About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Pain Research and Treatment
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 407504, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/407504
Research Article

Chronic Opioid Therapy and Opioid Tolerance: A New Hypothesis

Anesthesiology Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA

Received 3 November 2012; Revised 23 December 2012; Accepted 27 December 2012

Academic Editor: Michael G. Irwin

Copyright © 2013 Joel S. Goldberg. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Opioids are efficacious and cost-effective analgesics, but tolerance limits their effectiveness. This paper does not present any new clinical or experimental data but demonstrates that there exist ascending sensory pathways that contain few opioid receptors. These pathways are located by brain PET scans and spinal cord autoradiography. These nonopioid ascending pathways include portions of the ventral spinal thalamic tract originating in Rexed layers VI–VIII, thalamocortical fibers that project to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), and possibly a midline dorsal column visceral pathway. One hypothesis is that opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia may be caused by homeostatic upregulation during opioid exposure of nonopioid-dependent ascending pain pathways. Upregulation of sensory pathways is not a new concept and has been demonstrated in individuals impaired with deafness or blindness. A second hypothesis is that adjuvant nonopioid therapies may inhibit ascending nonopioid-dependent pathways and support the clinical observations that monotherapy with opioids usually fails. The uniqueness of opioid tolerance compared to tolerance associated with other central nervous system medications and lack of tolerance from excess hormone production is discussed. Experimental work that could prove or disprove the concepts as well as flaws in the concepts is discussed.

1. Introduction

Chronic pain is one of the greatest causes of human suffering. Chronic pain becomes intractable when standard therapies fail to control the pain [1, 2]. In many societies and regulated by laws, chronic opioid therapy is reserved for patients who suffer from intractable pain [3, 4]. Common examples of diseases that lead to intractable pain include arachnoiditis, brachial plexus avulsion, thalamic syndrome, and multiple surgical traumas. Patients who suffer from these conditions are frequently referred to pain management physicians who may consider invasive therapies such as neurosurgical deafferentation, peripheral, spinal cord, or deep brain stimulation, or high-dose opioid therapy [5]. This paper discusses possible mechanisms of two problems of chronic opioid therapy, namely, tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

2. Pain Is an Excitatory Process, and Opioids Are Inhibitory [6, 7]

From the first-order afferent receptor (mechanical, thermal, or chemical) through the ascending tracts to the thalamo, reticular, and mesencephalic relays to the final destination in the somatosensory cortices, anterior cingulated gyrus, and basal ganglia, pain is associated with a net excitatory stimulus. Numerous studies and clinical observations, including those from neural blockade, cordotomy, or rhizotomy, support this concept [8]. Destructive lesions of the third-order thalamocortical neurons that accompany thalamic syndrome or destructive lesions of the posterior columns of the spinal cord that occur in B 12 deficiency, tabes dorsalis, and multiple sclerosis produce pain because these neurons are inhibitory (Figures 1 and 2) [9]. Therefore, these destructive lesions produce a net excitatory response. Furthermore, stimulation of the neurons in the posterior columns can produce analgesia [10]. Numerous studies on the mechanism of action of opioids support clinical evidence that opioid effects have inhibitory influences on excitatory nociceptive pathways [11, 12].

407504.fig.001
Figure 1: Hemorrhagic destruction of the thalamus is associated with intractable pain (white arrow).
407504.fig.002
Figure 2: Destruction of posterior columns (arrow) from B 12 deficiency is associated with intractable pain. Subaute combined degeneration of spinal cord—B12 deficiency. pathology.mc.duke.edu. With permission.
2.1. Tolerance
2.1.1. Neuroanatomic Correlates of Opioid Receptors and Ascending Nociceptive Pathways

Opioid tolerance can be defined as a decrease in analgesic response with increasing dose or frequency of administration. Tolerance is the greatest obstacle to the development of effective opioid treatment for intractable pain. Tolerance to endogenous opioids is often rapid, whereas tolerance to exogenous opioids is often delayed [13]. Opioids that are not associated with tolerance have not yet been developed. One hypothesis is that opioid tolerance is not only a function of ligand-receptor inefficiency but in addition may be caused by activation or upregulation (defined by an increased response to a stimulus) of non-opioid-dependent divisions of ascending pain pathways. This hypothesis is supported by the following observations.

(1) The Human Thalamocortical and Spinothalamic Tracts Have Divisions That Are Not Modulated by Opioids. This observation has not been fully appreciated in the literature but is depicted in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6.

407504.fig.003
Figure 3: In vivo distribution of opioid receptors in human brain with decrease in receptors in area of S1 (arrow). Photo Researchers Picture Number: SF2688. Credit: Philippe Psaila/Photo Researchers, Inc. License: Rights Managed. Description: Opioid receptors. Colored sagittal Positron Emission Tomography. (PET) scan showing the normal distribution of opioid receptors in the human brain. By injecting a patient with an opioid tagged with carbon-11 (radioactive tracer), a color-coded scan is produced, showing the concentration of opioid receptors from red (highest) through yellow and green to blue (lowest).
407504.fig.004
Figure 4: Somatosensory cortex (S1) of parietal lobe (arrow). Schematic of cortical areas involved with pain processing and fMRI cropped.jpg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
407504.fig.005
Figure 5: Opioid receptors in thalamus (red) and secondary somatosensory cortex, S2 (arrow). Photo Researchers Picture Number: SF2687. Credit: Philippe Psaila/Photo Researchers, Inc. License: Rights Managed. Description: Opioid receptors. Colored frontal Positron Emission Tomography. (PET) scan showing the normal distribution of opioid receptors in the human brain. By injecting a patient with an opioid tagged with carbon-11 (radioactive tracer), a color-coded scan is produced, showing the concentration of opioid receptors from red (highest) through yellow and green to blue (lowest).
407504.fig.006
Figure 6: Secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) in green (arrow). Schematic of cortical areas involved with pain processing and fMRI cropped.jpg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Sensory fibers of the thalamocortical tract project to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and secondary sensory cortex (S2) [14, 15]. In humans, opioid receptors densely populate S2 but are very sparse in S1 [16]. In addition, in most studies, intrathecal or intravenous administration of opioids does not decrease the amplitude or latency of somatosensory-evoked potentials when monitored at S1 [17]. Therefore, a nociceptive division of the thalamocortical tract not modulated by opioids may be upregulated when opioids are administered. This could be viewed as a homeostatic mechanism that allows patients to maintain the ability to discriminate pain. Such upregulation of a sensory system is known to occur in the auditory perception of the blind and tactile and visual sensations of the deaf [1822]. Deleterious effects associated with complete loss of pain sensation, whether genetic or acquired, as in Hansen’s disease, are well recognized [23, 24]. If opioids completely abolished pain perception, patients would not be aware of traumatic events such as bone fractures, cholecystitis, and myocardial infarctions. Further support for the hypothesis that non-opioid ascending pain pathways are upregulated is found in the treatment of cancer patients who are medicated with very high doses of opioids. These patients experience profound analgesia after successful cordotomy with ablation of the lateral and medial spinothalamic tracts [8, 25].

As shown in Figure 7, opioid receptors are rarely found in the origin of the ventral spinothalamic tract. Unlike the lateral and medial spinothalamic tracts, the ventral spinal thalamic tract does not project from Rexed layer II of the spinal cord where the highest concentrations of opioid receptors are found [26]. Instead, the fibers project from layers VI–VIII where very few, if any, opioid receptors exist, suggesting that this tract may be opioid independent and could upregulate [26].

407504.fig.007
Figure 7: Ventral spinothalamic tract fibers (vst, white arrow) originate in non-opioid Rexed layers (VI–VIII) (dark arrow).

(2) Surgical Interruption of a Midline Dorsal Column Visceral Pain Pathway Produces Analgesia [27]. Clinical reports confirm that a modified midline myelotomy can provide successful visceral pain relief especially in patients who have become tolerant to opioids. The analgesia produced by punctuate midline myelotomy that interrupts ascending fibers of the posterior columns has effectively controlled pain in patients suffering from pelvic pain secondary to malignancy [28]. It is not known whether this ascending nociceptive tract is regulated by opioids.

(3) When Compared to Other G-Protein Ligands, a Unique form of Tolerance Develops after Opioid Administration. Patients who suffer from hypersecretory states activated by G-protein receptors, such as hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and pheochromocytoma, do not become tolerant to endogenous hormone ligands, and they need to be treated by lowering the production of these hormones. Although catecholamine tolerance has been reported in animal models, anecdotal reports from critical care physicians confirm that norepinephrine and dopamine administered as infusions rarely require major adjustments secondary to tolerance [2931]. Opioids, either endogenous (endomorphin, enkephalin, endorphin) or exogenous (morphine, methadone, fentanyl), bind to G-protein receptors initiating a cascade that results in neuronal inhibition. Tolerance to opioid-induced constipation normally does not occur. Therefore, tolerance to endogenous G-protein receptor ligands may be specific to the central nervous system (CNS). Some have postulated that the milieu within the central nervous system is unique because of microglia effects, and that microglia activity contributes to opioid tolerance [3234]. Tolerance develops to other G-protein ligands within the CNS, including cocaine, ethanol, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, and barbiturates, but the magnitude of the tolerance is usually less than that seen with opioids, and the perception associated with the tolerance is different because pain is not a consideration.

2.2. Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia [3537]

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is a condition that may occur after chronic administration of large doses of an opioid. It is characterized by a lowering of the pain threshold with an exaggerated response to painful and nonpainful stimuli [36]. One hypothesis to explain opioid-induced hyperalgesia is upregulation of the non-opioid-dependent divisions of the thalamocortical and/or spinothalamic tract. In contrast, neural blockade is rarely associated with tolerance or hyperalgesia because all proximal ascending tracts are inhibited.

2.3. Proof of Concept

The hypothesis that upregulation of non-opioid-dependent ascending sensory systems is a possible cause of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia is novel, but recent reports have implied that this could be true [38]. This hypothesis could be proven by serial electrical recordings and imaging of the somatosensory cortex in patients treated with escalating doses of opioids to levels that produce signs of opioid tolerance. Considerable data are reported in the anesthesiology literature that describes somatosensory-evoked potential changes from various medications, and this information could be helpful [39, 40]. As opioid tolerance develops, functional MRI and PET scans may provide images that correspond to metabolic changes in the brain, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy could provide evidence for changes in glutamate and/or GABA concentrations in the somatosensory cortex [4143]. Sensory stimulation during these studies may provide insight into the mechanisms of opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

2.4. Implication for Therapy

Most pain practitioners acknowledge that opioid therapy in sufficient doses can ameliorate acute and chronic intractable pain, and addition of adjuvant medications such as antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and anti-inflammatory medication improves response. However, opioids alone cannot provide long-term relief because of tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, or side effects. Pain practitioners are also well aware that other nonopioid therapies, such as intravenous infusion of local anesthetics or ketamine, inhalation of nitrous oxide, or conduction block, provide reliable analgesia for patients suffering from intractable pain probably via a different mechanism than activation of opioid receptors.

If upregulation of non-opioid-dependent ascending nociceptive pathways is shown to be a cause of pain from opioid tolerance or opioid-induced hyperalgesia, providers may consider adding GABA agonist to the medication regime of opioid-tolerant patients. Interestingly, our patients who suffer from intractable pain have learned that alcohol and benzodiazepines, both indirect GABA agonists, provide additional, but unsafe, analgesia when combined with opioids. In addition to increasing GABA, decreasing glutamate or blocking glutamate receptors could possibly attenuate the excitatory activity of non-opioid-dependent pathways.

2.5. Possible Flaws in the Hypotheses

As espoused by most investigators, opioid tolerance is believed to be caused by ligand-receptor inefficiency [44]. Evidence suggests that endocytosis, downregulation of receptors, upregulation of P-glycoprotein, and mu/delta heterodimer formation may be causes of tolerance [4547]. The hypotheses presented in this paper, regardless of how elegant they may appear, could be inaccurate. However, this author is not aware that in the current medical literature, location of human opioid receptors has been correlated with known ascending nociceptive pathways, and the significance of this observation extrapolated to possible etiologies of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

3. Conclusion

Intractable pain is one of the leading causes of worldwide suffering. Opioids are the most consistent, efficacious, and cost-effective analgesics available. Tolerance to opioids limits their effectiveness, and some aspects of this phenomenon are unique to opioids when compared to other G-protein receptor ligand systems. One hypothesis of this paper is that some aspect of opioid tolerance is caused by homeostatic upregulation of non-opioid-mediated ascending nociceptive pathways, including the thalamocortical and ventral spinothalamic tracts and possibly the midline dorsal column tract. Another hypothesis is that upregulation of these tracts may contribute to opioid-induced hyperalgesia. As one observes in clinical practice, therapy with adjuvant agents combined with opioids, rather than opioids alone, produced the best outcome for the treatment of intractable pain. Aside from presumed stimulation of descending inhibitory tracts from some adjuvants, one possible explanation for these outcomes is that these therapies inhibit nonopioid ascending dependent tracts as well as opioid-dependent tracts. This paper offers a hypothetical explanation based on neuroanatomic correlation as to why adjuvants plus opioid therapy are most successful and single-opioid therapy usually fails. When shown a comparison of opioid and non-opioid ascending nociceptive dependent tracts, physicians and patients may develop a better understanding of their therapy.

Conflict of Interests

The author has no conflict of interests to declare pertaining to the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Kathy Gage of Duke University for editorial assistance.

References

  1. M. M. Puig, “When does chronic pain become intractable and When is pharmacological management no longer appropriate? The pain specialist's perspective,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. S1–S2, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Tennant and L. Hermann, “Intractable or chronic pain: there is a difference,” Western Journal of Medicine, vol. 173, no. 5, article 306, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. W. Clark and K. L. Sees, “Opioids, chronic pain, and the law,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 297–305, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. M. Gilson, “The concept of addiction in law and regulatory policy related to pain management: a critical review,” Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. G. Bittar, I. Kar-Purkayastha, S. L. Owen et al., “Deep brain stimulation for pain relief: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 515–519, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Zhuo, “Cortical excitation and chronic pain,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 199–207, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. W. Vanderah, “Pathophysiology of Pain,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. J. P. Crul, L. M. Blok, J. van Egmond, and R. T. M. van Dongen, “The present role of percutaneous cervical cordotomy for the treatment of cancer pain,” Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. M. Jacobs, “Lightning pain of tabes dorsalis treated with meticorten,” New York State Journal of Medicine, vol. 58, no. 13, pp. 2283–2284, 1958. View at Scopus
  10. W. H. Sweet and J. Wepsic, “Stimulation of the posterior columns of the spinal cord for pain control,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 4, no. 1, article 133, 1975. View at Scopus
  11. T. Kohno, E. Kumamoto, H. Higashi, K. Shimoji, and M. Yoshimura, “Actions of opioids on excitatory and inhibitory transmission in substantia gelatinosa of adult rat spinal cord,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 518, no. 3, pp. 803–813, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Mizuta, T. Fujita, T. Nakatsuka, and E. Kumamoto, “Inhibitory effects of opioids on compound action potentials in frog sciatic nerves and their chemical structures,” Life Sciences, vol. 83, no. 5-6, pp. 198–207, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. P. Huidobro-Toro and E. L. Way, “Single-dose tolerance to antinociception, and physical dependence on β-endorphin in mice,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 1978. View at Scopus
  14. R. P. Dum, D. J. Levinthal, and P. L. Strick, “The spinothalamic system targets motor and sensory areas in the cerebral cortex of monkeys,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 45, pp. 14223–14235, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. H. Hong, S. M. Son, and S. H. Jang, “Identification of spinothalamic tract and its related thalamocortical fibers in human brain,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 468, no. 2, pp. 102–105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. K. P. Jones, L. Y. Qi, T. Fujirawa et al., “In vivo distribution of opioid receptors in man in relation to the cortical projections of the medial and lateral pain systems measured with positron emission tomography,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 25–28, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Goodarzi, N. H. Shier, and D. P. Grogan, “Effect of intrathecal opioids on somatosensory-evoked potentials during spinal fusion in children,” Spine, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 1565–1568, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. J. Kolarik, S. Cirstea, and S. Pardhan, “Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues,” Experimental Brain Research. In press.
  19. C. M. Karns, M. W. Dow, and H. J. Neville, “Altered cross-modal processing in the primary auditory cortex of congenitally deaf adults: a visual-somatosensory fMRI study with a double-flash illusion,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 28, pp. 9626–9638, 2012.
  20. D. Bottari, E. Nava, P. Ley, and F. Pavani, “Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 167–179, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Alary, M. Duquette, R. Goldstein et al., “Tactile acuity in the blind: a closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2037–2043, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Voss, M. Lassonde, F. Gougoux, M. Fortin, J. P. Guillemot, and F. Lepore, “Early- and late-onset blind individuals show supra-normal auditory abilities in far-space,” Current Biology, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 1734–1738, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. P. Legendre, C. A. Muzny, and E. Swiatlo, “Hansen's disease (Leprosy): current and future pharmacotherapy and treatment of disease-related immunologic reactions,” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2012.
  24. M. Manfredi, G. Bini, G. Cruccu, et al., “Congenital absence of pain,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 507–511, 1981. View at Scopus
  25. A. M. Raslan, J. S. Cetas, S. Mccartney, and K. J. Burchiel, “Destructive procedures for control of cancer pain: the case for cordotomy: a review,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 155–170, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. L. M. Faull and J. W. Villiger, “Opiate receptors in the human spinal cord: a detailed anatomical study comparing the autoradiographic localization of [3H]diprenorphine binding sites with the laminar pattern of substance P, myelin and Nissl staining,” Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 395–407, 1987. View at Scopus
  27. H. J. W. Nauta, E. Hewitt, K. N. Westlund, and W. D. Willis Jr., “Surgical interruption of a midline dorsal column visceral pain pathway. Case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 538–542, 1997. View at Scopus
  28. D. Hong and Å. Andrén-Sandberg, “Punctate midline myelotomy: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of pain in inextirpable abdominal and pelvic cancer,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 99–109, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. E. Rosenthale and J. R. Dipalma, “Acute tolerance to norepinephrine in dogs,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 136, pp. 336–343, 1962.
  30. J. C. Bizot, C. Le Bihan, A. J. Puech, M. Hamon, and M. H. Thiébot, “Serotonin and tolerance to delay of reward in rats,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 400–412, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Svenson, L. E. Strandberg, B. Lindvall, and L. Erhardt, “Haemodynamic response to dopexamine hydrochloride in postinfarction heart failure: lack of tolerance after continuous infusion,” British Heart Journal, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 489–496, 1988. View at Scopus
  32. Y. R. Wen, P. H. Tan, J. K. Cheng, Y. C. Liu, and R. R. Ji, “Microglia: a promising target for treating neuropathic and postoperative pain, and morphine tolerance,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 487–494, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. J. Horvath, The Role of Microglia in Morphine Tolerance, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, Ohio, USA, 2010.
  34. S. C. Kao, X. Zhao, C. Y. Lee, et al., “Absence of mu opioid receptor mRNA expression in astrocytes and microglia of rat spinal cord,” Neuroreport, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 378–384, 2012.
  35. Y. Low, C. F. Clarke, and B. K. Huh, “Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management,” Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 357–360, 2012.
  36. M. Lee, S. Silverman, H. Hansen, V. Patel, and L. Manchikanti, “A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia,” Pain Physician, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 145–161, 2011. View at Scopus
  37. A. DuPen, D. Shen, and M. Ersek, “Mechanisms of opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia,” Pain Management Nursing, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 113–121, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. L. Fields, “Pain and the primary somatosensory cortex,” Pain, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 742–743, 2012.
  39. S. Westerén-Punnonen, H. Yppärilä-Wolters, J. Partanen, K. Nieminen, A. Hyvärinen, and H. Kokki, “Somatosensory evoked potentials by median nerve stimulation in children during thiopental/sevoflurane anesthesia and the additive effects of ketoprofen and fentanyl,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 799–805, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Kumar, A. Bhattacharya, and N. Makhija, “Evoked potential monitoring in anaesthesia and analgesia,” Anaesthesia, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 225–241, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. O. A. Petroff, R. H. Mattson, and D. L. Rothman, “Proton MRS: GABA and glutamate,” Advances in Neurology, vol. 83, pp. 261–271, 2000. View at Scopus
  42. M. H. Pollack, J. E. Jensen, N. M. Simon, R. E. Kaufman, and P. F. Renshaw, “High-field MRS study of GABA, glutamate and glutamine in social anxiety disorder: response to treatment with levetiracetam,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 739–743, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Wiebking, N. W. Duncan, P. Qin, et al., “External awareness and GABA-A multimodal imaging study combining fMRI and [18F]flumazenil-PET,” Human Brain Mapping. In press.
  44. M. Pawar, P. Kumar, S. Sunkaraneni, S. Sirohi, E. A. Walker, and B. C. Yoburn, “Opioid agonist efficacy predicts the magnitude of tolerance and the regulation of μ-opioid receptors and dynamin-2,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 563, no. 1–3, pp. 92–101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. L. Whistler, “Examining the role of mu opioid receptor endocytosis in the beneficial and side-effects of prolonged opioid use: from a symposium on new concepts in mu-opioid pharmacology,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 189–204, 2012.
  46. J. M. Bian, N. Wu, R. B. Su, and J. Li, “Opioid receptor trafficking and signaling: what happens after opioid receptor activation?” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 167–184, 2012.
  47. G. W. Pasternak and Y. X. Pan, “Mix and match: heterodimers and opioid tolerance,” Neuron, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 6–8, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus