Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in the Modulation of the Immune/Inflammatory Response in Atherosclerosis

Fernandez, Ana Z.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/285842

PPAR Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Development of Synthetic Modulators of PPARs: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2008 | Article ID 285842 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/285842

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in the Modulation of the Immune/Inflammatory Response in Atherosclerosis

Ana Z. Fernandez¹

Academic Editor: Francine Gregoire

Received29 Feb 2008

Revised09 May 2008

Accepted02 Aug 2008

Published21 Aug 2008

Abstract

Inflammation has been recognized as an important hallmark of atherosclerosis. The pharmacological activation of PPAR- by the thiazolidinediones in diabetes, and of PPAR- by the fibrates in hyperlipidemia has been shown to help to reduce inflammatory markers in preclinical and clinical studies. PPARs are known to modulate immune pathways through at least three different mechanisms: by direct binding to PPRE of anti-inflammatory cytokines genes; by transrepression of transcription factors like NF-B and AP-1; or by corepression. The regulation of the inflammatory pathways by PPARs can be achieved on each one of the cells involved in the atherosclerotic process, that is, monocytes, macrophages, T cells, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells. Moreover, as each of these cellular components is interconnected with each other, PPAR activation in one cell type could affect the other ones. As activation of PPARs has clear ant-inflammatory benefits, PPARs ligands should be considered as a new therapeutical approach to ameliorate the exacerbated immune response in atherosclerotic diseases.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases represent the main cause of morbidity and mortality in western societies since the 20th century and mostly are a consequence of atherosclerosis, a prior established pathology. Atherosclerosis is defined as a progressive, chronic pathology characterized by the accumulation of lipids and fibrous elements in the large arteries. It is classified as an inflammatory disease, since in every phase of the atherosclerotic process, the immune response has a significant role [1]. Immune cells like monocytes, macrophages, and T-cells are crucial in the development of the atheroma and the stimulation and activation of endothelial cells (EC) and smooth muscle cells (SMC), cellular components of the vascular wall are extremely relevant for the recruitment of the cells responsible for the immune response.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) and their agonists have been gaining more attention recently in regard to the study of the mechanisms involved in the etiology and pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The expression of PPAR-α, -δ/β, and -γ in vascular wall cells and in immune cells, as well as in atherosclerotic lesions, has been described [2, 3]. The pharmacological modulations of both PPAR-α and -γ as therapeutic treatments for diabetes and hyperlipidemia have been linked to an improvement on the low-grade inflammation associated with these conditions [4, 5]. The inhibition of function and/or expression of certain genes critical for the initiation or maintenance of inflammatory cells recruitment, survival, proliferation, and activation has been shown to alter the progression of atherosclerotic lesions [6]. In this regard, the three PPAR isoforms certainly could play distinctive roles in modulating the inflammatory response in atherosclerosis.

2. PPAR: General Characteristics

The PPARs belong to a subfamily of the nuclear receptors superfamily and are ligand-activated transcription factors which heterodimerize with the retinoic X receptor and recognize PPAR response elements (PPRE) localized in the promoter region of target genes [2]. In addition to the direct involvement of PPAR in the gene-specific transcription, PPAR could also repress the transcription of certain genes brought about by the proinflammatory transcription factors, nuclear factor (NF)-κB, activation protein-1 (AP-1), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT-1), through the binding and sequestration of their corresponding cofactors [7].

Three PPAR forms have been described: PPAR-α (NR1C1), PPAR-δ/β (NR1C2), and PPAR-γ (NR1C3). These different receptors show a similar protein structure in spite of their different coding genes [3]. PPAR-α and PPAR-γ have been recognized to be key players in both cellular differentiation processes and anti-inflammatory regulation and, most recently, PPAR-δ/β has also been implicated in the immune response [8].

PPAR-α is mainly expressed in tissues characterized by a high rate of fatty acid catabolism (liver, kidney, heart, and muscle) and is the most abundantly expressed PPAR isoform in human endothelial cells (EC) [9]. The transcriptional activity of PPAR-α is stimulated by a variety of compounds (see Table 1) [2]. PPARα synthetic ligands, such as clofibrate, fenofibrate, and bezafibrate, were developed as hypolipidemic agents, through optimization of their lipid-lowering activity in rodents, even before the discovery of the PPARs [10]. PPAR-α is involved in the control of lipoproteins metabolism, fatty acid oxidation, and in the cellular uptake of fatty acids [10]. Studies in vitro suggest that PPAR-α also regulates the expression of genes that control inflammatory responses in EC, SMC, and macrophages, cells known to be implicated in the inflammatory response of vascular EC and in the pathology of atherosclerosis [9, 11].

PPAR-δ/β is ubiquitously expressed both in vascular SMC as well as in EC, besides liver, kidney, and abdominal adipose tissues. Several eicosanoids have been reported to activate PPAR-δ/β, including PGA₁ and PGD₂, and a synthetic prostaglandin carbaprostacyclin [10]. The important physiological roles of PPAR-δ/β are highlighted in genetically modified mouse models as deletion of PPAR-δ/β in mice leads to incomplete but very high penetration of a lethal phenotype and PPAR-δ/β heterozygous animals display abnormal wound healing [12]. Additionally, PPAR-δ/β has been implicated in the maintenance of lipid homeostasis [13], keratinocyte proliferation in response to injury [12, 14, 15], hyperplasic development of adipose tissue in animal under a high-fat diet [16], and was recently shown to have beneficial effects on muscle fat oxidation and lipid profiles in humans [17, 18].

The best characterized receptor in this group of nuclear factors is the PPAR-γ which plays a significant role in adipocyte differentiation and fat deposition [10, 19]. This receptor is expressed in adipose tissue, skeletal, and cardiac muscle and is also expressed in human peripheral blood monocytes and in monocytic cell lines. The large list of activators of PPAR-γ includes prostaglandin-derived 15-deoxi-delta 12,14PGJ₂ (15d-PGJ₂), the thiazolidinediones (TZD) troglitazone (), pioglitazone (), and rosiglitazone (), among others (see Table 1) [2, 10, 20]. The currently marketed TZDs are potent and selective PPAR-γ activators; they are antidiabetic agents that increase the insulin sensitivity of target tissues in animal models of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and in diabetic patients.

One of the features that characterize the PPAR is the large amounts of natural and synthetic molecules that can activate them. PPARs are differentially activated by naturally occurring eicosanoids and related molecules [21, 22]. Nitroalkene derivatives of fatty acids have also been characterized as endogenous PPAR ligands. Schopfer et al. [23], using CV-1 reporter cells cotransfected with plasmids containing the ligand-binding domain for PPAR-α, -δ/β, and -γ, found that nitrated linoleic acid (1 μM) (LNO₂) was capable to induce significant activation of PPAR-γ (620%), PPAR-α (325%), and PPAR-δ/β (221%), when compared to control cells. Concomitant works revealed the existence of LNO₂ and other fatty acid nitration products, generated by NO-dependent reactions, in human red cells, blood, and urine samples [24, 25].

The general approach used to study the effects of PPARs is through PPAR activation by natural or synthetic agonist. However, PPAR ligands have been shown to have both PPAR-dependent and -independent actions, which could be addressed by in vivo genetic manipulation, such as PPAR-knockout animals or in cell-based systems using small interfering RNA [26].

3. Inflammation Is Modulated by Ox-ldl through PPAR

A primary initiating event in atherosclerosis is the accumulation of modified low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the subendotelial matrix, such as oxidized-LDL (ox-LDL. These ox-LDL are taken up by macrophages, inducing the formation of foam cells, and stimulating the EC to produce a number of proinflammatory molecules, such as monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, whose effects are mediated by the G protein-coupled receptor CCR2, expressed mainly in monocytes, basophils, and certain subsets of T cells [27, 28].

One of the most studied factors involved in the atherosclerotic process is ox-LDL [29]. Ox-LDL provides ligands for PPAR-γ and PPAR-α [30, 31] and also seems to enhance the expression of PPAR-γ in differentiated macrophages [32]. Ox-LDL, oxidized linoleic acid, and metabolites derived from it, including 9-hydroxyoctadecaenoic acid (HODE) and 13-HODE, induce PPAR-γ activation in monocytes and monocytic cellular lines, stimulating the transcription of the ox-LDL receptor CD36/fatty acid translocase, through a PPRE in the promoter of CD36/fatty acid translocase gene, which leads to the formation of foam cells [19, 30, 33].

The first contact between ox-LDL and monocyte/macrophage cell elicits reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, followed by a desensitization of macrophages via activation of PPAR-γ, which reduces ROS production, giving the ox-LDL a dual role in the activation/deactivation of macrophages [34]. Ox-LDL inhibited NF-κB-mediated IL-12 production in LPS-stimulated mouse macrophages, involving both inhibition of the NF-κB-DNA interactions and physical interactions between NF-κB and PPAR-γ [35]. Activation of NF-κB is involved in the pathophysiology of many inflammatory chronic diseases, including atherosclerosis. Binding sites for NF-κB have been found in cellular adhesion molecules and chemokines [36, 37]. The NF-κB signaling pathway is activated by the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1α which are the major cytokine inducers of gene expression in EC. In resting macrophages, PPAR-γ ligands completely blocked the ox-LDL-mediated activation of NF-κB [38].

PPAR-α activation by ox-LDL in the vascular wall components seems to upregulate the inflammation. The activation of this receptor in human EC by oxidized components in LDL resulted in an increase in the production of chemotactic factors for monocytes (MCP-1 and IL-8), conferring it a proinflammatory effect [9].

4. Molecular Mechanisms for the Regulation of Inflammatory/Immune Response in Atheroclerosis by PPAR Agonists

The adhesion of monocytes to the vascular wall is mediated by adhesion molecules expressed on the surface of the EC, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), P and E selectins [39], which is a phenotypic hallmark of EC activation and a critical step of many proinflammatory processes. The constitutive activation of PPAR-γ in ECs inhibited the expression of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin, by interference with NF-κB and AP-1 transactivation [40].

Many of the immune cells in the atheroma exhibit signs of activation and produce proinflammatory cytokines. In addition to monocytes and macrophages, T cells definitely play a significant role in the lesion, where CD4+ T cells dominate over CD8+ cells. CD4+ T cells differentiate into several subtypes, being T helper-1 cells (Th1) the predominant pattern in atherosclerosis. IFN-γ is a major proatherogenic Th1 cytokine, promoting macrophage and endothelial activation with production of adhesion molecules, cytokines, chemokines, radicals, proteases, and coagulation factors. In addition, IFN-γ inhibits cell proliferation, collagen production, and cholesterol efflux [41]. PPAR-α and PPAR-γ mRNA, and protein are expressed in isolated human CD4+ T cells, and the activation of each one of them by specific ligands reduces the secretion of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 in these lymphocytes [42]. Furthermore, the effect of PPAR agonist on CD4+ T cells impaired their action on monocytes and EC, suggesting that PPAR modulation of inflammatory pathways in T cells may offer clinical benefits in atherosclerosis [43].

TNFα is a catabolic proinflammatory cytokine, produced by Th1 cells and macrophages, that exerts a wide range of effects on cells and tissues, through the activation of the transcription factor NF-κB. Gene targeting of TNFα leads to reduced atherosclerosis [42]. It has been shown that human aortic EC activation by TNFα could be prevented by incubation with MCC-555, a novel TZD, while pioglitazone and rosiglitazone did not [44].

PPAR-α has been shown to inhibit transcriptional responses to inflammatory stimuli by interfering with the activation of NF-κB, leading to the reduction of VCAM-1 in EC [11]. In vascular SMC, PPAR-α agonists inhibited IL-1-induced IL-6 expression, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and prostaglandin production [45]. The upregulation of antioxidant enzymes activity by the PPAR-α activators reduced the oxidative stress and, as the result, it might inhibit the NF-κB activation and subsequent inflammatory response [46].

The regulation of chemokine-receptor expression may be a crucial mechanism to control monocyte responses to chemokines. Monocytic-line THP-1 cells incubated with rosiglitazone reduced CCR2 surface expression by about 50–60% (P < .001) compared with untreated control cells [29]. PPAR-γ agonists suppress monocyte elaboration of inflammatory cytokines TNFα, IL1, and IL6 [47]. Table 2 summarizes the general effects of PPAR activation on each cell type.

In murine hypercholesterolemic models, the administration of PPAR-γ ligands inhibited the development of atherosclerosis, in spite of the high expression of CD36 in the vascular wall [48]. Downstream PPARγ-dependent anti-inflammatory effects of 15d-PGJ₂ include the inhibition of transcriptional activation by NF-κB via IκB, which affect gene expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), TNFα, COX-2, IFN-α, IL-1, IL-6, and LPS-induced transcription of AP-1 and STAT-1 [49]. Oxidative burst in macrophages is also attenuated by PPAR-γ activation [50].

Other regulatory mechanism that could be attributed to PPAR is the selective activation of anti-inflammatory cytokines, like IL-10. IL-10 has potent deactivating properties in macrophages and T cells and modulates many cellular processes that may interfere with the development and stability of the atherosclerotic plaque [51]. Using nanomolar concentrations of rosiglitazone, Thompson et al. have demonstrated the upregulation of IL-10, likely through a functional PPRE found in the promoter region of IL-10 gene [52].

Major histocompatibility complex class II molecules (MHC-II) play a critical role in the induction of immune responses by presenting peptides of foreign antigens to CD4+ T lymphocytes, which result in their activation and proliferation. Human ECs are capable of expressing MHC-II under treatment with IFN-γ and this induction is repressed by PPAR-γ ligands [53].

PPAR-δ/β seems to have dual effects in regard to inflammation in atherosclerotic models [8, 54–57]. Although results from both PPAR-δ/β–/– and PPAR-δ/β overexpressing macrophages suggested a proinflammatory role for PPAR-δ/β, treatment of cells with PPAR-δ/β agonist GW501516 suppressed the expression of MCP-1 and IL-1β in a receptor-dependent manner, indicating that activation of PPAR-δ/β had an anti-inflammatory effect [54]. The pharmacological modulation of PPAR-δ/β in atherosclerotic LDLR–/– mice showed decreased expression of MCP-1, TNFα, and ICAM-1 [55] and similarly, proinflammatory modulators were suppressed in apoE–/– mice treated with GW501516 [56]. Fan et al. also found an anti-inflammatory effect of PPAR-δ/β agonists in TNFα-activated EC [8]. In addition, Takata et al. have found that PPAR-δ/β agonist GW0742 substantially inhibited vascular proinflammatory gene expression, macrophage content, and atherosclerosis in an angiotensin II-induced high fat-fed male LDLR–/– mouse model of accelerated atherosclerosis [57]. Furthermore, promising results were obtained in a clinical evaluation of the PPAR-δ/β agonist GW501516 in six obese males [17]. Although inflammatory markers were not considered in this study, the wide range of beneficial effects by the pharmacological activation of PPAR-δ/β could suggest an improvement on the inflammatory grade of proatherogenic conditions and an attractive therapeutic target for drug development to treat atherosclerosis [56].

Post-translational modifications have been found to modulate transcriptional activity of PPAR-γ [57]. One of these modifications is sumoylation, the covalent attachment of a small ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubl) called SUMO-1. Pascual et al. [58] proposed a novel pathway mediating ligand-dependent transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-γ in macrophages which involves ligand-dependent sumoylation of the PPAR-γ ligand-binding domain. This targets PPAR-γ to nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR)/histone deacetylase-3 (HDAC3) complexes on inflammatory gene promoters, which in turn prevents recruitment of the ubiquitylation/19S proteosome machinery that normally mediates the signal-dependent removal of corepressor complexes required for gene activation. As a result, NCoR complexes are not cleared from the promoter and target genes are maintained in a repressed state. This mechanism provides an explanation for how an agonist-bound nuclear receptor can be converted from an activator of transcription to a promoter-specific repressor of NF-κB target genes that regulate immunity and homeostasis [59].

5. Conclusion

Basic and clinical research points out towards an intrinsic interplay between immune/inflammatory mediators and PPAR activation in the pathogenesis and development of atherosclerosis. Each one of PPARs seems to have and share different output in order to reach the cellular homeostasis. It could be seen that Inflammation, as a disruption of homeostasis, has not only internal control by its own but an external regulation through the activation of PPARs. However, it is still not clear what are the “real functional in vivo” natural ligands of PPAR. Meanwhile, the search for the ideal synthetic ligand that would combine the beneficial effects of PPAR activation is ongoing. Such “magical” drug would be prescribed either as hypoglycemic, hypolipemic and anti-inflammatory agent, but would need to be chronically administered. Overall, pharmacological activation of PPARs might be a better approach to cover all the underlying inflammatory features of the atherosclerosis.

Abbreviations

ABC:	ATP-binding cassette
ALBP:	Adipocyte lipid binding protein
AP-1:	Activation protein-1
COX:	Cyclooxygenase
EC:	Endothelial cells
FAT:	Fatty acid translocase
HDAC3:	Histone deacetylase-3
HDL:	High-density lipoprotein
HMG-CoA:	Hydroxy methyl glutaryl coenzyme A
HODE:	Hydroxy octadecaenoic acid
ICAM-1:	Intercellular adhesion molecule 1
IFN:	Interferon
IL:	Interleukin
LDL:	Low-density lipoprotein
LNO₂:	Nitrated linoleic acid
LPS:	Lipopolysaccharide
MCP:	Monocyte chemotactic protein
MHC-II:	Major histocompatibility complex class II molecules (MHC-II)
NCoR:	Nuclear receptor corepressor
NF-B:	Nuclear factor B
NOS:	Nitric oxide synthase
PG:	Prostaglandin
PPAR:	Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors
PPRE:	PPAR response elements
ROS:	Reactive oxygen species
SMC:	Smooth muscle cells
STAT-1:	Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1
Th:	T helper cells
TNF:	Tumor necrosis factor
TZD:	Thiazolidinediones
Ubl:	Ubiquitin-like proteins
VCAM-1:	Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

References

R. Ross, “Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Chinetti, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): nuclear receptors at the crossroads between lipid metabolism and inflammation,” Inflammation Research, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 497–505, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. P. Neve, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) in atherosclerosis,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1245–1250, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cuzzocrea, B. Pisano, L. Dugo et al., “Rosiglitazone, a ligand of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- $γ$ , reduces acute inflammation,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 483, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Adamiec, M. Gacka, T. Dobosz, S. Szymaniec, D. Bednarska-Chabowska, and A. Sadakierska-Chudy, “Stimulation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $γ$ (PPAR $γ$ ) and the expression of selected blood monocyte cytokine genes in diabetic macroangiopathy,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. e108–e115, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Shah, “Circulating markers of inflammation for vascular risk prediction: are they ready for prime time,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 15, pp. 1758–1759, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Chinetti, S. Lestavel, V. Bocher et al., “PPAR- $α$ and PPAR- $γ$ activators induce cholesterol removal from human macrophage foam cells through stimulation of the ABCA1 pathway,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Fan, Y. Wang, Z. Tang et al., “Suppression of pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules by PPAR- $δ$ in human vascular endothelial cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 315–321, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lee, W. Shi, P. Tontonoz et al., “Role for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $α$ in oxidized phospholipid-induced synthesis of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 interleukin-8 by endothelial cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 516–521, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
T. M. Willson, P. J. Brown, D. D. Sternbach, and B. R. Henke, “The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 527–550, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Marx, G. K. Sukhova, T. Collins, P. Libby, and J. Plutzky, “PPAR $α$ activators inhibit cytokine-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in human endothelial cells,” Circulation, vol. 99, no. 24, pp. 3125–3131, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Michalik, B. Desvergne, N. S. Tan et al., “Impaired skin wound healing in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) $α$ and PPAR $β$ mutant mice,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 799–814, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Akiyama, G. Lambert, C. J. Nicol et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $β$ / $δ$ regulates very low density lipoprotein production and catabolism in mice on a Western diet,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 20, pp. 20874–20881, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Gilroy and P. R. Colville-Nash, “New insights into the role of COX 2 in inflammation,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 121–129, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Tan, L. Michalik, N. Noy et al., “Critical roles of PPAR $β$ / $δ$ in keratinocyte response to inflammation,” Genes & Development, vol. 15, no. 24, pp. 3263–3277, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jehl-Pietri, C. Bastie, I. Gillot, S. Luquet, and P. A. Grimaldi, “Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor $δ$ mediates the effects of long-chain fatty acids on post-confluent cell proliferation,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Risérus, D. Sprecher, T. Johnson et al., “Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) $δ$ promotes reversal of multiple metabolic abnormalities, reduces oxidative stress, and increases fatty acid oxidation in moderately obese men,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 332–339, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. R. Oliver, Jr., J. L. Shenk, M. R. Snaith et al., “A selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $δ$ agonist promotes reverse cholesterol transport,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 5306–5311, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-B. Debril, J.-P. Renaud, L. Fajas, and J. Auwerx, “The pleiotropic functions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $γ$ ,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 30–47, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Lehmann, J. M. Lenhard, B. B. Oliver, G. M. Ringold, and S. A. Kliewer, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors $α$ and $γ$ are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 6, pp. 3406–3410, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Yu, W. Bayona, C. B. Kallen et al., “Differential activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by eicosanoids,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 41, pp. 23975–23983, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. U. Scher and M. H. Pillinger, “15d-PGJ2: the anti-inflammatory prostaglandin?,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 100–109, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. J. Schopfer, Y. Lin, P. R. S. Baker et al., “Nitrolinoleic acid: an endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $γ$ ligand,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 2340–2345, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. S. Baker, Y. Lin, F. J. Schopfer et al., “Fatty acid transduction of nitric oxide signaling: multiple nitrated unsaturated fatty acid derivatives exist in human blood and urine and serve as endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 51, pp. 42464–42475, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. S. Baker, F. J. Schopfer, S. Sweeney, and B. A. Freeman, “Red cell membrane and plasma linoleic acid nitration products: synthesis, clinical identification, and quantitation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 32, pp. 11577–11582, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Cunard, M. Ricote, D. DiCampli et al., “Regulation of cytokine expression by ligands of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 6, pp. 2795–2802, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
A. J. Lusis, “Atherosclerosis,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6801, pp. 233–241, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
K. H. Han, M. K. Chang, A. Boullier et al., “Oxidized LDL reduces monocyte CCR2 expression through pathways involving peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $γ$ ,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 793–802, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Galle, T. Hansen-Hagge, C. Wanner, and S. Seibold, “Impact of oxidized low density lipoprotein on vascular cells,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 219–226, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Nagy, P. Tontonoz, J. G. A. Alvarez, H. Chen, and R. M. Evans, “Oxidized LDL regulates macrophage gene expression through ligand activation of PPAR $γ$ ,” Cell, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 229–240, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Leonarduzzi, M. C. Arkan, H. Başağa, E. Chiarpotto, A. Sevanian, and G. Poli, “Lipid oxidation products in cell signaling,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1370–1378, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ricote, J. Huang, L. Fajas et al., “Expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $γ$ (PPAR $γ$ ) in human atherosclerosis and regulation in macrophages by colony stimulating factors and oxidized low density lipoprotein,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 13, pp. 7614–7619, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Feng, J. Han, S. F. A. Pearce et al., “Induction of CD36 expression by oxidized LDL and IL-4 by a common signaling pathway dependent on protein kinase C and PPAR- $γ$ ,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 688–696, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Fischer, A. von Knethen, and B. Brüne, “Dualism of oxidized lipoproteins in provoking and attenuating the oxidative burst in macrophages: role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- $γ$ ,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 6, pp. 2828–2834, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. W. Chung, B. Y. Kang, S. H. Kim et al., “Oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibits interleukin-12 production in lipopolysaccharide-activated mouse macrophages via direct interactions between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- $γ$ and nuclear factor- $κ$ B,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 42, pp. 32681–32687, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Schreck, K. Albermann, and P. A. Baeuerle, “Nuclear factor $κ$ B: an oxidative stress-responsive transcription factor of eukaryotic cells,” Free Radical Research Communications, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 221–237, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Schoonbroodt and J. Piette, “Oxidative stress interference with the nuclear factor- $κ$ B activation pathways,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1075–1083, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-Y. Han, S.-Y. Park, and Y. K. Pak, “Role of endocytosis in the transactivation of nuclear factor- $κ$ B by oxidized low-density lipoprotein,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 350, no. 3, pp. 829–837, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. T. Price and J. Loscalzo, “Cellular adhesion molecules and atherogenesis,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Wang, L. Verna, N.-G. Chen et al., “Constitutive activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- $γ$ suppresses pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules in human vascular endothelial cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 37, pp. 34176–34181, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Hansson, A.-K. L. Robertson, and C. Söderberg-Nauclér, “Inflammation and atherosclerosis,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 297–329, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Marx, B. Kehrle, K. Kohlhammer et al., “PPAR activators as anti-inflammatory mediators in human T lymphocytes: implications for atherosclerosis and transplantation-associated arteriosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 703–710, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Brånén, L. Hovgaard, M. Nitulescu, E. Bengtsson, J. Nilsson, and S. Jovinge, “Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor- $α$ reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2137–2142, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kurebayashi, X. Xu, S. Ishii, M. Shiraishi, H. Kouhara, and S. Kasayama, “A novel thiazolidinedione MCC-555 down-regulates tumor necrosis factor- $α$ -induced expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in vascular endothelial cells,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Delerive, K. De Bosscher, S. Besnard et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $α$ negatively regulates the vascular inflammatory gene response by negative cross-talk with transcription factors NF- $κ$ B and AP-1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 45, pp. 32048–32054, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Tedgui and Z. Mallat, “Anti-inflammatory mechanisms in the vascular wall,” Circulation Research, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 877–887, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jiang, A. T. Ting, and B. Seed, “PPAR- $γ$ agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines,” Nature, vol. 391, no. 6662, pp. 82–86, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Li, K. K. Brown, M. J. Silvestre, T. M. Willson, W. Palinski, and C. K. Glass, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $γ$ ligands inhibit development of atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 523–531, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ye, S. P. Nishi, S. Manickavasagam et al., “Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- $γ$ (PPAR- $γ$ ) by atorvastatin is mediated by 15-deoxy- $Δ^{12, 14}$ - ${PGJ}_{2}$ ,” Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 43–53, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. von Knethen and B. Brüne, “Delayed activation of PPAR $γ$ by LPS and IFN- $γ$ attenuates the oxidative burst in macrophages,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 535–544, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Mallat, S. Besnard, M. Duriez et al., “Protective role of interleukin-10 in atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. e17–e24, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
P. W. Thompson, A. I. Bayliffe, A. P. Warren, and J. R. Lamb, “Interleukin-10 is upregulated by nanomolar rosiglitazone treatment of mature dendritic cells and human CD4+ T cells,” Cytokine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 184–191, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Kwak, S. Myit, F. Mulhaupt et al., “PPAR $γ$ but not PPAR $α$ ligands are potent repressors of major histocompatibility complex class II induction in atheroma-associated cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 356–362, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-H. Lee, A. Chawla, N. Urbiztondo, D. Liao, W. A. Boisvert, and R. M. Evans, “Transcriptional repression of atherogenic inflammation: modulation by PPAR $δ$ ,” Science, vol. 302, no. 5644, pp. 453–457, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Graham, C. Mookherjee, K. E. Suckling, C. N. A. Palmer, and L. Patel, “The PPAR $δ$ agonist GW0742X reduces atherosclerosis in ${LDLR}^{- / -}$ mice,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Barish, A. R. Atkins, M. Downes et al., “PPAR $δ$ regulates multiple proinflammatory pathways to suppress atherosclerosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 4271–4276, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takata, J. Liu, F. Yin et al., “PPAR $δ$ -mediated anti-inflammatory mechanisms inhibit angiotensin II-accelerated atherosclerosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 4277–4282, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Pascual, A. L. Fong, S. Ogawa et al., “A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR- $γ$ ,” Nature, vol. 437, no. 7059, pp. 759–763, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ohshima, H. Koga, and K. Shimotahno, “Transcriptional activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor $γ$ is modulated by SUMO-1 modification,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 28, pp. 29551–29557, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2008 Ana Z. Fernandez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1015

Downloads

777

Citations