About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Sarcoma
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 168145, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/168145
Clinical Study

A Pilot Study of Anti-CTLA4 Antibody Ipilimumab in Patients with Synovial Sarcoma

1Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
2Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics, and Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, P.O. Box 1208, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA
3Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, New York, NY 10065, USA
4Sarcoma and Bone Cancer Treatment Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
5University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
6Medarex, Inc., Bloomsbury, NJ 08804, USA
7Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT 06492, USA
8Regeneron, Inc., Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA

Received 12 December 2012; Accepted 27 January 2013

Academic Editor: Akira Kawai

Copyright © 2013 Robert G. Maki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Patients with recurrent synovial sarcomas have few options for systemic therapy. Since they express large amounts of endogenous CT (cancer testis) antigens such as NY-ESO-1, we investigated the clinical activity of single agent anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab in patients with advanced or metastatic synovial sarcoma. Methods. A Simon two-stage phase II design was used to determine if there was sufficient activity to pursue further. The primary endpoint was tumor response rate by RECIST 1.0. Patients were treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for three cycles and then restaged. Retreatment was possible for patients receiving an extra three-week break from therapy. Sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected before and during therapy to assess NY-ESO-1-specific immunity. Results. Six patients were enrolled and received 1–3 cycles of ipilimumab. All patients showed clinical or radiological evidence of disease progression after no more than three cycles of therapy, for a RECIST response rate of 0%. The study was stopped for slow accrual, lack of activity, and lack of immune response. There was no evidence of clinically significant either serologic or delayed type hypersensitivity responses to NY-ESO-1 before or after therapy. Conclusion. Despite high expression of CT antigens by synovial sarcomas of patients treated in this study, there was neither clinical benefit nor evidence of anti-CT antigen serological responses. Assessment of the ability of synovial sarcoma cell lines to present cancer-germ cell antigens may be useful in determining the reason for the observed lack of immunological or clinical activity.

1. Introduction

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is one of the more common forms of soft tissue sarcoma, with an incidence of approximately 3 per million [1]. It presents as a painless or painful mass, typically in an extremity, with a peak incidence around adolescence and young adulthood [2]. SS is characterized genetically by a t(X;18) translocation involving SS18 and either SSX1, SSX2, or SSX4 [38]. While surgery and radiation therapy are usually effective in controlling local disease [9], approximately 40% of patients with synovial sarcoma will die of metastatic disease [10]. Chemotherapies including ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and possibly trabectedin have demonstrated activity against SS; however, responses are not durable [1114]. As a result, the development of novel therapies remains a focus of research for this diagnosis.

One area of focus has centered on the finding that the SS18-SSX translocation product is associated with the upregulation of a variety of cancer-testis antigens (CTAs), such as some antigens of the MAGE-A family and NY-ESO-1, which are generally found in normal adult tissues solely in testicular germ cells and occasionally in placenta. However, CTAs are upregulated in a variety of malignant tumors [15]. Interestingly, the SSX genes represent CTAs as well [16]. In comparison to other malignant tumors, there is a high incidence of CTA expression in synovial sarcoma; moreover, the expression pattern is highly homogeneous as opposed to a heterogeneous pattern in most other tumors [1719]. Furthermore, immune responses, in particular antibody responses and T-cell responses to certain CTAs, can be detected in patients with a variety of CTA-expressing tumors [2022].

These data were the basis of clinical trials that demonstrated impressive responses of tumors to various immune mediated therapies. Notably, Hodi et al. showed that ipilimumab improved survival in patients with metastatic melanoma [23]. This response is perhaps seen because ipilimumab enhances immunity against CTAs [24, 25]. Similar responses were seen with infusion of genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1 in melanoma patients [26]. This latter study also demonstrated objective clinical responses in 4 of 6 patients with SS. Recent data indicate the activity of immune costimulator anti-PD1 in several solid tumor subtypes [27].

Given the high incidence and homogeneous expression of CTAs in SS, we conducted a phase II study of anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab as a means to increase endogenous T-cell responses against CTAs, with the hope of engendering a radiological and/or clinical response. We describe herein the results of the study, which was terminated early due to slow accrual, lack of clinical efficacy, and lack of immune response in the first six patients treated on study.

2. Methods

This was a single cohort, single center, and open label phase II study of ipilimumab in patients with advanced synovial sarcomas. Institutional review board approval of the protocol had been granted to perform the study. Each participant provided written informed consent. RECIST response determinations were made by study radiologists; images were not reviewed centrally. Radiology results were subject to confirmatory review by an independent committee at Memorial Hospital. Death data were obtained using the Social Security Death Index.

2.1. Study Design

The primary objective of the study was to determine the radiological response rate of patients with advanced synovial sarcoma following treatment with ipilimumab, as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 definitions. The secondary objectives of the study were to (1) determine the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + stable disease ) of patients with advanced synovial sarcoma following treatment with ipilimumab, (2) evaluate NY-ESO-1 specific immunity (NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1 antibody, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, and delayed-type hypersensitivity ) induced by three doses of ipilimumab in this patient population, (3) and determine the safety of ipilimumab in this group of patients.

The study was designed as a Simon two-stage phase II study [28]. The outcome representing futility was a 5% RECIST response rate, and indicator of activity was a 25% RECIST response rate. For an alpha of 0.05 and power (1-beta) of 80%, the study was to be stopped if there were no responses after 9 patients were accrued. If there was at least one RECIST partial response (PR), another 8 patients were to be accrued for a total of 17 patients. The drug would be declared inactive if there were 2/17 or fewer responses and declared worthy of further investigation if there were at least 3/17 RECIST PR. With this design, there was a 63% probability of study termination after 9 patients if the true response rate had been 5%.

2.2. Ipilimumab Administration

Three doses of ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg over 90 minutes each at 1 mL/min, were administered by intravenous infusion at 3-week intervals. Premedication was not given with the first dose of therapy. The agent was supplied by Medarex, Inc. A 6-week observation period followed the final dose. Toxicity and immunological assessments were made throughout the 12 week study period. In the absence of disease progression (requiring other treatment) or grade 3 or greater toxicity, patients were eligible to receive an additional three doses of anti-CTLA4 following the same schedule as the first 12 weeks of treatment.

2.3. Eligibility

Entry criteria included the following.

Inclusion Criteria. Locally recurrent or metastatic synovial sarcoma with RECIST defined measurable disease, who failed or refused standard treatment; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–2; laboratory constraints: absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0 × 109/L; hemoglobin ≥8 g/dL; platelet count ≥75 × 109/L; serum creatinine ≤2 mg/dL; ALT, AST ≤ 5 × institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 × ULN.

Exclusion Criteria. Clinically significant heart disease (NYHA Class III or IV), other serious illnesses, or intercurrent illness, requiring hospitalization; patients with a second cancer diagnosis in the last 5 years, except for basal cell carcinoma, completely resected, or cervical carcinoma in situ, completely resected; known HIV positivity or history of autoimmune disease; chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs such as systemic corticosteroids; women who were pregnant or breast feeding; refusal or inability to use effective means of contraception (all men and women with childbearing potential).

2.4. NY-ESO-1 Protein Expression

In-situ presence of NY-ESO-1 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry as previously described [17]. Briefly, analysis was done on representative tumor sections of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. For the detection of NY-ESO-1, monoclonal antibody E978 was used in combination with a heat-based antigen retrieval method and a Powervision secondary kit (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlaer, Germany). Diaminobenzidine (Liquid DAB, Bioegenx, San Ramon) was used as a chromogen, and testicular tissue with preserved spermiogenesis was used as a positive control.

2.5. Correlative Studies

HLA typing was performed in all patients. Tumor typing for NY-ESO-1 was performed by RT-PCR and/or immunohistochemistry. Humoral and cellular immunity were assayed at different times before and after treatment as described previously and included (1) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for anti-NY-ESO-1 and anti-LAGE-1 from serum (see the following); (2) total T-cell number (CD3+ T-cell count); (3) ELISPOT assays for NY-ESO-1-specific T cells: Ad2/NY-ESO-1; HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1b; HLA-DP4/NY-ESO-1-DP4; and (4) tetramer staining of T cells (peripheral blood NY-ESO-1b specific CD8+ T cells in HLA-A*0201(+) patients). All patients underwent delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin testing with NY-ESO-1 protein, NY-ESO-1b, and DP4 peptides and had analysis for ANA and human anti-human antibody production (HAHA). Indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit lamp examination were performed before and after 3 cycles of therapy to rule out the possibility of uveitis on ipilimumab.

2.6. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Patient serum samples were analyzed by ELISA for seroreactivity to various recombinant proteins, including NY-ESO-1. Sera were serially diluted starting from 1 : 100 and added to low-volume 96-well plates (Corning) coated with 1 μg/mL antigen and blocked with PBS containing 5% nonfat milk. After incubation, plates were washed with PBS containing 0.2% Tween and rinsed with PBS. Sera IgG bound to antigens was detected with an alkaline phosphatase conjugated specific mAb (Southern Biotech). After addition of ATTOPHOS substrate (Fisher Scientific), absorbance was measured using a fluorescence reader Cytofluor Series 4000 (PerSeptive Biosystems). A reciprocal titer was calculated for each serum sample as the maximal dilution still significantly reacting to a specific antigen. Specificity was determined by comparing seroreactivity among various antigens tested. In each assay, sera of patients with known presence or absence of specific reactivity were used as controls. A positive result was defined as extrapolated reciprocal titers of >100.

2.7. Statistical Methods

Given the small number of correlative study samples, statistics were descriptive only.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics

Six patients (4 women, 2 men) were enrolled between June 2005 and April 2007. All patients were Caucasian. All patients had failed doxorubicin and ifosfamide-based therapy before enrolling on study. After failing treatment on this study, three patients received no further chemotherapy, while for the other three, treatment of an unknown type was delivered through local facilities. No data are available on the agents employed. Their HLA status regarding HLA-A2 and HLA-DP4 is indicated in Table 1. All tumors expressed NY-ESO-1 protein (from 2+ to 4+) by immunohistochemistry [17].

tab1
Table 1: Patient characteristics.
3.2. Toxicity, Dose Reductions

A total of 51 adverse events were reported for the six patients on study. The adverse events and their relationship to study medication are indicated in Table 2. There were 2 reported serious adverse events (SAE). One patient had severe vomiting and diarrhea, considered possibly related to ipilimumab. A report of dyspnea was considered unrelated to study drug. No dose reductions were employed in the study.

tab2
Table 2: Adverse events on study and reported relationship to study drug.
3.3. Clinical Outcomes

All were taken off study due to progressive disease after the first cycle of therapy. Four completed all three of the planned doses of ipilimumab: one patient received two, and one patient received one dose of therapy before developing radiological and/or clinical progression. Time to progression ranged from 0.47 to 2.1 months (median 1.85), and overall survival times ranged from 0.77 to 19.7 months (median 8.75 months).

3.4. Translational Studies

Patient sera showed no clear evidence of anti-NY-ESO-1 or anti-LAGE antibodies before or after initiation of therapy with ipilimumab. As a result, ELISPOT assays against NY-ESO-1 HLA class I and class II peptides were not pursued.

No patient had a DTH reaction to intact NY-ESO-1 protein, NY-ESO-1b HLA class I, or NY-ESO-1-DP4 HLA class II peptides. There was no evidence in patients of either ANA antibodies or HAHA before or after the start of treatment with ipilimumab, and no patient had any evidence of uveitis on ophthalmologic examination.

One patient reproducibly showed a weak preexisting serum antibody response to MAGEA3 and MAGEA4 that increased after treatment (Figure 1). The same patient also had serum antibodies to CT47 throughout the study that did not change in titers, and a seroconversion against CSAG2, a new CT antigen not well characterized, observed after the first ipilimumab injection. A second patient had some reactivity to SOX2 that did not change with treatment. This patient also demonstrated a transient response to CSAG2 only seen at week 4.

fig1
Figure 1: One study patient demonstrated an immune response to a CTA after ipilimumab administration. Plots demonstrating immune titers in each patient to the specified CTA before ipilimumab and at weeks 4, 7, and 10 are presented. Only patient SS-F06 reproducibly showed a weak preexisting serum antibody response to MAGEA3 and MAGEA4, that increased after treatment. Patient SS-F06 also had serum antibodies to CT47 throughout the study that did not change in titers and seroconversion against CSAG2 after the first ipilimumab injection. Patient SS-C03 had some reactivity to SOX2 and had a transient response to CSAG2.

4. Discussion

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of immunomodulating treatments in various cancer types, including SS. Two randomized phase III trials showed a modest, but significant, response of melanoma to CTLA-4 antagonist ipilimumab [23, 29]. Ipilimumab appears to act at least in part by enhancing cellular immunity to NY-ESO-1. This is further supported by the demonstration that treatment with autologous T cells engineered to recognize NY-ESO-1 antigen in treatment of both melanoma and SS produced striking results in some patients [26, 30].

We had similarly hypothesized that SS patients would benefit from immunomodulation with ipilimumab, hoping to observe radiological or immunological activity. However, due to slow accrual after rapid progression of several patients in the initial cohort of the study and lack of immune response to NY-ESO-1, this study was terminated. The positive immune responses to other CTAs that are presented here were found using reagents that were not available at the time the study was conducted. The clinical significance of these responses is currently unclear. In light of the promising data by Rosenberg and colleagues [26] and hints of activity of vaccines directed against other antigens in a series of studies in Japan [3136], the data presented here suggest that triggering an effective anti-SS response is not accomplished by CTLA-4 inhibition alone.

We were somewhat surprised by the lack of an immune response against NY-ESO-1 in these patients, given the high rates of CTA expression in tumors of this type [17, 19]. Interestingly, at least one previous study showed that sarcoma patients, in particular those with SS, were less likely to generate humoral antibodies to CTAs, with only 2 of 54 sarcoma patients and 0 of 5 synovial sarcoma patients demonstrating spontaneous humoral immunity to NY-ESO-1 [37]. A later study in 2004 described one SS patient with a spontaneous immune response to NY-ESO-1 [38], suggesting that the immunogenicity of sarcomas is variable. It was further suggested that immunogenicity of other cancers like melanoma and ovarian cancer is somewhat higher than what has been reported in sarcoma [20], especially considering how likely it is that sarcomas will express CTAs.

There is a variety of reasons for the observed immune disparity between this and other clinical trials. First, the results here suggest that the transfer of autologous T-cells and immune stimulation with CTLA-4 inhibition are not equivalent strategies to trigger an anti-tumor response. As there was never any evidence of NY-ESO-1 immunologic sensitivity in any of the 6 patients in this study, factors other than CTLA-4 inhibition may be required to create an antitumor response to CTAs.

These findings may also be explained by the insight, published after this study was completed, that RECIST is not the ideal criteria to use for assessment of tumor response with immunological agents. Responses to ipilimumab can be delayed, requiring additional assessments over a longer time period [39]. Unfortunately this assessment was not possible in this study population, as it was not possible to apply different study criteria when the patients were already off study. The short time from study discontinuation to death indicates that a late immune response would likely not have been detected. It is also important to note that the six patients in this study perhaps fared worse than the average person with this diagnosis just diagnosed with metastatic disease. For comparison, the median survival in the PALETTE phase III study was 10.7 months, compared to 8.75 months in this study [40]. Additionally, only one dose, 3 mg/kg, was used in this study. It is possible that a higher dose would elicit a NY-ESO-1 response in the study population.

Additional studies demonstrating whether or not SS present CTAs to the immune system, in addition to merely expressing them, are one necessary component to connect this chain of data. The role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, clear in melanoma, is also not well examined in SS. Finally, due to the very small sample size of this trial, we may not have had sufficient power to identify what may be a small subset of patients who may benefit from ipilimumab alone. Thus, despite the overt inactivity of ipilimumab in the setting of metastatic SS, one could envision use of ipilimumab or other costimulatory antibodies such as anti-PD1 in patients receiving either vaccines or T cells directed against NY-ESO-1 or other CTAs. By publishing this negative trial we hope that similar trials in the future will not repeat our mistakes. We remain hopeful that future studies will point the way toward the appropriate use of immunotherapy for this difficult clinical situation.

Abbreviations

SS:Synovial sarcoma
CTLA-4: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4
CTA:Cancer testis antigen.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to participating patients, their families, and to Medarex for study support. The paper is written in honor of our friend and mentor Lloyd Old, who inspired so many to do better research, including investigators associated with this work. Research support was provided in part from NCI by Grants CA47179, CA148260, and CA008748 supplement

References

  1. N. Howlader, A. M. Noone, M. Krapcho et al., Eds., SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2012, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/.
  2. A. J. Spillane, R. A'Hern, I. R. Judson, C. Fisher, and J. M. Thomas, “Synovial sarcoma: a clinicopathologic, staging, and prognostic assessment,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 3794–3803, 2000. View at Scopus
  3. B. De Leeuw, M. Balemans, D. O. Weghuis et al., “Molecular cloning of the synovial sarcoma-specific translocation (X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) breakpoint,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 745–749, 1994. View at Scopus
  4. J. Clark, P. J. Rocques, A. J. Crew et al., “Identification of novel genes, SYT and SSX, involved in the t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) translocation found in human synovial sarcoma,” Nature Genetics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 502–508, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Dimitriadis, D. Rontogianni, A. Kyriazoglou et al., “Novel SYT-SSX fusion transcript variants in synovial sarcoma,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. R. dos Santos, D. R. H. de Bruijm, and A. G. van Kessel, “Molecular mechanisms underlying human synovial sarcoma development,” Genes Chromosomes Cancer, vol. 30, pp. 1–14, 2001.
  7. A. Chrysostomou, “Fusions of the SYT and SSX genes in synovial sarcoma,” Oncogene, vol. 20, no. 40, pp. 5755–5762, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Przybyl, M. Jurkowska, P. Rutkowski, M. Debiec-Rychter, and J. A. Siedlecki, “Downstream and intermediate interactions of synovial sarcoma-associated fusion oncoproteins and their implication for targeted therapy,” Sarcoma, vol. 2012, Article ID 249219, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Al-Hussaini, D. Hogg, M. E. Blackstein, et al., “Clinical features, treatment, and outcome in 102 adult and pediatric patients with localized high-grade synovial sarcoma,” Sarcoma, vol. 2011, Article ID 231789, 7 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. J. Lewis, C. R. Antonescu, D. H. Y. Leung et al., “Synovial sarcoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 112 patients with primary localized tumors of the extremity,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 18, pp. 2087–2094, 2000.
  11. F. C. Eilber, M. F. Brennan, F. R. Eilber et al., “Chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in adult patients with primary extremity synovial sarcoma,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. H. Edmonson, L. M. Ryan, R. H. Blum et al., “Randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus ifosfamide plus doxorubicin or mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin against advanced soft tissue sarcomas,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1269–1275, 1993. View at Scopus
  13. A. Le Cesne, J. Y. Blay, I. Judson et al., “Phase II study of ET-743 in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 576–584, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. A. Thornton, “Trabectedin: the evidence for its place in therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma,” Core Evidence, vol. 4, pp. 191–198, 2010. View at Scopus
  15. M. J. Scanlan, A. J. Simpson, and L. J. Old, “The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary,” Cancer Immunity, vol. 4, article 1, 2004. View at Scopus
  16. N. H. Segal, N. E. Blachere, J. A. Guevara-Patiño et al., “Identification of cancer-testis genes expressed by melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma using bioinformatics,” Cancer Immunity, vol. 5, article 2, 2005. View at Scopus
  17. A. A. Jungbluth, C. R. Antonescu, K. J. Busam et al., “Monophasic and biphasic synovial sarcomas abundantly express cancer/testis antigen NY-ESO-1 but not MAGE-A1 or CT7,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 252–256, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. P. Lai, P. F. Robbins, M. Raffeld et al., “NY-ESO-1 expression in synovial sarcoma and other mesenchymal tumors: significance for NY-ESO-1-based targeted therapy and differential diagnosis,” Modern Pathology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 854–858, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. C. R. Antonescu, K. J. Busam, K. Iversen et al., “MAGE antigen expression in monophasic and biphasic synovial sarcoma,” Human Pathology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 225–229, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Stockert, E. Jäger, Y. T. Chen et al., “A survey of the humoral immune response of cancer patients to a panel of human tumor antigens,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 187, no. 8, pp. 1349–1354, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Gnjatic, D. Atanackovict, E. Jäger et al., “Survey of naturally occurring CD4+ T cell responses against NY-ESO-1 in cancer patients: correlation with antibody responses,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 15, pp. 8862–8867, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Jäger, Y. Nagata, S. Gnjatic et al., “Monitoring CD8 T cell responses to NY-ESO-1: correlation of humoral and cellular immune responses,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 4760–4765, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. S. Hodi, S. J. O'Day, D. F. McDermott et al., “Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 8, pp. 711–723, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. S. Weber, O. Hamid, S. D. Chasalow et al., “Ipilimumab increases activated T cells and enhances humoral immunity in patients with advanced melanoma,” Journal of Immunotherapy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2012.
  25. J. Yuan, M. Adamow, B. A. Ginsberg et al., “Integrated NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses correlate with clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 40, pp. 16723–16728, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. F. Robbins, R. A. Morgan, S. A. Feldman et al., “Tumor regression in patients with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma and melanoma using genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 917–924, 2011.
  27. S. L. Topalian, F. S. Hodi, J. R. Brahmer et al., “Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 26, pp. 2443–2454, 2012.
  28. R. Simon, “Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1989. View at Scopus
  29. C. Robert, L. Thomas, I. Bondarenko et al., “Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously unreated metastatic melanoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, pp. 2517–2526, 2011.
  30. S. A. Rosenberg, “Cell transfer immunotherapy for metastatic solid cancer- what clinicians need to know,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 8, pp. 577–585, 2011.
  31. Y. Sato, Y. Nabeta, T. Tsukahara et al., “Detection and induction of CTLs specific for SYT-SSX-derived peptides in HLA-A24+ patients with synovial sarcoma,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 1611–1618, 2002. View at Scopus
  32. S. Kawaguchi, T. Wada, K. Ida et al., “Phase I vaccination trial of SYT-SSX junction peptide in patients with disseminated synovial sarcoma,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 3, article 1, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Tsukahara, S. Kawaguchi, T. Torigoe et al., “Prognostic impact and immunogenicity of a novel osteosarcoma antigen, papillomavirus binding factor, in patients with osteosarcoma,” Cancer Science, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 368–375, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Tsukahara, S. Kawaguchi, T. Torigoe et al., “HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitope of a novel osteosarcoma antigen, papillomavirus binding factor,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 7, article 44, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Kawaguchi, T. Wada, S. Nagoya et al., “Phase I vaccination trial of SYT-SSX junction peptide and its JLA-*2402 anchor substitute in patients with disseminated synovial sarcoma,” in Proceedings of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS '05), 2005, Abstract 364.
  36. S. Kawaguchi, T. Wada, S. Nagoya et al., “The second vaccination tril of SYT-SSX junction peptide in patients with disseminated synovial sarcoma,” in Proceedings of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS '07), 2007, Abstract 817.
  37. S. Y. Lee, Y. Obata, M. Yoshida et al., “Immunomic analysis of human sarcoma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 2651–2656, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Ayyoub, R. N. Taub, M. L. Keohan et al., “The frequent expression of cancer/testis antigens provides opportunities for immunotherapeutic targeting of sarcoma,” Cancer Immunity, vol. 4, article 7, 2004. View at Scopus
  39. J. D. Wolchok, A. Hoos, S. O'Day et al., “Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 7412–7420, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. T. van der Graaf, J. Y. Blay, S. P. Chawla, et al., “Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial,” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9829, pp. 1879–1886, 2012.