Reconstruction of the Distal Radius following Tumour Resection Using an Osteoarticular Allograft

Table 1

Osteoarticular allograft reconstructions at distal radius: comparison of results.

	Patients	Followup (months)	Nonunion	Infection	Fracture	Instability	Failed	Survival	Flex/ext [°]	Pron/sup [°]
Presented results	5	32 (3,7; 121)	2 (40%)	0	0	0	0	100% at 3 years	38/60	77/76,7
Scoccianti et al. [19]	17	58,9 (28; 119)	2 (11,8%)	0	2 (11,8%)	4 (23,5%)	1	94,1% at 4,9 years	56/58	80/84
Szabo et al. [20]	9	100 (39; 219)	0	1 (11%)	1 (11%)	0	0	100% at 3,5 years	26/52	80/67
Bianchi et al. [21]	12	52 (26; 145)	1 (8,3%)	0	0	7 (58,3%)	1	91,7% at 4,3 years	51/37	n.s.
Kocher et al. [22]	24	130,8 (25; 268)	0	0	6 (25%)	0	8	66% at 10,9 years	36/21	72/58
Asavamongkolkul et al. [17]*	8	52,7 (41,5; 90,9)	2 (25%)	0	1 (12,5%)	0	1	87,5% at 4,4 years	35/40	50/70
Vander Griend and Funderburk [5]*	1	36	0	0	1	1	1		n.s.	n.s.
Gitelis et al. [23]*	4	80,5 (43; 105)	0	0	0	1 (25%)	0	100% at 5 years	39/51	n.s.
Harness and Mankin [24]*	15	228	2 (13,3%)	0	n.s.	2 (13,3%)	4	73,3 at 19 years	n.s.	n.s.
van Isacker et al. [25]*	2	149.5	0	0	0	0	1	50% at 12,5 years	n.s.	n.s.

Range and percentages in brackets.
∗Also other reconstruction methods than osteoarticular allografts had been used in these series.
n.s.: not specified.