- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 574180, 5 pages
PPAR Could Contribute to the Pathogenesis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai City, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
Received 23 August 2012; Revised 7 November 2012; Accepted 16 November 2012
Academic Editor: Kenji Uno
Copyright © 2012 Osamu Kimura et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Viral hepatitis with hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus and chronic liver disease such as alcoholic or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are critical factors in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Furthermore, diabetes is known as an independent risk factor for HCC. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) is known to have an important role in fatty liver, and the mechanism of carcinogenesis has been clarified. PPAR controls ligand-dependent transcription, and three subtypes (α, δ, and γ) in humans are known. PPARs could contribute to the mechanisms of cell cycling, anti-inflammatory responses, and apoptosis. Therefore, to clarify the pathogenesis of HCC, we should examine PPAR signaling. In this paper, we have summarized the relevance of PPARs to the pathogenesis of HCC and cancer stem cells and possible therapeutic options through modifying PPAR signaling.
Worldwide, the mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma represents one-third of all cancer deaths with more than 1 million a year . In the early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma, when patients maintain a hepatic functional reserve, local treatment such as hepatic resection or radio-frequency ablation is relatively effective . However, many patients die from repeated recurrence. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) [3, 4] for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is only sometimes effective. Also, sorafenib (VEGF-2/PDGFR-beta inhibitor) , which has come in to use recently, has not shown satisfactory results [6, 7]. Therefore, finding a new therapeutic target molecule has become very important.
Viral hepatitis with HCV or HBV and chronic liver disease such as alcohol or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)  are critical factors in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, diabetes is known as an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma [9, 10]. In addition, the hepatitis C is known to become fatty liver at a high rate [11, 12]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) [13, 14] plays an important role in fatty liver, and its involvement in carcinogenesis has been clarified. PPAR controls ligand-dependent transcription, and three subtypes (α, δ, and γ) in humans are known. PPARα  is present in liver, kidney, heart, and small intestine and has an important role in the regulation of lipid metabolism . PPARγ is expressed in adipose tissue and macrophages. It is involved in adipose cell differentiation and lipid uptake and has anti-inflammatory effects. In addition, PPARγ expression is induced in the liver in a hypernutrition state such as fatty liver. PPARδ is expressed universally. It is involved in fatty acid metabolism and the induction of energy in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue.
PPARs have roles regulating the cell cycle and metabolism and have been reported to be involved in carcinogenesis. As the organ that controls metabolism, the liver in particular shows the strong involvement of PPARs. It is not clear whether each subtype of PPARs works to promote or inhibit cancer. In this paper, we describe the associations between PPAR and HCC.
2. Relevance of PPAR and the Pathogenesis of HCC
PPARα expression has a major impact on the maintenance of mitochondrial beta-oxidation . The ligand in the natural product of PPARα assumes the form of a fatty acid, and fenofibrates that reduce triglycerides act as a PPARα agonist . It has been controversial whether it promotes or suppresses cancer growth. Several reports have described that it has an inhibitory effect on cancer [17–20]. PPARα agonist suppressed the inhibition of angiogenesis via excess production of thrombospondin (TSP)-1. In addition, PPARα acts as a master regulator of inflammation, showing an anti-inflammatory action in suppressing interleukin-1β, TNF-α, and ICAM-1 . The antiangiogentic and anti-inflammatory effects promote the suppression of tumor growth by improving microenvironment.
On the other hand, hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatomegaly has been known to occur when PPARα agonists were administered for a long time to mice or rats . Peters et al.  employed fenofibrates in PPARα knockout mice and wild-type mice to investigate the cell cycle regulatory proteins. The expression levels of cell cycle regulatory proteins did not change significantly between the knockout mice and wild-type mice in the steady state. On the other hand, the expressions of cyclin D1, cyclin E, cyclin-dependent kinase 2, CDK4, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen increased remarkably in wild-type mice that were administered fibrates. However, their expression levels did not change in the knockout mice. In this study, it was revealed that PPARα was involved in the regulation of the cell cycle. In addition, HCV core transgenic mice showed a high rate of hepatocellular carcinoma from fatty liver and hepatomegaly . In this model, by knocking down PPARα, the development of hepatocellular carcinoma was suppressed . In brief, HCV core, which can lead to carcinoma, is abnormally sustained by PPARα activation. In this mouse model, the overexpression of several genes related to fat was observed. PPARα leads to carcinoma from fatty liver through these genes (fatty acid translocase (FAT) and fatty acid transport protein (FATP)). Appropriate stimulation of PPARα suppresses the cancer through the microcirculation. On the other hand, continuous abnormal stimulation promotes the cancer.
3. Relevance of PPAR and the Pathogenesis of HCC
PPARγ expression is observed in adipose cells and macrophages. Furthermore, PPARγ is expressed in the liver in a hypernutrition state such as fatty liver . The expression of PPARγ varies in hepatocellular carcinoma and is reported to be at the same level , a higher level , or a lower level  in comparison with normal liver. It has been reported that PPARγ inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma [28, 30, 31] and other carcinomas [32–35] in many vitro studies. These control epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and prevent the invasion and metastasis of carcinoma. The overexpression of PPARγ inhibits the metastasis of carcinoma by increasing E-cadherin through TIMP3 . PPARγ has been also revealed to be involved in cell cycle arrest . These mechanisms have been reported to act through p21 and p53 . Additionally, the pathway of p27 has been reported to be independent . Furthermore, PPARγ induces apoptosis directly through Fas, resulting in an inhibitory effect on carcinoma .
4. PPAR and HCC
PPARδ is expressed universally. PPARδ plays an important role in lipid and glucose metabolism and has been implicated in obesity-related metabolic disease. The involvement of PPARδ in colon cancer has been reported. It is reported that PPARδ in the cells indicates extreme malignancy in a colon cancer cell . PPARδ is a gene derived from TCF/β-catenin pathway. However, there are few reports on the association between PPARδ and HCC. EpCAM is a useful cancer stem cell marker in HCC. Activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the nucleus causes it to migrate along with β-catenin, FHL2, and intracellular domain (EpICD) of EpCAM . The association between PPARδ and HCC through Wnt/β-catenin signaling should be clarified in the future.
5. PPARs and Cancer Stem Cell
The cancer stem cell theory has been proposed in recent years to be applicable to many types of cancer [40–43]. In this theory, there are low-frequency cancer cells that have the potential for self-renewal, pluripotency, tumorigenicity, and asymmetric division like bone marrow stem cells and progenitor cells in normal tissue. The cancer stem cell theory itself was first suggested in the 1970s , and since then, it has been difficult to be confirmed experimentally. However, it was reported that there is a high tumorigenic fraction, , in human acute myeloid leukemia in 1997 . The presence of cancer stem cells was subsequently reported in various types of cancer. Now, this concept has been established by many studies. PPAR is involved in the control of cancer because it acts in the control of the cell cycle. Therefore, it seems that some link exists between PPAR and cancer stem cells. However, there are still few reports concerning cancer stem cells . Chearwae and Bright  reported that PPARγ agonists inhibited growth and expression of brain tumor stem cells by inhibition of EGF/bFGF signaling through Tyk2-Stat3 pathway and the expression of PPARγ. It is also notable that there is a relationship between cancer stem cells and EMT. Mani et al.  reported that EMT-generating cells had the properties of stem cells. If PPARγ is involved in EMT, it is possible that PPAR has a role in the mechanism of metastasis of the cancer stem cells. PPARγ agonists might regulate cancer stem cells. However, cancer stem cells have reduced the expression of PPARγ, allowing cells to escape from the control of the normal cell cycle .
6. PPARs and Treatment
PPARs may become the target of cancer treatment. Particularly, PPAR has an important role in carcinogenesis from fatty liver cells. It is expected that the thiazolidinediones (TZDs), which act on PPARγ, can be used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma. TZDs are expected to inhibit the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Troglitazone was the first TZD to become clinically available. However, troglitazone produced liver damage at a high rate  and therefore can no longer be used. Today, we can only use pioglitazone in Japan. Pioglitazone is reported to have a certain therapeutic effect for NASH. Although it has been widely used in clinical practice, sufficient effectiveness has not been reported fore hepatocellular carcinoma. However, aggressive usage has become more difficult, and some reports suggested that pioglitazone caused weight gain and edema as a side effect, and also bladder cancer . However, PPARγ activity exists in other drugs and natural products. For example, telmisartan , a kind of angiotensin II receptor blockers that has some PPARγ activity, and side effects such as weight gain do not occur. Chearwae and Bright  reported PPARγ agonist, and all-trans retinoic acid combination therapy had strong inhibitory effects on brain tumor stem cells. All-trans retinoic acid is used for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Such use of retinoic acid is a differentiation induction therapy used only in a cancer. APL is caused by abnormal molecules called PML/RARα made by translocation t(15; 17).
With PPAR agonists alone, it is difficult to treat cancer. However, there is a possibility for its use in the treatment of HCC in the future, such as in combination with molecular target drugs like retinoic acid. Therefore, curative effects for HCC are expected in the future.
PPARs play an important role in the generation of fatty liver. Abnormal stimulation of PPARα generates HCC through fatty liver. Particularly, infection of HCV causes abnormal stimulation of PPARα. In HCC, it is not clear whether PPARγ promotes cancer or can control it. At present, PPARγ suppresses cancer in vitro. Some reports describe that PPARγ affects control of cancer stem cells. In cancer stem cell theory, it is thought that cancer stem cells participate in chemoresistance and recurrence. Accordinly, it is important to induce cancer stem cells to become noncancer stem cells (mature cancer cells). Nuclear receptor agonists like PPARs might be the key for differentiation therapy. PPARs might be useful to target cancer stem cells in inducing the differentiation of HCC, because the expression of PPARs has been implicated in the regulation of cell cycle of hepatocytes and adipocytes in the liver.
- W. Y. Lau and E. C. H. Lai, “Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and recent advances,” Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 237–257, 2008.
- Y. Minami and M. Kudo, “Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status,” World Journal of Radiology, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 417–424, 2010.
- E. Ando, M. Tanaka, F. Yamashita et al., “Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: analysis of 48 cases,” Cancer, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 588–595, 2002.
- Y. C. Lai, C. Y. Shih, C. M. Jeng et al., “Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2666–2670, 2003.
- S. J. Hotte and H. W. Hirte, “BAY 43-9006: early clinical data in patients with advanced solid malignancies,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 8, no. 25, pp. 2249–2253, 2002.
- J. Bruix, J. L. Raoul, M. Sherman, et al., “Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: subanalyses of a phase III trial,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 821–829, 2012.
- A. L. Cheng, Z. Guan, Z. Chen, et al., “Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to baseline status: subset analyses of the phase III Sorafenib Asia-Pacific trial,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1452–1465, 2012.
- J. Ludwig, T. R. Viggiano, D. B. McGill, and B. J. Ott, “Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 434–438, 1980.
- J. A. Davila, R. O. Morgan, Y. Shaib, K. A. McGlynn, and H. B. El-Serag, “Diabetes increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: a population based case control study,” Gut, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 533–539, 2005.
- S. W. Lai, P. C. Chen, K. F. Liao, C. H. Muo, C. C. Lin, and F. C. Sung, “Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in diabetic patients and risk reduction associated with anti-diabetic therapy: a population-based cohort study,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 107, pp. 46–52, 2012.
- J. H. Lefkowitch, E. R. Schiff, G. L. Davis et al., “Pathological diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C: a multicenter comparative study with chronic hepatitis B,” Gastroenterology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 595–603, 1993.
- Y. Shintani, H. Fujie, H. Miyoshi et al., “Hepatitis C virus infection and diabetes: direct involvement of the virus in the development of insulin resistance,” Gastroenterology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 840–848, 2004.
- B. Desvergne and W. Wahli, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 649–688, 1999.
- I. Issemann and S. Green, “Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators,” Nature, vol. 347, no. 6294, pp. 645–650, 1990.
- T. Aoyama, J. M. Peters, N. Iritani et al., “Altered constitutive expression of fatty acid-metabolizing enzymes in mice lacking the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 10, pp. 5678–5684, 1998.
- B. Staels, J. Dallongeville, J. Auwerx, K. Schoonjans, E. Leitersdorf, and J. C. Fruchart, “Mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism,” Circulation, vol. 98, no. 19, pp. 2088–2093, 1998.
- R. Grau, C. Punzón, M. Fresno, and M. A. Iñiguez, “Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α agonists inhibit cyclo-oxygenase 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor transcriptional activation in human colorectal carcinoma cells via inhibition of activator protein-1,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 395, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2006.
- Y. Yokoyama, B. Xin, T. Shigeto, et al., “Clofibric acid, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha ligand, inhibits growth of human ovarian cancer,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 6, pp. 1379–1386, 2007.
- D. Panigrahy, A. Kaipainen, S. Huang et al., “PPARα agonist fenofibrate suppresses tumor growth through direct and indirect angiogenesis inhibition,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 985–990, 2008.
- D. Yamasaki, N. Kawabe, H. Nakamura et al., “Fenofibrate suppresses growth of the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell via PPARα-independent mechanisms,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 657–664, 2011.
- I. P. Torra, P. Gervois, and B. Staels, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in metabolic disease, inflammation, atherosclerosis and aging,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 151–159, 1999.
- J. K. Reddy, M. S. Rao, and D. E. Moody, “Hepatocellular carcinomas in acatalasemic mice treated with Nafenopin, a hypolipidemic peroxisome proliferator,” Cancer Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1211–1217, 1976.
- J. M. Peters, T. Aoyama, R. C. Cattley, U. Nobumitsu, T. Hashimoto, and F. J. Gonzalez, “Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α in altered cell cycle regulation in mouse liver,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1989–1994, 1998.
- K. Moriya, H. Yotsuyanagi, Y. Shintani et al., “Hepatitis C virus core protein induces hepatic steatosis in transgenic mice,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 1527–1531, 1997.
- N. Tanaka, K. Moriya, K. Kiyosawa, K. Koike, F. J. Gonzalez, and T. Aoyama, “PPARα activation is essential for HCV core protein-induced hepatic steatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 683–694, 2008.
- T. M. Willson, M. H. Lambert, and S. A. Kliewer, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and metabolic disease,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 70, pp. 341–367, 2001.
- H. Koga, S. Sakisaka, M. Harada et al., “Involvement of p21WAF1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and p18INK4c in troglitazone-induced cell-cycle arrest in human hepatoma cell lines,” Hepatology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1087–1097, 2001.
- K. L. Schaefer, K. Wada, H. Takahashi et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ inhibition prevents adhesion to the extracellular matrix and induces anoikis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2251–2259, 2005.
- J. Yu, L. Qiao, L. Zimmermann, et al., “Troglitazone inhibits tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo,” Hepatology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 134–143, 2006.
- S. S. Palakurthi, H. Aktas, L. M. Grubissich, R. M. Mortensen, and J. A. Halperin, “Anticancer effects of thiazolidinediones are independent of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and mediated by inhibition of translation initiation,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 6213–6218, 2001.
- J. Yu, B. Shen, E. S. H. Chu, et al., “Inhibitory role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in hepatocarcinogenesis in mice and in vitro,” Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 2008–2019, 2010.
- Y. Tsubouchi, H. Sano, Y. Kawahito et al., “Inhibition of human lung cancer cell growth by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonists through induction of apoptosis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 270, no. 2, pp. 400–405, 2000.
- E. Elstner, C. Müller, K. Koshizuka et al., “Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptory and retinoic acid receptor inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in BNX mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 15, pp. 8806–8811, 1998.
- S. Kitamura, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Shinomura, S. Kondo, S. Kanayama, and Y. Matsuzawa, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ induces growth arrest and differentiation markers of human colon cancer cells,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 1999.
- A. K. Reka, H. Kurapati, V. R. Narala et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g activation inhibits tumor metastasis by antagonizing smad3-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 3221–3232, 2010.
- B. Shen, E. S. H. Chu, G. Zhao, et al., “PPARgamma inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma metastases in vitro and in mice,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, pp. 1486–1494, 2012.
- A. Galli, E. Ceni, T. Mello et al., “Thiazolidinediones inhibit hepatocarcinogenesis in hepatitis B virus-transgenic mice by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-independent regulation of nucleophosmin,” Hepatology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 493–505, 2010.
- O. Takayama, H. Yamamoto, B. Damdinsuren, et al., “Expression of PPARdelta in multistage carcinogenesis of the colorectum: implications of malignant cancer morphology,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 95, pp. 889–895, 2006.
- D. Maetzel, S. Denzel, B. Mack et al., “Nuclear signalling by tumour-associated antigen EpCAM,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 162–171, 2009.
- D. Bonnet and J. E. Dick, “Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell,” Nature Medicine, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 730–737, 1997.
- M. Al-Hajj, M. S. Wicha, A. Benito-Hernandez, S. J. Morrison, and M. F. Clarke, “Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 3983–3988, 2003.
- T. Yamashita, M. Forgues, W. Wang, et al., “EpCAM and alpha-fetoprotein expression defines novel prognostic subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, pp. 1451–1461, 2008.
- O. Kimura, T. Takahashi, N. Ishii et al., “Characterization of the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)+ cell population in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines,” Cancer Science, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 2145–2155, 2010.
- J. E. Till and E. A. McCulloch, “A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells,” Radiation Research, vol. 14, pp. 213–222, 1961.
- H. Kuniyasu, “The roles of dietary PPARγ ligands for metastasis in colorectal cancer,” PPAR Research, vol. 2008, Article ID 529720, 7 pages, 2008.
- W. Chearwae and J. J. Bright, “PPARγ agonists inhibit growth and expansion of CD133+ brain tumour stem cells,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 2044–2053, 2008.
- S. A. Mani, W. Guo, M.-J. Liao, et al., “The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 704–715, 2008.
- N. L. Julie, I. M. Julie, A. I. Kende, and G. L. Wilson, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and delayed hepatotoxicity: another lesson from troglitazone,” Diabetologia, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 2108–2116, 2008.
- J. D. Lewis, A. Ferrara, T. Peng et al., “Risk of bladder cancer among diabetic patients treated with pioglitazone: interim report of a longitudinal cohort study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 916–922, 2011.
- K. Fujita, M. Yoneda, K. Wada et al., “Telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, controls progress of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in rats,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3455–3464, 2007.