The Versatility of Perforator-Based Propeller Flap for Reconstruction of Distal Leg and Ankle Defects

Table 1

Patient summary.

Patient	Age (yrs)/sex	Location of defect	Defect size (cm)	Perforator source vessel	Followup (months)	Complications
1	22/M	Lateral malleolus	7×3	Peroneal	15	None
2	16/M	Lateral malleolus	6×5	Peroneal	11	None
3	18/M	Medial malleolus	5.5×4	Post. tibial	2	Transient venous
						congestion
4	38/M	Anterior lower tibia	7×5	Post. tibial	4	None
5	40/M	Lateral malleolus	4×4.5	Peroneal	10	Partial flap
						necrosis
6	70/M	Medial malleolus	5×4	Post. tibial	6	None
7	52/M	Anterior lower tibia	6×4	Post. tibial	18	None
8	36/M	Medial malleolus	4.5×5	Post. tibial	18	None
9	46/M	Antero medial	6.5×5	Post. tibial	7	None
		lower tibia
10	40/M	Medial malleolus	4×3.5	Post. tibial	2	Marginal wound
	Diabetic					dehiscence
11	22/M	Medial malleolus	5×4	Post. tibial	12	None
12	36/M	Lateral malleolus	6×3	Peroneal	24	None
13	55/M	Medial malleolus	5.5×4	Post. tibial	10	Transient venous
						congestion
14	26/M	Medial malleolus	5×5	Post. tibial	8	None
15	38/M	Medial malleolus	6×5	Post. tibial	10	None
16	40/M	Lateral malleolus	6.5×5	Peroneal	14	None
17	51/M	Medial malleolus	5×4.5	Post. tibial	16	None
18	34/M	Lateral malleolus	6×4	Peroneal	5	None
19	27/M	Medial malleolus	5×4	Post. tibial	18	None
20	56/M	Medial malleolus	5.5×6	Post. tibial	12	None