Establishment and Characterization of a Human Small Cell Osteosarcoma Cancer Stem Cell Line: A New Possible<i> In Vitro</i> Model for Discovering Small Cell Osteosarcoma Biology

Palmini, Gaia; Zonefrati, Roberto; Romagnoli, Cecilia; Aldinucci, Alessandra; Mavilia, Carmelo; Leoncini, Gigliola; Franchi, Alessandro; Capanna, Rodolfo; Brandi, Maria Luisa

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3042198

Stem Cells International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 3042198 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3042198

Establishment and Characterization of a Human Small Cell Osteosarcoma Cancer Stem Cell Line: A New Possible In Vitro Model for Discovering Small Cell Osteosarcoma Biology

Gaia Palmini,¹Roberto Zonefrati,¹Cecilia Romagnoli,¹Alessandra Aldinucci,²Carmelo Mavilia,¹Gigliola Leoncini,¹Alessandro Franchi,¹Rodolfo Capanna,³and Maria Luisa Brandi¹

Academic Editor: Abdel Kareem Azab

Received25 Mar 2016

Revised20 Jun 2016

Accepted20 Jul 2016

Published29 Aug 2016

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OSA) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor, usually arising in the long bones of children and young adults. There are different subtypes of OSA, among which we find the conventional OS (also called medullary or central osteosarcoma) which has a high grade of malignancy and an incidence of 80%. There are different subtypes of high grade OS like chondroblastic, fibroblastic, osteoblastic, telangiectatic, and the small cell osteosarcoma (SCO). In this study, for the first time, we have isolated, established, and characterized a cell line of cancer stem cells (CSCs) from a human SCO. First of all, we have established a primary finite cell line of SCO, from which we have isolated the CSCs by the sphere formation assay. We have proved their in vitro mesenchymal and embryonic stem phenotype. Additionally, we have showed their neoplastic phenotype, since the original tumor bulk is a high grade osteosarcoma. This research demonstrates the existence of CSCs also in human primary SCO and highlights the establishment of this particular stabilized cancer stem cell line. This will represent a first step into the study of the biology of these cells to discover new molecular targets molecules for new incisive therapeutic strategies against this highly aggressive OSA.

1. Introduction

Inside the heterogeneous group of sarcomas we find the osteosarcoma (OSA). OSA is one of the most common primary bone tumors which occurs in childhood and in youth [1–3]. The incidence of this cancer is about 2 cases per million persons, per year [4, 5].

Principle sites, which are involved by OSA, are the metaphyseal regions of the long bones of the extremities, characterized by a rapid bone development during the adolescence. The most common sites injured are distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal humerus [6–9]. Nowadays, despite the fact that multimodality treatment approach has increased the survival rate from 50% in adults to 70% in children, there is always a large proportion which suffers from recurrences and dissemination of the primary tumor. Unfortunately, the survival rate for these people and for whom present micrometastases at the moment of the diagnosis remains poor (<20%) [10–12].

The World Health Organization has classified the OSA as malignant bone tumor which presents several different subtypes in relation to the histology and to the area of interest of the primary tumor bulk [13].

Between the different typologies there is also the low-grade OSA, but the major types of OSA are high grade tumors, which include the small round cell osteosarcoma (SCO). SCO is an extremely rare form of OSA with an incidence of 1.3% of all diagnosed cases for OSA [14, 15].

Histologically the SCO is composed of small round cells with malignant phenotype, necrotic areas, and island of osteoid matrix in the stroma (Figure 1).

In any cases has been reported the production of the chondroid, too [15–19]. SCO mainly involved the femur but it can occur in all portions of the skeleton. This bone tumor can be confused by the other primary bone tumor, Ewing’s Sarcoma (ES). This is possible only when the typical osteoid matrix produced by the tumor cells is not visible in the portion of biopsy. In this case, it is possible to diagnose the SCO, evaluating the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of CD99 and SATB2, two markers of osteoblastic differentiations which are not expressed in cells of ES [4, 20–22].

The importance to make a correct diagnosis is related to the different kind of therapies which can be used against these two tumors, and which can influence the prognosis. Nowadays, as the other typologies of OSA, the therapeutic approach is multidisciplinary (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) but unfortunately this does not permit having a good prognosis.

Additionally, it has been reported that the median survival time for a patient who did not have only the surgery but also the chemotherapy treatment is 13 years from the diagnosis of the cancer.

While this value is of 1.4 years for patients who did not have the surgery excision of the tumor bulk, in all these cases recurrence of the primary tumor and the appearance of metastases are often present and the principal site of SCO’s metastases is the lung, as the other OSA [14, 23, 24].

Recent studies have also indicated the presence in bone sarcomas of a subpopulation of particular cells, called CSCs which result to be responsible to maintain and to regenerate the tumor bulk after the conventional multidisciplinary neoadjuvant therapy [25–30]. Consequently, CSCs should be present in all of the types of OSA, which are resistant to chemotherapy, like the SCO. Several studies have evaluated the presence of this subpopulation in OSA [31–34].

Since we have had the possibility of establishing a finite cell line from a human fresh biopsy of SCO, we have isolated and characterized a cell line of CSCs, in order to investigate the presence of CSCs in SCO. Hence, for the first time a CSCs line of small round cell osteosarcoma has been established.

2. Materials and Methods

The whole study was conducted following the approval of Florence University Hospital Ethics Committee (Rif. N. 141/12) and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments Informed Consent for tissue collection, use, and storage of the samples was obtained from the donor at AOUC.

2.1. Primary Osteosarcoma Cell Culture

Primary SCO cell culture has been produced in our laboratory from a fresh sample of SCO biopsy collected at the “Unità Ortopedia Oncologica e Ricostruttiva”, AOUC Careggi, Florence. The biopsy, obtained by the method of the needle aspiration, was immediately placed in a culture medium supplemented by 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, pH 7.4, transported to the laboratory and processed.

The SCO primary cell culture, from the SCO tissue sample, has been set up after enzymatic treatment in Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) with collagenase type II (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 37° and followed by mechanical dispersion. Cells were cultured as monolayer in Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a modified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ in air at 37°C. The culture medium was changed every three days. The SCO cell culture was signed as OSA3. When cells grew to approximately 80–90% confluence, they were subcultured or harvested using Trypsin-EDTA.

2.2. Sphere Formation Assay

This is an in vitro assay used to identify and isolate cancer stem cells (CSCs) from a cancer cell line. At the 90% confluence in Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium, monolayer cells were dissociated with Trypsin-EDTA into a single-cell suspension. The cells were inoculated into sarcosphere growth medium (SGM) supplemented with 2% sterile methylcellulose (MC) at a density of 4 × 10⁴ cells/well in ultra-low attachment six-well plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY). SGM medium consists of 2x Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium supplemented with progesterone (20 nM), putrescine 100 μM, sodium selenite (30 nM), transferrin (25 μg/mL), insulin (20 μg/mL), the human recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF; 10 ng/mL), and the basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF; 10 ng/mL) as described by Gibbs et al. [35]. All reagents were purchased by Sigma-Aldrich. Fresh aliquots of b-FGF and EGF were added every three days.

After 28 days of culture, spherical colonies formed by >50 cells were defined as “sarcospheres” and were quantitated by inverted phase contrast microscope and after that they were isolated and plated in normal attachment 60 mm diameter tissue culture plates with normal growth medium. The cells isolated from sarcospheres were signed as osteosarcoma cancer stem cells (OSA3-CSCs). When OSA3-CSCs have reached approximately 90% confluence, they were harvested and subcultured into a 100 mm diameter tissue culture plate. An additional sphere formation assay has been set up on OSA3-CSCs to investigate their ability of self-renew through secondary sphere formation. The cells isolated from this additional assay have been signed as OSA3-CSCs II.

2.3. Osteosarcoma Cancer Stem Cell Culture

OSA3-CSCs and the OSA3-CSCs II cell lines were cultured in a specific growth medium (GM), which is composed of Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 1 ng/mL b-FGF. The medium was refreshed twice a week and the cells were used for cryopreservation and for in vitro analyses to characterize their stem-like phenotype upon reaching 5 × 10³ cells/cm².

2.4. Cell Line Characterization

The characterization of the cancer stem cell phenotype of the OSA3-CSCs cell line was performed by studying the doubling time, the sphere formation assay, the soft agar assay, the colony forming unit assay, the adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation, the aldehyde dehydrogenase activity analysis, the flow cytometric analyses, the immunofluorescence staining, and the gene expression. To confirm the stem phenotype of the second generation of cancer stem cells, the OSA3-CSCs II cell line has been characterized by several analyses (i.e., colony forming unit assay (CFU), differentiation stainings, immunofluorescence stainings, and gene expression analyses).

2.4.1. Analysis of Cell Proliferation

OSA3-CSCs were plated in 100 mm diameter dishes at the concentration 10,000 cells/dish. After 24 hours, GM was replaced with Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium with 1.5% FBS and maintained in culture for three days. At the end, Coon’s medium was replaced by Coon’s medium with 10% FBS. The number of cells was evaluated at 0, 2, 4, and 6 days counting by hemocytometer chamber. The growth curve was plotted and the cell population doubling time was calculated. Each experimental point has been performed in triplicate.

2.4.2. Soft Agar Colony Forming Assay for Neoplastic Transformation

The soft agar assay is an anchorage independent growth assay in soft agar, which is considered the most rigorous assay in vitro for detecting and proving the malignant transformation of cells. We have performed the agar soft assay on the primary cell line of SCO (OSA3), on the OSA3-CSCs, on the human osteosarcoma cell lines Saos-2 purchased from American Type Culture (ATCC, Manassas, VA), and on the mesenchymal stem cell line of preadipocytes (PA).

A 35 mm dish was coated with 1% sterile agar prepared in culture medium maintained liquid at 47°C. The dish was immediately cooled. The cell lines in growth phase were detached, suspended in medium, diluted to double the required final concentration, and maintained at 37°C. 0.33% agar was prepared in medium and maintained at 45°C.

Cell suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 0.33% agar, distributed into the agar coated dish to obtain a final concentration of 2,500 cells/dish, and immediately cooled. The cells were cultured at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO₂ for 4 weeks until the formation of colonies and their growth. Colonies formed per dish were observed and counted in phase contrast microscopy (Axiovert 200, ZEISS). This experiment has been performed in triplicate.

2.4.3. Colony Forming Unit Assay

OSA3-CSCs and OSA3-CSCs II lines were plated in 100 mm diameter dishes. When they had, respectively, reached 80% confluence, they were detached with Trypsin-EDTA and plated in 100 mm diameter dishes with a final concentration of 450 cells/dish. The cells were cultured in Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium with 20% FBS, 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO₂ for 4 weeks until the formation of colonies. Colonies formed per dish were stained with Toluidine Blue. The colored colonies have been counted using an inverted microscope (Axiovert 200, ZEISS). The CFU efficiency has been calculated according to the following formula: (number of colonies formed/number of cells seeded) 100. This experiment has been performed in triplicate.

2.4.4. Osteogenic Differentiation

OSA3-CSCs and OSA3-CSCs II cell lines were plated on 24-well plates at a cell density of 1 × 10⁴ cells/cm² in GM and grown to 80–90% confluence in each well. Afterwards, the medium was switched to osteogenic medium (OM): Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 10 nM dexamethasone, 0.2 mM sodium L-ascorbyl-2-phosphate, and 10 mM β-glycerol phosphate. The medium was refreshed every three/four days. The osteogenic differentiation was stopped at 21 days to evaluate the osteoblastic phenotype. The main characteristics of osteoblastic phenotype are the presence of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and of extracellular calcium mineralized deposits.

The cells were washed with DPBS (LONZA) (two times), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/DPBS for 15 min, and washed with ultrapure water (three times). After that, for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, the cells were washed with DPBS (two times) and stained with a specific dye mixture.

This mixture is composed of Solution A (5 mg naphthol-AS-MX phosphate sodium salt dissolved in 1 mL dimethyl sulfoxide) and Solution B (40 mg Fast Blue BB dissolved in 49 mL Tris-HCl Buffer 280 mM, pH 9.0) which are mixed together forming Solution C. 1 mL of Solution C was added for each well for 30 min at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO₂. ALP+ cells were stained in blue and nuclei were counterstained in red with Propidium Iodide. For mineralization staining, the cells were washed with DPBS (two times), fixed in 4% PFA/DPBS for 15 min, and washed with ultrapure water (three times). Calcium mineralized deposits were stained for 2 min with Alizarin Red S, pH 6.0, and rinsed with ultrapure water (three times). Hence, calcium mineralized deposits were stained in red-orange. ALP+ cells and calcium mineralized deposits were observed in brightfield microscopy (Axiovert 200, ZEISS).

2.4.5. Adipogenic Differentiation

OSA3-CSCs and OSA3-CSCs II cell lines were cultured with a specific adipogenic medium (AM): in Ham’s F12 Coon’s modification medium supplemented with 10% (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 1 μM dexamethasone, 1 μM bovine insulin, and 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX). The medium was refreshed twice a week. The expression of the adipogenic phenotype was evaluated on cells cultured in AM or GM for 30 days by Oil Red O staining. The colored cells were observed in brightfield microscopy (Axiovert 200, ZEISS).

2.4.6. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Activity Assay

The aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity has been evaluated by an ALDH activity colorimetric assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) on the OSA3-CSCs and on a finite cell line of fibroblast, used as negative control. This kit quantifies the ALDH enzymatic activity by absorbance reading at 450 nm (VICTOR3, Perkin Elmer). The cell line was grown in 100 mm diameter dishes. When the cells had reached 100% confluence, they were detached with Trypsin-EDTA, centrifuged, resuspended in ALDH assay buffer, transferred in an ice cold 5 ml Dounce homogeniser, and disrupted. After that we have proceeded as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. All tests have been done in triplicate.

2.4.7. Flow Cytometry Analysis

For flow cytometry, OSA3, OSA3-CSCs, and PA were detached from tissue dishes with Trypsin-EDTA. Cells were suspended at a density of 1 × 10⁵ cells/mL in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline with 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide (Miltenyi) [36]. The antibodies were used according to manufacturer’s instruction. The marked cell suspensions in 800 μL were analyzed in a flow cytometer (CyFlowSpace, PARTEC).

2.4.8. Immunofluorescence Staining

Immunofluorescence staining on OSA3-CSCs fixed in 4% PFA/DPBS was used to investigate the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) markers, using primary antibody to CD44, CD45, and CD105, and to investigate the embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and the CSCs markers, using, respectively, primary antibody to Nanog, POU5F1, SOX2, KLF4, LIN-28A, and PROM1 (CD133) and CD117. After fixation cells were permeabilized by 0.2% Triton X-100/DPBS at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO₂. Cells were washed three times with DPBS and were treated by RNase diluted 1/1000 with 2% BSA/DPBS at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO₂. After that cells were washed three times in DPBS and stained with the mouse primary antibodies (1 : 5; anti-CD44 (Invitrogen); 1 : 5; anti-CD45 (Abcam); 1 : 5; anti-CD105 (Invitrogen); 1 : 5; anti-POU5F1 (Sigma); 1 : 10; anti-PROM1 (Miltenyi)) and with the rabbit primary antibodies (1 : 5, anti-Nanog (Abcam); 1 : 5; anti-SOX2 (Abcam); 1 : 5; anti-LIN28A (Abcam); 1 : 5; anti-KLF4 (Abcam); 1 : 5; anti-CD117 (Bioss)). After incubation in a humid environment at 4°C over night the primary antibodies were removed and cells were stained with the secondary antibody (1 : 300; goat anti-Mouse Alexa Fluor 635 IgG (H+L), Life Technologies; 1 : 300; goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Superclonal Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488, Invitrogen) in the dark in a humid environment at room temperature for 45 minutes. Then cells were washed several times by DPBS and counterstained for nuclei with Propidium Iodide (1 : 100 in DPBS). As negative internal control we used cells marked with only the secondary antibody. Stained cells were examined with 20x at room temperature on a Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSM 5109 Meta, ZEISS).

2.5. Gene Expression Analyses by Real-Time PCR

mRNA of OSA3, OSA3-CSCs, and OSA3-CSCs II was prepared by Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Reverse transcription and Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis were carried out as described using specific primers following the manufacturer’s protocol. β-actin was used as internal control.

First of all, we have analyzed the expression of SATB2 and of EWSR1 genes to analyze the phenotype of the primary cell line of small round cell osteosarcoma, OSA3. After that we have proceeded to characterize the CSCs lines. The expression of the ESCs and of the pluripotency marker genes (POU5F1, Nanog, SOX2, KLF4, LIN-28A, and MYC) was evaluated on OSA3, OSA3-CSCs, and OSA3-CSCs II lines.

At the same time on OSA3 and OSA3-CSCs lines have been evaluated also the expression of the cancer stem cells marker genes (prominin 1 (PROM1), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1), and CD34 antigen (CD34)) and the expression of the marker genes for migration and metastasis (EZR and AXL).

All these analyses were set up on CSCs cell lines cultured in GM at the 4th passage of subculture after the isolation of the sarcospheres and on the primary cell line cultured in GM at the 1st passage of subculture.

The expression of the adipogenic phenotype in the OSA3-CSCs was evaluated on cells cultured in GM or AM for 30 days by RT-PCR analysis of the marker genes peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL). The primer sequences used for amplification of all the genes described above are listed in Table 1. Aliquots of 10 μL of the amplification products were analyzed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis visualized by ethidium-bromide staining.

3. Results

Small round cell (SCO) sample, obtained by surgical resection of a part of the tumor (Figure 2) permits the isolation of only one osteosarcoma cell line (OSA) if treated precisely, as described before. The number of cells isolated from the small biopsy is very low (Figure 3). The output range is from 20% to 30% and it depends on the type and the dimension of the biopsy. For the primary cell line approximately one–two months is necessary to reach confluence in a 100 mm tissue dish. After this period a cell was obtained and marked as OSA3 (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). When the cells were grown they must be subcultured to obtain sufficient number of cells to make the characterization analyses and to cryopreserve the primary cell line obtained.

(a)

(b)

In relation to the characterization of OSA3 as a cell line of SCO we have evaluated the gene expression of SATB2 and of EWSR1 by RT-PCR analysis. As showed in Figure 5 OSA3 express both these genes, in particular SATB2. When the cell line at the 4th passage of subculture reached confluence, cells were detached and plated in 6-well ultra-low attachment plates for the sarcosphere assay. This particular type of plate is used because it permits us to maintain cells in a suspended state, to prevent stem cells from the attachment-mediated differentiation, to prevent the anchorage-dependent cells from dividing, and, finally, to reduce attachment to the substrate. Hence, their use permits us to create a stressful conditions which are necessary to the selection of cancer stem cells (CSCs). At 24 h after the start of the assay, cells appear isolated from one another (Figure 6). After 14 days of monitoring the progression of the assay, small spherical colonies have started to form and are visible. After 28 days, several big spherical colonies that have formed in each well can be observed and can be isolated (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). The sarcospheres isolated were placed in normal attachment 60 mm diameter tissue dishes, under adherent conditions. Figure 8 shows their adherent expansion in normal attachment plates.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

Cells that expand from the sarcospheres could be cancer stem cells. Consequently, after isolation, the osteosarcoma cancer stem cells (OSA-CSCs) were probably obtained and the cell line obtained was marked as OSA3-CSCs (Figure 9). As was done for the OSA3 line, it was necessary to make the OSA3-CSCs line grow and to subculture it, to cryopreserve this particular cell line, and to obtain the right number of cells to proceed with the characterization of the stem-like phenotype.

All the analyses of characterization of the OSA3-CSCs cell line were performed on the 4th passage of subculture after the isolation of the sarcospheres. The OSA3-CSCs cell line showed a doubling time of 167 hours (Figure 10).

The soft agar assay has showed the capacity of the OSA3-CSCs cell line to grow in soft agar and to form large spherical colonies like the Saos-2 line, compared to the OSA3 and PA lines (Figures 11(a)–11(e)). The OSA3-CSCs showed a rate of clonogenic efficiency of 62%, similar to the rate of the SaOS-2 while the clonogenic efficiency for the OSA3 was less than 10% and was zero for PA. At the 4th passage of subcultured the OSA3-CSCs were detached and plated in ultra-low attachment plates to observe if they have maintained their capacity of self-renew (Figure 12).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

After 14 days of the sphere formation assay, several small sarcospheres were observed (Figure 13).

After 30 days from the start of the sphere formation assay several large sarcospheres were observed (Figure 14).

Consequently, the sarcospheres were isolated and plated in normal adherent conditions.

The sarcospheres were isolated and the cell line was obtained in normal attachment condition after the sarcospheres isolation was indicated as the second generation of cancer stem cells from the OSA3 cell line and marked as OSA3-CSCs II (Figure 15).

OSA3-CSCs II were made expand to evaluate if the cancer stem cell phenotype is maintained during the growth of OSA3-CSCs. Hence, OSA3-CSCs II were evaluated for their stem cell phenotype as described for their progenitor, the OSA3-CSCs. Adipogenic differentiation was not observed in both OSA3-CSCs and OSA3-CSCs II lines at 0 days, while after 30 days of adipogenic induction some cells showed the presence of intracellular vacuoles containing drops of lipids of variable shape and size (Figures 16(a)–16(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

The adipogenic differentiation for the OSA3-CSCs line was confirmed also by RT-PCR of adipocyte-specific LPL and PPARγ genes. In the absence of induction, qualitative RT-PCR showed lack of expression of both these genes, while after 30 days of induction, qualitative RT-PCR revealed a bright and intense band on agarose gel for both genes (Figure 17).

The osteogenic differentiation assay showed the capacity of both isolated OSA-CSCs lines to differentiate into osteoblast after 14 days of osteogenic induction.

After 21 days of induction both OSA-CSCs lines showed approximately 90% of the cell population positive to ALP and showed several calcium mineralized deposits. In both the cell lines the increase of the number of positive cells to ALP (Figures 18(a)–18(f)) and the production of calcium mineralized deposits (Figures 19(a)–19(f)) were time-dependent as observed.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Furthermore, data obtained by the CFU assay (Figure 20) have shown a good rate of clonogenic efficiency which is 27% for OSA3-CSCs and 33% for OSA3-CSCs II.

Several recent studies have shown that high levels of ALDH activity are characteristic of various types of cancer. This parameter could be used as a cancer stem cell marker and with a poor prognosis.

Our ALDH activity assay has showed that the OSA3-CSC line has high levels of ALDH activity (Figure 21), whereas ALDH activity was observed at the lower quantifiable limit in the fibroblast line that was used as a negative control in this assay. Both OSA3-CSCs and OSA3-CSCs II lines showed a strong positivity for the surface MSC markers (CD44 and CD105) (Figures 22(a)–22(c) and 23(a)–23(c)), while they showed a complete negativity or the hematopoietic surface marker CD45 (Figures 24(a)–24(c)). To evaluate and confirm the MSC phenotype were also performed flow cytometric analyses on OSA3, OSA3-CSCs, and a mesenchymal stem cell line of preadipocytes, marked as PA. All the results are reported in Table 2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

(c)

By qualitative RT-PCR analysis we assessed the expression not only of the ESC marker genes (Nanog, Sox2, KLF4, LIN28A, and POU5F1) in OSA3, OSA3-CSCs, and OSA3-CSCs II (Figure 25), but also of the expression of the pluripotency marker gene, MYC, and of the other specific cancer stem cells marker genes (PROM1, ALDH1A1, CD34, EZR, and AXL) in OSA3 and in OSA3-CSC lines (Figure 26).

We noticed that all these genes, which are characteristic of CSCs phenotype, are expressed in both the OSA3-CSCs lines, while in the OSA3 line they have resulted to be not expressed except for Nanog, KLF4, POU5F1, AXL, and ALDH1A1 genes, which have been resulted to have only a hard expression. Furthermore, by the immunofluorescence staining we have showed the presence and the nuclear localization into the cells of the ESCs marker genes (Figures 27(a)–27(j)) and of two important CSCs markers, PROM1 and CD117, which have been resulted to be localized on the surface of the cells (Figures 28(a)–28(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

4. Discussion

OSA is the most common malignant bone tumor in children and young adults [1, 2]. This is a tumor which takes origin from the connective tissue and involve the metaphyseal areas of the long bones. Despite the fact that it has a low incidence it is one of the most common primary bone cancers, thus classified by the WHO [13]. OSA tumors are a big family which includes several types of bone injuries.

One of the rarest type of high grade OSA, is the SCO [15–17]. In 1979 Sim et al. [37] were the first who for first used the term “small cell osteosarcoma” to define this rare form of OSA. Nowadays the therapeutic approach to SCO is the same used for OSA, but the prognosis for those who present this malignant tumor is always poor.

In the last decades, in the oncologic research field the new concept of CSCs has emerged, since in the 1990s they were identified and characterized into several tumors [29, 38, 39]. This is a particular cellular cluster which is located inside the differentiated tumor bulk and it is responsible to maintain the homeostasis of the tumor, to give to the malignancy the possibility of invading other tissues and, in particular, to preserve and protect the tumor cells from the chemo- and radiotherapy. All these abilities recognized to the CSCs, in relation to their stem phenotype, gave a valid explanation for why tumors, like OSA or SCO, have a poor outcome despite the neoadjuvant therapies used to treat his malignancies.

The CSCs, as mentioned before, have been just identified in several solid tumors [40–43] and, between them, there are also the bone sarcomas. The identification of these particular cells in bone sarcomas, like the OSA [32, 33], has permitted starting and studying the biology of these tumors using a new scientific approach in order to understand the mechanisms which are behind the chemoresistance of these tumors.

Consequently, to several studies which have identified CSCs in OSA, we have decided to investigate the presence of the CSCs in SCO. We have had the possibility of obtaining a fresh sample of tissue of SCO, from which we have isolated a finite cell line, marked as OSA3. After the confirmation, by the pathologist, of the tissue histotype and the establishment of the OSA3, we have evaluated the phenotype of our cell line. We have observed in OSA3 line not only a strong expression of the marker gene for the osteoblast differentiation, SATB2, but also a minimal expression of the EWSR1 gene, which is the principle marker gene for the Ewing Sarcoma [44].

Despite these particular aspects, some recent studies have reported the effective presence of EWSR1 rearrangements in few cases of SCO [45, 46] and it needs to be more investigated to understand the possible importance of this particular gene into the biology of SCO.

After all the cellular and tissue characterization of SCO, we have proceeded to investigate the stemness of the OSA3 line.

On the base of the experiments reported by Gibbs et al. [35], in relation to the possibility of isolating the CSCs by using the capacity of stem cells to survive and grow in extreme condition, like nonadherent conditions, we have isolated from the OSA3 line a cancer stem cell line, marked as OSA3-CSCs II. We have successfully established a OSA3-CSCs finite cell line and also characterized this as a real CSCs line, studying both the embryonic and the mesenchymal stem phenotype which characterized the CSCs [29].

It has been observed that OSA3-CSCs at the 4th passage of subculture were able to self-renew; in fact the sphere formation assay setup has showed their capacity to grow in nonadherent conditions and to generate several large sarcospheres, which have given origin to the “second” generation of CSCs of SCO. Our differentiation experiments have confirmed the capacity of both the CSCs lines to differentiate in the mesodermal lineages of osteoblasts and adipocytes, as can be done by the mesenchymal stem cells like the preadipocytes. The mesenchymal stem phenotype has been also confirmed by the clonogenic efficiency and in particular by the data obtained by flow cytometry on the expression of the epithelial-specific antigens CD44, CD105 and CD90, which, if they are both expressed, are recognized to be mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) markers. Data showed that our OSA3-CSCs population isolated by the sarcospheres assay is totally positive to their presence, compared to the primary culture of SCO, which has been resulted to be very positive only to the presence of CD44. Hence, the flow cytometric analysis has showed that OSA3-CSCs line has a stemness phenotype comparable to preadipocytes. The membrane localization of the two MSCs markers is also showed by the immunofluorescence staining, which has confirmed the total absence of the other hematopoietic-specific antigen CD45. This is another important data that confirms the mesenchymal stemness of OSA3-CSCs line.

Additionally, we have evaluated and confirmed their embryonal stemness, the other aspect which characterizes the CSCs. Both the OSA3-CSCs lines have showed the expression of all the five genes which are related to the embryonic stemness (Nanog, Sox2, POU5F1, KL4, and LIN28A), while they are only a few expressed in OSA3 line. They are defined as the genes of the transcriptional core which is entirely responsible for the maintenance of the pluripotency in the embryonic cells [47–54]. So, the expression of all these genes in the CSCs has been recognized to be the base for their stem phenotype and for their ability to self-renew, not only themselves but all the tumor bulk in which these cells are included.

The embryonic stem phenotype has been also confirmed by the study of the nuclear localization of the embryonic stem cells (ESCs) markers by the immunofluorescence staining.

Since this small subpopulation has this particular property, the tumor can be resistant to the different therapies until the small cluster will not eradicated. In our study we have also characterized the malignant phenotype of the OSA3-CSCs by the analysis of the activity and the expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1) a detoxification enzyme, which is responsible for the tumor resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy [55]. Furthermore, only in the malignancies, we can observed high levels of ALDH1A1, and in particular in the CSCs in relation to their capacity to protect the other differentiated cancer cells.

Moreover, we have demonstrated the gene expression of another three very important genes in the characterization of the cancer stem cells. The PROM1 gene, also known as CD133+, is one of the principal markers of osteosarcoma cancer stem cells [32, 33] together with CD34, a marker of the undifferentiated state of the cells, and the ALDH1A1 genes. At the same time, we have observed the absence of these genes into the OSA3 line. Contemporary, we have also study the presence of CD133 and of CD117, other important cancer stem cells markers in osteosarcoma [55], on the surface of OSA3-CSCs, by the immunofluorescence staining.

Afterwards we have investigated also the presence of two other genes which recently have been linked to the CSCs, the EZR and the AXL genes which encode for two proteins which have been observed to be related to the malignant phenotype of a tumor [56–58]; these are involved and probably are key molecules, in the process of migration and of invasiveness operated by the CSCs. In addition to this, we have evaluated the effective capacity of the OSA3-CSCs to form colonies in agar soft assay, which is the most well established and rigorous in vitro assay to test the malignant transformation and the capacity to invade others tissues. Property is absent in the mesenchymal stem cells, as demonstrated by the data obtained. Hence, the data showed in vitro are predictive of the capacity to relapse the SCO, as described in several studies [16–20].

5. Conclusions

To develop an effective therapeutic strategy against OSA, and in particular against the typologies which are more aggressive and with a poor prognosis as the SCO, it is necessary not only to know the origin of this pathology, but also to understand which are the internal mechanisms responsible for the recurrence and for the invasiveness of these bone tumors. The discovery of the cluster of the cancer stem cells inside the tumors has represented the possibility of studying the mechanisms responsible for their resistance to the therapies. Consequently, our principal aim has been to demonstrate the presence of stemness into one of the rarer and aggressive histotypes of OSA.

In this research, we have collected and established a human primary cell line of SCO. Additionally, we have provided the evidence of the existence of the CSCs in SCO, too. Here, we have aimed to characterize the OSA3-CSCs line as a cellular model of human CSCs selected from primary cell line of small round cells osteosarcoma.

For the first time, we have established a CSCs line of this rare type of OSA and we have proved their in vitro features of CSCs.

In conclusion, our research aims to be an important first step to study in vitro the biology and the molecular mechanisms which are linked to the CSCs phenotype in SCO, with the principal aim to identify new molecular biomarkers cancer related. Nowadays one of the most common and famous molecular biomarkers is the large family of the small noncoding RNA, and in particular the micro RNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNA (siRNA) and other classes of small molecules [59–62]. Several studies have demonstrated their importance in the development of the tumors and in the maintenance of their stemness [63–66], but on the other hand they have also demonstrated how these small molecules can be used as target against the maintenance of the stem phenotype of putative CSCs, representing a possible instrument against the stem cluster of a cancer [67–72]. Consequently, we have established a cellular model of CSCs from one of the rarer forms of OSA to study the presence of these targets and of their effect on his proved cancer stem phenotype with the hope to pave the way to the development of more effective focused therapeutic strategies for small cell osteosarcoma, with this still being not investigated thoroughly with an unfavorable prognosis despite the aggressive multitherapeutic approach.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests and that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by ITT (Istituto Toscano Tumori) Grant Proposal 2010.

References

K. M. Yaw, “Pediatric bone tumors,” Seminars in Surgical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 173–183, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Tang, W.-X. Song, J. Luo, R. C. Haydon, and T.-C. He, “Osteosarcoma development and stem cell differentiation,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 466, no. 9, pp. 2114–2130, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. S. Kundu, “Classification, imaging, biopsy and staging of osteosarcoma,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 238–246, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Klein and G. P. Siegal, “Osteosarcoma: anatomic and histologic variants,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 555–581, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Cotterill, C. M. Wright, M. S. Pearce, and A. W. Craft, “Stature of young people with malignant bone tumors,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Friedman and S. K. Carter, “The therapy of osteogenic sarcoma: current status and thoughts for the future,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 482–510, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Meyers and R. Gorlick, “Osteosarcoma,” Pediatric Clinics of North America, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 973–989, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Bielack, B. Kempf-Bielack, G. Delling et al., “Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 776–790, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Ross, L. G. Spector, and S. M. Davies, “Etiology of childhood cancer: recent reports,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 239–241, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Hayden and B. H. Hoang, “Osteosarcoma: basic science and clinical implications,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Picci, S. Ferrari, G. Bacci, and F. Gherlinzoni, “Treatment recommendations for osteosarcoma and adult soft tissue sarcomas,” Drugs, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 82–92, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kempf-Bielack, S. S. Bielack, H. Jürgens et al., “Osteosarcoma relapse after combined modality therapy: an analysis of unselected patients in the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS),” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 559–568, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. M. Fletcher, J. A. Bridge, P. C. W. Hogendoom, and F. Mertens, Eds., World Health Organization, Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics of Tumor of Soft Tissue Bones, IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2013.
D. C. Dahlin and K. K. Unni, General Aspects and Data on 11087 Cases, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 5th edition, 1996.
H. Nakajima, F. H. Sim, J. R. Bond, and K. K. Unni, “Small cell osteosarcoma of bone. Review of 72 cases,” Cancer, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 2095–2106, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Ayala, J. Y. Ro, A. K. Raymond et al., “Small cell osteosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 27 cases,” Cancer, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 2162–2173, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. R. Dickersin and A. E. Rosenberg, “The ultrastructure of small-cell osteosarcoma, with a review of the light microscopy and differential diagnosis,” Human Pathology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 267–275, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-H. Park and I. Kim, “Small cell osteogenic sarcoma of the ribs: cytological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study with literature review,” Ultrastructural Pathology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133–140, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Bishop, C. H. Shum, S. Sheth, P. E. Wakely Jr., and S. Z. Ali, “Small cell osteosarcoma. Cytopathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 756–761, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hameed, “Small round cell tumors of bone,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 192–204, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Righi, M. Gambarotti, S. Longo et al., “Small cell osteosarcoma. Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 36 cases,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 691–699, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. MacHado, M. Alberghini, F. Giner et al., “Histopathological characterization of small cell osteosarcoma with immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic support. A study of 10 cases,” Histopathology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 162–167, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Kaste, C. B. Pratt, A. M. Cain, D. J. Jones-Wallace, and B. N. Rao, “Metastases detected at the time of diagnosis of primary pediatric extremity osteosarcoma at diagnosis: Imaging features,” Cancer, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 1602–1608, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
G. M. Jeffree, C. H. G. Price, and H. A. Sissons, “The metastatic patterns of osteosarcoma,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 87–107, 1975.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Clarke, J. E. Dick, P. B. Dirks et al., “Cancer stem cells—perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR workshop on cancer stem cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 19, pp. 9339–9344, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Magee, E. Piskounova, and S. J. Morrison, “Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty,” Cancer Cell, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 283–296, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Baylin and P. A. Jones, “A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome-biological and translational implications,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 726–734, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Charles, T. Ozawa, M. Squatrito et al., “Perivascular nitric oxide activates notch signaling and promotes stem-like character in PDGF-induced glioma cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. S. Dela Cruz, “Cancer stem cells in pediatric sarcomas,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 3, article 168, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Clevers, “The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 313–319, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, X.-Y. Zhong, Z.-Y. Li et al., “CD133 expression in osteosarcoma and derivation of CD133⁺ cells,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 577–584, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Tirino, V. Desiderio, R. D'Aquino et al., “Detection and characterization of CD133⁺ cancer stem cells in human solid tumours,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 10, article e3469, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Tirino, V. Desiderio, F. Paino et al., “Human primary bone sarcomas contain CD133⁺ cancer stem cells displaying high tumorigenicity in vivo,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2022–2030, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Di Fiore, D. Fanale, R. Drago-Ferrante et al., “Genetic and molecular characterization of the human Osteosarcoma 3AB-OS cancer stem cell line: a possible model for studying osteosarcoma origin and stemness,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 228, no. 6, pp. 1189–1201, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Gibbs, V. G. Kukekov, J. D. Reith et al., “Stem-like cells in bone sarcomas: implications for tumorigenesis,” Neoplasia, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 967–976, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Majumdar, M. A. Thiede, J. D. Mosca, M. Moorman, and S. L. Gerson, “Phenotypic and functional comparison of cultures of marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and stromal cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. H. Sim, K. K. Unni, J. W. Beabout, and D. C. Dahlin, “Osteosarcoma with small cells simulating Ewing's tumor,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 1979.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Tang, B. T. Ang, and S. Pervaiz, “Cancer stem cell: target for anti-cancer therapy,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 3777–3785, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Bonnet and J. E. Dick, “Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell,” Nature Medicine, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 730–737, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Dalerba, S. J. Dylla, I.-K. Park et al., “Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 24, pp. 10158–10163, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Collins, P. A. Berry, C. Hyde, M. J. Stower, and N. J. Maitland, “Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 23, pp. 10946–10951, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li, D. G. Heidt, P. Dalerba et al., “Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1030–1037, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. F. Bender Kim, E. L. Jackson, A. E. Woolfenden et al., “Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer,” Cell, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 823–835, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Machado, R. Noguera, A. Pellin et al., “Molecular diagnosis of ewing sarcoma family of tumors: a comparative analysis of 560 cases with FISH and RT-PCR,” Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 189–199, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Noguera, S. Navarro, and T. J. Triche, “Translocation (11;22) in small cell osteosarcoma,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 121–124, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Oshima, S. Kawaguchi, S. Nagoya et al., “Abdominal small round cell tumor with osteoid and EWS/FLI1,” Human Pathology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 773–775, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sell, “Stem cell origin of cancer and differentiation therapy,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. D. Oliver, “Germ cell cancer,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 236–241, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Takahashi, T. Ichisaka, and S. Yamanaka, “Identification of genes involved in tumor-like properties of embryonic stem cells,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 329, pp. 449–458, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Carmel-Gross, N. Bollag, L. Armon, and A. Urbach, “LIN28: a stem cell factor with a key role in pediatric tumor formation,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 367–377, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Adachi, H. Suemori, S.-Y. Yasuda, N. Nakatsuji, and E. Kawase, “Role of SOX2 in maintaining pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells,” Genes to Cells, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 455–470, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. H. Looijenga, H. Stoop, H. P. de Leeuw et al., “POU5F1 (OCT3/4) identifies cells with pluripotent potential in human germ cell tumors,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 2244–2250, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Gong, Q. Li, C. R. Jeter, Q. Fan, D. G. Tang, and B. Liu, “Regulation of NANOG in cancer cells,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 679–687, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Ma and A. L. Allan, “The role of human aldehyde dehydrogenase in normal and cancer stem cells,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 292–306, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Adhikari, N. Agarwal, B. M. Wood et al., “CD117 and Stro-1 identify osteosarcoma tumor-initiating cells associated with metastasis and drug resistance,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 4602–4612, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. W. Hunter, “Ezrin, a key component in tumor metastasis,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 201–204, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Brown, J. R. M. Black, R. Sharma, J. Stebbing, and D. J. Pinato, “Gene of the month,” Journal Clinical Pathology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 391–397, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Martin, G. Harrison, R. E. Mansel, and W. G. Jiang, “The role of the CD44/ezrin complex in cancer metastasis,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 165–186, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Jean Finnengan and M. A. Matzke, “The small RNA world,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 116, no. 23, pp. 4689–4693, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lagos-Quintana, R. Rauhut, W. Lendeckel, and T. Tuschl, “Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5543, pp. 853–858, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-Y. Ying and S.-L. Lin, “Intronic microRNAs,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 326, no. 3, pp. 515–520, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Garzon, M. Fabbri, A. Cimmino, G. A. Calin, and C. M. Croce, “MicroRNA expression and function in cancer,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 580–587, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mao, Y. Liu, X. Fang et al., “Tumor-derived microRNA-494 promotes angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer,” Angiogenesis, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 373–382, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zhuang, X. Wu, Z. Jiang et al., “Tumour-secreted miR-9 promotes endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis by activating the JAK-STAT pathway,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 17, pp. 3513–3523, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Frediani and M. Fabbri, “Essential role of miRNAs in orchestrating the biology of the tumor microenvironment,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 15, no. 1, article 42, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Bahena‐Ocampo, M. Espinosa, G. Ceballos‐Cancino et al., “miR‐10b expression in breast cancer stem cells supports self‐renewal through negative PTEN regulation and sustained AKT activation,” EMBO Reports, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 648–658, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Albino, G. Civenni, C. Dallavalle et al., “Activation of the Lin28/let-7 axis by loss of ESE3/EHF promotes a tumorigenic and stem-like phenotype in prostate cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 3629–3643, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bimonte, M. Leongito, A. Barbieri et al., “The therapeutic targets of miRNA in hepatic cancer stem cells,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 1065230, 10 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Vishnubalaji, R. Hamam, S. Yue et al., “MicroRNA-320 suppresses colorectal cancer by targeting SOX4, FOXM1, and FOXQ1,” Oncotarget, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Yang, D. Chen, J. Nie et al., “MicroRNA-143 targets CD44 to inhibit breast cancer progression and stem cell-like properties,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 5193–5199, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Yang, D. Chen, J. Nie et al., “MicroRNA-143 targets CD44 to inhibit breast cancer progression and stem cell-like properties,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 5193–5199, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Xin, Z. Qiao, J. Li et al., “miR-22 inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by targeting ATP citrate lyase: evidence in osteosarcoma, prostate cancer, cervical cancer and lung cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 28, pp. 44252–44265, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Gaia Palmini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1695

Downloads

1570

Citations