Research Article
Association between Functional Severity and Amputation Type with Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients with Lower Limb Amputation
Table 3
Odds ratios from multiple logistic regression model.
| Variables | Community discharge | Odds ratio | Confidence interval (95%) |
| Age, yrs | 0.98 | 0.98 to 0.99 | Male | 1.13 | 1.06 to 1.20 | White | 0.97 | 0.91 to 1.03 | Married | 1.51* | 1.42 to 1.60 | Dysvascular | 0.94 | 0.88 to 1.01 | Diabetes | 1.06 | 0.99 to 1.13 | Comorbid, sum | 0.95 | 0.93 to 0.96 | CMG 1003 (Ref) | | | CMG 1002 | 2.56* | 1.86 to 3.52 | CMG 1001 | 4.54* | 2.26 to 9.12 | bl TF (Ref) | | | bl TT | 0.99 | 0.82 to 1.18 | ul TF | 0.96 | 0.83 to 1.10 | ul TT | 0.93 | 0.82 to 1.06 | CMG 1002 × bl TT | 1.36 | 0.86 to 1.68 | CMG 1002 × ul TF | 1.56* | 1.10 to 1.33 | CMG 1002 × ul TT | 1.20 | 0.86 to 1.67 | CMG 1001 × bl TT | 0.56 | 0.23 to 1.33 | CMG 1001 × ul TF | 1.60 | 0.73 to 3.47 | CMG 1001 × ul TT | 1.43 | 0.69 to 2.97 |
|
|
ul = unilateral, bl = bilateral, TF = transfemoral, and TT = transtibial.
*Significance at . × = interaction term.
|