Clinical Study
Hip Fractures in Persons with Stroke
Table 4
Accuracy of the fracture prediction.
| | | Prevalence of hip fracture | Sensitivity
% () | Specificity
% () | Positive predictive value
% () | Negative predictive value
% () |
| Impaired vision
| 5 (9/165) | 67 (6/9) | 67 (104/156) | 10 (6/58) | 97 (104/107) | Previous fractures
| 5 (9/165) | 22 (2/9) | 96 (150/156) | 25 (2/8) | 96 (150/157) | TUG ≥ 14 s
| 4 (5/115) | 80 (4/5) | 66 (73/110) | 10 (4/41) | 99 (73/74) | SWWT
| 6 (7/125) | 29 (2/7) | 94 (111/118) | 22 (2/9) | 96 (111/116) |
|
|
TUG: Timed Up & Go; SWWT: Stops Walking When Talking.
|
