About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Scientifica
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 160174, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/160174
Review Article

Role of Angiopoietin/Tie2 in Critical Illness: Promising Biomarker, Disease Mediator, and Therapeutic Target?

1Department of Nephrology & Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
2Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Nephrology, University Hospital Münster, 48149Münster, Germany

Received 1 July 2012; Accepted 30 July 2012

Academic Editors: M. A. Choudhry and B. Rippe

Copyright © 2012 Alexander Lukasz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Critical illness is a descriptive, broad term for a serious clinical condition that can result from enormously heterogeneous etiologies. A common end feature these patients regularly suffer from is the so-called multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), often a consequence of organ hypoperfusion and ischemia, coagulopathies, overwhelming inflammatory responses, immune paralysis and mitochondrial dysfunction. Mechanistically, endothelial injury and particularly microvascular leakage is a major step in the pathophysiology of MODS and contributes to its mortality. The angiopoietin (Angpt)/Tie2 system consists of the endothelial tyrosine kinase Tie2 and its 4 circulating ligands (Angpt1-4). The balance between the agonistic ligand “Angpt-1" and the antagonistic one “Angpt-2" regulates baseline endothelial barrier function and its response to injury and is therefore considered a gatekeeper of endothelial activation. This paper provides a systematic overview of the Angpt/Tie2 system with respect to (1) its role as a global biomarker of endothelial activation in critical ill patients, (2) its contribution to MODS pathophysiology as a disease mediator, and last but not least (3) putative therapeutic applications to modify the activation state of Tie2 in mice and men.

1. Introduction

Critical illness is a serious condition that can arise from countless etiologies and that requires highly specialized intensive care units (ICU) for adequate treatment. Among the most common ICU admission reasons are: poisoning, trauma, shock (septic, cardiac, and hemorrhagic), major surgery, respiratory failure, and cardiac ischemia and arrhythmia [1]. One common complication of all these conditions is the so-called multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) that has a devastating mortality rate [2, 3]. The pathophysiology of MODS is very complex and remains unclear [4, 5]. Hypotheses are multifactorial and range from theories as simple as critical organ hypoperfusion with consequent ischemia to more complex processes as an overwhelming inflammatory response and later immune paralysis [6, 7]. Moreover, the disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) [8] as well as mitochondrial dysfunction [9] have been demonstrated to play a critical part in the pathogenesis of the syndrome. The repeated failure of clinical trials suggests that some fundamental knowledge is lacking in our current understanding in the development of MODS. A major opportunity, therefore, exists to pursue novel insights into this condition with the hope of improving outcomes.

2. Role of Endothelium

The endothelium pervades every organ and is responsible for a variety of physiological functions [10], such as regulation of oxygen and nutrients transport, blood pressure, coagulation, inflammatory processes, diapedesis, angiogenesis, and volume control between different compartments [1113]. Despite spatial and temporal heterogeneity in endothelial cell (EC) responses to the noxious stimuli, each of these functions are altered in critical illness [14, 15]. The net result is that the activated endothelium presents a procoagulant, proadhesive surface; fails to produce its usual profile of vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory compounds; and suffers a loss of normal barrier function. Of these changes, increased vascular permeability may be particularly important because it gives rise to hypovolemia and contributes to hemoconcentration, stasis of blood flow, and shock [16, 17]. In every organ, edema basically increases the distance essential nutrients and oxygen must travel to reach their target cells. Thus, systemic vascular changes have severe consequences for organ function.

On the molecular level vascular leakage is determined by a combination of disassembled junctional complexes (e.g., vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin), and myosin driven cell contraction, resulting in paracellular gap formation [11, 14].

The clinically relevant consequences of this so-called “systemic capillary leakage syndrome” are profound decrease in systemic vascular tone, collapse of the microcirculation, and subsequent distributive shock, acute pulmonary distress syndrome (ARDS), and eventually multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [14, 1820]. Thus, the “activated” endothelium might play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of MODS [14].

3. The Angiopoietin/Tie2 System

In 1996/1997, Davies et al. discovered the angiopoietin (Angpt)/Tie2 ligand-receptor system as the second class of transmembrane vascular-specific receptor tyrosine kinases (the first being the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF-receptor system) [21]. Gaining attention as an important regulator in vessel maturation and remodeling, several studies demonstrated that the Angpt-Tie2 system not only regulates angiogenesis, but also controls endothelial inflammation and permeability in a nonredundant manner [22, 23]. Ligation of Angpt-1—secreted by pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells—to the extracellular fibrinogen-like domain of the Tie2 receptor, which is almost exclusively expressed on endothelial cells (and some monocytes) [24, 25] leads to phosphorylation of the intracellular tyrosine split domain of the receptors that promotes endothelial-cell migration and survival mainly via the canonical phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase (PI3 K)/Akt pathway [26]. Furthermore, Angpt-1 signaling strongly activates Rac1 via the IQ motif-containing GTPase activating protein 1 (IQGAP1) [27] thereby shifting the RhoA-Rac1 balance towards Rac1, which morphologically results in a cortical F-actin formation promoting structural integrity of the cytoskeletal architecture [28]. Anti-inflammatory properties of Tie2 signaling are promoted via inhibition of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) mediated expression of leucocyte adhesion molecules expression like intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) [29]. Hence, Angpt-1 mediated Tie2 phosphorylation has anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory and antipermeability effects and maintains a quiescent status quo of the endothelium (Figure 1).

160174.fig.001
Figure 1: Scheme of the endothelial angiopoietin (Angpt)/Tie2 system highlighting fundamental signalling pathways. Angpt-1 ligation phosphorylates and thereby activates the Tie2 receptor promoting an anti-inflammatory signal via inhibition of surface adhesion molecule expression and the transcription factor NfkB. Moreover, the PI3K/Akt pathway promotes an antiapoptotic, prosurvival signal. The antipermeability effects are induced by maintaining the cytoskeletal architecture in a cortical quiescent formation. On a signalling level this is achieved by simultaneous inhibition of the Rho kinase and activation of the small GTPase Rac1 via IQGAP1 binding. Direct effects on the adherens junction protein VE-cadherin via src have also been reported. Upon stimulation, endothelial cells release prestored Angpt-2 from Weibel Palade bodies into the circulation. Angpt-2 competitively antagonizes positive Angpt-1/Tie2 signalling, thus dramatically activating the endothelial cell and priming it for further inflammatory stimuli.

Consistent with the properties of a classical competitive antagonism, Angpt-2 binding to the shared extracellular Tie2 binding domain results in Tie2 dephosphorylation [23]. Data from genetically modified mice underline the hypothesis of functional antagonistic effects of Angpt-1 and Angpt-2 to the Tie2 receptor. Both, Angpt-1-/and Tie2-deficient mice have a lethal phenotype [30, 31]. Consistently, Angpt-2 transgenic mice phenocopy the lethality due to vascular defects like Angpt-1 −/− and Tie2 −/− mice, which suggests that Angpt-2 is indeed a nonredundant antagonistic ligand of Tie2 [32].

Angpt-2 is stored and rapidly released from endothelial vesicles, the Weibel-Palade bodies (WPB), upon different inflammatory stimuli (e.g., TNF- , LPS, hypoxia) [33]. Angpt-2 sensitizes EC to activation by inflammatory cytokines like TNF- [34]. In Angpt-2 deficient mice leucocytes cannot attach to the endothelium because of a negative NFkB regulation of leukocyte adhesion molecules, which may result from the vast Angpt-1 signaling [32, 35]. Angpt-2 signaling disrupts the integrity of the endothelial barrier through a RhoA mediated endothelial cell contraction and consequent gap formation [23, 36]. Summarized Angpt-2 signaling activates the endothelial layer from a resting state to a proinflammatory state including expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules and a loss of vascular integrity (Figure 1).

4. Angiopoietin-2 as a Biomarker and Putative Mediator of Endothelial Activation

So far, several groups including our own have investigated circulating Angpt-1 and Angpt-2 levels in critically ill patients. In humans, the balance between both Tie2 ligands appears to be dramatically shifted in favor of Angpt-2, which at least theoretically means that Tie2 receptor signaling is impaired. In sepsis, those Angpt-2 elevations correlate with the severity of illness as assessed by injury severity score [37], organ failure index [38], physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores [3944].

It all started in 2006 when Dr. Parikh and his coworkers presented the first clinical and experimental study investigating the role of circulating Angpt-2 in ICU patients. Their investigation was based on previous findings that disrupted Tie2 signaling could arise in the inflammatory milieu of sepsis [45, 46], which might predominantly occur in the lung because of high Tie2 expression levels [47, 48]. Therefore, they hypothesized that excessive Angpt-2 release resulting in a competitive Tie2 antagonism may occur in sepsis and promote pulmonary vascular leakage. Besides quantifying circulating Angpt-2 in enrolled patients with mild and severe sepsis, they tested the effect of human septic serum on the morphology of EC architecture in vitro. In fact they found that circulating Angpt-2 was elevated in septic patients and associated with oxygenation failure indicated by a PaO2/FiO2 ratio below 200 (defined as ARDS). In contrast to following studies with a larger number of patients Angpt-2 did not correlate with the APACHE II score, although there was a trend to higher Angpt-2 levels in patients with an APACHE II score >25. In vitro experiments with EC showed for the first time that cells incubated with septic patient serum induced actin stress fibers and intercellular gap formation. Recombinant Angpt-2 alone was sufficient to reproduce their earlier findings with septic serum. They concluded that Tie2 signaling could be impaired as a consequence of excess circulating Angpt-2, which leads to Rho-kinase activation and MLC-p, with the end result being EC contraction, gap formation, and disruption of barrier integrity [36, 49]. This landmark paper was the starting shot for different groups evaluating angiopoietins as biomarkers in sepsis around the globe.

Our own group quantified Angpt-2 in septic ICU patients on admission to a medical ICU. All patients had an invasive hemodynamic monitoring which was performed by the pulse contour continuous cardiac output (PiCCO, Pulsion, Munich, Germany) system to test the hypothesis if high Angpt-2 levels are associated with hemodynamic parameters and surrogates of vascular leakage like the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI). In line with previous reports Angpt-2 concentrations were increasingly higher across strata of the sepsis syndrome (i.e., healthy controls, ICU patients without sepsis, patients with sepsis, and patients with septic shock). Furthermore, Angpt-2 correlated with surrogate markers of pulmonary dysfunction (PaO2/FiO2) and tissue hypoxia (serum lactate). Surprisingly, there was no association between Angpt-2 and any hemodynamic parameter including EVLWI.

Likewise van der Heijden et al. detected no association between EVLWI and Angpt-2, which may show the limitation of this method to detect permeability in mechanically ventilated patients. Assessed with the 67Gallium-labelled transferrin method van der Heijden et al. found a correlation between the pulmonary leak index and circulating Angpt-2 [44]. In a multivariate regression model Angpt-2 admission levels outperformed the SOFA and APACHE II score and was an independent marker of 30-day survival [41].

To this point, it was unclear if elevation of circulating Angpt-2 is just an epiphenomena of otherwise activated endothelium (e.g., interleukins) or if it is indeed a direct consequence of the septic stimuli. However, our observation that healthy volunteers subjected to a very small dose of LPS led to a dramatic increase of circulating Angpt-2 within less than 2 hours, even preceding the release of some traditional proinflammatory cytokines, makes a direct endothelial Angpt-2 release upon LPS stimulation likely [51].

Recently published large clinical trials provide further evidence for Angpt-2’s potential as a promising biomarker of severity and mortality prediction in a slightly different cohort of patients with acute lung injury (ALI) [5254]. Calfee and colleagues included an impressive 931 patients with ALI of infectious and noninfectious origin in their study [52]. In non-infection-related ALI, higher baseline Angpt-2 levels were strongly associated with increased mortality. Confusingly, in infection-related ALI there was no Angpt-2 difference in baseline values between survivors and nonsurvivors. This finding is in contrast with previous findings in which baseline Angpt-2 was consistently associated with outcomes in sepsis (i.e., infection)-related ALI. Calfee and colleagues discuss a spectrum bias or differences to previous studies in timing of plasma samples as a possible reason.

In 2010, Ong and colleagues found in a prospective study that the ratio of Angpt-2 to Angpt-1 did predict mortality in 56 ALI patients whereas other factors of endothelial markers (IL-6, IL-8, vWF, thrombomodulin, protein c, icam-1) did not [54]. Given the Tie2 antagonistic concept of Angpt-1 and Angpt-2 this approach using the ratio between both circulating ligands is particularly interesting and deserves careful further analysis.

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a critical condition associated with a severe inflammatory response regularly resulting in massive vascular leakage. We hypothesized that the Angpt/Tie2 system might be involved in this process. Indeed, we observed that Angpt-2 levels in patients with noninfection related primary ALF were associated with the severity of illness. Patients with later transplant free recovery had lower levels of Angpt-2 as those who reached the composite endpoint of death or emergency liver transplantation. Even more interesting, Angpt-2 was identified as an independent predictor of this composite end point. In vitro studies underlines the hypothesis of Angpt-2 release from the liver [55].

Together, these results from various clinical and experimental studies demonstrate the potential of Angpt-2 as an endothelial biomarker for severity of illness and outcome prediction in critically ill patients. However, larger prospective trials (in particular in sepsis) are highly desirable to establish Angpt-2 measurements for clinical use.

5. Manipulating the Tie2 Receptor as a Putative Treatment Strategy

5.1. The Ligand Perspective

In 2005, Witzenbichler et al. demonstrated in a fascinating in vivo experiment the protective role of Angpt-1 in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced endotoxic shock. As a vector to achieve high levels of circulating Angpt-1 they used an adenoviral construct expressing either the human Angpt-1 protein (AdAngpt-1) or a green fluorescent protein (AdGFP) as a control treatment. Hemodynamic function assessed by left heart catheterization was severely depressed in AdGFP compared to AdAngpt-1 treated mice. In detail, mean arterial blood pressure, contractile ability of the heart (initial velocity − dP/dt max), and cardiac output were lower in control mice. Lung water content and activity of pulmonary myeloperoxidase activity as parameters of capillary leakage and lung inflammation were also reduced in the AdAngpt-1 group. The LPS-induced increase in expression levels of pulmonary VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin as a marker of endothelial inflammation was markedly lower in AdAngpt-1 mice than in control mice. Furthermore, the survival of AdAngpt-1 mice was slightly superior to control mice (30% overall survival benefit). These experiments showed improved hemodynamic function, reduced lung injury, and a lower inflammatory response accompanied by an improved survival rate in AdAngpt-1 treated mice. Although, adenoviral transduction is generally not feasible in humans and leads to a very high expression of Angpt-1 (up to 1 ug/mL) the authors demonstrated here a potential role of Angpt-1 as an adjunctive agent for the treatment of septic shock [56] and opened a new avenue for specific sepsis therapeutics.

In 2007, Mei et al. provided further evidence for the protective potential of Angpt-1. They showed in a set of in vivo experiment the effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) overexpressing Angpt-1 for the prevention of LPS-induced ALI in mice. MSC with or without transfection with the plasmid containing the human Angpt-1 gene (pAngpt-1) were injected in the mice after intratracheal instillation of LPS to induce ALI. Both groups showed a dramatic reduction in LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation quantified by neutrophils and cytokines in the bronchoalveolar space. Of note, the administration of MSC transfected with pAngpt-1 resulted in a nearly complete reversal of LPS-induced pulmonary hyperpermeability, as reflected by reductions in IgM and albumin levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) [57]. These results underline the potential of a cell-based Angpt-1 gene therapy in the treatment of ALI/ARDS.

In sum, a benefit of upregulating Angpt-1 by different means in vivo has been shown in the context of endotoxic shock on the one hand and ALI/ARDS on the other hand. Unfortunately, these approaches using adenoviral gene transfer or modified-stem cell delivery are not feasible to translate in humans yet.

In 2009, Kim et al. determined the positive effect of an increased Angpt-1 signaling in LPS-induced acute kidney injury using a slightly different approach. Mice were pretreated with an engineered variant of native Angpt-1, the so-called Angpt-1 with cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP Angpt-1), which is more potent in phosphorylating Tie2 than native Angpt-1. Three days after COMP Angpt-1 pretreatment mice were challenged with LPS. LPS-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) was ameliorated in the COMP angpt1 group possibly caused by improved renal and systemic hemodynamics, as reflected by an increase of renal blood flow and mean arterial pressure. The inulin-measured glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher in the treated group than in the control group. Again, decreased renal ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 protein expression levels were detected. Furthermore, macrophage infiltration was decreased in COMP Angpt-1 pretreated mice [58]. These results show the protective effect of Angpt-1 signaling, in this case with an engineered variation, COMP Angpt-1, against endotoxic AKI. A comparable experiment with a rescue application of COMP Angpt-1 after LPS infusion to simulate a more realistic setting was not provided but would be highly desirable.

Another way to therapeutically modulate Tie2 phosphorylation is the administration of a PEGylated 7-mer, HHHRHSF, which was recently identified by screening a phage display library for binding to the Tie2 receptor [59]. A polyethylene-oxide clustered version of this peptide is called Vasculotide (VT) and activates Tie2 very effectively and for over 72 hours [60]. In human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVECs), we could show that VT prevented morphological endotoxin-induced gap formation, functional loss of monolayer resistance, and translocation of labeled albumin. These in vitro findings are comparable to Parikh’s work from 2006, who showed an analogous protective effect of recombinant Angpt-1 for endothelial cell integrity [36, 50].

From a pharmaceutical point of view VT may hold promise as a drug-like compound. We therefore assessed VT in vivo in a model of endotoxemic ALI. And indeed, a single VT injection 7 hours prior to LPS was sufficient to prevent the development of lung vascular leakage, as demonstrated by Evans blue extravasation. Lungs of mice treated with LPS and an empty PEGylated backbone had a 4-fold higher increase in dye extravasation than those treated with VT. VT pretreatment also improved survival of endotoxemia by 41% an effect that was completely abolished in Tie2 heterozygous knockout mice (Figure 2). Indicating the high specificity of VT for Tie2. Rescue experiment with VT given 2 hrs after LPS administration showed only a trend towards improved survival by 33%. Furthermore, echocardiographic evaluations showed also a nonsignificant trend toward improved myocardial performance associated with VT [50]. This finding is discrepant to Witzenbichler’s who found improved cardiac performance but might be explained by the differences between Angpt-1 and VT. Again, VT is a 7-mer that specifically (and probably exclusively) binds Tie2. At least in vitro, Suzan Dallabrida demonstrated in 2005 that native, full-length Angpt-1 could also bind integrins on cardiomyocytes thereby improving contractility of this cell type [61].

fig2
Figure 2: Tie2 activation via the synthetic pegylated 7-mer “HHHRHSF” termed Vasculotide (VT) improves ssurvival in experimental murine sepis. (a) C57BL6 mice were pretreated with 500 ng VT ( ) or PBS (control, ) 7 h prior to injection of a 70% lethal LPS dose. VT improved survival by 41.4% ( ). (b) Male Tie-2 heterozygous (Tie-2 +/−) mice were pretreated with 500 ng VT or PBS 7 h prior to injection of LPS. Survival was indistinguishable ( ) excluding unspecific off target effects of VT. (Modified after: [50].)

In another study of our own group Kumpers et al. also provided evidence for the high therapeutic potential of VT in the context of polymicrobial abdominal murine sepsis. Their key finding was that prophylactic as well as therapeutic (i.e., rescue) administration of VT was sufficient to reduce mortality in a clinically relevant experimental murine sepsis model [62]. Both reports provide a proof of principle for the potential use of the Tie2 receptor agonist, VT, as a strategy against vascular leakage thereby improving organ function and survival rates in 2 different models of murine sepsis.

5.2. Perspective of the Antagonist

Given that circulating levels of Angpt-2 (the natural antagonist of Tie2) were so high in different septic clinical populations the question arises if Angpt-2 directly contributes to sepsis severity rather than “just” being a marker of severity. In fact, this question has been asked for a long time but never been answered satisfactory in the “vascular biology-sepsis community.”

The first proof of principle Tie2 loss-of-function experiment has been provided by Parikh and coworkers in 2006. Adult mice were pretreated via intraperitoneally injection with a relatively high dose of Angpt-2 or vehicle. The miles assay, an Evans blue extravasation technique, was then used to quantify the vascular leakage. The extravasated dye (that covalently binds to albumin) showed enhanced leakage with a 3-fold increase in lungs and 2-fold increase in livers of Angpt-2 challenged mice compared with vehicle treated controls [36]. These results were the first in vivo to demonstrate a putative mechanistic role of Angpt-2 in disrupting the integrity of the endothelium.

Fiedler et al. used an Angpt-2 deficient (−/−) mouse to analyze leucocyte-endothelial interaction in a sterile peritonitis model by intravital microscopy. They could convincingly demonstrate that Angpt-2 deficiency leads to a relevant reduction in adhesion molecules and a consequent failure to firmly adhere to leucocytes [34]. Furthermore, Bhandari et al. found in the same global Angpt-2 knockout mouse that hyperoxia induced ALI is an Angpt-2 driven process that can be ameliorated in the absence of Angpt-2 [63].

Besides these reports so far no data have been published to ultimately prove a mechanistic role of Angpt-2 in the development of MODS in clinically relevant sepsis models.

We therefore designed a series of experiments to investigate the role of Angpt-2 in sepsis morbidity and mortality. In fact, Angpt-2-deficient mice have less organ failure and a survival benefit exceeding 40% in two different murine sepsis models (endotoxin and polymicrobial sepsis) most likely by ameliorating the critical Angpt-2-driven Tie2 deactivation [64]. Moreover, severe morphological changes induced in EC culture by coincubation with serum from septic patients where completely reversible after treatment with an Angpt-2 function-blocking antibody. These in vivo and in vitro experiments provide evidence that Angpt-2 directly contributes to the adverse outcomes in sepsis.

A very recent PNAS study from Ghosh et al. comprehensively demonstrated the potential of any Tie2 modulating therapy in another model of critical illness, that is, lethal anthrax infection. Clinically, anthrax infection is dreaded for its dramatic vascular leakage. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that the Angpt/Tie2 system might be involved in this system and found upregulated Angpt-2 in murine and primate models of the disease. They used 2 different knockout models and an Angpt-2 delivering adenovirus (AdAngpt-1) to prove the mechanistic involvement of Angpt/Tie2 in this condition. Interestingly, not only AdAngpt-1, but also Angpt-2 deficient mice showed improved survival in an otherwise 100% lethal anthrax model. Again, as a proof of principle Tie2 deficient mice had a worse outcome using a lower dose of the toxin [65].

6. Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Within the last 5 years, several studies around the globe established the role of elevated circulating Angpt-2 as a biomarker of severity of illness and outcome prediction. Although a promising candidate of global endothelial activation Angpt-2 is not ready for prime time yet. To justify the use of circulating Angpt-2 as an additional routine diagnostic and/or prognostic test large prospective clinical trials are required. In this context, the role of the angiopoietin balance has been given little less attention although theoretically this balance appears to be more important than the absolute levels.

The fundamental role of Tie2 activation as a consequence of alterations in the competitive antagonists Angpt-1 and Angpt-2 in various experimental models of critical illness has been demonstrated by independent groups. Angpt-2 appears to be a disease mediator directly contributing to morbidity and mortality.

Different Tie2 manipulating experimental tools from antibodies to agonistic peptides are available but have not been tested in men. A series of experimental data suggest that both an exogenous Tie2 activating as well as an Angpt-2 inhibition strategy might not only be effective in mice but also generally feasible in men. It is well possible that inhibition of a natural inhibitor (Angpt-2) could reasonably be expected to restore Tie-2 phosphorylation to pre-sepsis levels whereas exogenous receptor activation offers greater titration control, even enabling one to exceed quiescent levels of Tie-2 activation.

In spite of removing activated protein C as the first (and only) specific endothelial targeting sepsis therapeutic from the market, other potential targets make the vasculature a promising target.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests. Particularly, they have no financial relation with any commercial identity mentioned in the paper.

References

  1. H. K. Simpson, M. Clancy, C. Goldfrad, and K. Rowan, “Admissions to intensive care units from emergency departments: a description study,” Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 423–428, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Engel, F. M. Brunkhorst, H. G. Bone et al., “Epidemiology of sepsis in Germany: results from a national prospective multicenter study,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 606–618, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. P. Wenzel, “Treating sepsis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 13, pp. 966–967, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. S. Hotchkiss, P. E. Swanson, B. D. Freeman et al., “Apoptotic cell death in patients with sepsis, shock, and multiple organ dysfunction,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1230–1251, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. M. Singer, V. De Santis, D. Vitale, and W. Jeffcoate, “Multiorgan failure is an adaptive, endocrine-mediated, metabolic response to overwhelming systemic inaflammation,” The Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9433, pp. 545–548, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. S. Hotchkiss and I. E. Karl, “The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 2, pp. 138–150, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. W. Schrier and W. Wang, “Acute renal failure and sepsis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 2, pp. 159–169, 2004. View at Scopus
  8. A. Gullo, “Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in the critical illness,” Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 831–838, 2001. View at Scopus
  9. M. Tran, D. Tam, A. Bardia, M. Bhasin, G. C. Rowe, et al., “PGC-1alpha promotes recovery after acute kidney injury during systemic inflammation in mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, pp. 4003–4014, 2011.
  10. D. Mehta and A. B. Malik, “Signaling mechanisms regulating endothelial permeability,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 279–367, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. C. Aird, “Endothelium as an organ system,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 32, no. 5, supplement, pp. S271–S279, 2004. View at Scopus
  12. W. C. Aird, “Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: I. Structure, function, and mechanisms,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 158–173, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. C. Aird, “Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: II. Representative vascular beds,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 174–190, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. C. Aird, “The role of the endothelium in severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 3765–3777, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. T. Broman and A. B. Malik, “Cellular and molecular biology for intensivists: a primer—endothelial cells,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, supplement, pp. S517–S519, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. M. Goldenberg, B. E. Steinberg, A. S. Slutsky, and W. L. Lee, “Broken barriers: a new take on sepsis pathogenesis,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 3, no. 88, Article ID 88ps25, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. C. Michel and F. E. Curry, “Microvascular permeability,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 703–761, 1999. View at Scopus
  18. E. Abraham and M. Singer, “Mechanisms of sepsis-induced organ dysfunction,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2408–2416, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. E. Orfanos, I. Mavrommati, I. Korovesi, and C. Roussos, “Pulmonary endothelium in acute lung injury: from basic science to the critically ill,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1702–1714, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. E. Spronk, D. F. Zandstra, and C. Ince, “Bench-to-bedside review: sepsis is a disease of the microcirculation,” Critical Care, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 462–468, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Davis, T. H. Aldrich, P. F. Jones et al., “Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning,” Cell, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1161–1169, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. P. J. Brindle, P. Saharinen, and K. Alitalo, “Signaling and functions of angiopoietin-1 in vascular protection,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 1014–1023, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. U. Fiedler and H. G. Augustin, “Angiopoietins: a link between angiogenesis and inflammation,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 552–558, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Mustonen and K. Alitalo, “Endothelial receptor tyrosine kinases involved in angiogenesis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 895–898, 1995. View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Venneri, M. De Palma, M. Ponzoni et al., “Identification of proangiogenic TIE2-expressing monocytes (TEMs) in human peripheral blood and cancer,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 12, pp. 5276–5285, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. I. Kim, H. G. Kim, J. N. So, J. H. Kim, H. J. Kwak, and G. Y. Koh, “Angiopoietin-1 regulates endothelial cell survival through the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase/Akt signal transduction pathway,” Circulation Research, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2000. View at Scopus
  27. S. David, C. C. Ghosh, A. Mukherjee, and S. M. Parikh, “Angiopoietin-1 requires IQ domain GTPase-activating protein 1 to activate Rac1 and promote endothelial barrier defense,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, pp. 2643–2652, 2011.
  28. T. Mammoto, S. M. Parikh, A. Mammoto et al., “Angiopoietin-1 requires p190 RhoGAP to protect against vascular leakage in vivo,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 33, pp. 23910–23918, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. P. Hughes, M. B. Marron, and N. P. J. Brindle, “The antiinflammatory endothelial tyrosine kinase Tie2 interacts with a novel nuclear factor-κB inhibitor ABIN-2,” Circulation Research, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 630–636, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. N. Sato, Y. Tozawa, U. Deutsch et al., “Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation,” Nature, vol. 376, no. 6535, pp. 70–74, 1995. View at Scopus
  31. C. Suri, P. F. Jones, S. Patan et al., “Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis,” Cell, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1171–1180, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. C. Maisonpierre, C. Suri, P. F. Jones et al., “Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis,” Science, vol. 277, no. 5322, pp. 55–60, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. U. Fiedler, M. Scharpfenecker, S. Koidl et al., “The Tie-2 ligand angiopoietin-2 is stored in and rapidly released upon stimulation from endothelial cell Weibel-Palade bodies,” Blood, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 4150–4156, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. U. Fiedler, Y. Reiss, M. Scharpfenecker et al., “Angiopoietin-2 sensitizes endothelial cells to TNF-α and has a crucial role in the induction of inflammation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 235–239, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. I. Kim, S. O. Moon, S. K. Park, S. W. Chae, and G. Y. Koh, “Angiopoietin-1 reduces VEGF-stimulated leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells by reducing ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin expression,” Circulation Research, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 477–479, 2001. View at Scopus
  36. S. M. Parikh, T. Mammoto, A. Schultz et al., “Excess circulating angiopoietin-2 may contribute to pulmonary vascular leak in sepsis in humans,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, article e46, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. T. Ganter, M. J. Cohen, K. Brohi et al., “Angiopoietin-2, marker and mediator of endothelial activation with prognostic significance early after trauma?” Annals of Surgery, vol. 247, no. 2, pp. 320–326, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. S. Giuliano Jr., P. M. Lahni, K. Harmon et al., “Admission angiopoietin levels in children with septic shock,” Shock, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 650–654, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. C. Gallagher, S. M. Parikh, K. Balonov et al., “Circulating angiopoietin 2 correlates with mortality in a surgical population with acute lung injury/adult respiratory distress syndrome,” Shock, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 656–661, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. Kümpers, C. Hafer, S. David et al., “Angiopoietin-2 in patients requiring renal replacement therapy in the ICU: relation to acute kidney injury, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and outcome,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 462–470, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Kümpers, A. Lukasz, S. David et al., “Excess circulating angiopoietin-2 is a strong predictor of mortality in critically ill medical patients,” Critical Care, vol. 12, no. 6, article R147, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Lukasz, J. Hellpap, R. Horn et al., “Circulating angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 in critically ill patients: development and clinical application of two new immunoassays,” Critical Care, vol. 12, no. 4, article R94, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. E. Orfanos, A. Kotanidou, C. Glynos et al., “Angiopoietin-2 is increased in severe sepsis: correlation with inflammatory mediators,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 199–206, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. van der Heijden, G. P. van Nieuw Amerongen, P. Koolwijk, V. W. M. van Hinsbergh, and A. B. J. Groeneveld, “Angiopoietin-2, permeability oedema, occurrence and severity of ALI/ARDS in septic and non-septic critically ill patients,” Thorax, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 903–909, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. J. Bhatt, G. S. Pryhuber, H. Huyck, R. H. Watkins, L. A. Metlay, and W. M. Maniscalco, “Disrupted pulmonary vasculature and decreased vascular endothelial growth factor, Flt-1, and TIE-2 in human infants dying with bronchopulmonary dysplasia,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 164, no. 10, pp. 1971–1980, 2001. View at Scopus
  46. A. Papapetropoulos, G. García-Cardeña, T. J. Dengler, P. C. Maisonpierre, G. D. Yancopoulos, and W. C. Sessa, “Direct actions of angiopoietin-1 on human endothelium: evidence for network stabilization, cell survival, and interaction with other angiogenic growth factors,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 213–223, 1999. View at Scopus
  47. A. I. Su, T. Wiltshire, S. Batalov et al., “A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 16, pp. 6062–6067, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. L. Wong, Z. A. Haroon, S. Werner, M. W. Dewhirst, C. S. Greenberg, and K. G. Peters, “Tie2 expression and phosphorylation in angiogenic and quiescent adult tissues,” Circulation Research, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 567–574, 1997. View at Scopus
  49. V. Spindler, N. Schlegel, and J. Waschke, “Role of GTPases in control of microvascular permeability,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 243–253, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. David, C. C. Ghosh, P. Kümpers et al., “Effects of a synthetic PEG-ylated Tie-2 agonist peptide on endotoxemic lung injury and mortality,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 300, no. 6, pp. L851–L862, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. Kümpers, M. van Meurs, S. David et al., “Time course of angiopoietin-2 release during experimental human endotoxemia and sepsis,” Critical Care, vol. 13, no. 3, article R64, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. S. Calfee, D. Gallagher, J. Abbott, B. T. Thompson, and M. A. Matthay, “Plasma angiopoietin-2 in clinical acute lung injury: prognostic and pathogenetic significance,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 40, pp. 1731–1737, 2012.
  53. N. J. Meyer, M. Li, R. Feng et al., “ANGPT2 genetic variant is associated with trauma-associated acute lung injury and altered plasma angiopoietin-2 isoform ratio,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 183, no. 10, pp. 1344–1353, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. T. Ong, D. E. McClintock, R. H. Kallet, L. B. Ware, M. A. Matthay, and K. D. Liu, “Ratio of angiopoietin-2 to angiopoietin-1 as a predictor of mortality in acute lung injury patients,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1845–1851, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. Hadem, C. L. Bockmeyer, A. Lukasz, et al., “Angiopoietin-2 in acute liver failure,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 40, pp. 1499–1505, 2012.
  56. B. Witzenbichler, D. Westermann, S. Knueppel, H. P. Schultheiss, and C. Tschope, “Protective role of angiopoietin-1 in endotoxic shock,” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. H. J. Mei, S. D. McCarter, Y. Deng, C. H. Parker, W. C. Liles, and D. J. Stewart, “Prevention of LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice by mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing angiopoietin,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 4, no. 9, article e269, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. H. Kim, Y. J. Jung, A. S. Lee et al., “COMP-angiopoietin-1 decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced acute kidney injury,” Kidney International, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1180–1191, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. R. Tournaire, M. P. Simon, F. le Noble, A. Eichmann, P. England, and J. Pouysségur, “A short synthetic peptide inhibits signal transduction, migration and angiogenesis mediated by Tie2 receptor,” EMBO Reports, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. P. Van Slyke, J. Alami, D. Martin et al., “Acceleration of diabetic wound healing by an angiopoietin peptide mimetic,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1269–1280, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. M. Dallabrida, N. Ismail, J. R. Oberle, B. E. Himes, and M. A. Rupnick, “Angiopoietin-1 promotes cardiac and skeletal myocyte survival through integrins,” Circulation Research, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. e8–e24, 2005. View at Scopus
  62. P. Kumpers, F. Gueler, S. David, et al., “The synthetic Tie2 agonist peptide vasculotide protects against vascular leakage and reduces mortality in murine abdominal sepsis,” Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 5, article R261, 2011.
  63. V. Bhandari, R. Choo-Wing, A. Harijith, et al., “Increased hyperoxia-induced lung injury in nitric oxide synthase 2 null mice is mediated via angiopoietin 2,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 46, pp. 668–676, 2012.
  64. S. David, A. Mukherjee, C. C. Ghosh, et al., “Angiopoietin-2 may contribute to multiorgan dysfunction and death in sepsis,” Critical Care Medicine. In press.
  65. C. C. Ghosh, A. Mukherjee, S. David, et al., “Impaired function of the Tie-2 receptor contributes to vascular leakage and lethality in anthrax,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, pp. 10024–10029, 2012.