- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 796235, 11 pages
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ-Mediated Polarization of Macrophages in Leishmania Infection
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Temple University School of Medicine, Room 534 OMS, 3400 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
3Undergraduate Research Program, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
Received 28 September 2011; Accepted 19 October 2011
Academic Editor: Dunne Fong
Copyright © 2012 Marion M. Chan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Infection is the outcome of a contest between a pathogen and its host. In the disease leishmaniasis, the causative protozoan parasites are harbored inside the macrophages. Leishmania species adapt strategies to make the infection chronic, keeping a balance between their own and the host's defense so as to establish an environment that is favorable for survival and propagation. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) is one of the tactics used. This ligand-activated nuclear factor curbs inflammation to protect the host from excessive injuries by setting a limit to its destructive force. In this paper, we report the interaction of host PPARs and the pathogen for visceral leishmaniasis, Leishmania donovani, in vivo and in vitro. PPAR expression is induced by parasitic infection. Leishmanial activation of PPARγ promotes survival, whereas blockade of PPARγ facilitates removal of the parasite. Thus, Leishmania parasites harness PPARγ to increase infectivity.
Leishmaniasis is caused by parasitic protozoa of the genus Leishmania. The disease is found worldwide, with an estimated prevalence of 12 million cases, 50,000 annual deaths, and 350 millions of the world’s population at risk . Leishmania has two stages in its life cycle: flagellated promastigotes that live within the alimentary canal of the insect vector and amastigotes that multiply within the phagolysosomes of mammalian macrophages. Infected female sandflies introduce saliva and promastigotes into the mammalian host during blood meals. The promastigotes are taken by leukocytes and differentiate into intracellular amastigotes within the macrophages. Then, infected macrophages carry the parasites to different organs. Over twenty species are known to infect humans. The cutaneous species reside and multiply within the skin tissue, whereas the visceral species predominantly accumulate in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. These diverse species cause different clinical manifestations, varying from self-healing or metastasizing skin lesions to enlargement of visceral organs including the liver and spleen. The disease symptoms are classified as cutaneous, mucocutaneous, or visceral leishmaniasis.
2. Resistance versus Susceptibility
Immunity against all species of Leishmania uniformly relies on a type 1 immune response that produces interferon γ (IFNγ). Produced by T helper 1 cells, IFNγ activates macrophages to generate nitric oxide (NO), a free radical that can kill Leishmania. Type 2 immune response, on the other hand, is ineffective . Production of interleukin-4 (IL-4) in Leishmania major infection, regulatory T cells in L. mexicana infection, and IL-10 in infection of various species are all associated with susceptibility [2–6]. It is well established that IL-4 exacerbates leishmaniasis when added exogenously, and IL-10 mutant mice become resistant to infection. However, to date, the reason why this cytokine promotes the pathogenesis of Leishmania infection remains partially understood [7–9].
3. M1 versus M2 in Disease Pathogenesis
Macrophages, the host of Leishmania parasites, are markedly heterogeneous. When stimulated by IFNγ, these macrophages differentiate into the classically activated (M1) phenotype, with inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) which produces NO from arginine. Intracellular Leishmania parasites are eliminated by this subpopulation. On the contrary, IL-4 differentiates macrophages towards the alternatively activated (M2) phenotype, which promotes humoral immunity and tissue repair. This subpopulation produces IL-10, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), .
In terms of signaling, IL-4 induces the expression of PPARγ and PPAR gamma coactivator-1 (PGC-1) β protein through the STAT-6 pathway . This nuclear regulator polarizes the monocytes into alternatively activated (M2) macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties. By its transcriptional activity, it mediates the expression of arginase-1 (Arg1) and CD36 [13, 14]. Arginine metabolism away from production of NO compromises the ability of infected macrophage to clear the intracellular pathogens [2, 11]. CD-36 is a scavenger receptor that mediates phagocytosis and facilitates the removal of apoptotic cells. By its transrepressive action, PPARγ blocks the expression iNOS as well as nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB)-mediated transcription of proinflammation mediators .
4. Leishmania donovani Infection Induces Host PPAR Gene Expression In Vivo and In Vitro
Our laboratory has been studying the pathogenesis of Leishmania, with particular interest in L. donovani. We investigated whether susceptibility to infection is associated with the activation of PPAR . Mice of the susceptible BALB/c strain were infected with stationary phase promastigotes of L. donovani. After four weeks, their liver and spleen were excised, and PPARα and γ mRNA levels were analyzed, using the technique of quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Infection of Leishmania leads to increase in PPAR gene expression. We detected 3-fold increase in mRNA of PPARα in the liver (Figure 1(a)) and 3-fold increase for PPARγ in the spleen (Figure 1(b)), as compared to the uninfected control organs. At the cellular level, when residential macrophages from peritoneal exudates of BALB/c mice were infected, PPARγ gene expression was also increased. The increase of PPARγ mRNA was 2-fold for Leishmania-infected peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) (Figure 1(c)). Kinetics study was performed to examine whether PPAR expression correlates to parasite burden (Figure 2). The expression of PPARγ in the liver was found to be slightly ahead of the increase in parasites burden (Figure 2(a)). Both PPARγ and parasite number peaked at 4 weeks, which is the time when granuloma will form and parasite growth will be quenched. As the infection in the liver decreases, the expression of PPARγ subsides in coordination. In the spleen where the parasites will persist, the rise in PPARγ expression correlates closely with the increase in parasite number (Figure 2(b)). Both parameters followed a logarithmic increase between weeks 2 to 4 until reaching a plateau at week 6.
5. Possible Mechanisms by Which Leishmania Induces PPAR Gene Expression
PPAR is a genetic sensor of fatty acids, and its ligands are produced during the course of Leishmania infection. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an enzyme that converts arachidonic acid into various bioactive lipids, including prostaglandin (PG) D2, PGE2, PGF2, thromboxane (TX) B2, 15d-PGJ2, and prostacyclin. Studies in the murine model of L. donovani infection have demonstrated that production of these bioactive lipids is enhanced upon infection [18, 19], and studies with L. amazonensis have revealed that COX-2 is needed for establishing infection . Blockade of COX with indomethacin inhibits L. amazonensis infection of peritoneal macrophages in vitro and reduces the size of lesions in susceptible BALB/c mice.
Among the COX-2 products 15d-PGJ2 is a potent endogenous ligand for PPAR . Moreover, in vitro addition of PGE2 increases the number of amastigotes within macrophages . PGE2 can activate the generation of lipoxins, a relatively new class of eicosanoids that are also derived from arachidonic acid, but through lipoxygenase or acetylated COX instead [23, 24]. Lipoxin will shut off inflammatory response when bound to its receptor . In L. major infection, addition of exogenous lipoxin A4 increases infectivity; this effect has been confirmed by receptor inhibition studies . The eicosanoid downregulates inflammation by promoting clearance of apoptotic neutrophils . Leishmania parasites (L. major, L. donovani, L. mexicana, etc.) are covered with phosphatidylserine (PS), a major surface characteristic of apoptotic cells, and engulfment of apoptotic cells leads to induction of PPAR [27, 28]. For these reasons, the parasitized macrophages would have activated PPAR and are likely to express an alternatively activated (M2) phenotype. Furthermore, PPAR turns on the expression of CD36, and this scavenger receptor would bind to thrombospondin and facilitate phagocytosis of the apoptotic neutrophils , the so-called Trojan horses for Leishmania parasites at the site of inoculation, reciprocally in a positive feedback manner [30–32]. Ligand activation of PPARγ augments phagocytic capacity of the alternatively activated macrophages.
6. Blockade of PPAR Reduces Leishmania Infection
Since PPAR is upregulated with Leishmania infection, we proceeded to determine whether the activation of PPAR is essential for infection. Studies assessing the effect of PPAR blockade on Leishmania infectivity have been conducted with L. major. Our laboratory studied L. donovani using PECs from the C57BL/6 mice, a strain that is susceptible to L. donovani infection though not L. major. A reason for selecting this strain is that it does not have a deficiency in T helper 1 cells and thus is capable of producing IFNγ, which is necessary for generation of the parasiticidal NO molecule. Nonelicited residential macrophages from the peritoneum were infected with L. donovani promastigotes, and IL-4 was added to activate PPARγ . Then, PPARγ transcriptional activity was blocked with SR202, an antagonist which efficacy and specificity have been shown in adipocytes [34–36]. The effect of PPARγ on parasite survival and proliferation in the host macrophages was assessed by enumerating the number of amastigotes per macrophage. In the absence of IL-4, the number of amastigotes per infected macrophage was (Figure 3(b)). IL-4 activated PPARγ (Figure 3(a)), and this resulted in an increase in infectivity (Figure 3(b)). There were amastigotes per macrophage. This enhancement by IL-4 was reversed by blocking PPARγ (Figure 3(b)). Addition of SR202, at 25 and 50 μM, in a dose-dependent manner, reduced the number of amastigotes per macrophage to and , respectively. This reduced infection was further correlated to an increase in nitric oxide level in the cultures (Figure 3(c)). The effect of SR202 at 50 μM or lower is specific to the infectious process for, at these concentrations, the compound did not affect the survival of promastigotes or mammalian cells (Figures 3(d) and 3(e)). Figure 4 shows the cultures that had been stained with Diff-Quik for microscopic enumeration. The macrophages that had been treated with 50 μM of SR202 presented a healthy morphology with many empty parasitophorous vacuoles freed of parasites.
Complementary results were obtained with Leishmania major in bone marrow-derived macrophages from the resistant C57BL/6 mice in a study by Gallardo-Soler et al. (2008). The PPAR antagonists, GW9662 and GW5393, reduce infectivity . Whereas we correlated PPAR activity in our L. donovani infection to the transrepressive action on iNOS-mediated NO production (Figure 3), this study correlated infectivity to the transcription of arginase. The enzyme is a bona fide marker for PPAR-mediated transcription and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages. Its mRNA level was decreased in coordination to the decrease in infection. In addition to pharmacological inhibitors, Odegaard et al. (2007) have examined L. major infectivity in mice with macrophages that do not express PPARγ (Mac-PPARγ KO, PPARγfl/fl ) . The mutant mice have impaired M2 macrophage activation, a delayed disease progression, and a lower parasite load (less footpad swelling) compared to the wild type . Henceforth, PPARγ plays an essential role in the pathogenic process of both L. major and L. donovani. In the absence of PPARγ activity, the balance shifts from the arginase producing M2 phenotype to that of nitric oxide producing, type 1, response.
7. PPAR Activation Enhances Leishmania Infection
Conversely, Gallardo-Soler et al. (2008) also demonstrated that the PPAR agonists GW1929 and GW7845 (for PPARα) and GW0742 (for PPARγ), at 1 μm concentration, increased intracellular growth of Leishmania major in bone marrow-derived macrophages . When both PPAR/RXR ligands were coadministered, the degree of infection was similar to those infected in the presence of IL-4. This increased number of intracellular amastigotes can be correlated to the levels of arginase activity.
PPAR is also regarded as dietary-sensing nuclear receptors; many activators of PPARγ have been identified in foods . Our laboratory is interested in the effect of curcumin (Figure 5), a dietary activator of PPARγ on visceral leishmaniasis [16, 39]. It is the active principle in the spice turmeric, which is used abundantly in India, where visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in the Bihar region. Curcumin is well known for its anti-inflammatory effect, and there is ample evidence that the activity can be attributed to the activation of PPARs [40–43]. Zheng and Chen (2007) have suggested that there is a curcumin-responsive element residing in the regulatory region of the PPARγ gene . We examined the effect of curcumin on PPAR activation and Leishmania infection in vivo . Susceptible BALB/c mice and resistant C3H mice were infected with L. donovani; immediately following inoculation, the mice were fed curcumin or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) every other day. Then, at 4 weeks after infection, the livers and spleens were harvested and quantified for PPARγ, iNOS, cytokines, and parasite load. Parasite load was quantified by two complementary methods, limiting dilution analysis and real-time PCR detection, and compared by the parametric test ANOVA after data transformation. Figure 6 shows the results on PPARγ, iNOS, and Leishmania kinetoplast DNA quantification. Curcumin treatment led to 5-fold increase in the gene expression for PPARγ and 2-fold increase in the gene expression for PPARγ in the spleen. It also caused an 80% decrease in the expression of iNOS in the liver and 68% in the spleen (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Concomitant with these modulations, parasite burden was elevated compared to the untreated vehicle control, (results from limiting dilution were not shown).
Corresponding to the feeding studies, we found that curcumin increased PPARγ and decreased iNOS gene expression in infected macrophages. At 10 μm, curcumin increased PPARγ mRNA levels in infected peritoneal macrophages from BALB/c by 1.5-fold Figure 7(a). The dose dependency of the curcumin actions was demonstrated by iNOS gene expression and nitric oxide production. The level of gene expression is shown in Figure 7(b). At 10 μm, curcumin reduced the level of steady-state RNA by 70%. The level of nitric oxide in the culture supernatants was also reduced. At 5, 7.5, and 10 μm of curcumin, the reduction was 18, 39.3, and 61.4%, respectively . In parallel to the reduction, parasite infectivity increased. The number of infected macrophages increased dose dependently from 28 to 37% in the resistant C3H strain and from 35 to 48% in the susceptible BALC/c strain. The number of amastigotes per macrophage also increased dose dependently, as shown in the table in Figure 7(c).
8. Conclusion: Mechanisms of PPARs on Leishmaniasis
Taken together, these cumulative data from L. donovani and L. major infections indicate that PPAR plays a role in leishmaniasis, no matter in the liver where the PPARα forms predominate, in the spleen and residential macrophages from the peritoneum or the bone marrow where the PPARγ forms predominate . Our perspective on how the nuclear factor is activated during infection and how its activation enhances the survival of Leishmania parasites is as follows. When the infected sandflies bite, an inflammatory reaction initiates innate and adaptive immune response for protection against the parasites. Neutrophils and macrophages are recruited to the injection site, and promastigotes enter the phagocytes. Launching a type 1 immune reaction, with production of nitric oxide, would resist infection. However, the parasites and infected host cells can synthesize ligands that activate PPARγ. Phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils and IL-4 from T helper 2 cells can do so as well. With the activation of PPARγ, Leishmania parasites would benefit from infiltration of macrophages, inactivation of the destructive inflammatory response, and promotion of the resolution of inflammation. Activation of PPAR promotes differentiation of the host macrophages into the alternatively activated (M2) macrophages, which have a type 2 phenotype and would produce arginase to interfere with enzymatic activity of iNOS . As such, the parasites can survive and multiply within the host’s macrophages, and the infection becomes chronic (Figure 8).
Currently, whether antagonists of PPAR would be therapeutic for leishmaniasis remains to be investigated. SR202, the antagonist that we used in our study, has been shown to prevent obesity in rats and therefore has in vivo efficacy. Ligands for PPARγ are drugs for type 2 diabetes, and ligands for PPARα are also currently in clinical use for obesity. How would these agents affect the outcome of leishmaniasis and whether PPAR affects the survival of other parasites are interesting questions .
This work was supported by Grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI-45555 and AR-051761) to M. M. Chan. The authors thank financial support to C. Chen from Temple University College of Science and Technology undergraduate research program. They also thank Dr. Xinmin Zhang for providing Diff-Quik stain, Grace Oey for technical assistance and the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology for use of microscope. The technical assistance that Drs. Andrea Moore and Kyle Evans gave to C. Chen when she first started on the project is also greatly appreciated.
- L. Kedzierski, A. Sakthianandeswaren, J. M. Curtis, P. C. Andrews, P. C. Junk, and K. Kedzierska, “Leishmaniasis: current treatment and prospects for new drugs and vaccines,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 599–614, 2009.
- F. P. Heinzel, M. D. Sadick, B. J. Holaday, R. L. Coffman, and R. M. Locksley, “Reciprocal expression of interferon γ or interleukin 4 during the resolution or progression of murine leishmaniasis. Evidence for expansion of distinct helper T cell subsets,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 1989.
- S. Nylén and S. Gautam, “Immunological perspectives of leishmaniasis,” Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, vol. 2, pp. 135–146, 2010.
- J. Ji, J. Masterson, J. Sun, and L. Soong, “CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells restrain pathogenic responses during Leishmania amazonensis infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 11, pp. 7147–7153, 2005.
- R. Chatelain, S. Mauze, and R. L. Coffman, “Experimental Leishmania major infection in mice: role of IL-10,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 211–218, 1999.
- D. Sacks and C. Anderson, “Re-examination of the immunosuppressive mechanisms mediating non-cure of Leishmania infection in mice,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 201, pp. 225–238, 2004.
- E. T. Guimarães, L. A. Santos, R. Ribeiro dos Santos, M. M. Teixeira, W. L. C. dos Santos, and M. B. P. Soares, “Role of interleukin-4 and prostaglandin E2 in Leishmania amazonensis infection of BALB/c mice,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1219–1226, 2006.
- R. Chatelain, S. Mauze, K. Varkila, and R. L. Coffman, “Leishmania major infection in interleukin-4 and interferon-γ depleted mice,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 423–431, 1999.
- J. Alexander and E. McFarlane, “Can type-1 responses against intracellular pathogens be T helper 2 cytokine dependent?” Microbes and Infection, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 953–959, 2008.
- F. O. Martinez, L. Helming, and S. Gordon, “Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 451–483, 2009.
- M. Munder, K. Eichmann, and M. Modolell, “Alternative metabolic states in murine macrophages reflected by the nitric oxide synthase/arginase balance: competitive regulation by CD4+ T cells correlates with Th1/Th2 phenotype,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 11, pp. 5347–5354, 1998.
- A. Chawla, “Control of macrophage activation and function by PPARs,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1559–1569, 2010.
- A. Gallardo-Soler, C. Gómez-Nieto, M. L. Campo et al., “Arginase I induction by modified lipoproteins in macrophages: a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ/δ-mediated effect that links lipid metabolism and immunity,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1394–1402, 2008.
- F. J. O. Rios, S. Jancar, I. B. Melo, D. F. J. Ketelhuth, and M. Gidlund, “Role of PPAR-gamma in the modulation of CD36 and FcgammaRII induced by LDL with low and high degrees of oxidation during the differentiation of the monocytic THP-1 cell line,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 22, no. 5-6, pp. 549–556, 2008.
- M. Ricote, J. S. Welch, and C. K. Glass, “Regulation of macrophage gene expression by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ,” Hormone Research, vol. 54, no. 5-6, pp. 275–280, 2000.
- N. Adapala and M. M. Chan, “Long-term use of an antiinflammatory, curcumin, suppressed type 1 immunity and exacerbated visceral leishmaniasis in a chronic experimental model,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 88, no. 12, pp. 1329–1339, 2008.
- R. G. Titus, M. Marchand, T. Boon, and J. A. Louis, “A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 545–555, 1985.
- N. E. Reiner and C. J. Malemud, “Arachidonic acid metabolism in murine leishmaniasis (Donovani): ex-vivo evidence for increased cyclooxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase activity in spleen cells,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 501–510, 1984.
- N. E. Reiner and C. J. Malemud, “Arachidonic acid metabolism by murine peritoneal macrophages infected with Leishmania donovani: in vitro evidence for parasite-induced alterations in cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 556–563, 1985.
- M. V. C. Lonardoni, C. L. Barbieri, M. Russo, and S. Jancar, “Modulation of Leishmania (L.) amazonensis growth in cultured mouse macrophages by prostaglandins and platelet activating factor,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 137–141, 1994.
- S. Cuzzocrea, N. S. Wayman, E. Mazzon et al., “The cyclopentenone prostaglandin 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 attenuates the development of acute and chronic inflammation,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 997–1007, 2002.
- F. L. Ribeiro-Gomes, A. C. Otero, N. A. Gomes et al., “Macrophage interactions with neutrophils regulate leishmania major infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 7, pp. 4454–4462, 2004.
- C. Bonnans, K. Fukunaga, M. A. Levy, and B. D. Levy, “Lipoxin A4 regulates bronchial epithelial cell responses to acid injury,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 168, no. 4, pp. 1064–1072, 2006.
- M. M. Y. Chan and A. R. Moore, “Resolution of inflammation in murine autoimmune arthritis is disrupted by cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition and restored by prostaglandin E2-mediated lipoxin A4 production,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 11, pp. 6418–6426, 2010.
- G. Bannenberg and C. N. Serhan, “Specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators in the inflammatory response: an update,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1801, no. 12, pp. 1260–1273, 2010.
- A. Wenzel and G. Van Zandbergen, “Lipoxin A4 receptor dependent leishmania infection,” Autoimmunity, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 331–333, 2009.
- D. El Kebir and J. G. Filep, “Role of neutrophil apoptosis in the resolution of inflammation,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 10, pp. 1731–1748, 2010.
- J. L. M. Wanderley, M. E. C. Moreira, A. Benjamin, A. C. Bonomo, and M. A. Barcinski, “Mimicry of apoptotic cells by exposing phosphatidylserine participates in the establishment of amastigotes of Leishmania (L) amazonensis in mammalian hosts,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 1834–1839, 2006.
- J. Savill, N. Hogg, and C. Haslett, “Macrophage vitronectin receptor, CD36, and thrombospondin cooperate in recognition of neutrophils undergoing programmed cell death,” Chest, vol. 99, supplement 3, pp. 6S–7S, 1991.
- G. Van Zandbergen, M. Klinger, A. Mueller et al., “Cutting edge: neutrophil granulocyte serves as a vector for Leishmania entry into macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 11, pp. 6521–6525, 2004.
- N. C. Peters, J. G. Egen, N. Secundino et al., “In vivo imaging reveals an essential role for neutrophils in leishmaniasis transmitted by sand flies,” Science, vol. 321, no. 5891, pp. 970–974, 2008.
- G. Van Zandbergen, A. Bollinger, A. Wenzel et al., “Leishmania disease development depends on the presence of apoptotic promastigotes in the virulent inoculum,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 37, pp. 13837–13842, 2006.
- N. Noben-Trauth, P. Kropf, and I. Müller, “Susceptibility to Leishmania major infection in interleukin-4-deficient mice,” Science, vol. 271, no. 5251, pp. 987–990, 1996.
- S. Doggrell, “Do peroxisome proliferation receptor-γ antagonists have clinical potential as combined antiobesity and antidiabetic drugs?” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 713–716, 2003.
- J. Liu, X. Wu, B. Mitchell, C. Kintner, S. Ding, and P. G. Schultz, “A small-molecule agonist of the Wnt signaling pathway,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 1987–1990, 2005.
- M. Soller, A. Tautenhahn, B. Brüne et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ contributes to T lymphocyte apoptosis during sepsis,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 235–243, 2006.
- J. I. Odegaard, R. R. Ricardo-Gonzalez, M. H. Goforth et al., “Macrophage-specific PPARγ controls alternative activation and improves insulin resistance,” Nature, vol. 447, no. 7148, pp. 1116–1120, 2007.
- H. Martin, “Role of PPAR-gamma in inflammation. Prospects for therapeutic intervention by food components,” Mutation Research, vol. 690, no. 1-2, pp. 57–63, 2010.
- M. M. Y. Chan, N. S. Adapala, and D. Fong, “Curcumin overcomes the inhibitory effect of nitric oxide on Leishmania,” Parasitology Research, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2005.
- M. M. Y. Chan, H. I. Huang, M. R. Fenton, and D. Fong, “In vivo inhibition of nitric oxide synthase gene expression by curcumin, a cancer preventive natural product with anti-inflammatory properties,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1955–1962, 1998.
- A. Jacob, R. Wu, M. Zhou, and P. Wang, “Mechanism of the anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin: PPAR-γ activation,” PPAR Research, vol. 2007, Article ID 89369, 2007.
- Q. Kang and A. Chen, “Curcumin suppresses expression of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, leading to the inhibition of LDL-induced activation of hepatic stellate cells,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 157, no. 8, pp. 1354–1367, 2009.
- J. Lin and A. Chen, “Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ by curcumin blocks the signaling pathways for PDGF and EGF in hepatic stellate cells,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 529–540, 2008.
- S. Zheng and A. Chen, “Disruption of transforming growth factor-β signaling by curcumin induces gene expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in rat hepatic stellate cells,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 292, no. 1, pp. G113–G123, 2007.
- L. Nicolas, E. Prina, T. Lang, and G. Milon, “Real-time PCR for detection and quantitation of Leishmania in mouse tissues,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1666–1669, 2002.
- M. M. Chan, K. W. Evans, A. R. Moore, and D. Fong, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR): balance for survival in parasitic infections,” Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, vol. 2010, p. 828951, 2010.
- A. Chawla, “Control of macrophage activation and function by PPARs,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1559–1569, 2010.