Review Article

Tissue Engineering for Rotator Cuff Repair: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review

Table 3

Clinical outcomes.

StudyOutcome measuresPre-op.3 days1 month3 months6 months12 months16 months24 months

Castricini et al., 2011 [17]Constant score value
 Control group42.9 (22–55)88.4 (54–100)<0.001
 PRP group42 (30–53)88.4 (72–99)<0.001
value0.44

Randelli et al., 2011 [30]Constant score
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.60.020.70.30.1
UCLA
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.60.030.30.70.06
SER (Kg)
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.40.040.20.50.5
SST
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.90.020.90.30.3
VAS
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.0030.0070.01
Jo et al., 2011 [29]Constant Score  
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.3970.0360.9100.4930.476
UCLA
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.5580.0610.8270.7080.579
ASES
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.3430.0310.5300.7120.744
DASH
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.3690.1660.7030.5880.473
SST
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.5790.3690.9820.2060.355
SPADI
 Control group
 PRP group
value0.3180.0450.7450.8690.673