- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Society Affiliation ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 598086, 9 pages
Reproductive Biology, Mating Behavior, and Vibratory Communication of the Brown-Winged Stink Bug, Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae)
1Laboratorio de Semioquimicos, EMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Avenida W5 Norte (Final), 70770-900 Brasília, DF, Brazil
2Departament of Entomology, National Institute of Biology, Večna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Received 25 October 2011; Revised 1 January 2012; Accepted 20 January 2012
Academic Editor: Antônio R. Panizzi
Copyright © 2012 Cleonor Cavalcante A. Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We describe different aspects of the reproductive biology, mating behavior, and vibratory communication of the pentatomid Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.). This species shows lower copulation frequency and reproductive potential with longer sexual maturation period compared to other species of pentatomids. Females with multiple mating show increased fecundity when compared with single-mated females and both increased fecundity and reduced longevity when compared with virgin females. Courtship and mating behavior and vibratory signals are typical and similar to what was observed in other species of pentatomids, except that males started the courtship. These results constitute the first paper on biology, behavior, and vibratory communication among species of the subfamily Edessinae.
The brown-winged stink bug, Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), has been reported as a minor component of the stink bug species complex that is economically important pest in many crops mainly of families Solanaceae and Leguminosae . In Brazil, E. meditabunda is present in the central-west and southern states [2–4]. Although E. meditabunda has been reported on a large number of plant families [5–7], soybean plants (Glycine max L.) seem to be a preferred host for adult feeding and reproduction .
Reproductive behavior of pentatomids is mediated by communication signals of different modalities among which sex pheromones are involved in female-male encounters, courtship, and matting [12–16]. Sex pheromones of stink bugs show high variability in the chemical structure, but in some cases, as in Nezara viridula (L.) and Chinavia spp. the pheromones consist of isomers of the same compound (trans and cis (Z)-bisabolene epoxide) in different ratios . Communication with vibratory signals transmitted through the plant is used among others for mate location and recognition [17–20]. Communication with species-specific substrate-borne vibratory signals as the key element of mating behavior has been demonstrated in different species of Heteroptera, for example, in Nezara viridula , Acrosternum hilare (Say) , Lygocoris pabulinus (L.) , Chinavia impiciticornis (Stål) (= Acrosternum impicticorne), Euschistus heros (Fabr.), Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood), Thyanta perditor (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) , and many other species .
No data on sex pheromones or communication signals of any other modality and general mating behavior among species of Edessinae have been described. Therefore, we investigated different aspects of E. meditabunda reproductive biology, mating behavior, and communication signals.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Insect Rearing
Adults of E. meditabunda were collected from soybean fields in Brasilia, DF, Brazil, and maintained in a colony in the Semiochemicals Laboratory at Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (Brasilia, DF). The insects were reared in plastic cages (8 L) and fed on bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris), soybean pods, and stalks of “boldo-brasileiro,” Plectranthus barbatus (Lamiaceae). Stalks of boldo were placed in 7.5 cm high × 7.5 cm diameter plastic containers, half-filled with vermiculite (sterilized at 120°C for one hour), and sprayed with tap water to simulate a wet soil conditions to the plants and provide humidity.
The containers were placed inside the rearing cages (one vial/cage), which were kept in a climatic room at °C, % RH, and photophase of 14 L : 10 D. Twice a week the containers were sprayed with tap water to keep the vermiculite moist and the plants replaced every week. Most of the eggs were oviposited on leaves of boldo, and, after oviposition the eggs mass attached to the leaves were transferred to new rearing cages. Egg masses were examined daily for hatching and molting, and nymphs were fed in the same way as adults. After completing the immature development (<24 h after the final molt), adults were collected and managed as described above for the experiments and for colony maintenance.
2.2. Sexual Maturity and Longevity of Males and Females
To determine the sexual maturation age and longevity for each sex separately, one virgin male (1 to 2 days after the final molt) was placed together with three 15-day-old females in plastic cup (500 mL) and fed as previously described. Subsequently, one virgin female (1 to 2 days after the final molt) was placed together with three 15-day-old males. The groups ( for each adult combination) were observed daily every 30 min between 13:00 and 18:30 h that was the time interval when major frequency of copulation was previously observed. When a female or a male of each group (3 females or 3 males) dies, it was replaced by a new insect at the same age.
2.3. Mating Frequency Experiments
(1) Multiple-Mated Females
One virgin female and one virgin male (<24 h after final moult) were placed into plastic pots of 500 mL () to record the mating sequence. The insects were observed daily every 30 min during the period of higher frequency of copula (determined in previous observations) during the photophase (from 8:30 to 18:30 hours). The couples were allowed to mate throughout their lifetime. For this group of females, only those observed in copula at least two times () during their life span were considered for data analysis.
(2) Single-Mated Females
One virgin female and one virgin male (<24 h after final moult) () were placed into plastic pots of 500 mL () and observed every 30 min for the first mating (from 8:30 to 18:30 hours). Once mating had finished males were removed and females were observed daily until they died. Only females observed in copula () were included in data analyses.
(3) Virgin Females
Single virgin females (<24 h after final moult) were isolated in plastic pots of 500 mL () and observed for egg production and longevity.
Insects of the different treatments were fed as described above. Reproductive parameters (number of egg mass/female, number of eggs/mass, number of eggs/female, and number of nymphs/number of eggs (fertility)) were recorded for each tested female. The duration of copula was estimated from couples that start and finish the mating during the observation period (from 8:30 to 18:30 hours). We measured the time to start oviposition (i.e., the preoviposition period), the intervals between the first mating and first oviposition, the time between consecutive ovipositions, the total reproductive period (time between first and last oviposition), and the females longevity.
2.4. Courtship Behavior and Vibratory Communication
The behavioral sequences of courtship and mating in E. meditabunda were observed simultaneously with the records of male and female vibratory signals (Figure 3). Insects were separated by sex in the first 24 hours after the final moult and maintained in different rooms until they reach the sexual maturation. A pair of virgins and sexual mature male and female (15–20 days old) was placed on the membrane of a 10 cm diameter low-midrange loudspeaker (40–6000 Hz frequency response, impedance; RadioShack, Taiwan). An acrylic box (9 cm diameter × 4 cm high) was placed over the speaker without contacting the loudspeaker membrane to prevent the insects moving away from the membrane surface. The loudspeaker was placed into a sound-insulated room to decrease environmental noise. All observations were conducted between 13:00 and 18:30 when most of the mating activities have been previously observed. If the insects did not display any courtship behavior within 20 minutes of the observations, they were classified as failed courtship. In this experiment, 62 couples were observed. To describe the courtship and mating behavior, the previously determined behavior categories in pentatomids were used [24, 25] (Table 1). The sequence of behavioral categories was registered in each observed couple.
The vibratory signals captured by the loudspeaker were amplified by a home-made operational amplifier TL081CN, digitized (Aardvark-Direct Pro 24/96 (Aardvark Computer Systems, Washington, USA), and stored on a computer using Cool Edit Pro software (Syntrillium Software 2001—Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA). Signals were followed in real time with headphones and recorded until the insects stopped singing.
Vibratory signals were analyzed by the Sound Forge 4.5 software (Sonic Foundry http://www.sonicfoundry.com/). A pulse was defined as a unitary homogeneous parcel of vibration of finite duration ; pulse trains as repeatable and temporally distinct groups of pulses and a song as a sequence of pulses and/or pulse trains with distinct beginning and end. Spectra were described by the dominant, first harmonic, and other subdominant frequency peaks, by the spectral width 20 dB below the amplitude of dominant frequency value and by frequency modulation described as downward or upward-orientated frequency sweeps quantified by the frequency difference per signal duration (Hz/s). Songs were classified, according to their order of appearance in a duetting couple .
2.5. Statistical Analyses
Reproductive parameters were analyzed by generalized linear models (GLM) and deviance analyses (ANODEV). The models have a factor for treatments and Gaussian distribution of errors for time variables, Poisson distribution of errors for fecundity parameters (number of egg masses/female number of eggs/mass and number of eggs/female), and binomial distribution of errors for fertility (number of nymphs/number of eggs). Contrast analyses were used to multiple comparisons of means. To test the relation between successive mating and cumulate fecundity, a linear model was used, with the cumulate fecundity (cumulate numbers of eggs/female) as dependent variable.
Data from observations of all courtship sequences were used to create a first-order Markovian behavioral transition matrix of total frequency of transitions (i.e., moving from one behavioral step to the next). The repetition of a single behavior (self-transition) was not included in the records to avoid the possible influence in the relative weight of transitions between behaviors. Transition probabilities were calculated from the observed frequency of a transition between two events divided by the total number of occurrences of the first event . The expected values of the matrix cells were found using the iterative proportional fitting method of , and the statistical significance of the individual transitions were evaluated using a log-likelihood ratio test ( test) and the results presented graphically in the ethogram. Data are shown as means ± SD, together with the number of signals analyzed () and the numbers of individuals ().
The age at which females reached the sexual maturity ( days) was estimated from the first copulation of virgin females maintained with old males. It was significantly different from the age at which males reached the sexual maturity () (estimated from first copulation of virgin males maintained with old females) (ANODEV = 30.15, ).
Multiple mating with the same male increased female’s fecundity of E. meditabunda (ANODEV = 51.95 ) but not its longevity (Table 2). The reproductive period also increased ( = 651.1 ) with the increase of the number of copulations (Table 2). For multiple-mated females, we observed copula () with duration of min () and intervals between copulations of days. The pre-oviposition period of virgin- and single-mated females was significantly longer when compared with multiple-mated females (ANODEV = 81.54 ) (Table 2). However, the interval between the first mating and first oviposition was similar for both groups of mated females and females with multiple mating showed shorter intervals between consecutive ovipositions (Table 2). Females with multiple mating laid a higher number of egg mass than did virgin and once-mated females (ANODEV = 86.51 ) (Table 2). However, there was no significant difference in the number of eggs per mass in multiple- or single-mated females (Table 2) but a significant difference in the number of eggs/mass from these groups of females in comparison with the lower number determined in virgin females (Table 2).
Most eggs were laid at night in two rows of approximately seven eggs per row, generally, under the surface of bold leaves and never on the smooth surface of the cages. Despite the increased fecundity of multiple-mated females there was no significant difference in the fertility (number nymphs/number of eggs) of the single- or multiple-mated females (Table 2). Thus, multiple mating was required for fecundity but not for egg viability.
Despite of higher fecundity, the number of egg/mass was constant and no effect of female age was observed for multiple- or single-mated females; the number of eggs/mass did not show significant differences in consecutive ovipositions in these groups of females (ANODEV = 4.08 for multiple-mated females and = 0.64 for single-mated females) (Figure 1). In the same way and for multiple-mated females, the cumulative fecundity (mean number of cumulative eggs oviposited by females) after one to five mating shows a significant linear increase ( = 443.6 ) (Figure 2).
At close range (i.e., below 10 cm between mates), successful copulation followed the usual behavioral steps described until now in most stink bugs as resting, grooming (i.e., rubbing the antennae, thorax, or abdomen with a par of leg), approaching, antennation during male-female interaction, abdominal vibration, genitalia contact, and copulation . Courtship was initiated by male approaching the female by emission of vibrational signals before any physical contact, indicating that at close range vibratory signals are involved in the first encounter. The courtship steps are characterized and coded in the Table 2, and their transitional probabilities are shown in the ethogram (Figure 4).
Vibratory communication started with the emission of the first male song (MS1) (Figure 4(a)). This song was produced when a male was alone in the arena, in the presence of a female or as response to a female song. During courtship, the MS1 may be changed to MS2 or interrupt it for some minutes (Figure 4(c)). In response to MS2 females emitted their first song (FS1), and, after the emission of some pulses, the couple started to exchange FS1 and MS2 first as intercalated and later with superimposed pulses (Figure 4). After some seconds of duet song emission, the male approached the female and started to antennate her body and antennae. The female responded with a slow antennation of male’s head and antennae. Subsequently, the male antennated the posterior end of female’s abdomen. During this mutual stimulatory antennation phase, both proceeded with the FS1 and MS2 song emission. In the final courtship step, both mates stopped singing, and the male lifted the female with the head to get the copula position, then turned its body 180° to female’s back and its phygophore, so that male and female in copula faced each other in opposite direction, and finally the copulation occurred (Figure 4). We recorded no vibratory emissions of copulated male and female. The male rival song (MR) was emitted when two males were placed with a female in the arena, these males emitted pulses similar (same temporal and spectral parameters) to MS1 pulses in an alternated a-b-a-b-a-b fashion. The pulses of one of the males were emitted with higher amplitude, until the other was silenced (Figure 4(a)).
Vibratory signals showed typical temporal and spectral characteristics described until now for most Pentatominae species (Figure 4, Table 3). The male song MS1 was a typical calling song, with relatively long pulses (~1 sec in duration) that may be repeated for several minutes. The dominant frequency and band width were also in the typical range of pentatomid vibratory signals (Table 3). The second song, MS2, was composed by a pulse trains of 5 to 11 short pulses with similar frequency characteristics as those of the MS1 (Table 3). Females emitted only one song type (Figure 4(d)) with specific temporal parameters and similar dominant frequency and band width as males’ songs (Table 3). FS1 showed a clear frequency modulation with the dominant frequency decreasing throughout the duration of each pulse (Table 3). The duet emission of MS2 and FS1 shows a clear courtship function initiating all the sequential behaviors that lead to copula.
Results presented here are the first report on the E. meditabunda reproductive biology, behavior, and vibratory communication. Adults of E. meditabunda showed lower copulation frequencies, reproductive potential, and longer sexual maturation period if compared with other pentatomid species reared under similar [29, 30] or different [25, 31, 32] laboratory conditions. The preoviposition period (time between emergence and first egg mass) for females with one or multiple matting was also longer when compared with other pentatomids [29, 32].
Repeated mating increased female fecundity in E. meditabunda, but it was costly in terms of reduced longevity compared with virgin females. Studies with some pentatomids reported similar correlation as a result of mating frequency [29, 32–34]. Decreased longevity and increased reproduction associated with multiple mating have been also reported for other insect species, like Coccinella septempunctata (L.) and Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) . This seems to be the general negative cost of multiple mating .
Arnqvist and Nilsson  suggested that, in many species, especially among insects, exists an optimal remating rate for females so that one or a few matings are necessary to increase the offspring production. In such a way, additional matings are not necessary. Results of works with Heteroptera showed that in some species exists an optimal number of mating [31, 32, 37, 38] but in others not [39, 40]. In E. meditabunda, multiple-mated females have increased fecundity but did not show any fecundity peak along successive mating.
The fecundity of multiple-mated E. meditabunda could be considered low when compared with previous studies  or with data on other stink bug species [30, 31]. The low fecundity could be a characteristic of the central Brazil populations and may be related to the reproductive biology of the insect, since both adults showed long sexual maturation period and females a short period of oviposition. This may be the one of the reasons for the low population densities of E. meditabunda observed in the field.
At close range, the main behavioral steps of courtship in E. meditabunda did not differ from those observed for other species of pentatomids [17, 23–25, 31], except that, in all couples that emitted vibratory signals, males started the courtship by approaching females, antennate them, and emit vibratory signals. The sequence of steps was highly stereotyped, suggesting that once a male starts the courtship, the subsequent steps will most likely follow. Copulation was successful when the female remained stationary after the first contact. High percentage of courted females (53.06%) refuses copulation and run away from males during the antennation phase of courtship behavior. A similar failed courtship behavior was observed in Murgantia histrionica . This fact could be a characteristic of the male selection behavior of females during courtship in some species of stink bugs or an effect of the artificial arenas used in the experiments.
The temporal and spectral patterns of vibratory signals of E. meditabunda were similar to the characteristics described previously for species of Pentatominae. However, some differences were found in the emission of signals and in the songs repertoire. In most Pentatominae species, two or three different male and female songs have been described [17–19] with calling and courtship songs of different temporal and spectral characteristics. In E. meditabunda, the repertoire of signals appears to be less complex with just one female and two male songs. The MS-2 has been emitted in the calling and courtship phase of the reproductive behavior. In most until now investigated Pentatominae species vibratory communication starts by female songs that trigger males to sing and move towards her [17–19]. The absence of a female song initiating the vibratory communication in E. meditabunda could be a characteristic of vibratory communications in Edessinae or could be related to the chemical communication in this species.
As sex pheromones of E. meditabunda was not identified, vibratory communication could have a central role to the sexual behavior in this species and males could use the vibratory signals to attract females.
Further observations on a plant are needed to confirm behavioral data and the role of communication signals of other modality described in this study for couples mating on a loudspeaker membrane. A possible influence of the size of arena on the vibratory communication cannot be discarded. Because the communication on stink bugs normally start on plants at distances of several cm (sometimes reaching 1 m or more) [18, 19], the reduced dimensions of the arenas used in our experiments (9 cm) could influence or inhibit the emission of some signals. In addition, the male calling song seems to act also as a rivalry song when a second male is present as reported by Shestakov  for Asopinae bugs.
Results here presented describe the mating biology, behavior, and vibratory signals of E. meditabunda. Multiple mating showed to be advantageous for E. meditabunda females. During courtship, E. meditabunda communicates with signals produced by abdominal vibration. Songs are similar to those of other stink bugs studied with the exception that the courtship is initiated by males rather than by females as reported for other stink bugs.
The authors thank Hélio Moreira dos Santos and Diva Tiburcio for helping with field collection and laboratory rearing of the insects. They are very grateful to Dr. Antônio R. Panizzi, Editor of the special issue: “True Bugs (Heteroptera): Chemical Ecology of Invasive and Emerging Pest Species,” for his kindly assistance with editorial corrections and suggestions that helped them to improve the work. An anonymous reviewer helped to improve the first version of the paper. This work received financial support from the CNPq (Brazil), MHEST (Slovenia) Bilateral Research Cooperation Project, and CNPq, Distrito Federal Research Foundation (FAPDF), and Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) research projects.
- A. R. Panizzi, “Wild hosts of pentatomids: ecological significance and role in their pest status on crops,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 42, pp. 99–122, 1997.
- A. R. Panizzi and E. Machado-Neto, “Development of nymphs and feeding habits of nymphal and adult Edessa meditabunda (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on soybean and sunflower,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 477–481, 1992.
- L. S. Schmidt and A. Barcellos, “Abundancia e riqueza de espécies de Heteroptera (Hemiptera) do Parque Estadual do Turvo, sul do Brasil: Pentatomidea,” Iheringia, Serie Zoológica, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2007.
- N. W. Perioto, R. I. R. Lara, D. Coutinho, and D. Milani, “Pentatomideos (Insecta, Hemiptera) fitófagos associados a gergelim Sesamum indicum L. (Pedaliaceae) em Ribeirão. Preto, SP, Brasil,” Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 93–94, 2004.
- A. G. A. Silva, C. R. Gonçalves, and D. M. Galvão, Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil: seus parasitos e predadores, vol. 4, Ministério de Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 1968.
- Q. J. Lopes, D. Link, and I. V. Basso, “Pentatomids of Santa Maria, RS, preliminary list of host-plants,” Revista do Centro de Ciências Rurais, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 317–322, 1974.
- A. L. Lourenção, J. C. N. A. Pereira, M. A. C. Miranda, and G. M. B. Ambrosiano, “Danos de percevejos e de lagartas em cultivares e linhagens de soja de ciclos médios e semi-tardio,” Annais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 157–167, 1999.
- H. F. Rizzo, “Aspectos morfologicos y biologicos de Edessa meditabunda (F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) (Pentatomidae),” Revista Peruana de Entomologia, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 272–281, 1971.
- M. C. Sánchez, D. Diaz, and M. Maselli, “El comportamiento y tiempo de desarrollo de la chinche Edessa meditabunda (F.) (Hemíptera: Pentamidae),” Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–158, 1999.
- D. S. Avalos and N. C. La Porta, “Aspectos biológicos y parámetros poblacionales de Edessa meditabunda (Hemíptera: Heteroptera) bajo condiciones controladas,” Revista da Sociedade Entomológica Argentina, vol. 60, no. 1–4, pp. 177–182, 2001.
- L. Gonçalves, F. S. Almeida, and F. M. Mota, “Effects of temperature on the development and reproduction of Edessa meditabunda (Fabricius, 1794) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae),” Acta Biologica Paranaense, vol. 37, no. 1-2, pp. 111–121, 2008.
- H. L. McBrien, J. G. Millar, R. E. Rice, J. S. McElfresh, E. Cullen, and F. G. Zalom, “Sex attractant pheromone of the red-shouldered stink bug Thyanta pallidovirens: a pheromone blend with multiple redundant components,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1797–1818, 2002.
- M. C. B. Moraes, J. G. Millar, R. A. Laumann, E. R. Sujii, C. S. S. Pires, and M. Borges, “Sex attractant pheromone from the neotropical red-shouldered stink bug, Thyanta perditor (F.),” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1415–1427, 2005.
- M. Borges, J. G. Millar, R. A. Laumann, and M. C. B. Moraes, “A male-produced sex pheromone from the neotropical redbanded stink bug, Piezodorus guildinii (W.),” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1235–1248, 2007.
- R. Baker, M. Borges, N. G. Coore, and R. H. Hebert, “Identification and synthesis of (Z)-(1′S, 3′ R, 4′ S)- (−)-2-(3′ 4-epoxy)-methylcyclohexyl-6-metnylhepta-2, 5-diene, the sex pheromone on the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.),” Journal of Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 414–416, 1987.
- M. C. B. Moraes, M. Pareja, R. A. Laumann, and M. Borges, “The chemical volatiles (Semiochemicals) produced by neotropical stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae),” Neotropical Entomology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 489–505, 2008.
- M. C. B. Moraes, R. A. Laumann, A. Cokl, and M. Borges, “Vibratory signals of four Neotropical stink bug species,” Physiological Entomology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 175–188, 2005.
- A. Čokl, “Stink bug interaction with host plants during communication,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1113–1124, 2008.
- A. Čokl and M. Virant-Doberlet, “Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 48, pp. 29–50, 2003.
- B. Lampson, Y. Han, A. Khalilian, J. Greene, R. W. Mankin, and E. Foreman, “Characterization of substrate-borne vibrational signals of Euschistus servus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae),” American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–36, 2010.
- A. Čokl, M. Virant-Doberlet, and N. Stritih, “Temporal and spectral properties of the songs of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (L.) from Slovenia,” Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, vol. 439, no. 7, pp. R168–R170, 2000.
- A. Čokl, H. L. McBrien, and J. G. Millar, “Comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of two stink bug species, Acrosternum hilare and Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 471–479, 2001.
- A. T. Groot, E. van der Wal, A. Schuurman, J. H. Visser, L. H. M. Blommers, and T. A. Van Beek, “Copulation behaviour of Lygocoris pabulinus under laboratory conditions,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 219–228, 1998.
- M. Borges, P. C. Jepson, and P. E. Howse, “Long-range mate location and close-range courtship behaviour of the green stink bug, Nezara viridula and its mediation by sex pheromones,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 205–212, 1987.
- D. K. Zahn, R. D. Girling, J. S. McElfresh, R. T. Cardé, and J. G. Millar, “Biology and reproductive behavior of Murgantia histrionica (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 215–228, 2008.
- W. B. Broughton, “Method in bio-acoustic terminology,” in Acoustic Behaviour of Animals, R. G. Busnel, Ed., pp. 3–24, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1963.
- P. Haccou and E. Meelis, Statistical Analysis of Behavioural Data: An Approach Based on Time-structured Models, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1992.
- L. A. Goodman, “The analysis of cross-classified data: independence, quasiindependence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 63, pp. 1091–1131, 1968.
- M. L. Costa, M. Borges, and E. F. Vilela, “Biologia Reprodutiva de Euschistus heros (F.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae),” Annais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 559–568, 1998.
- R. A. Laumann, M. F. S. Aquino, L. S. M. Motta, H. M. Santos, M.C. B. Moraes, and M. Borges, “Parâmetros biológicos de populações de Chinavia ubica e Chinavia impicticornis (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) do Distrito Federal,” Comunicado Técnico 50, Embrapa, Brasília, DF, Brazil, 2006.
- Q. Wang and J. G. Millar, “Reproductive behavior of Thyanta pallidovirens (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 1997.
- P. Fortes and F. L. Cônsoli, “Are there costs in the repeated mating activities of female Southern stink bugs Nezara viridula?” Physiological Entomology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 215–219, 2011.
- T. S. Adams, “Effect of diet and mating status on ovarian development in a predaceous stink bug Perillus bioculatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 529–535, 2000.
- Q. Wang and J. G. Millar, “Mating behavior and evidence for male-produced sex pheromones in Leptoglossus clypealis (Heteroptera: Coreidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 972–976, 2000.
- G. M. Omkar, “Mating in aphidophagous ladybirds: costs and benefits,” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 432–436, 2005.
- G. Arnqvist and T. Nilsson, “The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 145–164, 2000.
- M. M. Lima, P. Jurberg, and J. R. de Almeida, “Behavior of triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) vectors of Chagas' disease. III. Influence of the number of matings on the fecundity and fertility of Panstrongylus megistus (Burm., 1835) in the laboratory,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 1987.
- D. M. Shuker, G. A. Ballantyne, and N. Wedell, “Variation in the cost to females of the sexual conflict over mating in the seed bug, Lygaeus equestris,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 313–321, 2006.
- A. M. Baker and P. L. Lambdin, “Fecundity, fertility and longevity of mated and unmated spined soldier bug females,” Journal of Agriculture Entomology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 378–382, 1985.
- Siswanto, R. Muhamad, D. Omar, and E. Karmawati, “The effect of mating on the eggs' fertility and fecundity of Helopeltis antonii (Heteroptera: Miridae),” Tropical Life Sciences Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2009.
- L. S. Shestakov, “Studies of vibratory signals in pentatomid bugs (Heteroptera, Asopinae) from European Russia,” Entomological Review, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2008.