Review Article
Should We Use PPAR Agonists to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk?
Table 2
Selected laboratory data from fibrate endpoint trials.
| Mean baseline level (mg/dL (mmol/L)) | Percent difference between treatment groups |
| Helsinki Heart [76] | | Gemfibrozil versus placebo | 1 year | 3 years | 5 years |
| Total
cholesterol | 269 (6.98) | −11% | −10% | −9% | LDL | 189 (4.90) | −11% | −10% | −9% | HDL | 47 (1.22) | 11% | 10% | 7% | Triglycerides | 178 (2.01) | −39% | −37% | −33% | Non-HDL | 222 (5.76) | −15% | −14% | −13% |
| VA-HIT [12] | | | Gemfibrozil versus placebo | | 1 year |
| Total cholesterol | 175 (4.53) | | −4% | | LDL | 112 (2.90) | | 0% | | HDL | 32 (0.83) | | 6% | | Triglycerides | 160 (1.81) | | −31% | |
| BIP [10] | | | Bezafibrate versus placebo | | 1 year |
| Total cholesterol | 212 (5.49) | | −5% | | LDL | 148 (3.83) | | −7% | | HDL | 34.6 (0.90) | | 18% | | Triglycerides | 145 (1.64) | | −21% | |
| FIELD [11] | | Fenofibrate versus placebo | | 4 months | | End-of-study |
| Total
cholesterol | 194 (5.04) | −11% | | −7% | LDL | 119 (3.07) | −12% | | −6% | HDL | 42.5 (1.10) | 5% | | 1% | Triglycerides | 172 (1.94) | −29% | | −22% |
|
|