Research Article

Postharvest Practices, Perceptions, and Knowledge of Mycotoxins among Groundnut Farmers in the Adamawa, Centre, and North Regions of Cameroon

Table 3

Postharvest practices of groundnut farmers.

Postharvest practicesOverall, N = 3801Adamawa, N = 991Centre, N = 1611North, N = 1201 value value

Drying pods after harvesting380 (100%)99 (100%)161 (100%)120 (100%)
Duration of pod drying156.3<0.0012
 0–7 days220 (59%)35 (37%)151 (94%)34 (29%)
 8–14 days112 (30%)36 (38%)8 (5%)68 (57%)
 Above 14 days43 (11%)24 (25%)2 (1.2%)17 (14%)
Sorting329 (87%)90 (91%)155 (96%)84 (70%)13.13<0.0012
Drying location0.0123
 Home363 (96%)94 (95%)159 (99%)110 (92%)
 Field17 (4.5%)5 (5.1%)2 (1.2%)10 (8.3%)
Drying method<0.0013
 In the sun with dryer45 (12%)1 (1.0%)44 (27%)0 (0%)
 In the sun without dryer323 (87%)96 (97%)117 (73%)110 (98%)
 Others2 (0.5%)2 (2.0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 Under shade2 (0.5%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2 (1.8%)
Drying surface41.86<0.0012
 On the ground214 (58%)73 (74%)75 (47%)66 (59%)
 Cemented area23 (6.2%)0 (0%)23 (14%)0 (0%)
 On a tarpaulin135 (36%)26 (26%)63 (39%)46 (41%)
Good drying indicator
 Sound of seed in pod322 (85%)95 (96%)131 (81%)96 (80%)13.130.0012
 Pod cracks easily156 (41%)12 (12%)125 (78%)19 (16%)154.8<0.0012
 Other method13 (3.4%)0 (0%)13 (8.1%)0 (0%)<0.0013
 Using a moisture meter0 (0%)
Grain deterioration indicator
 Color other than that typical of the seed291 (77%)91 (92%)118 (73%)82 (68%)18.50<0.0012
 Taste (Bitter)109 (29%)23 (23%)64 (40%)22 (18%)17.36<0.0012
 No insect damage109 (29%)10 (10%)68 (42%)31 (26%)31.64<0.0012
 Others49 (13%)13 (13%)23 (14%)13 (11%)0.730.72
Duration of storage in pods<0.0013
 0–3 months52 (16%)6 (7.3%)44 (35%)2 (1.7%)
 3–6 months49 (15%)10 (12%)15 (12%)24 (20%)
 >6 months224 (69%)66 (80%)66 (53%)92 (78%)
Type of bags used for storage<0.0013
 Polypropylene bags273 (75%)85 (99%)87 (54%)101 (86%)
 Jute bag19 (5.2%)0 (0%)5 (3.1%)14 (12%)
 Polyethylene bags50 (14%)1 (1.2%)49 (31%)0 (0%)
 Hermetic bag17 (4.7%)0 (0%)17 (11%)0 (0%)
 Others4 (1.1%)0 (0%)2 (1.3%)2 (1.7%)
Threshing method used257.4<0.0012
 Hand threshing258 (68%)29 (29%)161 (100%)68 (57%)
 Use thresher86 (23%)69 (70%)0 (0%)17 (14%)
 Both36 (9%)1 (1.0%)0 (0%)35 (29%)
Practice scores0.17843
 Poor (0–7)375 (98.7%)98 (99%)157 (98%)120 (100%)
 Good (8–12)5 (1.3%)1 (1.0%)4 (2.5%)0 (0%)

1n (%), 2Pearson’s chi-squared test, 3Fisher’s exact test.