| | Factors favoring plaintiff | Number of cases (total: 40), percentage (%) of cases | Verdict |
| | Failure to treat with tPA | 27, 67.5% | Defendant: 18, 66.7%
Plaintiff: 7, 25.9%
NA: 2, 7.4% | | Failure to diagnose | 8, 20% | Defendant: 6, 75%
Plaintiff: 2, 25% | | Failure to transfer | 8, 20% | Defendant: 5, 62.5%
Plaintiff: 3, 42.9% | | Delay in attending patient by ED physician or neurologist | 5, 12.5% | Defendant: 3, 60%
Plaintiff: 2, 40% | | Failure to recommend tPA as a treatment option | 4, 10% | Defendant: 4, 100%
Plaintiff: 0 | | Delay in getting test (CT-scan) | 4, 10% | Defendant: 3, 75%
Plaintiff: 1, 25% | | NO informed consent | 3, 7.5% | Defendant: 2, 66.7%
Plaintiff: 1, 33.3% | | Complications of treatment with tPA | 2, 5% | Defendant: 1, 50%
Plaintiff: 1, 50% | | Failure to perform proper complete exam | 2, 5% | Defendant: 0
Plaintiff: 2, 100% |
|
|
