About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 560682, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/560682
Review Article

Protective Mechanisms of Green Tea Polyphenols in Skin

1Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106-5028, USA
2Department of Dermatology, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

Received 9 February 2012; Accepted 25 April 2012

Academic Editor: Luciano  Pirola

Copyright © 2012 Patricia OyetakinWhite et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Skin is frequently exposed to a variety of environmental, chemical, and genotoxic agents that contribute to disease and carcinogenesis. Ultraviolet light (UVR) is the main external stress that leads to immunosuppresion, oxidative stress, premature aging, and tumor formation. Scientists and health professionals emphasize the importance of prevention strategies to circumvent such unfavorable outcomes. Plant polyphenols are a promising approach to disease prevention and treatment. Green tea is an abundant source of plant polyphenols that exhibit significant antioxidant, chemopreventive, and immunomodulatory effects in protecting the skin.

1. Introduction

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a major environmental source of damage to the skin. Its effect on the skin’s biology and immune system plays a major role in photoaging, inflammation and carcinogenesis [1]. Approximately 3.5 million skin cancers are diagnosed annually in the United States and the incidence of nonmelanoma (NMSC) increased dramatically from 1996 to 2006 [2]. The morbidity and economic burden of this malignancy is significant as the estimated total direct costs for treatment of NMSC and melanoma are $1.5 billion and $249 million, respectively [3, 4]. Sun avoidance, regular use of sunscreen, and protective clothing are the recommended methods of preventing UVR-induced damage but patient compliance is a major challenge. For example, a recent study by Buller and colleagues surveyed 4837 adult skiers and snowboarders about their sunscreen use and reapplication. Only 4.4% of adults were compliant with the recommended guidelines of applying sunscreen up to 30 minutes before sun exposure and reapplication every 2 hours [5]. Therefore there is a need to identify additional photoprotection strategies to engage the community at-large about the importance and benefits of sun protection.

In the last few decades there has been a dramatic increase in the use of plant and herbal supplements as people are seeking different methods of disease prevention [6]. Green tea consumption has become a popular trend in western cultures as its beneficial effects in human disease have shown promising results. Scientists searching for alternatives to preventing and treating disease have recognized its powerful beneficial effects in many organ systems. Green tea extracts were found to be effective at suppressing environmentally induced breast cancer [7], inhibiting T lymphocyte expansion in autoimmune diseases [8], and suppressing inflammatory responses in coronary vessels in rodent experiments [9]. Favorable results have also been demonstrated in skin disease and carcinogenesis. Recent in vitro and in vivo animal and human skin studies also showed its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, photoprotective, and chemopreventative effects after topical application and oral consumption [1014]. This review will discuss the chemical properties of green tea that make it effective in skin biology and immunology and how its mechanisms of action play a role in antioxidant, photoprotective and chemopreventative functions in the skin.

2. Background

Polyphenols are naturally occurring chemicals derived from plants, fruits, nuts, and vegetables. They have been proven to have many beneficial health benefits. Being widely abundant and relatively inexpensive, the use of polyphenols is highly attractive to researchers as a strategy for a cost-effective alternative to current pharmacologic therapeutics [15]. Tea is an important dietary source of plant polyphenols and next to water it is the second most commonly consumed beverage in the world. It is produced mainly from a single plant species Camellia sinensis. The tea plant originated in Southeast Asia over 4,000 years ago and is currently produced in over 35 countries with China, India, Sri Lanka, and Kenya generating three-quarters of the world’s production. The six different types of tea (white, yellow, green, oolong, black, and post fermented teas) are categorized based on the wilting and enzymatic oxidization that takes place during processing [16].

There are three main types of polyphenols (flavonoids, stilbenes, and lignans) that are classified by the number of phenol rings they contain and the binding properties of the ring structures. The phenol rings are comprised of phenyl and hydroxyl group structures that possess anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties [17]. Each class of polyphenols can be further subclassified by the interactions of their respective phenyl rings to carbon, oxygen, and organic acid molecules [18]. This creates the huge diversity of polyphenol compounds that can be found in many naturally occurring food products. Flavonoids are divided into 6 subclasses: flavonols, flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, anthocyanidins, and flavanols. Majority of the green tea polyphenols (GTPPs) are monomeric flavanols called catechins. The four main catechin compounds are (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), (−)-epigallocatechin (EGC), (−)-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG), and (−)-epicatechin (EC) (Figure 1). EGCG is the most abundant and extensively studied catechin with potent therapeutic effects in skin.

fig1
Figure 1: Structure of green tea polyphenols.

3. Skin Damaging Effects of Ultraviolet Light

Sunlight is an important source of energy to sustain life. However, except for vitamin D synthesis, it has several harmful effects to the skin. Solar UVR can be divided into three categories based on wavelength: UVA (320–400 nm), UVB (280–320 nm), and UVC (<280 nm). High energy short wavelength UVC (<280 nm) and a portion of UVB (280–295 nm) are absorbed by the ozone layer and atmosphere; therefore it does not reach the Earth’s surface where it is capable of causing extreme damage to DNA and biomolecular molecules [19]. Longer wavelength UVB (295–320 nm) makes up only 5–10% of atmospheric UVR but it has been implicated in a variety of skin diseases, nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancers. DNA is a chromophore for UVB and this direct interaction produces cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6–4) mutagenic photoproducts that lead to tumor initiation and tumor promotion [2022]. UVB also has indirect detrimental effects on the skin’s immune system, oxidative stress responses, and photoaging [22, 23].

UVA radiation is far more abundant (90%) and penetrates much deeper into the epidermis and dermis of the skin. It is weakly absorbed by DNA but reacts with other nonDNA chromophores that lead to the formation of ROS which damage DNA, proteins, and lipids in the skin [2426]. Singlet molecular oxygen produced by UVA targets DNA base guanine producing 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-odHG) which is an important marker of oxidative stress [27, 28]. With the increased use of high-intensity UVA tanning booths and UVB-absorbing sunscreens, human exposure to UVA has become a public health concern [29]. UVA-induced mutagenesis is still an area of debate; however, it is clear it plays a significant role in producing bipyrimidine photoproducts that have genotoxic effects [30]. In vivo human studies have also demonstrated the immunosuppressive effects of UVA and its increasing role in carcinogenesis [31]. In order to avoid potential mutations, UVR-induced DNA lesions are repaired by nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER) mechanisms before DNA replication occurs. Additionally, stress signals created by UVR trigger protective signaling responses in the cell membrane, nucleus, and mitochondria that lead to cell cycle arrest or apoptosis [3234]. Chronic and excessive UVR exposure overwhelms and depletes these cutaneous defense mechanisms. Therefore, compounds with antioxidant and cell repair potential are promising additions to our sun protection armamentarium.

4. Oral Consumption and Topical Application of GTPP

Human and animal studies using both topical and oral preparations of GTPP have shown significant protective effects against UV-induced skin damage and immunosuppression. As an external organ system, skin allows for direct pharmacological intervention with topical products. This mode of delivery also minimizes the potential for systemic toxicity. Topical application of EGCG in a hydrophilic ointment demonstrated better photoprotective properties versus oral consumption in mice [35]. In this in vivo study, topical application provided significantly greater benefit against UVB irradiation-induced depletion of antioxidant enzymes and signaling protein phosphorylation. These photoprotective functions of GTPP may be mediated through interactions with inflammatory signaling molecules. Upon UVR exposure Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is known to enhance NER enzyme activity in keratinocytes [36]. Meeran et al. proposed an IL-12-dependent mechanism of DNA repair by topically applied EGCG [37]. In this study, UV-induced suppression of CHS responses was maintained in IL-12 knockout mice in comparison to wild type mice. Subcutaneous injection with IL-12 three hours prior to UV exposure in the IL-12 knockout mice diminished the amount of CPD positive cells produced in contrast to the untreated group. Earlier studies using topical and orally consumed GTPP in mice decreased UVR-induced carcinogenesis, by inhibiting the activity of chemical tumor initiators and promoters [3840].

Recent studies by Katiyar et al. demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in UVR-induced immunosuppression via contact hypersensitivity response (CHS) to 2, 4-dinitrofluorobenzene in mice that were fed purified GTE [41]. This decrease in immunosuppression was persistent 4 weeks after resumption of a normal liquid diet in the animals. The authors further demonstrated that GTPs in drinking water of UV-irradiated mice reduced the migration of CPD positive cells to lymph nodes and improved the NER mechanisms. Similar results were seen in adult human subjects that ingested 7.5 mg of pure (commercially available) green tea brewed in 540 mL of boiling water. There was a significant decrease in UVR-induced DNA damage of peripheral white blood cells [42, 43]. Human studies using topically applied GTPP prior to exposure with 2-MED of SSR demonstrated a decrease in SSR-induced erythema, DNA damage, Langerhans cell damage, and production of 8-OHdG in healthy human subjects [44, 45].

5. Toxicity of GTPP

In general, GTPP has been shown to be well tolerated in animal and human trials. Topical preparations have the least harmful effects with minor irritation being the most significant finding [46]; however, adverse effects of oral consumption have been demonstrated. In a 9-month chronic study in fasting Beagle dogs, oral ingestion of green tea extract capsules caused unexpected morbidity and mortality (16 deaths out of 24 treated animals) in the treated versus control group resulting in early termination of the study group [47]. Clinical signs of toxicity, weight loss were observed as early by day 9 of this chronic study group with fasting animals. Follow-up studies by the authors demonstrated more favorable results when the green tea capsules were administered in a fed state. Although the exact mechanism of the toxicity was not determined, the authors suggested gastrointestinal irritation, organ, and hematologic evidence of immune-mediated hemolysis may have played a role in the toxicity of ingesting a capsular form of the green tea extracts. Studies by Isbrucker et al., where mice were fed liquid and powered purified green tea extracts, did not show any genotoxic effects [48].

In vitro culture experiments by Navarro-Peran et al. showed that EGCG inhibits the activity of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) which is an important enzyme in nucleotide biosynthesis [49]. The authors suggested that this effective inhibition provides evidence for EGCG’s chemotherapeutic mechanism of action. Their results provide an interesting insight into the reported association of maternal tea consumption and neural tube defects [50]. There are a limited number of published studies showing this teratogenic effect especially given the large amount of tea consumed globally. Experiments evaluating reproductive and developmental toxicity of EGCG in rats did not show teratogenic effects [51].

6. Antioxidant Activity of GTPP in Skin

The skin has a complex defense system to deal with harmful environmental and chemical substances but excessive or chronic exposure can overwhelm the system leading to oxidative stress and oxidative damage. In cells, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are formed during the energy-producing process of reducing molecular oxygen to water. These are superoxide radicals ( ), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (OH). An overproduction of ROS depletes physiologic ROS-scavenging enzymes (superoxide dismutase, and catalase) which cause damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA [52] that contribute to skin diseases, immunosuppression, and development of skin cancer. GTPPs have been shown to be effective in curbing these harmful effects because their chemical structures can chelate metal ions and decrease free radical damage to cellular structures [53, 54].

Photoaging is caused by chronic UV exposure. In vitro studies using cultured human skin fibroblasts pretreated with GTPP showed a decrease in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced ROS. In this study, the authors demonstrated the ability of GTPP to improve fibroblast cell shape and absolute cell numbers when compared to control groups [10]. To assess the effect of GTE on lipid peroxidation (LPO), Jorge et al. conducted an in vitro assay using liposomal phophatidylcholine structure. They demonstrated a significant decrease in the concentration of hydroperoxides after a 3-hour reaction with an oxidative compound [55].

The inhibitory effect of GTPP on hydrogen peroxide formation and cell signaling is paramount to its antioxidant properties. There are few in vivo human studies demonstrating this protective event. In 2001, Katiyar and colleagues demonstrated this protective effect in adult human volunteers exposed to a single dose of (4xMED) UV irradiation prior to topical EGCG administration [56]. These authors confirmed what is already known about EGCG inhibition of UV-induced H2O2, NO and LPO production. They also demonstrated blockage of UV-induced infiltration of ROS-producing CD11b+ cells and restoration of epidermal antioxidant enzymes reduced glutathione, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase.

7. Mechanism of Action of GTPP

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are a group of serine/threonine proteins that are involved in cellular functions in the skin including cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis [57]. These proteins include extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNK), and p38. MAPK signaling cascades and downstream effectors are triggered in response to UVR-induced oxidative and genotoxic stress. The activity of GTPP is likely due to free radical scavenging activity that prevents MAPK activation. Topical application of GTPP in SKH-1 hairless mice showed inhibition of UVB-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 expression [58]. These results were also seen in human dermal fibroblasts where EGCG inhibited the UVB-induced activation of these downstream effector pathways [59]. Bae et al. also demonstrated the attenuation of nuclear transcription factors c-Jun, p53, and c-fos within 30 mins of UVB irradiation of the cultured cells. UVB-generated hydrogen peroxide stimulates membrane epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) that activate ERK proteins which contribute to cell proliferation and differentiation that may be involved in tumor promotion [60]. Pretreatment of normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs) with EGCG prior to UVB exposure inhibited H2O2 production and phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 proteins [61]. Green tea extracts have been implicated in immunoregulatory signaling functions. Rodent experiments by Kim et al. demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in histamine production by peritoneal mast cells incubated with GTPP [62]. Further experiments by these authors proposed that the altered histamine release was due to a GTE-mediated decrease in cAMP and calcium levels which led to a NFκB and p38 MAPK-dependent inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines, TNF-α and IL-6. Table 1 lists the major cellular and molecular targets of GTPP on normal skin.

tab1
Table 1: Summary of effects of green tea polyphenols on skin.

8. Role of GTPP in Chemoprevention and Carcinogenesis

Cancer remains the second leading cause of death in the United States [15]. Studies have shown that 30–40% of all cases of cancers can be prevented by combining a healthy diet, exercise, and maintaining a healthy body weight, and more than 20% of all cases of cancer can be prevented just by consuming an ample and varied amount of fruits and vegetables [15, 63]. EGCG has been shown to inhibit tumor invasion and angiogenesis thereby preventing tumor growth and metastasis [64]. Dermatologists are considerably interested in green tea polyphenols (GTPP) as preventative products for skin cancer, as their use have shown promising results.

Skin cancer is the most common of all cancers; however it is very preventable and curable if diagnosed early. Chronic exposure to UVR is the key factor in initiating skin cancer. UVB radiation induces both direct and indirect biologic effects, including multiple effects on the immune system, inducing oxidative stress, and damaging DNA, all in which play an important role in the generation and maintenance of neoplasms [65]. In vitro and in vivo systems have both shown the protective effects from polyphenols on the biochemical processes that are induced or mediated by UV radiation, suggesting that routine use of polyphenols both topically and orally may provide effective protection against UV radiation and ultimately skin cancer [65].

Polyphenols are shown to possess anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant properties [65]. EGCG and green tea extract are non-toxic for humans and have a wide range of target organs making it significantly different than the standard form of preventative cancer drugs. Not only is EGCG widely distributed throughout the body, but studies also show that multiple oral administrations causes a synergistic effect leading to higher concentrations of EGCG in the cells. This effect was first seen in a study involving mice, where 3H-EGCG was administered and measured in the excretions. 24 hours after the intubation, radioactivity was still found in multiple organs including the skin. After multiple administrations of 3H-EGCG, radioactivity increased 4–9 times in most organs, suggesting that routine consumption or topical treatment may provide efficient protection against UV radiation in humans. These results eventually led to a study in humans, where researchers looked at green tea consumption and the average age of cancer onset. Cancer onset of male patients consuming more than 10 cups of green tea was approximately 3.2 years later than male patients who consumed less than 10 cups of green tea per day, and cancer onset for women drinking more than 10 cups of green tea per day was 7.3 years later. These results allowed researchers to determine the effective cancer preventative amount to be approximately 10 Japanese-size cups (120 mL/cup) of green tea per day, which is equivalent to about 2.5 g of green tea extract [66]. Another study observed that regular intake of EGCG increased the minimal dose of radiation required to induce erythema, suggesting that the EGCG is able to strengthen the skin’s tolerance by inhibiting the UV-induced skin damage from the radiation [65]. From these findings it can be seen that orally consumed EGCG has two different mechanisms of action and can act as both a chemopreventive and photochemopreventive drug; it can protect the body by suppressing, slowing down, and reversing the process of carcinogenesis, as well as protecting the skin from damaging radiation caused by harmful UVB rays.

As mentioned before, UVB radiation induces oxidative stress and DNA damage, and also affects the immune system. In separate experiments, it has been shown that topical treatments containing EGCG significantly inhibits acute or chronic UV irradiation-induced protein oxidation in the skin of mice, suggesting that GTTP’s may be able to reduce photo damage in the skin and prevent premature aging [45, 65, 67]. Another study showed that the pretreatment of mouse skin with EGCG inhibited UVB-induced infiltration of leukocytes, specifically CD11b+ cells in the skin which mediate UV-induced immunosuppression. These infiltrating leukocytes can be a potential source of H2O2 and NO which play important roles in initiating and promoting tumor cells. Less damage to the epidermal structure of the mouse skin was also observed with the topical application of EGCG before being exposed to UVB light. The data collected in this study demonstrated the potent preventative effects of topical EGCG in mice against UV radiation-induced infiltration of leukocytes, suggesting that GTTP’s may have preventative effects against the development of skin cancer in humans [68]. Inflammatory responses are implicated in skin disease, tumorigenesis, and tumor metastasis. EGCG effectively inhibited human melanoma cell culture growth by decreasing IL-1β secretion and NFκB activity [69].

9. Concluding Remarks

As discussed in this paper, GTPPs have important antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and photoprotective functions. Their ability to modulate critical biochemical functions through topical and oral formulations makes GTPPs a promising candidate for chemoprevention and treatment of disease. Future collaborative studies are needed to clarify optimum dosing amounts that will provide therapeutic benefits.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. J. Hildesheim and A. J. Fornace, “The dark side of light: the damaging effects of UV rays and the protective efforts of MAP kinase signaling in the epidermis,” DNA Repair, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 567–580, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. W. Rogers, M. A. Weinstock, A. R. Harris et al., “Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States, 2006,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 283–287, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. R. Bickers, H. W. Lim, D. Margolis et al., “The burden of skin diseases: 2004. A joint project of the American Academy of Dermatology Association and the Society for Investigative Dermatology,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 490–500, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. M. Seidler, M. L. Pennie, E. Veledar, S. D. Culler, and S. C. Chen, “Economic burden of melanoma in the elderly population: population-based analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-medicare data,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. B. Buller, P. A. Andersen, B. J. Walkosz et al., “Compliance with sunscreen advice in a survey of adults engaged in outdoor winter recreation at high-elevation ski areas,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. P. Kelly, D. W. Kaufman, K. Kelley, L. Rosenberg, T. E. Anderson, and A. A. Mitchell, “Recent trends in use of herbal and other natural products,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Rathore and H.-C. R. Wang, “Green tea catechin extract in intervention of chronic breast cell carcinogenesis induced by environmental carcinogens,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 280–289, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Wu, J. Wang, M. Pae, and S. N. Meydani, “Green tea EGCG, T cells, and T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 107–118, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. L. Shen, C. Samathanam, O. L. Tatum et al., “Green tea polyphenols avert chronic inflammation-induced myocardial fibrosis of female rats,” Inflammation Research, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 665–672, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. I. Silverberg, J. Jagdeo, M. Patel, D. Siegel, and N. Brody, “Green tea extract protects human skin fibroblasts from reactive oxygen species induced necrosis,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1096–1101, 2011.
  11. D. S. Domingo, M. M. Camouse, A. H. Hsia et al., “Anti-angiogenic effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate in human skin,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 705–709, 2010. View at Scopus
  12. Y.-H. Hong, E. Y. Jung, K.-S. Shin et al., “Photoprotective effects of a formulation containing tannase-converted green tea extract against UVB-induced oxidative stress in hairless mice,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 165–175, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. T. Singh and S. K. Katiyar, “Green tea catechins reduce invasive potential of human melanoma cells by targeting COX-2, PGE2 receptors and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 10, Article ID e25224, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. D. Liu, S. H. Chen, C. L. Lin, S. H. Tsai, and Y. C. Liang, “Inhibition of melanoma growth and metastasis by combination with (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and dacarbazine in mice,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 631–642, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. R. M. R. Amin, O. Kucuk, F. R. Khuri, and D. M. Shin, “Perspectives for cancer prevention with natural compounds,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 2712–2725, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. N. Graham, “Green tea composition, consumption, and polyphenol chemistry,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 334–350, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Del Rio, L. G. Costa, M. E. J. Lean, and A. Crozier, “Polyphenols and health: what compounds are involved?” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Manach, A. Scalbert, C. Morand, C. Rémésy, and L. Jiménez, “Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 727–747, 2004. View at Scopus
  19. F. R. De Gruijl, “Skin cancer and solar UV radiation,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 2003–2009, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. L. Mitchell, “The relative cytotoxicity of (6-4) photoproducts and cyclobutane dimers in mammalian cells,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 1988. View at Scopus
  21. G. A. Garinis, J. R. Mitchell, M. J. Moorhouse et al., “Transcriptome analysis reveals cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers as a major source of UV-induced DNA breaks,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 24, no. 22, pp. 3952–3962, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Wang, V. S. Shirure, M. M. Burdick, and S. Wu, “UVB-irradiation regulates VLA-4-mediated melanoma cell adhesion to endothelial VCAM-1 under flow conditions,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 58–65, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. L. Walker and A. R. Young, “An action spectrum (290-320 nm) for TNFα protein in human skin in vivo suggests that basal-layer epidermal DNA is the chromophore,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 48, pp. 19051–19054, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Sage, P.-M. Girard, and S. Francesconi, “Unravelling UVA-induced mutagenesis,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. T. M. Rünger and U. P. Kappes, “Mechanisms of mutation formation with long-wave ultraviolet light (UVA),” Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. F. R. De Gruijl, “Photocarcinogenesis: UVA vs. UVB radiation,” Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Physiology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 316–320, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Cadet, T. Douki, J. L. Ravanat, and P. Di Mascio, “Sensitized formation of oxidatively generated damage to cellular DNA by UVA radiation,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 903–911, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Cadet and T. Douki, “Oxidatively generated damage to DNA by UVA radiation in cells and human skin,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1005–1007, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. W. Lim, W. D. James, D. S. Rigel, M. E. Maloney, J. M. Spencer, and R. Bhushan, “Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation from the use of indoor tanning equipment: time to ban the tan,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 893–902, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Douki, A. Reynaud-Angelin, J. Cadet, and E. Sage, “Bipyrimidine photoproducts rather than oxidative lesions are the main type of DNA damage involved in the genotoxic effect of solar UVA radiation,” Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 30, pp. 9221–9226, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. D. Baron, A. Fourtanier, D. Compan, C. Medaisko, K. D. Cooper, and S. R. Stevens, “High ultraviolet A protection affords greater immune protection confirming that ultraviolet A contributes to photoimmunosuppression in humans,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 869–875, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. Pustišek and M. Šitum, “Uv-radiation, apoptosis and skin,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 35, no. 2, supplement 2, pp. 339–341, 2011.
  33. R. P. Rastogi, K. A. Richa, M. B. Tyagi, and R. P. Sinha, “Molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage and repair,” Journal of Nucleic Acids, vol. 2010, Article ID 592980, 32 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. S. Courdavault, C. Baudouin, M. Charveron et al., “Repair of the three main types of bipyrimidine DNA photoproducts in human keratinocytes exposed to UVB and UVA radiations,” DNA Repair, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 836–844, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. K. Vayalil, C. A. Elments, and S. K. Katiyar, “Treatment of green tea polyphenols in hydrophilic cream prevents UVB-induced oxidation of lipids and proteins, depletion of antioxidant enzymes and phosphorylation of MAPK proteins in SKH-1 hairless mouse skin,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 927–936, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Schwarz, S. Ständer, M. Berneburg et al., “Interleukin-12 suppresses ultraviolet radiation-induced apoptosis by inducing DNA repair,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. M. Meeran, S. K. Mantena, and S. K. Katiyar, “Prevention of ultraviolet radiation—induced immunosuppression by (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in mice is mediated through interleukin 12-dependent DNA repair,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 7, part 1, pp. 2272–2280, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Z. Y. Wang, R. Agarwal, D. R. Bickers, and H. Mukhtar, “Protection against ultraviolet B radiation-induced photocarcinogenesis in hairless mice by green tea polyphenols,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1527–1530, 1991. View at Scopus
  39. W. A. Khan, Z. Y. Wang, M. Athar, D. R. Bickers, and H. Mukhtar, “Inhibition of the skin tumorigenicity of (±)-7β,8α-dihydroxy-9α,10α-epoxy-7,8,9,10- tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene by tannic acid, green tea polyphenols and quercetin in Sencar mice,” Cancer Letters, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 7–12, 1988. View at Scopus
  40. Z. Y. Wang, W. A. Khan, D. R. Bickers, and H. Mukhtar, “Protection against polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced skin tumor initiation in mice by green tea polyphenols,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 411–415, 1989. View at Scopus
  41. S. K. Katiyar, M. Vaid, H. Van Steeg, and S. M. Meeran, “Green tea polyphenols prevent uv-induced immunosuppression by rapid repair of DNA damage and enhancement of nucleotide excision repair genes,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. Malhomme de la Roche, S. Seagrove, A. Mehta, P. Divekar, S. Campbell, and A. Curnow, “Using natural dietary sources of antioxidants to protect against ultraviolet and visible radiation-induced DNA damage: an investigation of human green tea ingestion,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 169–173, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. N. Morley, T. Clifford, L. Salter, S. Campbell, D. Gould, and A. Curnow, “The green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin gallate and green tea can protect human cellular DNA from ultraviolet and visible radiation-induced damage,” Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. A. Elmets, D. Singh, K. Tubesing, M. Matsui, S. Katiyar, and H. Mukhtar, “Cutaneous photoprotection from ultraviolet injury by green tea polyphenols,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 425–432, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. M. Camouse, D. S. Domingo, F. R. Swain et al., “Topical application of green and white tea extracts provides protection from solar-simulated ultraviolet light in human skin,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 522–526, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. A. Isbrucker, J. A. Edwards, E. Wolz, A. Davidovich, and J. Bausch, “Safety studies on epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) preparations. Part 2: dermal, acute and short-term toxicity studies,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 636–650, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. I. M. Kapetanovic, J. A. Crowell, R. Krishnaraj, A. Zakharov, M. Lindeblad, and A. Lyubimov, “Exposure and toxicity of green tea polyphenols in fasted and non-fasted dogs,” Toxicology, vol. 260, no. 1–3, pp. 28–36, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. A. Isbrucker, J. Bausch, J. A. Edwards, and E. Wolz, “Safety studies on epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) preparations. Part 1: genotoxicity,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 626–635, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. E. Navarro-Perán, J. Cabezas-Herrera, F. García-Cánovas, M. C. Durrant, R. N. F. Thorneley, and J. N. Rodríguez-López, “The antifolate activity of tea catechins,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2059–2064, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Correa, A. Stolley, and Y. Liu, “Prenatal tea consumption and risks of anencephaly and spina bifida,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 476–477, 2000.
  51. R. A. Isbrucker, J. A. Edwards, E. Wolz, A. Davidovich, and J. Bausch, “Safety studies on epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) preparations. Part 3: teratogenicity and reproductive toxicity studies in rats,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 651–661, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Ott, V. Gogvadze, S. Orrenius, and B. Zhivotovsky, “Mitochondria, oxidative stress and cell death,” Apoptosis, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 913–922, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. S. Yang, J. D. Lambert, and S. Sang, “Antioxidative and anti-carcinogenic activities of tea polyphenols,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. H. Wei, Q. Ca, R. Rahn, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, and M. Lebwohl, “DNA structural integrity and base composition affect ultraviolet light-induced oxidative DNA damage,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 18, pp. 6485–6490, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. T. S. Jorge, K. F. Arroteia, J. C. Lago, V. M. De Sá-Rocha, J. Gesztesi, and P. L. Moreira, “A new potent natural antioxidant mixture provides global protection against oxidative skin cell damage,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 113–119, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. K. Katiyar, F. Afaq, A. Perez, and H. Mukhtar, “Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate treatment of human skin inhibits ultraviolet radiation-induced oxidative stress,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 287–294, 2001. View at Scopus
  57. V. Muthusamy and T. J. Piva, “The UV response of the skin: a review of the MAPK, NFκB and TNFα signal transduction pathways,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 302, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. F. Afaq, N. Ahmad, and H. Mukhtar, “Suppression of UVB-induced phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and nuclear factor kappa B by green tea polyphenol in SKH-1 hairless mice,” Oncogene, vol. 22, no. 58, pp. 9254–9264, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. Y. Bae, J. S. Choi, Y. J. Choi et al., “(-)Epigallocatechin gallate hampers collagen destruction and collagenase activation in ultraviolet-B-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts: involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1298–1307, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. D. Peus, A. Meves, R. A. Vasa, A. Beyerle, T. O'Brien, and M. R. Pittelkow, “H2O2 is required for UVB-induced EGF receptor and downstream signaling pathway activation,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 27, no. 11-12, pp. 1197–1202, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. K. Katiyar, F. Afaq, K. Azizuddin, and H. Mukhtar, “Inhibition of UVB-induced oxidative stress-mediated phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in cultured human epidermal keratinocytes by green tea polyphenol ( - )-epigallocatechin-3-gallate,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 110–117, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. H. Kim, C. D. Jun, K. Suk et al., “Gallic acid inhibits histamine release and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in mast cells,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 123–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. J. Glade, “Food, nutrition, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective,” Nutrition, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 523–526, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. Y. D. Jung and L. M. Ellis, “Inhibition of tumour invasion and angiogenesis by epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a major component of green tea,” International Journal of Experimental Pathology, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 309–316, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. J. A. Nichols and S. K. Katiyar, “Skin photoprotection by natural polyphenols: anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and DNA repair mechanisms,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 71–83, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. H. Fujiki, “Green tea: health benefits as cancer preventive for humans,” Chemical Record, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 119–132, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. S. K. Katiyar, A. Perez, and H. Mukhtar, “Green tea polyphenol treatment to human skin prevents formation of ultraviolet light B-induced pyrimidine dimers in DNA,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 3864–3869, 2000. View at Scopus
  68. S. K. Katiyar and H. Mukhtar, “Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate treatment to mouse skin prevents UVB-induced infiltration of leukocytes, depletion of antigen-presenting cells, and oxidative stress,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 719–726, 2001. View at Scopus
  69. L. Z. Ellis, W. Liu, Y. Luo et al., “Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate suppresses melanoma growth by inhibiting inflammasome and IL-1beta secretion,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 414, no. 3, pp. 551–556, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar