Review Article

The Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Included comparative studies reporting on obstetric events ( ).

Author, yearMethod study qualityPopulation
total (cut)
Country/originAgeFGM/C characteristicsOutcomes (self-report or clinical verification)

Adinma 1997 [28]Low (124)Nigeria16–40Type: 22% TI, 78% TII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: 97% in childhood/not stated
Episiotomy (self-report)
Berardi et al. 1985 [29]Low (71)FranceNot statedType: 100% TII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Tears; cesarean section; episiotomy (clinical)
Bohoussou et al. 1986 [30]Low (1099) Ivory CoastNot statedType: 29% TI, 73% TII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; tears; cesarean section; episiotomy; instrumental delivery (not stated)
Browning et al. 2010 [31]High (255) EthiopiaMean 28.5Type: 100% TI and TII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor (clinical)
Chibber et al. 2011 [32]Low (1842)Not statedNot statedType: “type I to III most common” (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; cesarean section; hemorrhage (clinical)
De Silva 1989 [33]Low (167)Saudi ArabiaNot statedType: 9% TI, 34% TII, 32% TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; tears; cesarean section; episiotomy; instrumental delivery; hemorrhage (clinical)
Diop et al. 1998 [34]Low (4359) MaliMean 27.0Type: 21% TI, 73% TII, 6% TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Tears; episiotomy; hemorrhage (clinical)
Elnashar and Abdelhady 2007 [35]Low (200)EgyptNot statedType: “circumcised” (self-report)
Age cut/by: not stated
Tears; cesarean section; episiotomy (self-report)
Essén et al. 2005 [36]Moderate (68)SwedenNot statedType: most TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor (clinical)
Hakim 2001 [14]Low (1225)EthiopiaMean 25.9Type: 12% TI, 85% TII, 3% TIII (not stated)
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; tears; episiotomy; hemorrhage (clinical)
Johnson 2005 [37]Low (579) USAMost 20–34Type: most likely type III (assumed, unverified).
Age cut/by: not stated
Tears; cesarean section; instrumental delivery; hemorrhage (clinical)
Jones et al. 1999 [15]bLow (1787)Burkina FasoMean 26.6Type: 56% TI, 39% TII, 5% TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by median 9.5 yrs/not stated
Difficult labor (self-report)
Jones et al. 1999 [15]bModerate (5017) MaliMean 25.0Type: 21% TI, 74% TII, 5% TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Difficult labor (clinical)
Larsen and Okonofua 2002 [16]Low (1009) Nigeria15–49Type: 71% TI, 25% TII, 3% TIII, 1% TIV (gyn exam).
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; tears; cesarean section; episiotomy (self-report)
Lupo and Marcotte 1999 [38]Low (38) USANot statedType: “female circumcision” (not stated)
Age cut/by: not stated
Tears (not stated)
Millogo-Traore et al. 2007 [39]Low (227) Burkina FasoMedian 25Type: 28% TI, 69% TII, 3% TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; tears; episiotomy; instrumental delivery (clinical)
National Statistics Office 1995 [40]Low aEritrea15–49Type: 62% TI, 4% TII, 34% TIII (self-report)
Age cut/by: 60% ≤5 yrs/91% tc
Problems during delivery (self-report)
NSEO 2003 [41]Low aEritrea15–49Type: 4% TI-II, 39% TIII, 46% TIV (self-report)
Age cut/by: 62% ≤1 yr/84% tc
Problems during delivery (self-report)
Ndlaye et al. 2010 [42]Low (210)Burkina FasoMean 24.0Type: 47% TI, 47% TII, 6% TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Tears; cesarean section; episiotomy; hemorrhage (clinical)
Oduro et al. 2006 [43]High (1466)GhanaMean 25.8Type: “type II is the commonest form” (gyn exam).
Age cut/by: not stated
Cesarean section (clinical)
Orji and Babalola 2006 [17]Low (423)NigeriaMean 27.5Type: 87% TI, 13% TII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: 95% cut in childhood/80% tc, 14% hcp
Cesarean section; episiotomy (self-report)
Slanger et al. 2002 [44]Moderate (621)NigeriaMean 33.7Type: 72% TI, 24% TII, 4% TIII + IV (gyn exam),
Age cut/by: 95% cut in childhood/80% tc, 14% hcp
Tears; cesarean section; episiotomy; instrumental delivery; hemorrhage; fever (self-report)
Small et al. 2008 [45]Low (10431)MultiplecMost 20–34Type: most likely type III (assumed, unverified).
Age cut/by: not stated
Cesarean section; instrumental delivery (clinical)
Vangen et al. 2002 [18]Low (1733) NorwayNot statedType: most likely type III (assumed, unverified).
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; tears; cesarean section; hemorrhage (clinical)
WHO study group 2006 [19]High (21222)MultipledMean 26.3Type: 32% TI, 37% TII, 31% TIII (gyn exam)
Age cut/by: not stated
Tears; cesarean section; episiotomy; hemorrhage (clinical)
Wuest et al. 2009 [20]Low (122) SwitzerlandMean 28.0Type: 17% TI, 24% TII, 48% TIII, 11% TIV (gyn exam).
Age cut/by: not stated
Prolonged labor; tears; cesarean section; episiotomy; instrumental delivery; hemorrhage (clinical)
Yount and Abraham 2007 [46]Moderate (1071) Kenya15–49Type: “had undergone FGC” (self-report)
Age cut/by: not stated
Cesarean section (self-report)
Yount and Carrera 2006 [47]Low aEgypt17–55Type: 4% TI, 73% TII, 23% TIV (self-report)
Age cut/by: mode 9-10 yrs/93% tc, 4% hcp
Pregnancy loss (self-report): 39% TI, 42% TII, 43% TIV

Legend: Method: Methodological; TI: FGM/C type I; TII: FGM/C type II; TIII: FGM/C type III; TIV: FGM/C type IV; gyn exam: FGM/C status verified through gynecological examination; self-report: FGM/C status based on self-report; hcp: health care provider; tc: traditional circumciser; adifferent types of FGM/C were compared; bJones et al. 1999 [15] consists of two studies, reported in same publication; cAustralia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, Norway, and Sweden; dBurkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Sudan, and Senegal.