Low-Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma: Incidence, Treatment Strategy of Metastases, and Clinical Significance of the FUS Gene

Table 1

Clinical data, followup, and FUS break-apart in 14 patients with low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, diagnosed at the Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus University Hospital in the period of 1979 to 2010.

Case	Age/sex	Size	Location	Depth	Treatment	Margin	Relapse time/location	Relapse treatment	Followup	FUS
1	8/M	8	Pelvic	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal	8.0/Local, intra-abdominal	Surgery, chemo- + radiotherapy	24.3	Neg.
2	38/F	4	Hand	Subfascial	Surgery + radiotherapy	Marginal	17.5/Local	Surgery	21.7	Neg.
3	54/F	3	Thigh	Subcutaneous	Surgery	Wide			6.0	Neg.
4	37/F	6	Thigh	Subfascial	Surgery	Wide			5.0	Pos.
5	14/M	5	Brachium	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal			4.8	Neg.
6	37/F	26	Gluteal	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal	4.1/Local	None	9.0	Pos.
7	53/F	2	Neck/head	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal			7.7	Neg.
8	24/F	25	Abdominal wall	Subfascial	Surgery	Wide			4.6	Neg.
9	30/F	3	Abdominal wall	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal	1.9/Local	Surgery	2.5	Neg.
10	35/M	4	Neck/head	Subfascial	Surgery	Wide			5.2	Neg.
11	64/M	9	Gluteal	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal			5.0	Neg.
12	14/M	3	Brachium	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal			4.0	Pos.
13	18/F	9	Gluteal	Subfascial	Chemotherapy		0/Lung, liver	Chemotherapy	3.2	Neg.
14	63/F	3	Gluteal	Subfascial	Surgery	Marginal	−0.3/Lung, brachium, and thigh	Surgery	2.8	Neg.