Review Article

Ants as Indicators in Brazil: A Review with Suggestions to Improve the Use of Ants in Environmental Monitoring Programs

Table 1

Papers reviewed regarding ants as indicators in Brazil, indicating the main disturbance investigated (Disturbance), the aim of the paper (Aim), if the paper was explicitly, implicitly or has the Potential to be used in indicator studies (Indication), the environmental parameters analyzed/sampled (Environmental parameters), the responses of ant community to disturbance that were found to be significant (Effects on ant community), the indicator type used (Indicator type) and the paper (Reference).

DisturbanceAimIndicationEnvironmental parametersEffects on ant communityIndicator typeReference

AgricultureEvaluate the effect of different soil tillage and crop management systems on soil fauna groupsYes (implicit)Soil tillage and crop management systemsChange in species dominance (discriminant and correspondence analysis)EnvironmentalBaretta et al. [28]

AgricultureEvaluate the ant diversity in fig crops under different managementsYesTypes of soil cover plantsChange in density of species (, Tukey test)EnvironmentalMerlim et al. [29]

Agriculture (forestry practices in Eucalyptus)Use the ant guild concept to evaluate changes in Eucalyptus plantations following control of leaf-cutting antsYesForestry practicesChange in species composition—observed frequency of species and guilds (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalLacau et al. [30]

Agriculture (preceded by deforestation and fire)Assess the recolonization by fauna in areas cleared and burned to plant corn and beansYesHuman land-use and resting timeIncrease in abundance in the less-disturbed areas (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalNunes et al. [31]

Agriculture (formicid granulated baits)Evaluate the effect of different applications of formicide baits on nontarget ant communityYesForms and timing of application of formicid-granulated baitsNo effect of bait type on ant species richness (, ANOVA) Reduction in species richness observed only in control method, systematic application being more harmful (, ANOVA)EnvironmentalRamos et al. [32]

Anthropogenic activitiesQuantify heavy metals in worker ants of Camponotus rufipes collected in different environmentsYesObserved human interferenceThree groups of ants with different heavy metal concentrations (PCA analyses)EnvironmentalSilva et al. [33]

Conservation statusCreate an inventory of epigaeic ant species that occur in vine forest and use them to indicate the level of conservation of this ecosystemYesNoneInventory (nonstatistical test)Carvalho et al. [34]

Conservation statusVerify the impact of human use in mangrovesPotentialObserved levels of human useReduction on species richness EnvironmentalDelabie et al. [35]

Conservation statusInventory the ant community in the Baturité hillsYesNoneInventory (nonstatistical test)*Hites et al. [36]

Conservation statusStudy the ant communities in preserved and impacted savanna sitesYesObserved human interferenceReduction of diversity in impacted sites *EnvironmentalRamos et al. [37]

FireTest the negative effect of fire in Restinga environments on the ant communityPotentialPresence of fireIncrease in species richness with presence of fire (mean and confidence intervals of estimated species richness)EnvironmentalEndringer et al. [38]

FireTest the hypothesis that ant species richness and composition change after burning sand dunesYesHistory of fireMore ant species and distinct species composition in the unburned area (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalTeixeira et al. [39]

FragmentationVerify the responses of ants nesting in twigs in the litter layer to habitat changes associated with forest fragmentationPotentialDistance to forest edge, remnant isolation, leaf-litter depth, density of dead twigs, and vegetation (three parameters measured)Higher species richness ; most ant species had greater nest densities in continuous areas than in remnants, change in species composition with forest edgeEcologicalCarvalho and Vasconcelos [40]

FragmentationDetermine the effect of forest fragmentation on ant communitiesYesRemnant area, distance to forest edge, vegetation cover of matrix, and vegetation (three parameters measured)No effect of many fragment characteristics on ant species richness: area , distance core-border . Only tree density had an effect EcologicalGomes et al. [41]

FragmentationKnow the community of ants in forest fragmentsYesRemnant areaNo change in species richness with remnant area *EnvironmentalSantos et al. [42]

Forestry systemsDescribe the epigaeic ant communities in Eucalyptus plantationsYesEucalyptus ageNo change in species richness with Eucalyptus age EnvironmentalFonseca and Diehl [43]

Human land-useCompare the ant community structure between a crop and a secondary forestPotentialLand useReduction of diversity and equitability and change in species composition (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalCastro and Queiroz [44]

Human land-useCompare the impact of different agroecosystems on ant species richnessYesLand useHigher species richness in forest edges and pasture (non-statistical test); coffee crop presented reduced estimated richness EnvironmentalDias et al. [45]

Human land-useSurvey of ant and termite fauna in four patches with different vegetation structures and in one open fieldPotentialLand useChange in species richness and composition (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalDiehl et al. [46]

Human land-useTest the effects of Restinga soil characteristics on ant communitiesYes (implicit)Land use, physical and chemical soil properties, and microbial activityChange in species richness (non-statistical test) and composition (canonical correspondence analysis)EcologicalGomes et al. [47]

Human land-useElucidate ant species richness and community structure associated with the micro basin of Sanga Caramuru-ChapecóYesHabitat type, temperature, and rainfallChange in species composition (Bray-Curtis Cluster Analysis indicated higher similarity for disturbed areas) and higher richness (observed and estimated) in the native area (sample-based accumulation curves)*EnvironmentalIlha et al. [48]

Human land-useDetermine the level of similarity of ant communities in forest areas (three native forest remnants) and an Eucalyptus reforestationYesLand useChange in species composition (Jaccard index— among Eucalyptus crops versus forest remnants and among forest remnants)EnvironmentalLapola and Fowler [49]

Human land-useTo inventory the ant fauna in a Cerrado area and in Eucalyptus plantations with five classes of understory agesYesEucalypt ageHigher density of species in Cerrado areas than in Eucalyptus (non-statistical test) and estimated species richness similar between areas EnvironmentalMarinho et al. [50]

Human land-useInvestigate the effect of structural characteristics of the environment on ant communitiesYesHabitat typeChange in species richness and composition (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalSantana-Reis and Santos [51]

Human land-useTest the hypotheses that there was a decrease in ant species richness and a change in the species composition in habitats with more intense soil useYesLand useSites with distinct soil use host a differential ant species composition (cluster analysis-Euclidean distance)EnvironmentalSchmidt and Diehl [52]

Human land-useEvaluate the effect of collection time (day and night) on ant fauna attracted to baits in areas of Eucalyptus cloeziana (Myrtaceae) and Cerrado (savanna vegetation)PotentialLand useCollection time effect was more important to ant fauna structure than the vegetation effect (ordination analyses)EnvironmentalTavares et al. [53]

Human land-use and successionCompare ant diversity under different land-use systemsYesLand use and age of successionChange in density of species (non-statistical test), species richness (sample-based accumulation curves and χ2), and composition (cluster analysis)*EnvironmentalBraga et al. [54]

InundationDocument the ant fauna in three different forest types (one annually inundated and two on terra firme)PotentialVegetation (several parameters measured)Change in diversity, similarity, and proportion of different nesting and feeding habitats (non-statistical test)EcologicalMajer and Delabie [55]

LoggingTest the hypothesis that logging affects forest ant fauna by reducing the species richness and changing the composition of ground-foraging ant communitiesYesCanopy openness, abundance of understory vegetation, and leaf-litter depthChange in species composition proportion of Pheidole was reduced from 21.4% and 26% in unlogged forest and low-impact logging, respectively, to 14.8% in high-impact logging EcologicalKalif et al. [56]

MiningDetermine the levels of heavy metals in plants and identify soil organisms of the mesofauna that could be biological indicators of soil qualityYesPhysical and chemical soil properties and heavy metal contentDecrease in abundance and increase in lead (Pb) accumulation (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalBarros et al. [57]

MiningAnt fauna survey and community structure, analyses of the ground-dwelling ants in native vegetation and areas with different inferred copper levelsYesAreas with different inferred copper levelsDecrease in species richness with inferred copper levels (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalDiehl et al. [58]

Restoration (agriculture)Investigate the recolonization profile of the restored Atlantic ForestYesAge after plantingIncrease in species richness (, ANOVA) and change in species composition (ANOSIM, )*EnvironmentalPais and Varanda [59]

Restoration (anthropogenic disturbance)Test the hypothesis that ant fauna is closely related to the structural complexity of habitatYesAge of restorationChange in species composition (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalCoelho et al. [60]

Restoration (dredging disturbance)Evaluating ant bioindication of impacted habitatsYesTime since restoration, distance from the impact, and physical properties of soilChange in species richness: higher in cerrado than in the restoration habitats, and also higher in the ecotone and intermediate zones than on the beach and change in abundance and composition (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalCosta et al. [61]

Restoration (mining)Investigate which ants recolonized reclaimed areas in subtropical regions and evaluate the effect of different rehabilitation techniques, comparing results with AustraliaYesAge of rehabilitation, soil penetrability, number of logs, litter and vegetation measures (three and five parameter, resp.)Increase in species richness (non-statistical test) and change in composition (PCoA)EcologicalMajer [62]

Restoration (mining)Evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation procedures in mining sites on facilitating ant recolonization and compare it with other tropical regions and climatic zonesYesAge of restoration, soil penetrability, litter depth, percentage of litter, grass, and herb cover, and vegetation (several parameters measured)Species richness increased in early ages but slowed in late ages and was smaller than control site (non-statistical test). Distinct species composition in sites at early ages, intermediate ages, and control sites (ordination analyses)EcologicalMajer [63]

Restoration (mining)Investigate the community structure changes of different rehabilitation techniquesYesRehabilitation techniqueChange in species richness (non-statistical test) and composition (cluster analysis)EcologicalPereira et al. [64]

RoadTest the hypothesis that dirt roads are favourable landing sites for Atta laevigata founding queens. Analyze the importance of litter cover as a proximate cue in nest-site selectionPotentialPresence of dirt roadsThe number of colonization attempts in roads was 5 to 10 times greater than that in the adjacent vegetation EnvironmentalVasconcelos et al. [65]

SeasonalityInvestigate ant diversity and species composition on an islandYesSeasonalityChange in species richness and composition with seasonality (non-statistical test)*EnvironmentalSchmidt et al. [66]

SuccessionExamine whether secondary forests of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest act as refugia for forest-adapted speciesYes (implicit)Age of succession and soil typeRichness and composition of ant assemblages in secondary forests have recovered slowly and have not approached conditions typical to old-growth forestsEnvironmentalBihn et al. [67]

SuccessionExamine bait preferences of litter ants along a successional gradient of forestPotentialAge of successionPreference of ants for the type of bait changed along the successional gradient . In young successional stages, N baits attracted more ants than CHO baits, whereas in late successional stages, CHO baits attracted more antsEnvironmentalBihn et al. [68]

SuccessionInvestigate how functional diversity profile changed in a successional gradientPotentialAge of successionIncreased diversity and change in functional groups (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalBihn et al. [69]

SuccessionVerify patterns in the structure of ant communities along a successional gradientPotentialAge of successionIncreased diversity and equitability (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalCastro et al. [70]

SuccessionCompare ant diversity among sites in different successional stagesPotentialAge of successionHigher diversity in intermediary stage and change in composition (non-statistical test)EnvironmentalLeal et al. [71]

SuccessionCompare the diversity and composition of tree-dwelling ants in different successional stages of a seasonal deciduous forestPotentialAge of successionIncrease in species abundance and change in species composition (PCA analysis)EnvironmentalNeves et al. [72]

SuccessionCompare the ant species diversity related to successional stage and seasonalityYesAge of succession, tree richness and densityChange in species composition (DCA deterrent correspondence analysis, )EcologicalNeves et al. [73]

SuccessionEvaluate the long-term effect of fire on ant species richnessPotentialPresence of fire 15 years beforeChange in species composition (cluster analyses-Euclidean distance)EnvironmentalSantos et al. [74]

SuccessionAssess the changes in species richness and composition between relatively pristine habitat and along a forest regeneration gradientYesAge of successionIncrease in species richness (sample-based accumulation curves) and distinct species composition between pristine area and areas at regeneration (ANOSIM, *EnvironmentalSilva et al. [75]

SuccessionCompare the structure of the ground ant communities in areas at different levels of restorationYesAge of successionIncrease in species richness and decrease in abundance , change in species composition (ordination analysis)EnvironmentalVasconcelos [76]

SuccessionDetermine experimentally the effects of selective logging on ground-living antsYesLogging age, canopy cover, litter depth, and understory densitySpecies richness, evenness, and abundance per plot did not vary among treatments . Most of the species found in the control plots were also present in the logged plotsEcologicalVasconcelos et al. [77]

UrbanizationCompare the thermal tolerances of leaf-cutter ants (Atta sexdens) from colonies inside and outside an urban areaPotentialTemperatureUrban ants support higher temperatures better than rural ones, which present higher rates of mortality EnvironmentalAngilletta et al. [78]

Vegetation typeInventory antsYesHabitat typeChange in species richness (non-statistical test)*EnvironmentalDiehl et al. [79]

Vegetation typeTest how the diversity of one taxa can be a good surrogate of all diversityYesHabitat typeCorrelation with other taxa (Pearson correlation coefficients)BiodiversityLeal et al. [80]

Vegetation typeCompare ant diversity in three different forest stages (primary, reforestation, and secondary)PotentialHabitat typeChange in diversity and exclusive species (non-statistical test)*EnvironmentalLopes et al. [81]

Vegetation typeCompare the ant fauna from forests and nearby patches of savanna (Cerrado) in the Brazilian Amazon. Assess whether there is a difference in the fauna between the ground and lower vegetation strata in both habitatsPotentialHabitat typeForests host twice as many species as savanna (sample-based rarefaction curves). In both habitats, the ground hosted more species than vegetation (). Distinct species composition between forest and savanna and between ground and vegetation within the same habitat; ant species fidelity and specificity is given by IndVal (see Table 2)EnvironmentalVasconcelos and Vilhena [82]

*papers with sample-based accumulation curves.