PPAR Research / 2008 / Article / Tab 1 / Review Article
Should We Use PPAR Agonists to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk? Table 1 Selected morbidity and mortality outcomes in large, long-term fibrate trials. CHD = coronary heart disease, CVD =
cardiovascular disease, MI = myocardial infarction, NR = not reported, ns =
reported as “not significant,” RR = Crude relative risk calculated form
reported number of events; hazard ratio was not reported.
Event rates Study treatment Nonfatal MI CHD mortality Nonfatal MI or CHD death Total stroke Cancer Total mortality Hospitalized CHF Helsinki Heart [9 ]Mean
F/U 5.0 years Primary
prevention
Dyslipidemia High
LDL Placebo 3.5% 0.64% 4.1% NR 1.3% 2.1% N = 2030Gemfibrozil 2.2% 0.53% 2.7% NR 1.5% 2.2% N = 2051Hazard
ratio (95% CI) RR
0.63 RR 0.83 0.66 NR RR 1.15 RR 1.05 P
< .02p = NRP < .02p = NRp = NRVA-HIT [8 ]Mean F/U 5.1 years CHD HDL < 40 mg/dl LDL < 140 mg/dl Placebo 14.5% 9.3% 21.7% 6.0% 10.9% 17.4% 13.3% N = 1267Gemfibrozil 11.6% 7.4% 17.3% 4.6% 9.9% 15.7% 10.6% N = 1264Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.77 0.78 0.78 0.75 RR 0.91 0.89 0.78 (0.62–0.96) (0.59–1.02) (0.65–0.93) (0.53–1.06) (0.73–1.08) (0.62–0.98) P
< .02P = .07P = .006P = .10P = .23P = .04BIP [10 ] Noncardiac death Mean
F/U 6.2 years CHD Dyslipidemia Placebo
11.2% 5.7% 15.0% 5.0% 5.9% 4.2% N = 1542Bezafibrate N = 1548 9.7% 6.1% 13.6% 4.6% 5.5% 4.3% Hazard
ratio (95% CI) 0.87
RR 1.07 0.91 RR 0.92 RR 0.93 RR 1.02 P
= .18P = .61P = .26
𝛼
nsP = .87FIELD [11 ]Laser therapy Albuminuria not progressing/ regressing Mean
F/U 5 years Type
2 diabetes
Dyslipidemia Low LDL Placebo 4.2% 1.9% 6% 3.6% 8% 6.6% 5.2% n = 4900Fenofibrate 3.2% 2.2% 5% 3.2% 8% 7.3% 3.6% N = 48950.76 1.19 0.89 0.90 1.11 0.70 RR 1.15 P = .002 Hazard ratio (95% CI) (0.62–0.94) (0.90–1.57) (0.75–1.05) (0.73–1.12) RR 1.0 (0.95–1.29) (0.58–0.85) P = .01P
= .22P
= .16P
= .36P
= .18P
= .0003