About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 852061, 29 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/852061
Review Article

Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review

Department of OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A-81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Received 9 August 2011; Accepted 25 August 2011

Academic Editor: Howard D. Homesley

Copyright © 2011 Lori Weinberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [20 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Dimitri Sarlos, LaVonne Kots, Nebojsa Stevanovic, Stefanie von Felten, and Gabriel Schaer, “Robotic Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Obstetrics And Gynecology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 604–611, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Teresa L. Rutledge, “Advances in Surgical Care,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 145–+, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • James T. Broome, Sharon Pomeroy, and Carmen C. Solorzano, “Expense of Robotic Thyroidectomy A Cost Analysis at a Single Institution,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 147, no. 12, pp. 1102–1106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Rudy L. De Wilde, and Anja Herrmann, “Robotic surgery – Advance or gimmick?,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 457–469, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Senem Ates, and Togas Tulandi, “Malpractice claims and avoidance of complications in endoscopic surgery,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 349–361, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Robert E. Bristow, “Robotic Surgery Gynecologic Oncology,” Cancer Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 167–176, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • V. Cela, L. Freschi, G. Simi, M. Ruggiero, R. Tana, and N. Pluchino, “Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Joseph Ng, “Robotics in Endometrial Cancer Care,” Robotics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 198–202, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kirsten Foell, Antonio Finelli, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Marcus Q. Bernardini, Thomas K. Waddell, Kenneth T. Pace, R. John D. 'A. Honey, and Jason Y. Lee, “Robotic surgery basic skills training: Evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum,” Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal, vol. 7, no. 11-12, pp. 430–434, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sangini B. Sheth, Robert L. Giuntoli, Ana I. Tergas, Abigail D. Winder, Amanda N. Fader, and Isabel C. Green, “A Pilot Study of Surgical Training Using a Virtual Robotic Surgery Simulator,” Jsls-Journal Of The Society Of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 219–226, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • M. Carbonnel, H. Abbou, H. T. N’Guyen, S. Roy, G. Hamdi, A. Jnifen, and J. M. Ayoubi, “Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Prospective Study,” Minimally Invasive Surgery, vol. 2013, pp. 1–4, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Pluvio J. Coronado, María Fasero, Javier F. Magrina, Miguel A. Herraiz, and José A. Vidart, “Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Cost Between Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopy for Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy (TIPAL),” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 674–681, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Julie Goetgheluck, Marie Carbonnel, and Jean Marc Ayoubi, “Robotically Assisted Gynecologic Surgery: 2-Year Experience in the French Foch Hospital,” Frontiers in Surgery, vol. 1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jiajie Yu, Yingqiang Wang, Youping Li, Xianglian Li, Cuicui Li, and Jiantong Shen, “The safety and effectiveness of Da Vinci surgical system compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: a rapid assessment,” Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 121–134, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nallapothula Kathya, Chaitanya Mallireddy, Seema S. Puntambekar, Geetanjali Agarwal, Saurabh Joshi, Rahul Kenawadekar, and Akhil Lawande, “Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology,” Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 80–83, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Lior Lowenstein, Mona Mustafa, Yechiel Z. Burke, Susana Mustafa, Dror Segal, and Amir Weissman, “Steep Trendelenburg position during robotic sacrocolpopexy and heart rate variability,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Anna-Maija Tapper, Mikko Hannola, Rainer Zeitlin, Jaana Isojärvi, Harri Sintonen, and Tuija S. Ikonen, “A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • R. Kimmig, B. Aktas, and M. Heubner, “„Robotic surgery“ in der Gynäkologie,” Der Gynäkologe, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Luisa Beckmeier, Ruediger Klapdor, Phillip Soergel, Sudip Kundu, Peter Hillemanns, and Hermann Hertel, “Evaluation of active camera control systems in gynecological surgery: construction, handling, comfort, surgeries and results,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sangini S. Sheth, Amanda N. Fader, Ana I. Tergas, Christina L. Kushnir, and Isabel C. Green, “Virtual Reality Robotic Surgical Simulation: An Analysis of Gynecology Trainees,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar