- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Physics Research International

VolumeΒ 2012Β (2012), Article IDΒ 506285, 11 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/506285

## On Theories in Two-Dimensional Spacetime

Physics Department, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait

Received 22 June 2011; Revised 26 October 2011; Accepted 3 December 2011

Academic Editor: AshokΒ Chatterjee

Copyright Β© 2012 M. A. Ahmed. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

In recent years, theories in which the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian is replaced by a function of the Ricci Scalar have been extensively studied in four-dimensional spacetime. In this paper we carry out an analysis of such theories in two-dimensional spacetime with focus on cosmological implications. Solutions to the cosmological field equations are obtained and their properties are analysed. Inflationary solutions are also obtained and discussed. Quantization is then carried out, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation is set up, and its exact solutions are obtained.

#### 1. Introduction

Attempts to modify the theory of general relativity, by including higher-order invariants in the action, started not too long after its inception [1, 2]. Later the nonrenormalizability of general relativity gave impetus to the inclusion of higher-order terms in the action [3, 4]. More recently it was shown that when quantum corrections are taken into consideration, higher order curvature invariants need to be added to the low-energy gravitational action [5, 6]. Such considerations further increased the interest in constructing theories in which the Einstein-Hilbert action is extended by the inclusion of higher-order curvature invariants with respect to the Ricci Scalar. Our interest here is in the so-called theories of gravity. In these theories the Lagrangian in the Einstein-Hilbert action where , is the gravitational constant, is the determinant of the metric tensor and is the Ricci scalar (in units ), is generalized to become In (2) is a general function of [7]. Our focus here is on the cosmological aspects of theories.

Now in another direction, the quest for quantum theory of gravity has led to the study of the simpler case of gravitational theory in two-dimensional spacetime. Such a spacetime provides an interesting arena in which to explore some fundamental aspects of both classical and quantum gravity. The reduction in the degrees of freedom greatly simplifies the analysis of the field equations. This leads to appreciable understanding of several problems in gravity theory. In two-dimensional spacetime, the two-dimensional gravitational constant is dimensionless and formally the theory with the bare action where , is power counting renormalizable in perturbation theory. However the Einstein-Hilbert action term is purely topological in two dimensions. In fact in two spactime dimensions, the curvature tensor has only one independent component since all nonzero components may be obtained by symmetry from . Equivalently the curvature tensor may be written in terms of the curvature scalar [8]: so that alone completely characterizes the local geometry. Equation (4) implies that so that the Einstein tensor , vanishes identically and the usual Einstein equations are meaningless in two dimensions. This led to various models for gravity in two-dimensional spacetime being proposed [9]. Of special interest are those models that involve a scalar field, the dilaton, in the action [9β12]. We have previously studied some aspects of classical and quantum cosmology in two-dimensional dilaton gravity models [13, 14]. In the present work we study theories as an alternative way to formulate gravitational theory in two-dimensional spactime and explore some of their cosmological implications.

In Section 2 we set up the gravity theory in two-dimensional spacetime and derive the general field equations. We then specialize to the case of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric and obtain the field equations with matter treated as a perfect fluid. Section 3 is devoted to obtaining solutions to the cosmological field equations under various conditions of matter or radiation dominance. Properties of these solutions are discussed in Section 4. In particular, conditions for ensuring cosmic acceleration and solving the horizon problem are elucidated. Inflation is discussed in Section 5 and solutions to the field equations in the absence of matter or radiation are obtained and their properties are discussed. In Section 6 we carry out the quantization. We establish the Wheeler-DeWitt equation and obtain its solutions. In Section 7 we offer some concluding remarks.

#### 2. Field Equations

We write the two-dimensional action for gravity as where is the gravitational action and is the matter action [15]. The field equations can be derived by varying the action with respect to the metric tensor . Upon noting that the stress-energy tensor is defined by we derive the following field equation: In (4) is the Ricci tensor, the prime denotes the differentiation with respect to , and the operator is defined by Using (5) we can write (9) as In the following we will concern with cosmological implications of (11). For this purpose will adopt the Friedman-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric which in two-dimensional spacetime reads () in terms of the comoving coordinates and . The quantity is the usual time-dependent cosmic scale factor. A change of variable leads to Thus in two dimensions the time evolution of is not affected by the value of corresponding to the three different cosmological models [16]. This is unlike the four-dimensional case. The values still describe spatially open flat and hyperbolic universe respectively, while describes a closed universe. The stress-energy tensor of the homogeneous isotropic universe is taken to be that of a perfect fluid: where is the pressure, is the energy density, and is the comoving velocity. Using (13) and (14) we obtain from (11) the following two independent cosmological field equations: where we use the dot as well as to indicate differentiation with respect to time. We note that if is expressed as a sum of powers of , then a term linear in would cancel out in the bracketed terms in (15) and would not contribute to the derivative terms either. Hence it has no effect on the dynamics. The stress-energy tensor obeys the conservation law: and this, for a perfect fluid, gives rise to the following two equations: For the FRW metric of (13) one readily obtains from (17) that Assuming an equation of state of the form , where is a constant, (19) immediately leads to where is a constant. Equation (18) is seen to be identically satisfied and does not give rise to anything new. For a pressureless (dust) pure matter universe ( we have while for a pure radiation universe (), one has Denoting the present time by and using the usual notation of and to denote present-day values of these quantities, we can write for a matter-dominated universe while for a radiation-dominated universe one has Finally we wish to note that for the FRW metric the curvature scalar of this two-dimensional universe is given by where .

#### 3. Solutions of the Cosmological Field Equations

In this section we seek solutions of the cosmological field equation (15) with the energy density and pressure given by (23) and (24) for each component of the cosmological fluid thus obtaining two sets of equations. For the matter dominated epoch we obtain the following:

For the radiation dominated epoch the corresponding equations read To proceed further we need to specify the function . Similar to the procedure followed in the four-dimensional case [7] we take for the following expression: where the real constants and are, at this stage, only restricted by and . Upon substitution of (29) into (26) we obtain Equations (30) and (31) describe the matter dominated epoch and we shall attempt to find solutions for them now. We start with (31) and note that in terms of the function defined by the equation is transformed into the following form: This equation is easily solved and we obtain for where is a constant. Equation (34) then leads to the parametric solution: where is a constant. For and one can carry out the integration using the result [16] where and are constants and is the hypergeometric function. We obtain

Ideally one should solve (37) to obtain as a function of the cosmic time and plug that into (30) in order to solve for in the case of , but that is a difficult task. Instead we consider solutions for which in (34) and a general . One can then easily derive that where we have renamed the integration constant as . In fact one can verify directly by substitution that the expression for in (38) is a solution of (31).

Next we substitute (38) into (30) and obtain where We readily solve (39) and get where is a constant and Clearly must be such that and are real and is finite. We will return to this issue later. It is interesting to note that the dependence of is and thus independent of , while that of does depend on . We also note that the relation is satisfied by the solutions for given in (38) and (42), respectively. We further note that the second term in (42) is a solution of (39) in its own right. On the other hand the first term in (42) is a solution of the homogeneous form of (39). Furthermore the constants and must be such that is positive.

We now turn to the case of radiation. Upon adding (27) and (28) we obtain Employing in (44) the expression for given in (29) above yields Next we use (29) in (27) and obtain Motivated by the structure of the solutions for the cosmological equations in the case of pure matter above, we seek solutions for and of (45) and (46) in the form of powers in where is some reference time. We obtain the following results: where the constant is given by Note that, as in the case of matter, the dependence of is independent of , the only such dependence appears in the overall coefficient. We also note that the relation is satisfied by the solutions for given in (46) and (48). For an expanding universe one must have and . Furthermore the value of must ensure that the bracketed term in (49) is finite and real.

#### 4. Properties of the Solutions

We now discuss some properties of the solutions of the cosmological field equations found in the previous section. Let us first look at the radiation dominated case and determine whether our vision of the universe is limited by a particle horizon. At a given cosmic time the proper distance of the emitter is given by where is the time of emission of the photon. Using (48) we obtain We can view as signifying the onset of the radiation epoch. We see that as , ) is finite for and diverges for . Hence no particle horizon problem will arise if which is the same condition required for an expanding universe. Reality of also requires to be an integer. For an even integer, the parameter must be positive while for odd, should be negative. Thus we take to be a positive integer greater than one. Next we note that the cosmic acceleration which is given by is positive for since and is constant for . Now in two-dimensional spacetime the radiation energy density is where is the temperature [16] and it follows therefore from (24) that Since we have as , we conclude that this radiation universe has a hot big bang origin.

Next we turn to the case of the matter dominated universe described by (38) and (42). First let us consider the case when the scale factor becomes As we have stated earlier this is viable because it represents a solution of (39). The time can be taken to signify the onset of matter dominance. The proper distance is now given by Hence no particle horizon will arise if . Also as we stated following (43), the parameter must be such that the constants and given by (40) are real. Since for the number of (41) is negative, it follows that has to be a positive integer. Now the requirement that for implies that . For even we have and hence should be positive to ensure while for odd one has and should be negative. Since we exclude , the smallest permissible value is . For such values of it is evident that the cosmic acceleration is positive. Finally we observe that for the pure matter universe we have as .

We now consider the case . Using (42) the proper distance is now given by

It is clear that the integral converges for and we do have a particle horizon. Performing the integral we determine the proper distance to the horizon to be where Let us now study further properties of the solution given in (42). In the following we consider only values of such that . Now it is evident that, except for values of in the interval , the first term in (42) dominates for near when while the second term dominates for . Hence to ensure positivity of the scale factor we require that both and be positive. For , and can have opposite signs but only in such a manner so as to keep . We shall for simplicity assume that and for all values of . Next we observe that outside the interval , the number of (41) is negative, and to ensure the reality of given by (40), the number has to be an integer. We readily deduce that for , can be a positive even integer or a negative odd integer. On the other hand for , can be a positive odd integer or a negative even integer. The cosmic acceleration is given by It is seen that for , for , and for or .

Next we consider the behavior of as for the case . We see from (42) that for , as and accordingly the temperature in this limit. For , we have as and is finite. However for outside the interval the behavior of is very different as . We see that in this limit and energy density and the temperature tend to zero. As increases beyond the value , decreases to finite values and the density increases. However never reaches zero and attains a minimum value at given by For , starts to increase. We also note from (38) that the curvature scalar is as and then starts increasing through finite negative values as grows beyond . The singular behavior of the scale factor noted here should be contrasted with that of the FRW cosmological models in four-dimensional general relativity where the scale factor and energy density go to zero and infinity, respectively, as the initial moment is approached.

#### 5. Inflation

The horizon problem in four-dimensional standard FRW cosmology is a consequence of deceleration in the expansion of the universe. The problem can be solved by postulating a phase of the universe, prior to the decelerating phase, in which the expansion is accelerating and such a phase is called a period of inflation. Hence inflation is characterized by the following property for the scale factor : Now as evident from the analysis of Section 4, is readily achieved in our theory in two-dimensional spacetime and the universe is accelerating. The solutions obtained for the scale factor displayed power dependence on time akin to that of power-law inflation. It would seem that there is no need to require an inflationary phase since matter or radiation dominated epochs yield an accelerating universe. Here we are not seeking to introduce scalar fields to propel acceleration as in the usual inflationary cosmology. We recall that one of the motivations for introducing modified or theories of gravity in four-dimensional spacetime is the desire to explain acceleration of the universe as an alternative to using scalar fields. For this purpose solutions for the cosmological field equations are sought in the absence of the matter fluid [7]. We carry out such an analysis in our case by considering solutions to (30) and (31) of Section 3 with the R.H.S set being equal to zero. We have earlier obtained a general solution for (31) given by (35) of Section 3. However the parametric nature of that solution makes it difficult to use in (30) in order to solve for . Putting enables the integration in (35) to be performed and leads to the solution given in (38) which we write as where , 1 and we have now denoted the integration constant by . Using (62) in (30) with the R.H.S. set being equal to zero yields: the solution of which reads where is a constant. We take the solution to hold for . The cosmic acceleration is given by The Hubble parameter is For we can identify with the onset of inflation . Equation (64) then describes a universe that expands with positive acceleration for . We also have and for which characterizes standard inflation. However if we make the identification for , we will have a situation in which as thus obtaining a universe that starts off already with an infinite size at the onset of inflation collapsing subsequently for at an accelerated rate. Such a scenario can be avoided if is instead taken to have a relatively large value so that during the inflationary epoch. We write now as The universe then starts off with a relatively small non-zero size at and expands with positive acceleration as time progresses. We also have so that and and we again have standard inflation.

As in four spacetime dimensions we define the so-called slow-roll parameter by [7] and in terms of which one has Inflation can thus be attained only if . In our present context is given by For both cases of and we clearly have . The slow-roll approximation corresponding to then obtain when . As we have stated previously the solution for given in (62) arises as a special case of the general solution given in (35). As an alternative to solving (30) and (31) one can derive an equation for the Hubble parameter [7, 17]. We write (30) with the R.H.S set being equal to zero: Now from (25) of Section 2 we obtain Substituting (25) and (73) in (72) one obtains Next in terms of , , and we can express (74), after some manipulations, as It is customary, in dealing with equations such as this, to invoke the slow-roll approximation and , [7, 17]. Applying this to (67) we obtain that The solution of (76) is where is a constant. Equation (77) in turn gives with being another constant. Equation (78) for is similar in structure to (67) and the properties of the solution are therefore similar to what we discussed before and hence will not be considered any further.

We shall next seek a general solution to (31) for that holds for close to the instant that signifies the onset of inflation. Specifically we assume that is a regular point of (31) and seek a solution for in the form of a power series confining ourselves to small values of . For simplicity we consider the case for which (31) becomes

We write

Substituting (80) in (79) and solving we obtain and so forth. This leads to We remark that if inflation lasts for a short period of time, then it is sensible to have a representation for as given in (82). Moreover for sufficiently small we can approximate by the first two terms and substitute in (72) with . Solving the resulting equation we obtain where is a constant. We can write (83) as where From (83) we obtain From (84) we see that we must have to ensure that . We must also require to be increasing for . This can be achieved by having for then will start off at the value and decreases reaching zero at . During the interval, , will be increasing. We must also require the cosmic acceleration to be positive during this interval and this leads to the following condition: This inequality will continue to hold until when . This implies that which yields The time then signifies the end of inflation. Since and , the conditions and can be expressed as We can also express the duration of inflation as

The Hubble parameter is given by

It thus decreases from an initial value given by

to a value at the end of inflation where We note that is negative during and we thus have standard inflation. The slow-roll parameter is given by We recall that for inflation to proceed one must have and this leads precisely to the condition expressed in (87) stated earlier.

The number of -foldings from to is defined by [7, 18] which is evaluated to give In four dimensions, the solution of the horizon and flatness problems of big bang cosmology requires that , [7, 19]. If we assume that we can use this value in our two-dimensional universe, we find that that is, the Hubble parameter decreases to about of its initial value by the time inflation ends.

#### 6. Quantization

As we stated in the introduction two-dimensional spacetime models of gravity provide an arena where issues like quantization are studied since in such a setting they prove to be more tractable than in four-dimensional spacetime. In this section we thus consider quantization of the gravity theory defined by the action of (3). Our objective is to derive the Wheeler-DeWitt equation for the wave function of the universe and obtain its solutions. Since we are considering a spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe, we drop the spatial integral and write the action as We take for the expression given in (29) and put . We use (25) that expresses the scalar curvature in terms of the scale factor and write We notice the appearance of the second derivative of in (101). The standard approach is to express the wave function in terms of and [20]. Hence integrating by parts in (101), we obtain where The canonical momenta are defined in the usual way: The Hamiltonian is then obtained as Replacing and by and , respectively, in the Hamiltonian, we obtain the Wheeler-DeWitt equation for the wave function of the universe: Instead of and we shall work with the variables: In terms of and the Wheeler-DeWitt equation becomes We seek solutions of (108) in factorizable form: and obtain the following equations for the functions and : where is the separation constant. The two equations are identical and hence it is enough to consider one of them. We first

take and define In terms of and , (110) reads It is interesting to note that (114) is identical to that describing the inverted or reversed oscillator discussed by several authors in a number of contexts [21β25]. By performing the change of variable we cast (114) into the following form: where . Equation (116) is one of the standard forms of the equation for the parabolic cylinder functions. Two linearly independent solutions are given by the real functions and [26]. For and these solutions display the following asymptotic behaviour: where The functions and satisfy the following normalization conditions [23]: The parabolic cylinder functions can be expressed in several forms [26] and we can use the various relations between these forms to express in terms of the more familiar function for some . In

fact one can easily derive that where Next we observe that the solutions to (111) are identical to those of (110) but expressed in terms of the vriable . Hence we can write the following for the wavefunction : where We now consider the case in which the parameter is negative and write (110) and (111) as We define and thus they retain the same forms as in (112) and (113), respectively. Focussing on (124) we write it as In terms of , (127) becomes where

Equation (128) has the form of Weberβs equation [27] and possesses the following solutio

n: In the above equation is the Whittaker function. Expressing in terms of the confluent hypergeometric function, we can write For the second solution of (128) we note that from (130) giving the relationship between and the Whittaker function, we know that are solutions linearly independent of as is linearly independent of . From the asymptotic behaviour of the confluent hypergeometric function, we deduce that as , that is, . For we have that is, unless is a positive integer or zero in which case the R.H.S of (133) vanishes. In fact we have the relationship that expresses the parabolic cylinder functions in terms of the Hermite polynomials . Going back to (126) and (129) with , we obtain as the value of the separation constant. The functions that solve (127) are then precisely those that describe the one-dimensional quantum oscillator. We write The solutions are identical in form and we obtain for the normalized wave function the following: For the wavefunctions will not have finite norm and solutions of (124) and (125) of the type given in (131) would have to be superposed, just as wave packets are constructed in quantum mechanics, in order to obtain wave functions capable of describing physical states.

#### 7. Conclusions

In this work we studied theories of gravity in two-dimensional spacetime with focus on applications to cosmology. With the metric taken to have to the FRW form we were able to obtain solutions for the cosmological field equations in the case of pure matter or radiation-dominated universe when . The remarkable feature of these solutions is that they readily describe an accelerating universe in contrast to the standard FRW cosmology of four-dimensional general relativity. The horizon problem is also readily solved. As we have stated in Section 2, the time evolution of the scale factor is not affected by the value of the curvature constant . We have also seen that the solution for the radiation-dominated universe and one solution for the case of pure matter-domination, describe a hot big bang. However an interesting solution in a matter dominated universe, given in (42), describes a universe that kicks off with an infinite size and zero temperature at the start of matter dominance. It subsequently collapses to a finite size and then begins to expand.

Now as we mentioned before, the interest behind the pursuit of theories is partially due to the desire to obtain a description of inflation without the introduction of scalar fields. This is done by seeking solutions to the cosmological field equations with the energy-momentum tensor set equal to zero, [7]. In Section 5 we obtained such solutions that characterize power law inflation. Furthermore, with inflation presumed to last for a short period of time, we obtained for the case a solution for near , the instant of onset of inflation. This solution displayed exponential dependence on time. For this case we computed the duration of inflation and the number of -foldings as well as an estimate for the change that ensues in the value of the Hubble parameter from the start to the end of inflation. The basic distinguishing feature between power law and exponential inflation appears to be in the behavior of the Ricci scalar. Exponential inflation is obtained when we assumed that can be expanded in a power series about with finite coefficients. In particular and are finite. On the other hand in the case of power law inflation these quantities exhibit singular behavior at . Another characteristic of our inflationary solutions is that they do not depend on the parameter that appears in (29) for . This is in contrast to the inflationary solution in four-dimensional theories where describes the Starobinsky model [28]. In that case with being written as , where the constant has the dimension of mass, exponential inflation is obtained with , , and all depending on , [7].

Interest in two-dimensional theories stems partially from the desire to investigate the quantum theory in a simple setting. Hence we carried out quantization of the theory in the case of . The Wheeler-DeWitt equation was derived and its solutions were obtained. We were able to solve the equation exactly in the entire domain of the variables, unlike the situation in the four-dimensional case [17, 20]. Interestingly we found that for the equation for the wave function coincided with that of the inverted oscillator. For the wave function, under certain conditions, turned out to be a product of two quantum harmonic oscillator wave functions in the variables and . In conclusion we have studied some aspects of classical and quantum cosmology in two-dimensional theories. Clearly a lot more issues need to be investigated and we hope to return to them in the near future.

#### References

- H. Weyl,
*Annalen der Physik*, vol. 364, no. 10, pp. 101β133, 1919. - A. S. Eddington,
*The Mathematical Theory of Relativity*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1923. - R. Utiyama and B. S. DeWitt, βRenormalization of a classical gravitational field interacting with quantized matter fields,β
*Journal of Mathematical Physics*, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 608β618, 1962. - K. S. Stelle, βRenormalization of higher-derivative quantum gravity,β
*Physical Review D*, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 953β969, 1977. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar - N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,
*Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982. - I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odinstov, and I. L. Smapiro,
*Effective Actions in Quantum Gravity*, IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 1992. - A. de Felice and S. Tsujikawa, βf (R) theories,β
*Living Reviews in Relativity*, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1β161, 2010. - L. P. Eisenhart,
*Riemannian Geometry*, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1949. - D. Grumiller, W. Kummer, and D. V. Vassilevich,
*Physics Reports*, vol. 369, no. 4, Article ID 104012, pp. 327β430, 2002. - C. G. Callan, S. B. Giddings, J. A. Harvey, and A. Strominger, βEvanescent black holes,β
*Physical Review D*, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. R1005βR1009, 1992. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - G. Mandal, A. M. Sengupta, and S. R. Wadia, βClassical solutions of two-dimensional string theory,β
*Modern Physics Letters A*, vol. 6, pp. 1685β1692, 1991. - E. Witten, βString theory and black holes,β
*Physical Review D*, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 314β324, 1991. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - M. A. Ahmed, βClassical and quantum cosmology in a model of two-dimensional dilaton gravity,β
*Physical Review D*, vol. 61, no. 10, Article ID 104012, 8 pages, 2000. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar - M. A. Ahmed, βCosmology in two-dimensional dilaton gravity theories,β
*Nuovo Cimento della Societa Italiana di Fisica B*, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 661β673, 2006. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - S. Weinberg,
*Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity*, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1972. - K. C. K. Chan and R. B. Mann, βCosmological models in two spacetime dimensions,β
*Classical and Quantum Gravity*, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 913β930, 1993. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar - A. Vilenkin, βClassical and quantum cosmology of the Starobinsky inflationary model,β
*Physical Review D*, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 2511β2521, 1985. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - M. P. Hobson, G. Efstathiou, and A. N. Lasenby,
*General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006. - A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth,
*Cosmological Inflation & Large Scale Structure*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000. - S. W. Hawking and J. C. Luttrell, βHigher derivatives in quantum cosmology. (I). The isotropic case,β
*Nuclear Physics, Section B*, vol. 247, no. 1, pp. 250β260, 1984. - K. W. Ford, D. L. Hill, M. Wakano, and J. A. Wheeler, βQuantum effects near a barrier maximum,β
*Annals of Physics*, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 239β258, 1959. View at Scopus - W. A. Friedman and C. J. Goebel, βBarrier-top resonances and heavy ion reactions,β
*Annals of Physics*, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 145β183, 1977. View at Scopus - G. Barton, βQuantum mechanics of the inverted oscillator potential,β
*Annals of Physics*, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 322β363, 1986. - N. L. Balazs and A. Voros, βWigner's function and tunneling,β
*Annals of Physics*, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 123β140, 1990. View at Scopus - D. ChruΕciΕski, βQuantum mechanics of damped systems. II. Damping and parabolic potential barrier,β
*Journal of Mathematical Physics*, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 841β854, 2004. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar - M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun,
*Handbook of Mathematical Functions*, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1972. - Z. X. Wong and D. R. Guo,
*Special Functions*, World Scientific, Singapore, 1989. - A. A. Starobinsky, βA new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,β
*Physics Letters B*, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 99β102, 1980. View at Scopus