About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Pain Research and Treatment
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 960780, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/960780
Review Article

Estrogen and Visceral Nociception at the Level of Primary Sensory Neurons

1Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Received 27 February 2011; Revised 10 June 2011; Accepted 30 June 2011

Academic Editor: Claudia Herrera Tambeli

Copyright © 2012 Victor Chaban. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Clinical studies suggest the comorbidity of functional pain syndromes such as irritable bowel syndrome, painful bladder syndrome, chronic pelvic pain, and somatoform disorders approaches 40% to 60%. The incidence of episodic or persistent visceral pain associated with these “functional” disorders is two to three times higher in women than in men. One of the possible explanations for this phenomenon is estrogen modulation of viscerovisceral cross-sensitization. While a central site of this modulation has been shown previously, our studies suggest a peripheral site, the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Estrogens have remarkably wide range of functions including modulation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and purinoreceptors (P2Xs). Significantly, inflammation dramatically alters purinoception by causing a several fold increase in ATP-activated current, alters the voltage dependence of P2X receptors, and enhances the expression of P2X receptors increasing neuronal hypersensitivity. Gonadal hormones are thought as indispensable cornerstones of the normal development and function, but it appears that no body region, no neuronal circuit, and virtually no cell is unaffected by them. Thus, increasing awareness toward estrogens appears to be obligatory.

1. DRG Neurons and Visceral Sensitization

Sex hormones and 17β-estradiol (E2), in particular, directly influence the functions of primary afferent neurons. However, E2 has a multiplicity of actions: membrane, cytoplasmic, and nuclear: E2 modulates cellular activity by altering ion channel opening, G-protein signaling, and activation of trophic factor-like signal transduction pathways [1]. DRG neurons in culture express receptors of nociceptive signals [2] and retain most, if not all, their intracellular signaling cascades. DRG neurons in vitro are a valuable preparation because adult primary sensory neurons can be studied without the interference of modulation by central or peripheral messengers. Visceral afferents are sensitive to ATP [3], and several indirect pieces of evidence suggest that visceral afferents are E2-sensitive: (i) visceral pain is affected by hormonal level in cycling females [4]; (ii) there are gender differences in the prevalence of functional disorders involving the viscera [5]; (iii) putative visceral afferents [6] fit into the population of DRG neurons that are E2-sensitive. Although it is generally accepted that each primary afferent neuron is a single sensory channel, several studies have challenged that view and demonstrate that a population of DRG neuron can innervate both the viscera and somatic tissues.

Both subtypes of estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) are present in small-diameter DRG neurons, presumably nociceptors. Relevantly, estrogen receptors are distributed in regions of the central and peripheral nervous system that mediate nociception. A large body of the literature supports the idea that E2 modulates nociceptive responses in pelvic pain syndromes; however, whether E2 is pro- or antinociceptive remains unresolved. Within the context of our hypothesis, E2 modulation of nociceptive response depends on the type of pain, its durations, and the involvement of other antinociceptive mechanisms. Visceral nociception and nociceptor sensitization appear to be regulated by ATP and substance P [7], and DRG is an important site of visceral afferent convergence and cross-sensitization.

Mechanisms of viscerovisceral hyperalgesia between organs with documented partially common sensory projection probably involve sensitization of visceroviscero-somatic convergent neurons [8]. Within the context of our hypothesis, sensory neurons can release an ATP intraganglionically during inflammation. The inflammation in the reproductive tract can cross-sensitize the response to ATP in colonic DRGs. Although it has been accepted that each primary afferent neuron is a single sensory channel (Figure 1(a)), several studies has challenged that view [9], and our own data using retrograde labeling demonstrate that population of DRG receive sensory input from different visceral organs: uterus and colon [10] and that inflammation in the uterus upregulated nociceptive signaling in the colon [11] (Figure 1(b)).

fig1
Figure 1: Models of alternative possibilities for viscero-visceral cross-sensitization in the DRG neuron. (a) ATP released by a neuron innervating the inflamed uterus acts on a neighboring neuron sensitizing its responses to colonic distention. (b) The same neuron innervates the uterus and colon. Uterus inflammation directly sensitizes the neuron to colonic distention.

2. Transduction of Visceral Nociception

Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential damage or depicted in terms of such damage and normal transmitting pain system is absolutely essential to keep the integrity of our body [12]. The incidence of persistent, episodic, or chronic “functional” visceral pain associated with functional disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, painful bladder syndrome, chronic pelvic pain, and others is much more prevalent in females [13, 14]. A meta-analysis of acute experimental pain studies (pressure pain and electrical stimulation) using a “box score” methodology in humans shows that females display greater sensitivity and that pain threshold and tolerance are modulated across the menstrual cycle [4]. 17β-estradiol (E2) may account for these observed fluctuations in pain perception and symptoms [13]. Thus, a possible explanation is that E2  may have different actions on nociceptive signaling depending on the origin of the noxious stimulus. The localization of both estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ in DRG neurons and the attenuation of ATP-induced [Ca2+]i [15] strongly suggest that E2 modulates visceral pain processing peripherally.

Nociceptors were defined as receptors by Sherrington more than a century ago (1906) that respond selectively to stimuli that cause tissue damage. The nociceptors can be divided into two main groups based on anatomical and functional properties: Activity in myelinated Aδ-fiber nociceptors gives rise to the initial sharp feeling of pain while on the contrary unmyelinated C-fiber nociceptors gives rise to the later, duller, burning pain sensation due to their different morphology. The cell bodies of these axons are located in the DRG.

The molecular and cellular mechanism of nociception has been defined during the past two decades. Molecular function of nociceptors depends on expression of different nociceptive receptors and ion channels that can be activated by noxious stimuli. These receptors and ion channels detect specific physical or chemical stimuli and induce membrane depolarization. Among these nociceptive receptors and ion channels, transient receptor potential ion channel (TRP)-related TRPV family and purinergic receptors (P2X2 and P2X3) have been very well studied and acknowledged as molecular detectors of noxious thermal, mechanical, or chemical stimuli [16]. Visceral nociceptive C-fibers are activated by ATP released by noxious stimuli from cells in target organs and have been implicated as mediators of noxious stimulus intensities [3]. Alteration in signal transduction of primary afferent neurons can result in enhanced perception of the visceral sensation, which is common in patients with different disorders resulting in elevated pain perception. Peripheral sensitization can develop in response to sustain stimulation, inflammation, and nerve injury.

3. Nongenomic Mechanism of Estrogen Action on Visceral Nociceptors

Both estrogen receptor α (ERα) and estrogen receptor β (ERβ) belong to nuclear receptors of the steroid/thyroid superfamily, in which the members have structural and functional similarities such as a ligand-dependent transcription factor that modulates gene expression. There is a high homology between ERα and ERβ in the DNA-binding domain (97%), but a moderate homology in the ligand-binding domain (55%), resulting in somewhat lower affinities for endogenous 17α- and 17β-estradiol to ERβ than ERα.

A variety of cell types respond rapidly to E2, making a nongenomic mechanism of action. Some nongenomic activities of estrogens may be explained by the presence of classic estrogen receptors [1719], but a brain-specific ERX has also been suggested [20]. However, this putative new receptor has been expressed only in glial cells and can be activated by the inactive 17α-estradiol stereoisomer. Overall, the nongenomic estrogen effects are thought to be mediated by ERα that is sequestered to the cytoplasm or the plasma membrane within a signaling complex [1]. The initial evidence for this concept was provided by studies showing that signal transduction is initiated by estradiol conjugated to large, membrane impermeant molecules such as bovine serum albumin [15]. The local synthesis of estrogens in the brain provides high concentrations of estrogens locally. In fact, local synthesis of estrogens in the brain seems to be a requirement for the rapid signaling of estrogen receptor since the cyclic changes of plasma hormone levels are too slow to fit this rapid pattern of activation. Many effects of estradiol in the brain, such as part of the regulation of lordosis behavior [21] and signaling in the dorsal root ganglion [7, 18], are in the time range proposing nonclassic mechanisms.

ERs distributed through CNS and PNS including regions that mediate nociception. For example, ERs are expressed in dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord [22, 23] and DRG neurons [24]. DRG neurons express both ERα and ERβ  in vivo [25] and in vitro [10]. These findings suggest that E2 may modulate sensory input at the primary afferent level. E2 can alter gene transcription, resulting in pronociceptive (reducing β-endorphin expression) or antinociceptive (increasing enkephalin expression) changes of endogenous opioid peptides and opioid receptors [22, 26, 27]. E2 can modulate cellular activity by altering ion channel opening and second messenger signaling by stimulating G-proteins [15, 2830], the signal transduction pathways traditionally associated with membrane receptor activation. Many of these effects have been ascribed to membrane-associated receptors [31]. The results from other laboratories [28, 32] and our data [15] indicate that E2 is acting to modulate L-type VGCC.

Adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) is one of the most common chemical compounds in living cells. Neurons represent a remarkable source of ATP, as a neurotransmitter, which is widely used in both central and peripheral nervous systems [33]. ATP can be released from vesicle pools, or it can be coreleased and/or costored together with classical neurotransmitters in neurons. A decade ago, ATP was shown to be an extracellular signal involved in peripheral hyperalgesia [34]. One of ATP’s best defined roles has been described in sensory transduction of noxious stimuli by activating purinergic, ATP-gated P2X receptors on primary afferent fibers [33]. ATP release from tissues during pathological conditions that cause tissue damage or inflammation activates P2X receptors on primary afferent fibers innervating the afferent organs [35].

Some molecular targets have been identified as key players in the activation and sensitization of visceral nociceptors, notably ASICs, TTX-resistant Na channels, and the TRPV1 receptor [36]. TRPV1 receptor is a sensory neuron-specific cation channel which belongs to the transient receptor potential subfamily 1 and plays an important role in transporting thermal and inflammatory pain signals. Evidence for TRPV1’s role in their pathogenesis comes from studies showing that mice lacking TRP1R gene have deficits in thermal- or inflammatory-induced hyperalgesia [37]. Activation of both TRPV1 and P2X receptors induce mobilization of [Ca2+]i in cultured DRG neurons [38]. Capsaicin-induced TPRV1 receptor-mediated changes in [Ca2+]i may represent a level of DRG activation to noxious cutaneous stimulation, while ATP-induced changes in [Ca2+]i may reflect the level of DRG neuron sensitization to noxious visceral stimuli since ATP is released by noxious stimuli and tissue damage near the primary afferent nerve terminals [39].

The expression of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) receptors is widespread in several areas of the nervous system, but it is particularly strong in DRG. TRPV1 receptors are at the cellular membrane as well as in the membrane of intracellular calcium stores (e.g., endoplasmatic reticulum). For pain transmission, the pain/temperature sensitive TRPV1 receptor is highly expressed in nociceptive neurons of the peripheral nerve system. TRPV1 receptors are activated by a wide variety of stimuli, both exogenous (capsaicin, noxious heat) and endogenous (protons, lipoxygenase products, anandamide, dopamine), and they mediate a nonselective cationic current with particularly high Ca2+ permeability [37]. The potentiating of TRPV1 activity can be quantified by measuring the differences of capsaicin-induced Ca2+ concentration changes before and after receptor activation [40]. Significantly, a subset of DRG neurons respond to both capsaicin and ATP [7] indicating that there may be cross-activation of these receptors that may underlie the sensitization of visceral nociceptors.

The action of estrogens at the level of primary sensory neurons is complex and determined by the characteristics of the target genes and coregulators, as well as, the regional availability of E2. Several authors have suggested that the sex differences in pain sensitivity and the prevalence of chronic pain disorders may result from a malfunctioning endogenous pain inhibitory response rather than an increase nociceptive activity [41]. Many previous studies have established connections between estrogens and the modulation of different nociceptive pathways. One of the mechanisms may be estrogen inhibition of nociceptive signaling (mediated by both P2X3 and TRPV1) through interaction with mGluR2/3. Painful stimuli initiate action potentials in the peripheral terminals of DRG neurons evoking release of excitatory neurotransmitters such as glutamate (Figure 2). Ligand-gated P2X receptors which can be activated by endogenous ATP during induction of action potentials are highly expressed in identified nociceptors [42]. Thus, E2-modulated encoding of nociceptive stimuli at the level of primary sensory neurons may contribute to our understanding of complex mechanism of nongenomic effect of gonadal steroids.

960780.fig.002
Figure 2: Proposed mechanism of estradiol effect on ATP-induced [Ca2+]i signaling in primary sensory neurons. ATP released by tissue damage acts on P2X3 receptor resulting in activation of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC). ERα activates mGluR2/3 which in turn activates Gi/o signaling resulting in inhibition of adenylate-cyclase (AC). Decreased cAMP concentration reduced PKA activation and decreased the conductance of the L-type VGCC.

4. Conclusions

The fact that homeostatic changes are similar in all “functional” disorders suggests a model in which alteration in the neuronal circuits in predisposed individuals is triggered by the similar pathophysiology. Both physiologic and psychological variables appear to play important roles in the development of functional syndromes, and psychologically oriented treatments have a role in their management. Patients have an altered perception of visceral sensation that is typically manifested as hyperalgesia, an enhanced perception of pain. Pain is the symptom that patients with functional disorders list as the most depressing and is a major factor for consulting a physician. The functional characteristics of primary sensory (small diameter, presumably nociceptors) neurons and their receptors are usually investigated by means of a wide diversity of experimental models, both in vivo and in vitro. Several in vivo animal models have been developed and characterized for specific sensory modalities, including nociception, particularly in rodents [2]. The use of these models suggests the advantage of a physiological/pathological condition, and it is hence a basic step in the understanding of the fundamental mechanisms underlying the function of sensory systems and for the development and proof of new possible strategies for their modulation. As far as the modulation of receptors involved in nociceptive input transmission is concerned, it is indeed possible to reproduce in rodents various painful states observed in humans. The deficiency of suitable animal models for certain pain syndromes requires the use of strictly controlled in vitro paradigms in order to dissect the fundamental properties of the basic processes. One possible approach to the study of the functional characteristics of neurotransmitter (i.e. ATP) release and activated ion channel receptor is the direct recording of the receptor response to its agonist and antagonist on isolated cells expressing the receptor, by means of calcium imaging or patch clamp recordings techniques. Histological and functional studies implied that the important receptors involved in the transmission and modulation of nociceptive inputs are expressed at the level of the peripheral and/or central terminals of DRG neurons (e.g., P2X3 and TRPV1).

Although it is generally accepted that each primary afferent neuron is a single sensory channel, several studies have challenged that view and demonstrate that a population of DRG neuron can innervate both the viscera and somatic tissues. The design of the proposed studies using retrograde labeling from the uterus and colon will address the possibility that the same primary afferent can innervate both reproductive and gastrointestinal organs (DRG neuron will have both retrograde tract tracing dyes). This new subset of dichotomizing fibers provides a novel pathway for sensitization of one viscus by another. Adult DRG neurons in short-term culture retain the expression of receptors (P2X and TRPV1) [2] which mediate the response to putative nociceptive signals. They continue to respond to ER agonists mimicking in vivo activation. An important advantage is that these neurons can be studied apart from endogenous signals. A large body of literature supports the idea that E2 modulates nociceptive responses in functional pain syndromes. Within the context of our hypothesis, E2 modulation of nociceptive responses depends on the type of pain, its durations, and the involvement of other antinociceptive mechanisms. E2 modulates DRG neurons response to ATP, suggesting that visceral afferent nociceptors are modulated by E2, which may explain the observed clinical and animal gender differences in visceral hypersensitivity and suggests a potential target for mediating nociception. Future direction of research should include more experiments to study the role of peripheral ERs in visceral nociception using in vivo models. Thus, from a public health perspective, the outcome of this study will have a substantial impact, because it will increase our knowledge of nociceptive functional diseases, such as IBS, interstitial cystitis, and chronic pelvic pain, and help achieve a deeper understanding of gender differences presented in clinical aspects of these symptoms associated with various psychiatric disorders. Only a thorough understanding of the mechanism implicated in these phenomena can truly contribute to the design of new and more efficient therapies. Many illnesses affect women and men differently. Some disorders are more common in women, and some express themselves with different symptoms. It is very well documented that differences between the sexes exist in the prevalence and severity of a broad range of diseases, disorders, and conditions. In calling for greater focus on gender-based biomedical research, the clinical and scientific communities will be better equipped to identify barriers to the achievement of knowledge about gender differences-including ethical, financial, sociological, and scientific factors. In developing countries, pain accounts for nearly 20% of all primary health care visits. Studies have shown that at least one-third of patients with pain also suffer from depression and it affects more women than men. The new approach in pain research and treatment should address a crucial question in women’s health and in visceral nociception in particular. Reaching further, this research is a liaison between the basic science work and the clinical aspects that are addressed through other disciplines such as anesthesiology (pain management), gastroenterology, obstetrics, and gynecology.

Conflict of Interests

The author has delare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by NIH NS 063939 Grant.

References

  1. E. R. Levin, “Cellular functions of plasma membrane estrogen receptors,” Steroids, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 471–475, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. S. Gold and G. F. Gebhart, “Nociceptor sensitization in pain pathogenesis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1248–1257, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Burnstock, “Purinergic receptors and pain,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 1717–1735, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. L. Riley, M. E. Robinson, E. A. Wise, C. D. Myers, and R. B. Fillingim, “Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis,” Pain, vol. 74, no. 2-3, pp. 181–187, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Z. Li, Y. Niwa, S. Sakamoto, X. Chen, and Y. Nakaya, “Estrogen modulates a large conductance chloride channel in cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 506–510, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. A. McRoberts, S. V. Coutinho, J. C. G. Marvizón et al., “Role of peripheral N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in visceral nociception in rats,” Gastroenterology, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 1737–1748, 2001. View at Scopus
  7. V. V. Chaban, “Peripheral sensitization of sensory neurons,” Ethnicity & Disease, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. S1–3, 2010. View at Scopus
  8. M. A. Giamberardino, R. Costantini, G. Affaitati et al., “Viscero-visceral hyperalgesia: characterization in different clinical models,” Pain, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 307–322, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. P. Malykhina, C. Qin, B. Greenwood-Van Meerveld, R. D. Foreman, F. Lupu, and H. I. Akbarali, “Hyperexcitability of convergent colon and bladder dorsal root ganglion neurons after colonic inflammation: mechanism for pelvic organ cross-talk,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 936–948, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. V. V. Chaban, “Visceral sensory neurons that innervate both uterus and colon express nociceptive TRPV1 and P2X3 receptors in rats,” Ethnicity & Disease, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. S2–S2, 2008. View at Scopus
  11. J. Li, P. Micevych, J. McDonald, A. Rapkin, and V. Chaban, “Inflammation in the uterus induces phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase and substance P immunoreactivity in dorsal root ganglia neurons innervating both uterus and colon in rats,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 2746–2752, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Melzack, “The tragedy of needless pain,” Scientific American, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 27–33, 1990. View at Scopus
  13. K. J. Berkley, “Sex differences in pain,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 371–380, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. O. Y. Lee, E. A. Mayer, M. Schmulson, L. Chang, and B. Naliboff, “Gender-related differences in IBS symptoms,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 2184–2193, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. V. V. Chaban, E. A. Mayer, H. S. Ennes, and P. E. Micevych, “Estradiol inhibits ATP-induced intracellular calcium concentration increase in dorsal root ganglia neurons,” Neuroscience, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 941–948, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. I. Basbaum, “Change is coming!,” Pain, vol. 141, no. 1-2, p. 1, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. M. Ábrahám, M. G. Todman, K. S. Korach, and A. E. Herbison, “Critical in vivo roles for classical estrogen receptors in rapid estrogen actions on intracellular signaling in mouse brain,” Endocrinology, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 3055–3061, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. V. Chaban and P. E. Micevych, “Estrogen receptor-α mediates estradiol attenuation of ATP-induced Ca2+ signaling in mouse dorsal root ganglion neurons,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Pedram, M. Razandi, M. Aitkenhead, C. C. W. Hughes, and E. R. Levin, “Integration of the non-genomic and genomic actions of estrogen: membrane-initiated signaling by steroid to transcription and cell biology,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 52, pp. 50768–50775, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. D. Toran-Allerand, X. Guan, N. J. MacLusky et al., “ER-X: a novel, plasma membrane-associated, putative estrogen receptor that is regulated during development and after ischemic brain injury,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 8391–8401, 2002. View at Scopus
  21. P. E. Micevych and P. G. Mermelstein, “Membrane estrogen receptors acting through metabotropic glutamate receptors: an emerging mechanism of estrogen action in brain,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Å. Amandusson, M. Hallbeck, A. L. Hallbeck, O. Hermanson, and A. Blomqvist, “Estrogen-induced alterations of spinal cord enkephalin gene expression,” Pain, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 243–248, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. J. Williams and R. E. Papka, “Estrogen receptor-immunoreactive neurons are present in the female rat lumbosacral spinal cord,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 492–501, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Taleghany, S. Sarajari, L. L. DonCarlos, L. Gollapudi, and M. M. Oblinger, “Differential expression of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 603–615, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. E. Papka and M. Storey-Workley, “Estrogen receptor-α and -β coexist in a subpopulation of sensory neurons of female rat dorsal root ganglia,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 319, no. 2, pp. 71–74, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. E. Micevych, C. B. Eckersell, N. Brecha, and K. L. Holland, “Estrogen modulation of opioid and cholecystokinin systems in the limbic- hypothalamic circuit,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 335–343, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Micevych and K. Sinchak, “Estrogen and endogenous opioids regulate CCK in reproductive circuits,” Peptides, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1235–1244, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. G. Mermelstein, J. B. Backer, and D. J. Surmeier, “Estradiol reduces calcium currents in rat neostriatal neurons via a membrane receptor,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 595–604, 1996. View at Scopus
  29. M. J. Kelly and E. J. Wagner, “Estrogen modulation of G-protein-coupled receptors,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 369–374, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. B. Eckersell, P. Popper, and P. E. Micevych, “Estrogen-induced alteration of μ-opioid receptor immunoreactivity in the medial preoptic nucleus and medial amygdala,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 3967–3976, 1998. View at Scopus
  31. E. R. Levin, “Cellular functions of the plasma membrane estrogen receptor,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 374–376, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Y. Lee, Y. G. Chai, E. B. Lee et al., “17β-Estradiol inhibits high-voltage-activated calcium channel currents in rat sensory neurons via a non-genomic mechanism,” Life Sciences, vol. 70, no. 17, pp. 2047–2059, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. M. Dunn, Y. Zhong, and G. Burnstock, “P2X receptors in peripheral neurons,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 107–134, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. J. Woolf and M. W. Salter, “Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5472, pp. 1765–1768, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Bodin and G. Burnstock, “Purinergic signalling: ATP release,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 26, no. 8-9, pp. 959–969, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Cervero and J. M. A. Laird, “Understanding the signaling and transmission of visceral nociceptive events,” Journal of Neurobiology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. J. Caterina, M. A. Schumacher, M. Tominaga, T. A. Rosen, J. D. Levine, and D. Julius, “The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway,” Nature, vol. 389, no. 6653, pp. 816–824, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. M. Gschossmann, V. V. Chaban, J. A. McRoberts et al., “Mechanical activation of dorsal root ganglion cells in vitro: comparison with capsaicin and modulation by κ-opioids,” Brain Research, vol. 856, no. 1-2, pp. 101–110, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. Burnstock, “Purines and sensory nerves,” Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 194, pp. 333–392, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. C. Petruska, J. Napaporn, R. D. Johnson, J. G. Gu, and B. Y. Cooper, “Subclassified acutely dissociated cells of rat DRG: histochemistry and patterns of capsaicin-, proton-, and ATP-activated currents,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 2365–2379, 2000. View at Scopus
  41. I. Gaumond, P. Arsenault, and S. Marchand, “The role of sex hormones on formalin-induced nociceptive responses,” Brain Research, vol. 958, no. 1, pp. 139–145, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. G. Burnstock, “Purine-mediated signalling in pain and visceral perception,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 182–188, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus