About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Psyche
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 601073, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/601073
Research Article

The Tergal Gland Secretion of the Two Rare Myrmecophilous Species Zyras collaris and Z. haworthi (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and the Effect on Lasius fuliginosus

Universität Hohenheim, Institut für Zoologie, Fachgebiet Tierökologie 220c, Garbenstr. 30, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany

Received 25 January 2013; Accepted 9 March 2013

Academic Editor: Jean-Paul Lachaud

Copyright © 2013 Michael Stoeffler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The beetle species Zyras collaris and Z. haworthi belong to the rove beetle tribe Myrmedoniini (Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae), which comprises many myrmecophilous species. Due to their rareness, it is unknown how the two species interact with their host ants. GC-MS analyses revealed that both species release α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene and limonene from their defensive tergal glands. This composition of tergal gland secretion is unique within the subfamily Aleocharinae. In biotests, Lasius fuliginosus ants showed increased antennation towards filter paper balls treated with mixtures of these substances in natural concentrations. Because these monoterpenes are also present in some aphid species which are attended by ants, we hypothesize that Zyras beetles mimic the presence of aphids and thereby achieve acceptance by their host ants.

1. Introduction

The rove beetles tribe Myrmedoniini (Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) contains many myrmecophilous species. In Central Europe, it comprises the myrmecophilous genera Lomechusa and Lomechusoides, Zyras, Myrmoecia, and Pella, as well as the nonmyrmecophilous species Drusilla canaliculata Fabricius, 1787. Myrmoecia and Pella were formerly considered subgenera of Zyras but, meanwhile, have been elevated to genus rank [13], which is also supported by molecular data [4, 5].

Lomechusa and Lomechusoides are textbook examples for the integration of myrmecophiles in ant nests by the use of appeasement glands on their abdomen [6]. Different strategies are used by Pella species to escape from aggressions by their host ant Lasius fuliginosus (Latreille, 1798). While the Japanese species P. comes (Sharp, 1874) mimics the cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) pattern of its host ant to be accepted [7], P. laticollis (Märkel, 1845) employs a specific appeasing behaviour [8]. Pella cognata (Märkel, 1842), P. funesta (Gravenhorst, 1806), and P. humeralis (Gravenhorst, 1802) repel ants by the use of their abdominal tergal gland. This tergal gland is only found within the Aleocharinae and is used by most species of the subfamily as defensive gland against aggressors [9]. In P. funesta and P. humeralis, the gland secretion specifically contains sulcatone, a panic alarm inducing pheromone of L. fuliginosus. By the release of this compound, beetles create an “ant free space” [8, 10]. In contrast to these species, only little is known on the biology of Zyras species, and it is unclear how they achieve acceptance by ants. For Z. collaris (Paykull, 1789) and Z. haworthi (Stephens, 1835), this is mainly due to their rarity. For South-West Germany, only 18 and 10 records exist from 1950 to 2000 for Z. collaris and Z. haworthi, respectively [11]. Our own collection efforts between 2001 and 2011 resulted in approximately 1200 specimens of different Pella species, but only one for each of the two Zyras species.

Here we report for the first time on the composition of the tergal gland secretion of Z. collaris and Z. haworthi and its potential role for the interaction with its putative host ant L. fuliginosus. Because the study is based on the analysis of only two Zyras specimen, more studies with these rare beetles are urgently needed to substantiate our findings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

One specimen of Z. collaris and one of Z. haworthi were collected in the state of Baden-Württemberg (Germany), the first in neglected grassland near Freiburg and the second in a rural area near Herrenberg, in the vicinity of a nest of L. fuliginosus. The nest was located in a stump between hedgerows along a brook.

In the lab, beetles were kept in plastic Petri dishes (diameter 90 mm) at room temperature under daylight conditions. The Petri dishes were filled with a 5 mm plaster layer, which was moistened daily to maintain humidity. A small piece of filter paper was provided as shelter. Beetles were fed with dead workers of L. fuliginosus. Ants used as food for the beetles and for behavioural observations were collected along ant trails near the nest entrances in the vicinity of Stuttgart (State of Baden-Württemberg, Germany). Insects were determined to species level using the identification keys by Lohse [13] for beetles and Seifert [14] for ants.

2.2. Chemical Analysis of the Tergal Gland Secretion

Volatiles released from the defensive tergal glands of the beetles were analysed as described in [10]. Beetles were placed in a flask and teased with a magnetic stir bar and a magnetic stick. The volatiles from the headspace of the flask were collected using a SPME-fiber coated with 65 μm Polydimethylsiloxane/Divinylbenzene [15]. The SPME-fiber was inserted into a gas chromatograph (Type 6890; Agilent Technologies, HP 5 column: 30 m long, 0.2 mm in diameter and 0.5 μm film thickness; splitless mode, programmed: 60°C for 3 min, 60°C to 300°C at 3°C/min and then constant over 30 min at 300°C, carrier gas: Helium 1.6 mL/min) coupled to a 5973 network mass selective detector (GC-MS) for identification of the collected substances. Chromatograms and mass spectra were analyzed with Agilent Technologies software (Enhanced Chemstation MSD Chem Station D 01.02.16, June 15, 2002) using Wiley- (Wiley275) and NIST-databases (NIST Mass Spectral Library 2002 Version). For identification, mass spectra and retention times of substances were compared with respective data from synthetic compounds.

2.3. Experiments on the Effect of the Tergal Gland Secretion

Ten L. fuliginosus ants were placed in a Petri dish with a filter paper ball in the center. The filter paper ball was treated with 10 μL terpene solution in hexane, containing a mixture of monoterpenes in a total concentration of either 1 μg/μL or 10 μg/μL. Control filter paper balls were treated with 10 μL hexane. Each test solution was tested 20 times with different ant specimen. Hexan as control was tested 40 times. The reaction of the ants to the filter paper balls was video-taped for 120 sec and analysed afterwards by counting the events of the different behaviours. Behaviour was considered as aggressive when ants touched the filter paper ball with both antennae and open mandibles or when they were biting into it. Antennation, that is, touching the filter paper ball with both antennae and closed mandibles, was considered as a nonaggressive behaviour.

The following test solutions containing mixtures of all four identified monoterpenes in hexane were prepared: (1)mixture of α-pinene (3 mg), -pinene (41 mg), myrcene (52 mg), and limonene (4 mg) in 100 mL hexane resembling the secretion of Z. collaris;(2)mixture of α-pinene (24 mg), β-pinene (57 mg), myrcene (14 mg), and limonene (6 mg) in 100 mL hexane resembling the secretion of Z. haworthi.

Both mixtures contain terpenes in a total concentration of 1 μg/μL. For tests with 10 μg/μL, the mixtures were concentrated tenfold in a water bath. The relative concentrations of the single compounds matched the composition of the headspace analyses of the tergal gland secretion by GC/MS (Table 1). The concentration of either 1 μg/μL or 10 μg/μL is based on the assumption that the tergal gland reservoir of the two Zyras species is about 0.2 μL, equivalent to the volume of the similar sized Aleochara curtula Goeze [16] and that between 1/20 to 1/5 of the whole volume is released at one time.

tab1
Table 1: Substances found in the headspace of a flask containing rove beetles of the genus Zyras, which have been teased using a magnetic stir bar. Numbers in the table refer to numbers in Figure 1. Relative proportions of the substances between the beetles were calculated in accordance with [12]. The substance with the highest peak area for each row is the reference (= 1.00).
2.4. Statistics

The results of the behavioural assays were analysed with the Mann-Whitney -test using the software package STATISTICA 1999 Edition (StatSoft Inc., 1999).

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Analysis of the Tergal Gland Secretion

GC-MS analyses of volatiles released by Z. collaris and Z. haworthi revealed the presence of the monoterpenes α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, and limonene, which were identified by comparison of those of authentic reference samples (Figure 1, Table 1).

fig1
Figure 1: Gas chromatograms (TIC) of the tergal secretions obtained by stir bar irritation of Zyras collaris (a) and Z. haworthi (b). 1: α-pinene; 2: β-pinene; 3: myrcene; 4: limonene.

To compare the relative importance of each compound between the species, the relative proportions of the substances were calculated in accordance with [12]. This method reveals that Z. haworthi has a five times higher amount of α-pinene than Z. collaris whereas the amount of myrcene in Z. collaris is approximately five times higher than in Z. haworthi. The amount of β-pinene and limonene is similar between the species.

3.2. Experiments on the Effect of the Tergal Gland Secretion

Filter paper balls treated with solutions mixed according to the results of the chemical analyses, representing the composition of the tergal secretion of Z. collaris and Z. haworthi, stimulated significantly more antennation by the ants than the control hexane. Furthermore, no significant aggression inducing effect was found (Figure 2).

601073.fig.002
Figure 2: Antennation and aggressive behaviour (□: median, boxes: 25–75 percentiles, whiskers: min.–max.) by Lasius fuliginosus ants in a laboratory experiment towards a filter paper ball treated with mixtures of substances (1 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL), which are present in the tergal gland secretion of Zyras collaris and Z. haworthi rove beetles. Bars with different lower case letters are significantly different at (Mann-Whitney -test; control: ; mixtures: ).

4. Discussion

Using headspace SPME and GC-MS, the volatile compounds that were released by the two rove beetle species Z. collaris and Z. haworthi from their defensive tergal gland upon molestation were analysed. The analysis revealed the exclusive presence of the terpenes α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, and limonene. This is remarkable, because terpenes are absent from the tergal gland secretion of all the other 26 species from nine different tribes of this subfamily Aleocharinae which have been studied so far, including all the other species of the same tribe Myrmedoniini [8, 10, 16, 17]. Generally, the tergal gland secretion of the Aleocharine contains quinones as toxins, which are dissolved in alkanes, alkenes, aldehydes, ketones, acids, esters, and acetates [9]. Obviously, the composition of the secretion in the genus Zyras is unique within the subfamily.

This supports recent findings on the molecular phylogeny of Lomechusini [5], which show that the genus Zyras is much more distant to the genus Pella and that Pella should not be considered a subgenus of the former. This settles a long dispute on the phylogenetic relationship of these genera.

Due to the rarity of Z. collaris and Z. haworthi, the present study is based on the analysis of one specimen of each species only. So, it is not guaranteed that the mixtures found in the tergal glands of both specimens are representative of the entire species. Also possible methodological or sampling deviations cannot be excluded. However, in our earlier studies, we found that the qualitative composition of the defensive tergal gland secretion of the Aleocharinae is highly species specific and varies only quantitatively between individuals [9]. Thus, we consider that our results on the chemical composition of the tergal gland secretion are very likely to be valid. The uniqueness of the Zyras secretion within the Myrmedoniini is also supported by the fact that both Zyras specimens had qualitatively very similar secretions. Nevertheless, more studies on the chemical composition of the tergal gland secretion of Zyras species are required to substantiate our findings and to clarify the exact stereochemistry of the identified pinenes.

To study the role of the terpenes in the tergal gland secretion, the reaction of L. fuliginosus ants to mixtures of these compounds was studied in laboratory experiments. L. fuliginosus was chosen based on the literature where this species is described as host ant of Z. haworthi [13, 18] and because our Z. haworthi was collected in the vicinity of a nest of L. fuliginosus. This indicates that L. fuliginosus might be the host ant of Z. haworthi, whereas the host ants of Z. collaris remains unclear. Two different mixtures were tested, composed according to the ratio of single compounds in our chemical analysis of the secretion of both species. Mixtures were tested in two different concentrations covering the quantity of secretion released by the beetles under natural conditions. The experiments revealed no deterrent or aggression eliciting effect of these substances to the ants. Instead, increased antennation behaviour of ants towards filter balls treated with a mixture of these terpenes was observed. This reaction of the ants points to the fact that the terpenes might be used by the beetles to deal with their host ants in analogy to the ability of some myrmecophilous Pella-beetles, which repel aggressive host ants by the release of the ants’ panic alarm pheromone sulcatone [8, 10]. However, none of the four identified monoterpenes have been described as pheromones in L. fuliginosus so far. Possibly, the antennation response of ants to the terpenes is based on their homobiosis with aphids. The aphids are protected by the ants, which receive the nutritious honeydew in return [6]. To obtain honeydew, ants antennate the aphid’s abdominal tip. This behaviour strongly resembles the behaviour observed by us in interactions between myrmecophilous rove beetles and ants. In accordance with this idea, α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, and limonene have been reported to be present in some aphid species [19]. α- and β-Pinene as well as limonene occur in the aphid honeydew [20, 21]. Therefore, we hypothesise that these terpenes are used by ants to recognize aphids and that Zyras beetles mimic these compounds to calm down the aggressions of host ants during encounters. To address this hypothesis, it would be required (1) to unequivocally identify the host ants of both Zyras species, (2) to study in more details behavioural interactions between Zyras specimens and these host ants, (3) to identify aphid species that are relevant for the host ants, and (4) to examine the role of the identified terpenes on the interaction between these aphids and their host ants. This working plan is especially challenging because of the rarity of the beetles.

Taken together, the tergal gland secretion of Z. collaris and Z. haworthi is unique within the rove beetle subfamily Aleocharinae by its composition of the terpenes α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, and limonene. In biotests, L. fuliginosus ants were neither repelled nor did show aggressive behaviour towards these substances but were stimulated to antennation. Because terpenes are present in aphids, we hypothesize that Zyras beetles release these compounds to mimic aphids and achieve acceptance by their host ants.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tanja Maier and Alexander Szallies for their help in providing Zyras beetles. An unknown reviewer carefully studied our paper and helped to improve it with his remarks.

References

  1. D. H. Kistner, “Studies of Japanese myrmecophiles, part I: the genera Pella and Falagria (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae),” in Entomological Essays to Commemorate the Retirement of Professor K. Yasumatsu, Z. Hidaka, Ed., pp. 141–165, Hokuryukan, Tokyo, Japan, 1972.
  2. M. Maruyama, “Revision of the Palearctic species of the myrmecophilous genus Pella (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae),” National Science Museum Monographs, vol. 32, pp. 1–207, 2006.
  3. P. Hlavác, A. F. Newton, and M. Maruyama, “World catalogue of the species of the tribe Lomechusini (Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae),” Zootaxa, no. 3075, pp. 1–151, 2011.
  4. H. Elven, L. Bachmann, and V. I. Gusarov, “Phylogeny of the tribe Athetini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 84–100, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Elven, L. Bachmann, and V. I. Gusarov, “Molecular phylogeny of the Athetini-Lomechusini-Ecitocharini clade of aleocharine rove beetles (Insecta),” Zoologica Scripta, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 617–636, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Hölldobler and E. O. Wilson, The Ants, The Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1990.
  7. T. Akino, “Chemical camouflage by myrmecophilous beetles Zyras comes (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and Diaritiger fossulatus (Coleoptera: Pselaphidae) to be integrated into the nest of Lasius fuliginosus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” Chemoecology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 83–89, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Stöffler, T. Tolasch, and J. L. M. Steidle, “Three beetles-three concepts. Different defensive strategies of congeneric myrmecophilous beetles,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1605–1613, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. L. M. Steidle and K. Dettner, “Chemistry and morphology of the tergal gland of free-living adult Aleocharinae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and its phylogenetic significance,” Systematic Entomology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 149–168, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Stöffler, T. S. Maier, T. Tolasch, and J. L. M. Steidle, “Foreign-language skills in rove-beetles? Evidence for chemical mimicry of ant alarm pheromones in myrmecophilous Pella beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae),” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1382–1392, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Frank and E. Konzelmann, Die Käfer Baden-Württembergs 1950–2000, Naturschutz-Praxis, Artenschutz 6, Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 1st edition, 2002.
  12. J. T. Romeo, “New SPME guidelines, guidelines for quantitative analysis by SPME,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 35, no. 12, p. 1383, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. G. A. Lohse, “Tribus zyrasini,” in Die Käfer Mitteleuropas, H. Freude, K. W. Harde, and G. A. Lohse, Eds., Band 5, pp. 222–229, Goecke and Evers, Krefeld, Germany, 1974.
  14. B. Seifert, Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas, Lutra Verlags- und Vertriebsgesellschaft, Tauer, Germany, 2007.
  15. C. L. Arthur and J. Pawliszyn, “Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optical fibers,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 19, pp. 2145–2148, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Peschke and M. Metzler, “Defensive and pheromonal secretion of the tergal gland of Aleochara curtula - I. The chemical composition,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 773–783, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Gnanasunderam, H. Young, C. F. Butcher, and R. F. N. Hutchins, “Ethyl decanoate as a major component in the defensive secretion of two new zealand aleocharine (staphylinidae) beetles—Tramiathaea cornigera (broun) and Thamiaraea fuscicornis (broun),” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 197–202, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Horion, “Staphylinidae 3. Teil Habrocerinae bis Aleocharinae (ohne Subtribus Athetae),” in Faunistik der Mitteleuropäischen Käfer, W. Schmidt, Ed., vol. 11, Wechselnd, Überlingen, Germany, 1967.
  19. F. Francis, S. Vandermoten, F. Verheggen, G. Lognay, and E. Haubruge, “Is the (E)-β-farnesene only volatile terpenoid in aphids?” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 6–11, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. A. Pickett and D. C. Griffiths, “Composition of aphid alarm pheromones,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 349–360, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. D. Leroy, A. Sabri, S. Heuskin et al., “Microorganisms from aphid honeydew attract and enhance the efficacy of natural enemies,” Nature Communications, vol. 2, no. 1, article 348, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus