Research Article

Parkinson’s Disease and Home Healthcare Use and Expenditures among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries

Table 4

Nonlinear and linear decomposition of home healthcare use and expenditures. Elderly Medicare beneficiaries with and without PD. Medicare 5% claims database (2006, 2007).

% with home healthcare use (PD)
% with home healthcare use (no PD)
22.5%
9.2%

Average log-transformed home healthcare expenditures (PD)8.44
Average log-transformed home healthcare expenditures (no PD)8.09

Difference 13.30.35

Total explained3.640.063

Nonlinear decompositionLinear decomposition

Predisposing characteristics
 Gender, race/ethnicity, age5.3%1.8%
Enabling characteristic
 Public assistance−1.5%1.6%
Need characteristic
 Number of comorbidities17.5%4.1%
Personal health choices
 Any type of SUD
 Baseline resource use
6.0%12.6%
External environmental factors
 Census region
 Metro status
0.2%−2.1%

Explained to total difference27.5%18.0%
Unexplained portion72.5%82.0%

Note: nonlinear decomposition analysis based on 10,865 and 50,009 elderly (age 65 or older) Medicare beneficiaries with and without PD.
Difference in home healthcare use = 13.3 percentage points. Percentage points in home healthcare use are explained by each independent variable. The percentage explained is derived by dividing the total explained portion by the 13.3-percentage-point difference between elderly Medicare beneficiaries with and without PD.
Linear decomposition analysis based on 2,445 and 4,601 elderly (age 65 or older) Medicare beneficiaries with and without PD and who used home healthcare.
SUD: substance use disorder; Exp.: expenditure.