Research Article

Survival and Cost-Effectiveness of Trabectedin Compared to Ifosfamide Monotherapy in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients

Table 7

Estimated average costs and effectiveness, comparing trabectedin and ifosfamide in advanced L-sarcoma and non-L-sarcoma.

Cost-effectiveness modelL-SarcomaNon-L-sarcoma
TrabectedinIfosfamideDifferenceTrabectedinIfosfamideDifference

Costs (all discounted)€44,879€24,797€20,082€27,497€22,799€4,698
(i) Drug acquisition€31,597€4,113€27,484€19,407€3,660€15,747
(ii) Drug administration€5,298€13,380−€8,082€3,646€11,941− €8,295
(iii) Nonrelated costs€6,866€5,464€1,402€3,325€5,357− €2,032
(iv) Adverse events costs€1,119€1,841−€722€1,119€1,841− €722

Effectiveness
(i) QALYs, discounted1.0250.7730.2510.5160.781−0.265
(ii) Preprogression LYs, undiscounted0.6460.4230.2230.3860.476−0.090
(iii) Postprogression LYs, undiscounted0.9020.7580.1440.3710.694−0.323
Cost-effectiveness ratios

(i) Costs per LY gained€56,000Ifosfamide dominant
(ii) Costs per QALY gained€80,000Ifosfamide dominant

QALYs: quality-adjusted life years; LY: life years.