Research Article

Association between Functional Severity and Amputation Type with Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients with Lower Limb Amputation

Table 1

Demographic characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes by amputation levels.

Totalul TTul TFbl TTbl TF

26,50115,7987,4951,6101,598
Demographics
 Age*64.5 ± 13.463.8 ± 13.266.3 ± 13.662.6 ± 13.564.2 ± 13.1
 Men (%)*64.065.759.968.562.5
 Race/ethnicity*%
  Non-Hispanic white63.56366.757.558.3
  Black21.020.420.225.826
  Hispanic7.68.56.27.16.7
  Other7.98.16.99.68.9
 Married (%)*50.450.750.152.947.6
Etiology-dysvascular (%)*76.579.868.780.476.8
Diabetes (%)*66.072.850.376.662.1
Comorbidities (sum)*2.2 ± 1.42.3 ± 1.41.9 ± 1.32.7 ± 1.52.3 ± 1.5
Case mix group*(%)
 CMG10018.38.58.48.16.7
 CMG100229.331.627.124.821.7
 CMG100362.359.964.567.171.6
Admission functional rating
 FIM motor admission*38.8 ± 11.439.6 ± 11.137.9 ± 11.837.6 ± 11.635.5 ± 11.8
 FIM cog admission*27.3 ± 6.427.5 ± 6.226.9 ± 6.626.9 ± 6.326.7 ± 6.7
 FIM total admission*67.9 ± 16.469 ± 15.966.7 ± 1766.2 ± 16.563.8 ± 17
Rehabilitation outcomes
 FIM motor discharge*55 ± 14.156.1 ± 13.554.2 ± 14.753.2 ± 14.150.4 ± 15.2
 FIM cog discharge*29.5 ± 5.729.9 ± 5.529.2 ± 629.3 ± 5.828.6 ± 6.4
 FIM total discharge*88 ± 19.489.5 ± 18.686.8 ± 20.285.7 ± 19.482 ± 21.2
 Length of stay (days)*13.3 ± 6.513.2 ± 6.413.2 ± 6.513.6 ± 6.914.2 ± 6.8
 Discharged home (%)72.472.672.471.870.7

ul = unilateral, bl = bilateral, TF = transfemoral, and TT = transtibial.
*A significant relationship between amputation category and denoted variable at .
Case mix groups (CMGs) are calculated from weighted admission FIM motor ratings: CMG 1001 (FIM motor greater than 47.65), CMG 1002 (FIM motor greater than 36.25 and less than 47.65), and CMG 1003 (FIM motor less than 36.25).