Response of Pea Varieties to Damage Degree of Pea Weevil, Bruchus pisorum L.

Table 6

Regression coefficients of the pea productivity in regard to the productivity traits.

(a) Healthy seeds (type 1)

ANOVA	df		SS	MS			Significance
Regression	3.000		0.220	0.073	0.713		0.678
Residual	1.000		0.103	0.103
Total	4.000		0.323
Productivity	Coefficients	Standard error	stat.	value	Lower; 95%	Upper; 95%	Lower; 95.0%	Upper; 95.0%
Intercept	4.273	1.605	2.663	0.229		24.661		24.661
	0.018	0.034	0.545	0.682		0.446		0.446
NP	0.356	0.466	0.764	0.585		6.281		6.281
NS	0.175	0.164	1.065	0.480		1.913		1.913

(b) Damaged seeds with parasitoid emergence hole (type 2)

ANOVA	df		SS	MS			Significance
Regression	3.000		0.469	0.156	18.341		0.170
Residual	1.000		0.009	0.009
Total	4.000		0.477
Productivity	Coefficients	Standard error	stat.	value	Lower; 95%	Upper; 95%	Lower; 95.0%	Upper; 95.0%
Intercept	3.062	0.519	5.898	0.107		9.658		9.658
	0.013	0.007	1.776	0.326		0.103		0.103
NP	0.806	0.167	4.835	0.130		2.923		2.923
NS	0.235	0.042	5.658	0.111		0.293		0.293

(c) Damaged seeds with bruchid emergence hole (type 3)

ANOVA	df		SS	MS			Significance
Regression	3.000		0.373	0.124	6538.771		0.009
Residual	1.000		0.000	0.000
Total	4.000		0.373
Productivity	Coefficients	Standard error	stat.	value	Lower; 95%	Upper; 95%	Lower; 95.0%	Upper; 95.0%
Intercept	0.616	0.044	14.103	0.045
	0.103	0.001	70.255	0.009	0.084	0.122	0.084	0.122
NP	1.630	0.016	102.506	0.006	1.428	1.832	1.428	1.832
NS	0.571	0.007	84.574	0.008

: height, cm; NP: number of pods; NS: number of seeds.