Review Article

Should We Use PPAR Agonists to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk?

Table 1

Selected morbidity and mortality outcomes in large, long-term fibrate trials. CHD = coronary heart disease, CVD = cardiovascular disease, MI = myocardial infarction, NR = not reported, ns = reported as “not significant,” RR = Crude relative risk calculated form reported number of events; hazard ratio was not reported.

Event rates
Study treatmentNonfatal MICHD mortalityNonfatal MI or CHD deathTotal strokeCancerTotal mortalityHospitalized CHF

Helsinki Heart [9]
Mean F/U 5.0 years
Primary prevention
Dyslipidemia
High LDL

Placebo 3.5%0.64%4.1%NR1.3%2.1%
N = 2030

Gemfibrozil 2.2%0.53%2.7%NR1.5%2.2%
N = 2051

Hazard ratio (95% CI)RR 0.63 RR 0.83 0.66 NRRR 1.15 RR 1.05
P < .02p = NRP < .02p = NRp = NR

VA-HIT [8]
Mean F/U 5.1 years
CHD
HDL < 40 mg/dl
LDL < 140 mg/dl

Placebo14.5%9.3%21.7%6.0%10.9%17.4%13.3%
N = 1267

Gemfibrozil 11.6%7.4%17.3%4.6%9.9%15.7%10.6%
N = 1264

Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.770.780.780.75RR 0.910.890.78
(0.62–0.96)(0.59–1.02)(0.65–0.93)(0.53–1.06)(0.73–1.08)(0.62–0.98)
P < .02P = .07P = .006P = .10P = .23P = .04

BIP [10]Noncardiac death
Mean F/U 6.2 years
CHD
Dyslipidemia

Placebo 11.2%5.7%15.0%5.0%5.9%4.2%
N = 1542

Bezafibrate N = 15489.7%6.1%13.6%4.6%5.5%4.3%

Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.87 RR 1.07 0.91 RR 0.92 RR 0.93RR 1.02
P = .18P = .61P = .26 𝛼  nsP = .87

FIELD [11]Laser therapyAlbuminuria not progressing/ regressing
Mean F/U 5 years
Type 2 diabetes
Dyslipidemia
Low LDL

Placebo 4.2%1.9%6%3.6%8%6.6%5.2%
n = 4900

Fenofibrate 3.2%2.2%5%3.2%8%7.3%3.6%
N = 4895

0.761.190.890.901.110.70RR 1.15 P = .002
Hazard ratio (95% CI)(0.62–0.94)(0.90–1.57)(0.75–1.05)(0.73–1.12)RR 1.0(0.95–1.29)(0.58–0.85)
P = .01P = .22P = .16P = .36P = .18P = .0003