Review Article
On the Use of Adaptive Resemblance Terms in Chemical Ecology
Table 2
Summarized table of the main terms used for chemical adaptive resemblances in reviews about parasites of social insects and in reviews about adaptive chemical resemblance. Systems can either be considered according to what a mimic pretends to be or according to what an operator perceives. We adopted the latter view. Furthermore, the terminology based on the origins of mimetic compounds is shown.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
—: not considered in the article. No distinction: the term chemical mimicry was used irrespective of the origin of mimetic cues. aAccording to the first two columns in Table 1. bDefined as being invisible through background matching. cAuthors follow the definition of Howard et al. [38]. dAuthors use the term mimicry irrespective of the origin of mimetic compounds but point out that different definitions exist depending on their origin. eAuthors follow Dettner and Liepert [15]. fThe term camouflage was used once to describe invading predators that biosynthesize CHCs of social insects. gDefined as resemblance of the background or of an entity in the background. hInconsistent to the definitions of Dettner and Liepert [15]. |