Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor <i>γ</i> Regulates the Expression of Lipid Phosphate Phosphohydrolase 1 in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells

Huang, Yazi; Zhao, Beilei; Liu, Yahan; Wang, Nanping

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/740121

PPAR Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 740121 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/740121

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Regulates the Expression of Lipid Phosphate Phosphohydrolase 1 in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells

Yazi Huang,¹Beilei Zhao,¹Yahan Liu,¹and Nanping Wang¹

Academic Editor: Youfei Guan

Received27 Nov 2013

Accepted01 Apr 2014

Published12 May 2014

Abstract

Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase 1 (LPP1), a membrane ectophosphohydrolase regulating the availability of bioactive lipid phosphates, plays important roles in cellular signaling and physiological processes such as angiogenesis and endothelial migration. However, the regulated expression of LPP1 remains largely unknown. Here, we aimed to examine a role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) in the transcriptional control of LPP1 gene expression. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) demonstrated that activation of PPARγ increased the mRNA level of LPP1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed that PPARγ binds to the putative PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs) within the 5′-flanking region of the human LPP1 gene. Genomic fragment containing 1.7-kilobase of the promoter region was cloned by using PCR. The luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that overexpression of PPARγ and rosiglitazone, a specific ligand for PPARγ, could significantly upregulate the reporter activity. However, site-directed mutagenesis of the PPRE motif abolished the induction. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that PPARγ transcriptionally activated the expression of LPP1 gene in ECs, suggesting a potential role of PPARγ in the metabolism of phospholipids.

1. Introduction

Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolases (LPPs), also known as phosphatidate phosphohydrolase-2 (PAP-2), are the Mg²⁺-independent and N-ethylmaleimide-insensitive N-glycosylated integral membrane ectophosphohydrolase [1, 2]. LPPs catalyze the dephosphorylation of a range of lipid phosphates, such as lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) [3, 4]. Extracellular LPA and S1P bind to the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and exert a number of pathophysiological actions, such as angiogenesis, platelet activation, inflammation, smooth muscle cells (SMCs) proliferation and migration, and cardiovascular remodeling [4, 5]. LPPs hydrolyze these lipid phosphates to terminate their signaling actions or generate new signaling molecules [6]. Three isoforms of LPPs (LPP1, LPP2, and LPP3) have been found [7]. LPP1 negatively regulates lysophospholipid signalings by degrading the bioactive lysophospholipids released from platelets and modulates their effects on the cell proliferation, migration, inflammation, coagulation, and wound healing [5, 6]. The activity of LPP1 is mainly regulated through de novo expression rather than posttranslational modification such as phosphorylation. Expression of LPP1 was induced by androgens in human prostatic adenocarcinoma cells and decreased in ovarian cancers [8, 9]. However, transcriptional mechanism underlying the regulation expression of the LPP1 remains largely unclear.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a family of ligand-activated nuclear receptors and transcription factors [10]. Among three PPAR isoforms (α, β/δ, and γ), PPARγ is predominantly expressed in adipose tissue and also in vasculature including vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and endothelial cells (ECs) [11, 12]. PPARγ forms a heterodimer with RXR and binds to the PPAR response elements (PPREs) in the promoter region of target genes [13]. When activated by various natural and synthetic ligands such as prostaglandin metabolite 15d-PGJ2 [14] and the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone [15], PPARγ transactivates the gene expression and regulates adipogenesis [16] and insulin response [17]. In addition, PPARγ possesses antiatherogenic and anti-inflammatory actions in ECs [18, 19]. Therefore, we attempted to examine a role of PPARγ in the regulation of LPP1 gene expression in ECs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured as previously described [20]. Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) were harvested from bovine aorta and maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS [21]. Rosiglitazone, GW501516, and GW9662 were obtained from Cayman Chemical. Polyclonal rabbit anti-PPARγ and rabbit IgG were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Luciferase assay reagent, MMLV reverse transcriptase, Taq polymerase, restriction enzymes (XhoI, NheI), and DNA ligase were from Promega Corporation. Lipofectamine 2000 and Trizol reagent were obtained from Invitrogen. The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit was from Stratagene Corporation.

2.2. Adenoviral Infection

Cells were infected with adenoviruses encoding the wild type human PPARα, β/δ, or γ1 (Ad-WT-PPARα or Ad-WT-PPARβ/δ, Ad-WT-PPARγ) together with Ad-tTA, which encodes a tetracycline-responsive transactivator. These viral constructs were previously described and used at 50 multiplicities of infection [22, 23]. Infected cells were maintained in the presence or absence of tetracycline (0.1 μg/mL, a tet-off expression) for 48 hours as described [20].

2.3. RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent and reverse transcribed into cDNA with M-MLV reverse transcriptase with oligo-dT as a primer. Real-time PCR was performed with SYBR-green dye and Taq polymerase in the DNA Engine Opticon real-time system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The primer sequences are: LPP1 5′-TCAACTGCAGCGATGGTTAC (forward), 5′-GCCCACATAAATGGATACGG (reverse); GAPDH 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC (forward), 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA (reverse).

2.4. Plasmids, Mutation, Transfection, and Reporter Assay

The genomic fragment containing −1921 to −221 bp upstream of the transcription start site of human LPP1 gene was PCR amplified from human genomic DNA with the primers (5′-CTTGATAGTACAACAGGGTCA and 5′-TCAGGTGGTCTCCGAACT) with flanking sites of NheI and XhoI. The amplified product was subcloned into the pGL3-basic luciferase vector to generate the pGL3/LPP1-luc. The Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis kit was used to generate the pGL3/mLPP1-luc by disruption of the putative PPRE site (from −624 to −611 bp) with the use of the mutagenic primers: 5′-GAGGGATTCTGGCTAAAGGCG(A)GT(G)TCCC(AA) GGT(G)CTTCTACAAC and 5′-GTTGTAGAAGA(C)CCGG(TT) GAA(C)CC(T)GCCTTTAGCCAGAATCCCTC. The plasmids were transfected together with the pRSV-β-gal plasmid into BAECs by using Lipofectamine 2000. Luciferase activity was measured with the luciferase assay kit and normalized with β-galactosidase activity.

2.5. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

HUVECs were infected with Ad-WT-PPARγ and, 48 h later, cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde. The sheared chromatin DNAs were immunoreacted with 2 μg anti-PPARγ antibody (or IgG as negative control) and precipitated with protein A/G sepharose beads. The eluted immunoprecipitates were digested with proteinase K. DNA was amplified by qPCR with the primers flanking the putative PPREs. The primers for ChIP assay were shown in Table 1.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed by using one-way ANOVA. The values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. PPREs Are Recurrent Motifs in the 5′-Flanking Region of Human LPP1 Gene

We analyzed the human LPP1 5′-flanking (NC_000005.9) using MatInspector (http://www.genomatix.de/) and identified three putative PPRE motifs, respectively, locating at −418 bp (AGGTCAACGTTGA), −548 bp (AATTCAACGGTGA), and −611 bp (AGGTCAAGGGCTT) upstream of the transcriptional start site of human LPP1 gene (Figure 1).

3.2. PPARγ Upregulates LPP1 Gene Expression in ECs

To examine whether PPARγ regulates LPP1, we infected HUVECs with Ad-WT-PPARγ together with Ad-tTA in the presence or absence of tetracycline (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Then, cells were treated with the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone (5 μM) for 24 h. The qRT-PCR results showed that mRNA level of LPP1 was significantly induced in ECs activated with rosiglitazone or overexpressing PPARγ. Rosiglitazone further augmented the induction by PPARγ overexpression (Figure 2).

To investigate whether other two isoforms of PPARs also have similar effects, we also infected the ECs with Ad-WT-PPARα or Ad-WT-PPARδ and treated with their specific agonists fenofibrate (5 μM) and GW501516 (1 μM) for 24 h. LPP1 mRNA level were not affected by neither PPARα nor PPARβ/δ overexpression. Similarly, PPARα and PPARβ/δ agonists had no effect on LPP1 expression (Figure 2).

In order to examine whether the effect of rosiglitazone was specific for PPARγ, we used GW9662, a selective antagonist, to pretreat ECs before the exposure. As shown in Figure 3, PPARγ antagonism significantly attenuated the LPP1 induction by rosiglitazone. Taken together, these results indicated that LPP1 gene was induced by PPARγ activation.

3.3. PPARγ Binds to the PPRE in the Promoter of Human LPP1 Gene

Sequence analysis of the 5′-flanking region of human LPP1 gene revealed three putative PPRE motifs. To examine whether PPARγ binds to these regions, ChIP assay was performed with the anti-PPARγ antibody and IgG as control. The results showed that PPARγ could bind to the PPRE located at −624/−611 bp upstream of the human LPP1 gene, while the two proximal sites at −481/−468 and −561/−548 had no binding (Figure 4). This result suggested that the PPRE at −624/−611 might mediate the induction by PPARγ.

3.4. PPARγ Increases the Promoter Activity of Human LPP1 Gene via Binding to PPRE3

To further examine whether PPARγ promotes the LPP1 gene transcription activity, we constructed pGL3/LPP1-luc reporter driven by the fragment containing three putative PPREs (Figure 5(a)). BAECs were transfected with pGL3/LPP1-luc plasmid. Luciferase assay showed that the reporter activity was increased by rosiglitazone or overexpression of PPARγ (Figure 5(b)). However, site-directed mutagenesis of the PPRE at −624/−611 abolished the induction by PPARγ, indicating that the PPRE at −624/−611 is the cis-element mediating the PPARγ transactivation.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

In the present study, we have demonstrated a transcriptional mechanism regulating the expression of LPP1 gene. We provided novel evidence that PPARγ and its specific agonist rosiglitazone positively regulate the transcription of LPP1 gene in ECs. We also identified the PPRE motif within the regulatory region of the LPP1 gene that mediates the action of PPARγ.

Elucidation of the transcriptional regulation of LPP1 is of physiological importance because LPP1 is a key enzyme responsible for the catabolism of LPA and S1P which are the bioactive lipid phosphates [5]. Therefore, given the mass and extensive distribution of ECs, the induction of LPP1 expression may lead to a profound decrease in the concentrations of LPA and S1P, both in circulation and in the tissues, and exert important biological effects. Although PPARγ has its major roles in the regulation of adipogenesis and insulin sensitivity, it also has a variety of protective effects on cardiovascular functions ranging from atherogenesis to blood pressure regulation [24, 25]. The finding that PPARγ induces LPP1 expression in ECs may provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular effects of PPARγ modulation.

LPP1 is an ectoenzyme with its active sites located on the outer surface of plasma membrane. It degrades extracellular LPA to monoacylglycerol, which can be taken into cells to produce intracellular LPA by acylglycerol kinase. Intriguingly, intracellular LPA was known to be an agonist for PPARγ [26, 27]. Thus, it is postulated that the regulation of LPP1 by PPARγ may act as positive loop for extracellular LPA degradation. In human atherosclerotic lesions, LPA was accumulated in the lipid core of the plaques and promoted the development of atherosclerosis in vivo [28, 29]. Lipoprotein-derived LPA promoted the atherosclerosis in animal models [30]. In contrast, PPARγ agonists thiazolidinediones (TZD) reduced atherosclerotic plaques both in diabetic patients and in animal models [31]. Therefore, whether the induction of LPP1 and ensuing decrease in LPA contribute to the antiatherosclerotic effect of PPARγ remains to be investigated. In addition, the effects of PPARγ activation on the protein level, enzymatic activity of LPP1, and extracellular levels of LPA and S1P need to be examined in the future.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Grants from the National Science Foundation of China (81220108005 and 81221061) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2010CB912500).

References

D. N. Brindley and D. W. Waggoner, “Mammalian lipid phosphate phosphohydrolases,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 38, pp. 24281–24284, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. English, M. Martin, K. A. Harvey et al., “Characterization and purification of neutrophil ecto-phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolase,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 324, no. 3, pp. 941–950, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
D. W. Waggoner, A. Gómez-Muñoz, J. Dewald, and D. N. Brindley, “Phosphatidate phosphohydrolase catalyzes the hydrolysis of ceramide 1- phosphate, lysophosphatidate, and sphingosine 1-phosphate,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 28, pp. 16506–16509, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chun, E. J. Goetzl, T. Hla et al., “International Union of Pharmacology. XXXIV. Lysophospholipid receptor nomenclature,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 265–269, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Karliner, “Lysophospholipids and the cardiovascular system,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1582, no. 1-3, pp. 216–221, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. A. Sciorra and A. J. Morris, “Roles for lipid phosphate phosphatases in regulation of cellular signaling,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1582, no. 1-3, pp. 45–51, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Roberts, V. A. Sciorra, and A. J. Morris, “Human type 2 phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolases: Substrate specificity of the type 2a, 2b, and 2c enzymes and cell surface activity of the 2a isoform,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 34, pp. 22059–22067, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ulrix, J. V. Swinnen, W. Heyns, and G. Verhoeven, “Identification of the phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2a isozyme as an androgen-regulated gene in the human prostatic adenocarcinoma cell line LNCaP,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 8, pp. 4660–4665, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tan, R. Yu, and J. M. Pezzuto, “Betulinic acid-induced programmed cell death in human melanoma cells involves mitogen-activated protein kinase activation,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 2866–2875, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Lemberger, O. Braissant, C. Juge-Aubry et al., “PPAR tissue distribution and interactions with other hormone-signaling pathways,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 804, pp. 231–251, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Braissant, F. Foufelle, C. Scotto, M. Dauça, and W. Wahli, “Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): Tissue distribution of PPAR-α, -β, and -γ in the adult rat,” Endocrinology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 354–366, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. E. Chen, M. Fu, J. Zhang et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and the cardiovascular system,” Vitamins & Hormones, vol. 66, pp. 157–188, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schoonjans, J. Peinado-Onsurbe, A. M. Lefebvre et al., “PPARα and PPARγ activators direct a distinct tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene,” EMBO Journal, vol. 15, no. 19, pp. 5336–5348, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
B. M. Forman, P. Tontonoz, J. Chen, R. P. Brun, B. M. Spiegelman, and R. M. Evans, “15-deoxy-Δ12, 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPARγ,” Cell, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 803–812, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Lehmann, L. B. Moore, T. A. Smith-Oliver, W. O. Wilkison, T. M. Willson, and S. A. Kliewer, “An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 22, pp. 12953–12956, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Farmer, “Regulation of PPARγ activity during adipogenesis,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 29, supplement 1, pp. S13–S16, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. O. Nehlin, J. P. Mogensen, I. Petterson et al., “Selective PPAR agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1067, no. 1, pp. 448–453, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Reiss and M. E. Vagell, “PPARγ activity in the vessel wall: anti-atherogenic properties,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 26, pp. 3227–3238, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Pasceri, H. D. Wu, J. T. Willerson, and E. T. H. Yeh, “Modulation of vascular inflammation in vitro and in vivo by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activators,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 235–238, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Wang, L. Verna, N. G. Chen et al., “Constitutive activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ suppresses pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules in human vascular endothelial cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 37, pp. 34176–34181, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Wang, L. Verna, H.-L. Liao, A. Ballard, Y. Zhu, and M. B. Stemerman, “Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of dominant-negative mutant of c-Jun prevents intercellular adhesion molecule-1 induction by LDL: a critical role for activator protein-1 in endothelial activation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1414–1420, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Fan, Y. Wang, Z. Tang et al., “Suppression of pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules by PPAR-delta in human vascular endothelial cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 315–321, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Fan, Z. Tang, and N. Wang, “Overexpression of adiponectin receptors potentiates the antiinflammatory action of subeffective dose of globular adiponectin in vascular endothelial cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li and N. Wang, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in vascular biology,” Cardiovascular and Hematological Disorders, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–117, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in vascular biology-molecular mechanisms and clinical implications,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. van der Bend, J. de Widt, E. J. Van Corven, W. H. Moolenaar, and W. J. Van Blitterswijk, “Metabolic conversion of the biologically active phospholipid, lysophosphatidic acid, in fibroblasts,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1125, no. 1, pp. 110–112, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. McIntyre, A. V. Pontsler, A. R. Silva et al., “Identification of an intracellular receptor for lysophosphatidic acid (LPA): LPA is a transcellular PPARγ agonist,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 131–136, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Siess, K. J. Zangl, M. Essler et al., “Lysophosphatidic acid mediates the rapid activation of platelets and endothelial cells by mildly oxidized low density lipoprotein and accumulates in human atherosclerotic lesions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 6931–6936, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Rother, R. Brandl, D. L. Baker et al., “Subtype-selective antagonists of lysophosphatidic acid receptors inhibit platelet activation triggered by the lipid core of atherosclerotic plaques,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 741–747, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhou, P. Subramanian, G. Sevilmis et al., “Lipoprotein-derived lysophosphatidic acid promotes atherosclerosis by releasing CXCL1 from the endothelium,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 592–600, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zimmet, “Addressing the insulin resistance syndrome: a role for the thiazolidinediones,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 354–362, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Yazi Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1222

Downloads

980

Citations