Research Article
Response of Pea Varieties to Damage Degree of Pea Weevil, Bruchus pisorum L.
Table 6
Regression coefficients of the pea productivity in regard to the productivity traits.
(a) Healthy seeds (type 1) |
| ANOVA | df | SS | MS | | Significance |
| Regression | 3.000 | 0.220 | 0.073 | 0.713 | 0.678 | Residual | 1.000 | 0.103 | 0.103 | | | | | Total | 4.000 | 0.323 | | | | | |
| Productivity | Coefficients | Standard error | stat. | value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | Lower 95.0% | Upper 95.0% |
| Intercept | 4.273 | 1.605 | 2.663 | 0.229 | | 24.661 | | 24.661 | | 0.018 | 0.034 | 0.545 | 0.682 | | 0.446 | | 0.446 | NP | 0.356 | 0.466 | 0.764 | 0.585 | | 6.281 | | 6.281 | NS | 0.175 | 0.164 | 1.065 | 0.480 | | 1.913 | | 1.913 |
|
|
(b) Damaged seeds with parasitoid emergence hole (type 2) |
| ANOVA | df | SS | MS | | Significance |
| Regression | 3.000 | 0.469 | 0.156 | 18.341 | 0.170 | Residual | 1.000 | 0.009 | 0.009 | | | | | Total | 4.000 | 0.477 | | | | | |
| Productivity | Coefficients | Standard error | stat. | value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | Lower 95.0% | Upper 95.0% |
| Intercept | 3.062 | 0.519 | 5.898 | 0.107 | | 9.658 | | 9.658 | | 0.013 | 0.007 | 1.776 | 0.326 | | 0.103 | | 0.103 | NP | 0.806 | 0.167 | 4.835 | 0.130 | | 2.923 | | 2.923 | NS | 0.235 | 0.042 | 5.658 | 0.111 | | 0.293 | | 0.293 |
|
|
(c) Damaged seeds with bruchid emergence hole (type 3) |
| ANOVA | df | SS | MS | | Significance |
| Regression | 3.000 | 0.373 | 0.124 | 6538.771 | 0.009 | Residual | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | | | | | Total | 4.000 | 0.373 | | | | | |
| Productivity | Coefficients | Standard error | stat. | value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | Lower 95.0% | Upper 95.0% |
| Intercept | 0.616 | 0.044 | 14.103 | 0.045 | | | | | | 0.103 | 0.001 | 70.255 | 0.009 | 0.084 | 0.122 | 0.084 | 0.122 | NP | 1.630 | 0.016 | 102.506 | 0.006 | 1.428 | 1.832 | 1.428 | 1.832 | NS | 0.571 | 0.007 | 84.574 | 0.008 | | | | |
|
|
: height, cm; NP: number of pods; NS: number of seeds.
|