Validation of the Self-Assessment of Treatment Questionnaire among Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia
Table 7
Construct validity: correlations between SAT and PRO measures (pooled dataset; )1.
Spearman correlations2
SAT 1 (Pain relief)
SAT 2 (Activity level)
SAT 3 (Quality of life)
SAT 4 (Undergo treatment again)
SAT 5 (Compared to previous treatment)
3-Item SAT treatment effect subscale
2-Item SAT treatment satisfaction subscale
PGIC
0.90
0.68
0.77
0.44
0.62
0.89
0.61
CGIC3
0.85
0.63
0.73
0.48
0.64
0.83
0.64
NPRS change scores
Pain now
−0.60
−0.47
−0.51
−0.30
−0.37
−0.59
−0.38
Average 24 hour pain
−0.69
−0.53
−0.60
−0.35
−0.45
−0.68
−0.46
BPI change scores
Pain in last 24 hours—at worst
−0.64
−0.50
−0.53
−0.28
−0.40
−0.63
−0.39
Pain in last 24 hours—at least
−0.52
−0.38
−0.44
−0.27
−0.32
−0.50
−0.34
SF-MPQ present pain intensity change scores
−0.45
−0.41
−0.43
−0.20
−0.29
−0.47
−0.29
SF-36v2 change scores
Physical functioning
0.20
0.16
0.25
0.144
0.154
0.23
0.16
Bodily pain
0.43
0.40
0.40
0.27
0.29
0.46
0.33
Vitality
0.25
0.23
0.21
0.095
0.144
0.25
0.144
BPI: Brief Pain Inventory; CGIC: Clinician Global Impression of Change; NPRS: Numeric Pain Rating Scale; PGIC: Patient Global Impression of Change; SAT: Self-Assessment of Treatment. onstruct validity of SAT item and subscales were evaluated by examining relationships between SAT items and subscales with component scores of conceptually-related outcome measures using Spearman correlation coefficients. Pooled dataset included data from two clinical trials, Studies C116 () and C117 (). ivariate correlations were significant at , except where noted otherwise. tudy C117 only. . .