Clinical Study
Future Intent to Run and Running Performance of Students Exposed to a Traditional versus an Autonomy Supportive Motivational Running Program
Table 3
Paired monthly runs.
| School | Pair | M | SD | 95% confidence level | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | Lower | Upper |
| Treatment | Sept-Oct | −0.089 | 3.091 | −0.832 | 0.653 | 68 | 0.810 | Sept–Nov | −0.719 | 2.948 | −1.423 | −0.011 | 68 | 0.047 | Sept–Dec | −1.877 | 5.252 | −3.139 | −0.615 | 68 | 0.004# | Oct-Nov | −0.629 | 3.565 | −1.486 | 0.227 | 68 | 0.147 | Oct–Dec | −1.787 | 4.611 | −2.895 | −0.679 | 68 | 0.002# | Nov-Dec | −1.158 | 4.140 | −2.152 | −0.163 | 68 | 0.023 |
| Control | Sept-Oct | −0.699 | 1.864 | −1.024 | −0.374 | 128 | 0.000# | Sept–Nov | −0.143 | 2.543 | −0.586 | 0.300 | 128 | 0.525 | Sept–Dec | −0.374 | 2.236 | −0.764 | 0.016 | 128 | 0.060 | Oct-Nov | 0.556 | 2.358 | 0.145 | 0.967 | 128 | 0.008 | Oct–Dec | 0.325 | 2.058 | −0.033 | 0.684 | 128 | 0.075 | Nov-Dec | −0.231 | 2.475 | −0.662 | 0.199 | 128 | 0.291 |
|
|
Alpha-adjusted significant at alpha = .004.
|