|
| Surgery | N | DRS versus OS | DRS versus LSC | Control | Surg-eon | OR time (min.) | EBL (mL) | Hospital stay (days) | Conversions to OS | Bld Tx | Intraoperative complications | Postoperative complications | Clinical outcomes |
|
| Adnexectomy | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Margina et al. [24] 2008 | 85 versus 91 | | ✓ | CC | SS | 77 versus 62 (median) | 25 versus 50 (median) | 0 versus 0 (median) | 0 | 0 | 1/85 versus 2/90 uretral injury (1) versus uretral injury (1) and rectotomy (1) | Major: none
Minor:10/81 versus 10/91 | — |
|
| Myomectomy | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advincula et al. [25]
2000–2004 | 29 versus 29 | ✓ | | CC
matched | DS | 231 versus 154 | 196 versus 365 | 1.5 versus 3.6 | 0 | 0 versus 2 | 1/29 versus 0/29cardiogenic shot from vasopressin (1) | Major: 0 versus 3arrest, DVT, ARF in same pt. (1), bld tx (2)
Minor: 3/29 versus 11/29 | — |
|
Nezhat et al. [18]
2006-2007 | 15 versus 35 | | ✓ | CC
matched | SS | 234 versus 203 | 370 versus 420 | 1 versus 1.1 | 0 | 0 | none | Major: none
Minor: NR | 6.7% versus 7.5% pregnancy rate |
|
Bedient et al. [26]
2000–2008 | 40 versus 41 | | ✓ | CC
adjusted | — | 144 versus 161 | 100 versus 250 | >2 days:12% versus 23% | 0 versus 5% | 2 versus 2 | 1/41 versus 8/40bleeding (1) versus bleeding (6), conversion (2) | Major: 4 versus 2Bld tx (2), bowel injury (1), pelvic abscess (1) versus bld tx (2)
Minor: 3 versus 4 | 85% versus 83% symptom resolution |
|
Ascher-Walsh and Capes [27]
2005–2008 | 75 versus 50 | ✓ | | HC(≤3 myomas) | — | 192 versus 138 | 226 versus 459 | 0.5 versus 3.3 | 0 | 0 | none | Major: none
Minor: 2/75 versus 19/50febrile morbidity 1 versus 19 | — |
|
Barakat [28]
2008-2009 | 89 versus 393
89 versus 93 | ✓ | ✓ | HC
HC | __
__ | 181 versus 126 | 181 versus 155 | 1 versus 3
1 versus 1 (median) | 0
0 versus 1 | DRS: 0
LSC: 2
OS: 25 | DRS (0), LSC (1) (bowel injury), OS (0)
Intraoperative hemorrhage: NR | Major: DRS (0), LSC (0), OS (1) (wound separation)
Minor: DRS (0), LSC (1), OS (0) | — |
|
| Hysterectomy | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payne and Dauterive [29] 2006-2007 | 100 versus 100 | | ✓
LSC = Type IVE | HC | SS | 119 versus 92 | 61 versus 113 | 1 versus 1.6 | 4% versus 9% | 0 | 1/100 versus 2/100 cystotomy (1) versus enterotomy (1), vaginal tear (1) | Major: none
Minor:1/100 versus 0 | — |
|
Shashoua et al. [30]
(2005–2007) | 24 versus 44 | | ✓
LSC = Type IVE | HC | SS | 142 versus 122 | 1.9 versus 1.8 (hgb drop) | 1.0 versus 1.4 | 0 | 0 | none | Major: 0 versus 1, cuff dehiscence
Minor: 1/24 versus 0 | — |
|
Sarlos et al. [31]
2007–2009 | 40 versus 150 | | ✓
LSC = TLH | HC
matched | SS | 109 versus 83 | <50 versus 81 | 3.3 versus 3.9 | 0 | 0 | none | Major: none
Minor: 5/40 versus 0 | — |
|
Giep et al. [32]
2007–2009 | 237 versus 265 | | ✓
LSC = LAVH | CC & HC | DS | 90 versus 125 | 59 versus 168 | 1.0 versus 1.2 | 1.7% versus 0.4% | 0 | 1/237 versus 1/265cystotomies | Major: 2 versus 1
PE (1), abscess (1) versus abscess (1)
Minor: 6/237 versus 3/265 | — |
|
| Sacrocolpopexy | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geller
et al. [33]
2004–2008 | 73 versus 105 | ✓ | | CC | DS | 328 versus 225 | 103 versus 255 | 1.3 versus 2.7 | 1.4% versus 0 | 1 versus 4 | 1/73 versus 1/105 cystotomies | Major: 1 versus 0
PE
Minor: 11/73 versus 11/105 | Improvement in POP-Q C point at 6 m f/u |
|
