Vestibular function vs. PREHAB	0.100 [2.9]	0.430 [0.6]	<0.001 [50.5]	0.010 [7.7]	0.406 [0.7]	0.113 [2.7]	0.508 [0.4]