About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 308358, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/308358
Research Article

Influence of Block of NF-Kappa B Signaling Pathway on Oxidative Stress in the Liver Homogenates

1Experimental and Clinical Physiology, Department of Cardiovascular Physiology, Medical University of Lodz, 6/8 Mazowiecka Street, 92-215 Lodz, Poland
2Department of Biochemical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, 1 Muszynskiego Street, 91-151 Lodz, Poland
3Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostic and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Biochemical Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, 1 Muszynskiego Street, 91-151 Lodz, Poland

Received 27 October 2012; Revised 18 February 2013; Accepted 19 February 2013

Academic Editor: Ron Kohen

Copyright © 2013 Paulina Kleniewska et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess whether BAY 11-7082, a nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) inhibitor, influences the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and NF-κB related signaling pathways in the liver. The animals were divided into 4 groups: I: saline; II: saline + endothelin-1 (ET-1) (1.25 μg/kg b.w., i.v.); III: saline + ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w., i.v.); and IV: BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w., i.v.) + ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w., i.v.). Injection of ET-1 alone at a dose of 12.5 μg/kg b.w. showed a significant ( ) increase in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) level and decrease ( ) in GSH level (vs. control). ET-1 administration slightly downregulated gene expression of p65 of NF-κB but potently and in a dose-dependent way downregulated p21-cip gene expression in the liver. BAY 11-7082 significantly decreased TBARS ( ), H2O2 ( ) and improved the redox status ( ), compared to ET-1 group. The concentration of TNF-α was increased in the presence of ET-1 ( ), while BAY 11-7082 decreased TNF-α concentration ( ). Inhibition of IkBα before ET-1 administration downregulated gene expression of p21-cip but had no effect on p65.

1. Introduction

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor polypeptide containing 21 amino acids. It was originally isolated from the culture supernatant of porcine aortic endothelial cells by Yanagisawa et al. [1]. However, ET-1 has been shown to exert a variety of biological actions in many different cell types including endothelial cells [2, 3]. The known hepatic cellular sources of ET-1 is the liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, the hepatic stellate cells, and the Kupffer cells [4].

ET-1 triggers its biological action after binding to ETA, ETB1, or ETB2 receptor. Each of those receptors is found in the liver with predominance of ETB over ETA receptor [59]. ET-1 acting via the ETA and ETB2 receptor causes a contraction of effector cells. On the contrary, ET-1 binding to ETB1 receptor on endothelial cells causes dependent relaxation of adjacent vascular smooth muscle cells and peritocytes.

Studies indicated that blood and tissue levels of ET-1 were enhanced in humans during liver inflammation [1014] and in animal models of liver ischemia-reperfusion [15, 16]. During pathological conditions, ET-1 production shifts from the sinusoidal endothelial cells to the hepatic stellate cells [16, 17]. Some authors speculate that the hepatic stellate cells are the primary “target” of ET-1 in the liver [8, 18]. Moreover, stellate cells, particularly during the liver injury, externalized far more ET-1 receptors than other liver cells [8, 18]. It has been indicated that ET-1 causes a contraction of the isolated stellate cells in culture [4, 19]. Moreover, systemic or intraportal infusion of ET-1 narrows the sinusoidal lumen in the isolated perfused liver [20] as well as in the liver with afferent nerves. This action is speculated to be mediated via phospholipase C activation [2123].

Apart from its vasomotor action, ET-1-induced signaling via ETA receptor is characterized by a rapid induction of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) p65 subunit/mitogen activated phosphokinase p38 transcription complex. This molecular signaling leads to releasing of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and proinflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). TNF-α is known to cause increased production of ROS via NF-κB [24] and NF-κB dependent cell-cycle regulating pathways like p21-cip (cyclin dependant inhibitor) [25]. Expression of the p21-cip, a member of the Cip/Kip family, increases when cells are damaged. In addition p21 participates in DNA repair and apoptotic processes [26]. Furthermore, ROS accumulation under high TNF-α concentration increases the DNA-binding activity of NF-κB required for ET-1 in endothelial cells [27]. Therefore, the release of proinflammatory cytokines and activation of NF-κB and p21-cip may strongly intensify the inflammatory process and cell damage and contribute to the microvascular dysfunction and liver injury [14]. Moreover, TNF-α-induced ROS generation increases ET-1 gene transcription and ET-1 production [27, 28].

The aim of this study was to investigate whether pharmacological inhibition of NF-κB activation, a major regulator of inflammatory response, by BAY 11-7082 ameliorates liver dysfunction induced by exogenous ET-1 infusion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The experiments were performed under urethane anesthesia on male Wistar rats weighing 260–280 g and aged 2-3 months. The rats were acquired from the Medical University of Lodz Animal Quarters and were housed in individual cages under standard laboratory conditions: 12/12 h light-dark cycle (light on at 7.00 a.m.) at ambient temperature and % air humidity. All animals received a standard laboratory diet and water ad libitum. All animals were maintained for 1 week in the laboratory for adaptation. The experimental procedures followed the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals, and were approved by the Medical University of Lodz Ethics Committee number 20/L418/2008.

2.2. Experimental Design

Animals were randomly divided into four groups: (1) control group ( ): rats received i.v. two doses of 0.2 mL saline, 30 min apart; (2) and (3) endothelin-1 groups ( ): ET-1 at a dose of 1.25 μg/kg b.w. and 12.5 μg/kg b.w., respectively, was injected i.v. 60 min after saline administration; (4) BAY group ( ): BAY 11-7082 10 mg/kg b.w. was injected 60 min before ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) injection.

2.3. Animal Preparations

Animals were anaesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of 10% urethane (2 mL/100 g b.w.). When a sufficient level of anesthesia was achieved, the skin and subcutaneous tissues on the neck were cut and then a 2 cm-long polyethylene tube (2.00 mm O.D.) was inserted into the trachea. The right femoral vein was catheterized for drug infusion.

2.4. Tissue Preparation and Collection of Samples

The animals were euthanized under anesthesia 5 hours after saline or ET-1 injection. The thoracic cavity was opened to remove the liver. Then the liver was cleaned of extraneous tissue. It was rinsed with cold isotonic saline, dried by blotting between two pieces of filter paper, and weighed on an electronic scale to estimate liver edema. The harvested liver was stored at − for measurement of oxidative parameters.

2.5. Preparation of Homogenates

An accurately weighed portion of liver (50 mg) was homogenized in either 0.15 M KCl for the estimation of lipid peroxidation and concentration of or in 5% SSA for the estimation of glutathione. Homogenates were centrifuged at , 10 min, and for glutathione measurement or at 3,500 rpm, , 15 min for lipid peroxidation assay. The resulting supernatant was used for biochemical analyses immediately.

2.6. Determination of Lipid Peroxidation

The formation of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) was used to quantify the degree of lipid peroxidation in tissues. The peroxidation product content in liver homogenates was assayed as TBARS and TBA-reactive substance concentration in the butanol layer were measured spectrofluorometrically using an LS-50 Perkin Elmer Luminescence Spectrometer (Norwalk, CT, U.S.A.). Excitation was set at 515 nm and emission was measured at 546 nm. The TBARS concentration in the sample was calculated by the use of the regression equation: , where = TBARS concentration (μM); , = fluorescence intensity of the samples and control, respectively (arbitrary units: AU). The regression equation was prepared from triplicate assays of six increasing concentrations of tetramethoxypropane (range 0.01 to 50 μM) as a standard for TBARS. Finally, the results were calculated for 50 mg of the liver tissue.

2.7. Determination of H2O2

The concentration in homogenates was measured using HRP/HVA systems. Samples were incubated for 60 min at after which the enzymatic reaction was stopped by adding 0.1 M glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 12.0) with 25 mM EDTA. Excitation was set at 312 nm and emission was measured at 420 nm (Perkin Elmer Luminescence Spectrometer, Beaconsfield UK). The readings were converted into a value for concentration using the regression equation: , where concentration in a homogenate (μM); = intensity of light emission at 420 nm for HRP + HVA assay reduced by HRP assay emission (arbitrary units: AU). The regression equation was prepared from three series of calibration experiments with 10 increasing concentrations (range 10–1,000 μM). The lowest detection was 0.1 nM, with intra-assay variability not exceeding 2%.

2.8. Determination of GSH Levels

Total glutathione (tGSH), reduced glutathione (GSH), and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were measured in the hepatic tissue homogenates. The total GSH content of the supernatant was measured in a 1 mL cuvette containing 0.7 mL of 0.2 mM NADPH, 0.1 mL of 0.6 mM DTNB, 0.150 mL of , and 50 μL of the sample. The cuvette with the mixture was incubated for 5 min at and then supplemented with 0.6 U of GR. The reaction kinetics was traced spectrophotometrically at 412 nm for 5 min by monitoring the increase in absorbance. GSSG concentration was determined in supernatant aliquots using the same protocol after optimization of pH to 6-7 with 1 M TEA and derivatization of endogenous GSH with 2-vinylpyridine (v : v). The reduced GSH level in the supernatant was calculated as the difference between total GSH and GSSG. The increments in absorbance at 412 nm were converted to GSH and GSSG concentrations using a standard curve (3.2–500 μM of GSH for total GSH and 0.975–60 μM of GSSG for GSSG). The results were expressed in μM.

2.9. GSH/GSSG Redox Ratio

The redox ratio of the ET-1 or BAY treated/untreated samples was calculated by dividing the reduced glutathione content over the oxidized glutathione content of their respective samples.

2.10. Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Assay

The concentration of TNF-α in the liver homogenates was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) commercial Kit (Quantikine, R&D System, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were read using a TEK Instruments EL340 BIO-spectrophotometer (Winooski VT, USA) (  nm). The lowest limit of detection for TNF-α was 0.037 pg/mL. The proper TNF-α concentration was read from a standard curve and expressed in pg/mL.

2.11. RNA Isolation and RT-PCR for p65 and p21

RNA was isolated by Total RNA Prep Plus Minicolumn Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland) based on RNA isolation method developed earlier [29]. For real-time PCR normalization UV absorbance was used to determine the amount of RNA added to a cDNA reaction. PCRs are then set up using cDNA derived from the same amount of input RNA. The isolated RNA has an A260/280 ratio of 1.6–1.8. Before the quantitative analysis of gene expression by real-time PCR reaction, the parameters were checked using qualitative PCR. PCR reaction mixture for PCR amplification consisted of a cDNA template, 0.5 μM of each primer, 10 × AccuTaq Buffer, 0.5 U of AccuTaq LA DNA Polymerase Mix, 0.2 mM each dNTP, water to a final volume of 20 μL. Negative control was included in each experiment (sample without a cDNA template).

Real-time PCR reactions were done using Rotorgene 6,000 (Corbett Life Science). The p65 gene and a reference Bactin were amplified parallel for each sample in separate wells, during the same PCR, the same experiment for pair of genes p21 and Bactin. The primers sequences for investigated genes p65 and p21 and also for reference gene Bactin were planned by using software Primer3: WWW primer tool (http://biotools.umassmed.edu/bioapps/primer3_www.cgi). The primers were as follows: Bactin (forward primer: 5′-gTg ggg CgC CCC Agg CAC CA-3′, reverse primer: 5′-CTC CTT AAT gTC ACg CAC gAT TTC-3′), p21-cip (forward primer 5′-TTg CAC TCT ggT gTC TgA gC-3′, reverse primer: 5′-AAT CTG TCA GGC TGG TCT GC-3′), p65 (forward primer. 5′-ACAACCCCTTCCAAGTTCCCT-3′, and reverse primer: 5′-TGGTCCCGTGAAATACACCT-3′).

Bactin was utilized as an internal positive control and as a normalizer for expression data correction. The thermal cycling conditions comprised an initial denaturation step at for 2 min, 35 cycles at for 30 s, (p65), (p21) for 30 s and for 30 s, and a final extension step at for 3 min. The relative levels of p21 and p65 expression were calculated as described previously [30].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. if not stated otherwise, from 8 animals in each group. The statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test as post hoc. values lower than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of ET-1 and BAY 11-7082 on Stress Oxidative Parameters and TNF-α Concentration

Changes in oxidative damage parameters are presented in Table 1. The administration of ET-1 at a dose of 12.5 μg/kg b.w. resulted in a significant increase in TBARS ( ) and ( ) concentrations as compared with the control group.

tab1
Table 1: Effect of administration of BAY 11-7082 on oxidative stress parameters in liver homogenates of rats with endothelin-1-induced endotoxemia. Mean ± S.E.M. ( ).

BAY 11-7082 administered 1 hour before ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w., i.v.) significantly decreased TBARS ( ) and ( ) levels as well as improved the redox status ( ) in the liver, compared to ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group (Table 1).

Intravenous administration of endothelin-1 at both doses 1.25 or 12.5 μg/kg b.w. resulted in a significant decrease in total glutathione (tGSH) ( , resp.) and reduced glutathione (GSH) concentrations ( ; resp.) as compared to saline-treated controls. Treatment of rats with BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg) and endothelin-1 (12.5 μg/kg) significantly enhanced the endothelin-1-induced decrease in tGSH and GSH concentrations in comparison with endothelin-1 group in both doses: 1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w. ( ) (Figure 1).

308358.fig.001
Figure 1: Liver status of the glutathione metabolism in the control group, the endothelin-1 groups, (1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg/b.w.) and BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w.) administered 1 hour before ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group ( , per group). Data is shown as mean ± S.E.M. ET-1-endothelin-1 at doses of 1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.; BAY+ET-1-BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w.) administered 1 hour before endothelin-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group; tGSH-total glutathione; GSH-reduced glutathione; GSSG-oxidized glutathione. , , , and   versus saline; , , , and   versus BAY 11-7082 + ET-1; ,   versus ET-1 (1.25 μg/kg b.w).

The redox status (GSH/GSSG ratio), an oxidative stress indicator, was found to be significantly reduced in ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group as compared to saline treated controls ( ) and significantly increased in BAY11-7082 + ET-1 groups as compared to ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group ( ) (Table 1).

Figure 2 shows that 5 hours after ET-1 administration the liver concentration of TNF-α was significantly increased versus control group ( ). By contrast, the level of hepatic TNF-alpha was significantly diminished in the BAY11-7082 + ET-1 group as compared to ET-1 group (  pg/mL versus  pg/mL; ).

308358.fig.002
Figure 2: TNF- concentration in liver homogenates in the control group, after endothelin-1 (1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.) and BAY 11-7082 + endothelin-1 (10 mg/kg b.w. and 12.5 μg/kg b.w., resp.) group. ( , per group). Data is shown as mean ± S.E.M. ET-1-endothelin-1 at doses of 1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.; BAY+ET-1-BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w.) administered 1 hour before ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group; TNF-α-tumor necrosis factor;   versus ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg).
3.2. Effect of ET-1 and BAY 11-7082 on p21 and p65 Gene Expression

All investigated cases for both genes were checked by qualitative PCR. In all cases expression of p21 and p65 was observed. Our results indicated a downregulation of p21-cip gene expression after ET-1 administration in the liver. The effect of ET-1 was dose-dependent and the 10-fold higher ET-1 dose caused a 5-fold decrease in p21-cip gene expression when compared to the control. The inhibition of NF-κB with BAY 11-7082 did not entirely prevent ET-1-induced downregulation of p21-cip; however, its expression was markedly diminished (Figure 3).

308358.fig.003
Figure 3: The p65 and p21-cip relative gene expression in the control group, after endothelin-1 (1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.) and BAY 11-7082 + endothelin-1 (10 mg/kg b.w. and 12.5 μg/kg b.w., resp.) group. ( , per group). Data is shown as mean ± S.E.M.

Analysis of p65 mRNA level is presented in Figure 3. The ET-1 infusion had a biphasic effect on p65 mRNA level. The lower dose of ET-1 (1.25 μg/kg) strongly downregulated p65 mRNA level, while 10-fold greater ET-1 dose exerted a weaker downregulated effect. Inhibition of Iκ-Bα degradation with BAY 11-7082 before ET-1 administration prevented changes in p65 mRNA level, therefore, indicating a successful inhibition of NF-κB signaling pathway.

4. Discussion

In this study, the administration of ET-1 to rats resulted in a development of oxidative damage in the liver tissue accompanied by a change in the gene expression of p65 subunit of NF-κB and a dose-dependent down-regulation of p21-cip. Oxidative stress was reflected by an increase in the concentrations of TBARS, , and TNF-α, as well as a decrease in the redox status.

The increase in TBARS concentration in our study was a result of increased production of ROS which in turn led to an excessive peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, causing liver damage [9]. It has been previously reported that ET-1 stimulates ROS production by activation of neutrophils and Kupffer cells [9, 21]. ROS cause a dose-dependent formation of large intracellular gaps and reduce the diameter of the remaining endothelial fenestration. These events lead to hypoperfusion by deterioration of microcirculation, therefore contributing to hepatotoxic injury [14, 31, 32]. Moreover, microcirculatory disturbances are a reason for insufficient energy supply, alteration in the mitochondrial redox state and subsequent decline in hepatic tissue oxygenation [33]. In addition, ROS-induced liver injury is mediated by the direct effects of ROS on signal transduction pathway that is activated through oxidation kinases and phosphatases [34]. Here, the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and NF-κB pathways play a particular role. Our results support the hypothesis that the lipid peroxidation process causes liver cell damage after ET-1 infusion.

The increasing formation of ROS in our study was indicated by an increased concentration in the liver homogenates. , which is a major component of intracellular ROS during many physiological and pathological processes, causes oxidative damage of tissues. is formed during the superoxide anion dismutation. This radical possesses a low molecular weight; therefore, it easily penetrates the lipid membrane causing lipid peroxidation and disturbance in lipid homeostasis. The basic enzymes that regulate the intracellular concentration are catalase and glutathione peroxidase [35]. During oxidative stress, the concentration of those enzymes decline resulting in an intense conversion to toxic hydroxyl radicals. This effect supports our results for an increase in production after ET-1 administration. It has been previously shown that rats treated with had a higher liver lipid peroxidation level and increased protein damage [3638].

The most important intracellular non-protein thiol compound is reduced glutathione (GSH), which plays a major role in the protection of cells and tissue structures from oxidative injury [39]. In our study the decrease in GSH concentration after ET-1 administration indicated the development of oxidative stress in the liver cells.

The results of our studies reveal that ET-induced oxidative stress resulted in an enhanced TNF-α content in the liver homogenates. Kim et al. [40] showed that TNF-α elevation can be a marker of hepatitis B or C as its concentration increases greatly during liver injuries. Moreover, TNF-α stimulates the production of other cytokines that acting together leads to death of hepatocytes. ET-1-induced oxidative stress and TNF-α excretion activate NF-κB, which in turn increases the release of TNF-α, thereby contributing to liver injury [4143].

In our study ET-1-induced oxidative stress and ameliorated TNF-α level were accompanied by changes in the gene expression of p65 of NF-κB in the liver. We observed a downregulation of p65 gene expression five hours after ET-1 administration at a dose of 1.25 μg/kg and almost no inhibiting effect of the 10-fold higher ET-1 dose on p65 gene. Those results may be due to the fact of an early downregulation of NF-κB signaling pathway, as we showed a strong concomitant inhibition of NF-κB-regulated p21-cip gene [44]. Moreover, it was indicated previously that both ET-1 and TNF-α lead to a rapid and prolonged stimulation of p65 of NF-κB subunit and stronger binding to native preproET-1 promoter [45]. Also Gallois et al. [46] presented that ET-1 increases the formation of p50 and p65 of NF-κB DNA binding complexes and it increases the degradation of IkBα in hepatic stellate cells. Therefore, those changes may result in ameliorated ET-1 production and stronger expression of numerous cytokines, such as TNF-α [47].

In our study, we observed a dose-dependent effect of ET-1 regarding NF-κB-regulated p21-cip gene. When administrated at a dose of 1.25 μg/kg ET-1 downregulated p21 and this inhibition was stronger for a 10-times greater dose of ET-1. We speculate that this effect can be connected with ameliorated ROS and TNF-α concentration which had a negative feedback on the key cell cycle regulator and proapoptotic p21-cip pathway. Therefore, stronger oxidative stress observed after infusion of higher dose of ET-1 could have triggered a faster deprivation of gene expression for p21. Furthermore, an inhibition of p21 in hepatocytes was shown to be beneficial in mice model of cirrhosis leading to greater proliferation of hepatocytes which led to a larger liver mass and less architectural distortion [25]. However, further evaluation of p21-cip signaling in liver is needed to precise the role of p21 in liver diseases.

In our study, pharmacological inhibition of NF-κB signaling pathway, by IKKβ inhibitor BAY 11-7082, significantly lowered TBARS and concentration. The decrease in TBARS and concentration was a result of the diminished ROS production in the liver tissue. It is in line with Calabrò et al. [48] who indicated that BAY 11-7082 reduced reactive oxygen species in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Cho et el. [49] indicated that BAY 11-7082 inhibited ROS production and increased GSH levels in Kupffer cells. While Zanotto-Filho et al. [50] showed that BAY 11-7082 decreased retinol induced redox-dependent NF-κB-binding activity and p65 translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus.

In our study, BAY 11-7082 administration caused an increase in tGSH and GSH concentrations when compared to the ET-1 group. These data indicate that pretreatment with BAY 11-7082 can protect the liver during oxidative stress in part by improving the concentration of reduced glutathione, which scavenges ROS and reduces their detrimental effects. Similarly, Kumar et al. [51] demonstrated that diabetic rats treated with BAY 11-7082 showed an increment in reduced glutathione (GSH) level and a decline in MDA content in sciatic nerve. GSH is a principal intracellular antioxidant-thiol compound and its reducing function is linked to maintain the redox homeostasis of cellular proteins [39]. Recently, Khan et al. [52] have indicated that inhibition of NF-κB signaling pathway by caffeic acid resulted in an increased GSH content. Similarly, Chávez et al. [53] described that acetyl salicylic acid and ibuprofen inhibited NF-κB activation and enhanced GSH, tGSH, and GSH/GSSG ratio in the liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride.

In our study, BAY 11-7082 has effectively suppressed TNF-α concentration in the liver tissue. We speculate that this effect resulted from the selective inhibition of the phosphorylation of IkB-α which decreased nuclear translocation of NF-κB [54]. Our previous studies indicated that BAY 11-7082 reversed ET-1 induced oxidative lung injury [54]. Furthermore, Kumar et al. [51] reported that treatment with BAY 11-7082 diminished TNF-α level in diabetic rats. Also Sigala et al. [43] indicated that NF-κB inhibition blunted the TNF-α in the diaphragm in rats. The decrease in TNF-α is at least in part caused by the inhibition of NF-κB activity loop as NF-κB plays the predominant role in TNF-α release.

As BAY 11-7082 is an inhibitor of IkBα breakdown in our study it prevented ET-1-stimulated liver activation of p65 gene. Moreover, silencing of NF-κB signaling resulted in less powerful downregulation of p21-cip gene than that in the ET-1 groups. Although inhibition of NF-κB is beneficial regarding oxidative stress and proinflammatory compounds generation its protecting role on cell preservation is controversial. It was indicated that NF-B activation plays cytoprotective role in TNF-α induced hepatotoxicity [55]; however, the activation of NF-κB may as well promote the survival of transformed hepatocytes, thus supporting malignancy and progression in cancer [56]. Therefore, this dual role of NF-κB highlights the need of studying the molecular pathways that regulate the outcome of ET-1 stimulation to understand how NF-κB exerts such distinct functions in the liver.

On the contrary the stress-induced upregulation of p21 is incorporated with activation of p38 of MAPK signaling pathway and leads to apoptosis [57]. Hence, downregulation of p21 by BAY 11-7082 may have a protective effect on the liver cells.

In summary, our results have demonstrated that BAY 11-7082 is an effective compound that protects the liver from ET-1 induced oxidative stress damages. Concomitantly, BAY 11-7082 inhibited an excessive release of TNF-α caused by ET-1 which may result from reduced expression of NF-κB and NF-κB dependent p21-cip signaling pathways. Thus BAY 11-7082 might be considered as a clinical drug in the prevention and treatment of hepatic injury.

Abbreviations

NF-κB:Nuclear factor-kappaB
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
ET-1:Endothelin-1
TBARS:Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances
:Hydrogen peroxide
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor
TNF:Tumor necrosis factor alpha
tGSH:Total glutathione
GSH:Reduced glutathione
GSSG:Oxidized glutathione
NADPH:Reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grant 503/0-079-03/503-01 and 503/3-015-02/503-01 from the Medical University of Lodz.

References

  1. M. Yanagisawa, H. Kurihara, S. Kimura et al., “A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells,” Nature, vol. 332, no. 6163, pp. 411–415, 1988. View at Scopus
  2. K. J. Dammanahalli and Z. Sun, “Endothelins and NADPH oxidases in the cardiovascular system,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 2–6, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. K. Khimji and D. C. Rockey, “Endothelin—biology and disease,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1615–1625, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Vollmar and M. D. Menger, “The hepatic microcirculation: mechanistic contributions and therapeutic targets in liver injury and repair,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 1269–1339, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Sakurai, M. Yanagisawa, Y. Takuwa et al., “Cloning of a cDNA encoding a non-isopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor,” Nature, vol. 348, no. 6303, pp. 732–735, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Taddei, A. Virdis, L. Ghiadoni, I. Sudano, A. Magagna, and A. Salvetti, “Role of endothelin in the control of peripheral vascular tone in human hypertension,” Heart Failure Reviews, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 277–285, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Yokomori, M. Oda, Y. Yasogawa et al., “Enhanced expression of endothelin B receptor at protein and gene levels in human cirrhotic liver,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 1353–1362, 2001. View at Scopus
  8. C. Housset, D. C. Rockey, and D. M. Bissell, “Endothelin receptors in rat liver: lipocytes as a contractile target for endothelin 1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 20, pp. 9266–9270, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Gabriel, R. H. Kuddus, A. S. Rao, W. D. Watkins, and C. R. Gandhi, “Superoxide-induced changes in endothelin (ET) receptors in hepatic stellate cells,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 614–627, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Pinzani, S. Milani, R. de Franco et al., “Endothelin 1 is overexpressed in human cirrhotic liver and exerts multiple effects on activated hepatic stellate cells,” Gastroenterology, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 534–548, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Moller, C. Emmeluth, and J. H. Henriksen, “Elevated circulating plasma endothelin-1 concentrations in cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 285–290, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. Alam, N. M. Bass, P. Bacchetti, L. Gee, and D. C. Rockey, “Hepatic tissue endothelin-1 levels in chronic liver disease correlate with disease severity and ascites,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 199–203, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Huguet, A. Gavelli, and S. Bona, “Hepatic resection with ischemia of the liver exceeding one hour,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 454–458, 1994. View at Scopus
  14. S. Francque, W. Laleman, L. Verbeke et al., “Increased intrahepatic resistance in severe steatosis: endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstrictor overproduction and altered microvascular architecture,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1428–1439, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. C. R. Gandhi, L. A. Sproat, and V. M. Subbotin, “Increased hepatic endothelin-1 levels and endothelins receptor density in cirrhotic rats,” Life Sciences, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. C. Rockey, L. Fouassier, J. J. Chung et al., “Cellular localization of endothelin-1 and increased production in liver injury in the rat: potential for autocrine and paracrine effects on stellate cells,” Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 472–480, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Shao and D. C. Rockey, “Effects of endothelins on hepatic stellate cell synthesis of endothelin-1 during hepatic wound healing,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 342–350, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Pinzani and F. Marra, “Cytokine receptors and signaling in hepatic stellate cells,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 397–416, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. C. Rockey, “Characterization of endothelin receptors mediating rat hepatic stellate cell contraction,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 725–731, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. C. Rockey and R. A. Weisiger, “Endothelin induced contractility of stellate cells from normal and cirrhotic rat liver: implications for regulation of portal pressure and resistance,” Hepatology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 233–240, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Jaeschke and A. Farhood, “Kupffer cell activation after no-flow ischemia versus hemorrhagic shock,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 210–219, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Bauer, J. X. Zhang, I. Bauer, and M. G. Clemens, “ET-1 induced alterations of hepatic microcirculation: sinusoidal and extrasinusoidal sites of action,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. G143–G149, 1994. View at Scopus
  23. A. Khimji and D. C. Rockey, “Endothelin and hepatic wound healing,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 512–518, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Sriram, D. Subramanian, R. Sathiakumar et al., “Modulation of reactive oxygen species in skeletal muscle by myostatin is mediated through NF-κB,” Aging Cell, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 931–948, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. G. Lunz III, H. Tsuji, I. Nozaki, N. Murase, and A. J. Demetris, “An inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase, stress-induced p21 Waf-1/Cip-1, mediates hepatocyte mito-inhibition during the evolution of cirrhosis,” Hepatology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1262–1271, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. A. O'Reilly, “Redox activation of p21Cip1/WAF1/Sdi1: a multifunctional regulator of cell survival and death,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 108–118, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. S. Yang, J. W. Chang, N. J. Han, and S. K. Park, “Darbepoetin alfa suppresses tumor necrosis factor-α-induced endothelin-1 production through antioxidant action in human aortic endothelial cells: role of sialic acid residues,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1242–1251, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W. S. Yang, J. M. Lee, N. J. Han, Y. J. Kim, J. W. Chang, and S. K. Park, “Mycophenolic acid attenuates tumor necrosis factor-α-induced endothelin-1 production in human aortic endothelial cells,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Chomczynski and N. Sacchi, “Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 156–159, 1987. View at Scopus
  30. K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2ΔΔCT method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. C. Cogger, M. Muller, R. Fraser, A. J. McLean, J. Khan, and D. G. Le Couteur, “The effects of oxidative stress on the liver sieve,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 370–376, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. A. Keller, C. C. Moore, M. G. Clemens, I. H. McKillop, and T. Huynh, “Activated protein C restores hepatic microcirculation during sepsis by modulating vasoregulator expression,” Shock, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 361–369, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Glanemann, B. Vollmar, A. K. Nussler, T. Schaefer, P. Neuhaus, and M. D. Menger, “Ischemic preconditioning protects from hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-injury by preservation of microcirculation and mitochondrial redox-state,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. J. Czaja, “Cell signaling in oxidative stress-induced liver injury,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 378–389, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. J. de Bleser, G. Xu, K. Rombouts, V. Rogiers, and A. Geerts, “Glutathione levels discriminate between oxidative stress and transforming growth factor-β signaling in activated rat hepatic stellate cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 48, pp. 33881–33887, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. S. Oliboni, C. Dani, C. Funchal, J. A. Henriques, and M. Salvador, “Hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, and renal-protective effects of organic and conventional grapevine leaf extracts on Wistar rat tissues,” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1403–1411, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. L. Li, Q. Y. Wang, H. Y. Luan, Z. C. Kang, and C. B. Wang, “Effects of L-carnitine against oxidative stress in human hepatocytes: involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 19, article 32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. A. Ganie, E. Haq, A. Hamid, A. Masood, and M. A. Zargar, “Long dose exposure of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in albino rats and effect of Podophyllum hexandrum on oxidative stress,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 906–915, 2011.
  39. M. E. Anderson and A. Meister, “Glutathione monoesters,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Y. Kim, E. H. Song, H. J. Lee et al., “HBx-Induced hepatic steatosis and apoptosis are regulated by TNFR1- and NF-κB-dependent pathways,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 397, no. 4, pp. 917–931, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. H. Lee, S. H. Kim, and S. M. Lee, “Effect of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate on hepatic vascular stress gene expression during ischemia and reperfusion,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 595, no. 1–3, pp. 100–107, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Ohkita, M. Takaoka, Y. Shiota, R. Nojiri, M. Sugii, and Y. Matsumura, “A nuclear factor-κB inhibitor BAY 11-7082 suppresses endothelin-1 production in cultured vascular endothelial cells,” Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 81–84, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. I. Sigala, P. Zacharatos, D. Toumpanakis et al., “MAPKs and NF-κB differentially regulate cytokine expression in the diaphragm in response to resistive breathing: the role of oxidative stress,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 300, no. 5, pp. R1152–R1162, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. S. Cho, S. B. Lee, I. H. Bae, Y. S. Lee, S. J. Lee, and H. D. Um, “Ionizing radiation induces blockade of c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent cell death pathway in a manner correlated with p21Cip/WAF1 induction in primary cultured normal human fibroblasts,” Experimental and Molecular Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 282–289, 2005. View at Scopus
  45. S. J. Wort, M. Ito, P. C. Chou et al., “Synergistic induction of endothelin-1 by tumor necrosis factor α and interferon γ is due to enhanced NF-κB binding and histone acetylation at specific κB sites,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 36, pp. 24297–24305, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Gallois, A. Habib, J. Tao et al., “Role of NF-κB in the antiproliferative effect of endothelin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α in human hepatic stellate cells: involvement of cyclooxygenase-2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 36, pp. 23183–23190, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Ghosh, M. J. May, and E. B. Kopp, “NF-κB and rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 16, pp. 225–260, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Calabrò, P. Cirillo, G. Limongelli et al., “Tissue factor is induced by resistin in human coronary artery endothelial cells by the NF-κB-dependent pathway,” Journal of Vascular Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. L. Cho, Y. M. Moon, Y. J. Heo et al., “NF-κB inhibition leads to increased synthesis and secretion of MIF in human CD4+ T cells,” Immunology Letters, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Zanotto-Filho, D. P. Gelain, R. Schröder et al., “The NFκB-mediated control of RS and JNK signaling in vitamin A-treated cells: duration of JNK-AP-1 pathway activation may determine cell death or proliferation,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 1291–1301, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Kumar, G. Negi, and S. S. Sharma, “Suppression of NF-κB and NF-κB regulated oxidative stress and neuroinflammation by BAY 11-7082 (IkB phosphorylation inhibitor) in experimental diabetic neuropathy,” Biochimie, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1158–1165, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. A. Q. Khan, R. Khan, W. Qamar et al., “Caffeic acid attenuates 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced NF-κB and COX-2 expression in mouse skin: abrogation of oxidative stress, inflammatory responses and proinflammatory cytokine production,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 175–183, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. E. Chávez, L. Castro-Sánchez, M. Shibayama et al., “Effects of acetyl salicylic acid and ibuprofen in chronic liver damage induced by CCl4,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. A. Piechota and A. Goraca, “Influence of nuclear factor-κB inhibition on endothelin-1 induced lung edemaand oxidative stress in rats,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 183–188, 2011. View at Scopus
  55. A. Wullaert, G. van Loo, K. Heyninck, and R. Beyaert, “Hepatic tumor necrosis factor signaling and nuclear factor-κB: effects on liver homeostasis and beyond,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 365–386, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. Karin, “Nuclear factor-κB in cancer development and progression,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7092, pp. 431–436, 2006.
  57. H. Nakagawa, Y. Hirata, K. Takeda et al., “Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 inhibits hepatocarcinogenesis by controlling the tumor-suppressing function of stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase,” Hepatology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 185–195, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus