Study
ref. no.
Data source Sample Outcome Time of measure Severity controlled Results
valueComment Horner et al., 2003 [11 ] Patients hospitalized in 9 VAMCs 1995–1997 738 (31.2% Black) Rankin % change Admit-D/C Yes Improvement after 3 days of rehab 16% of Blacks 35% of Whites 0.007 Low income Blacks had worse recovery; delay in rehab initiation had greater impact on Blacks Moorthy et al., 2004 [16 ] Patients in IP rehab ‡ Black: 56 White: 55 Hispanic: 18FIM Admit-D/C No Improvement at D/C‡ Blacks: 7.1 White: 8.9 Hispanic: 10.1 NR Small statistically significant differences in FIM gain scores among ethnic groups Bhandari et al., 2005 [17 ] Patients in community based IP rehab facility 1995–2001 Black: 419 White: 421 Hispanic: 33 Asian: 96 Other: 33 FIM D/C-3 months No Improvement at D/C Blacks: 1.9 points (7% less) Improvement at 3 months Asians 16% less than Whites 0.02 0.005 Blacks with less improvement but more likely to be discharged home Nichols-Larsen et al., 2005 [18 ] EXCITE trial White: 153 Non-White: 63 SIS 3–9 months after stroke No Non-Whites reported lower HRQOL in the physical domain 0.003 Keng et al., 2005 [19 ] Patients in urban community hospital ‡ Black: 83 ∞ White: 20 Hispanic: 68FIM Admit-D/C No Improvement at D/C Hispanic: 31.4 Caucasian: 28.4 Blacks: 18.9 FIM gain higher for Hispanic and Caucasian but only significant between Hispanics and Blacks (
) Chiou-Tan et al., 2006 [20 ] UDSMR data 2000–2003 Black: 83 White: 20 Hispanic: 68 FIM Admit-D/C No Improvement at D/C Black: 21.53 White: 21.70 Hispanic: 26.78 Efficiency to D/C Black: 1.43 White: 1.20 Hispanic: 1.70 0.014 0.035 Blacks with higher scores on admission (68.89), compared to Whites (66.50) and Hispanics (58.89) (
) Hinson et al., 2007 [21 ] Patients seen at outpatient medical center Black: 66 White: 52
, 6-min walk test, and 30 ft walking velocityAdmit only No Walking velocity BM-.60 BF-.50 WM-.61 WF-.41 6 min walk test BM: 223 BF: 198 WM: 226 WF: 157
BM: 15 BF: 11.5 WM: 15.1 WF: 12.3 NS NS NS Reported as BM: Black male; BF: Black female; WM: White male; WF: White female Ottenbacher et al., 2008 [22 ] UDSMR data; IP rehab in 2002-2003 Black: 25,334 White: 123,537 Hispanic: 7,994 Other: 4,827 FIM Admit-D/C No D/C FIM Black: 80.23† White: 81.54 Hispanic: 79.43† Other: 81.77 Efficiency to D/C Black: 1.53† White: 1.61 Hispanic: 1.57 Other: 1.59 † 0.01 † 0.01 Differences in functional status across race groups were related to age. White was reference group. Hinojosa et al., 2009 [23 ] Veterans in the US and Puerto Rico ‡ Black: 30 ∞ White: 42 Puerto Rican: 49FIM D/C 1 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months No D/C motor FIM Black: 80.94 Caucasian: 78.29 Puerto Rican: 67.66 0.000 In HLM models and controlling for time, Blacks had average FIM 4.66 points higher than Whites (
) and Puerto Ricans had FIM 5.64 points lower than Whites (
) Horn et al., 2010 [24 ] Six US inpatient rehabilitation facilities Black: 239 White: 493 FIM Admit-D/C No Improvement at D/C Moderate stroke Blacks: 24.9 Whites: 26.9 Severe stroke Blacks: 28.1 Whites: 32.2 0.066 0.019 Moderate and severe strokes analyzed separately No Black/White differences found in unadjusted stroke rehabilitation outcomes Deutscher et al., 2010 [25 ] Six US inpatient rehabilitation facilities Black: 239 White: 493 FIM Admit-D/C No Blacks with lower discharge FIM (In OLS models using patient variables, nontherapy ancillaries, and use of PT/OT) 0.015 Liu et al., 2010 [26 ] Medicare assessment and claims data Black: 33,639 White: 216,664 Asian: 3,157 Hispanic: 4,575 North American Natives: 839 FIM: 12 Admit-D/C No Blacks had lower functional status than Whites after adjusting for covariates NR Putnam et al., 2010 [27 ] Six US inpatient rehabilitation facilities ‡ Blacks: 239 Whites: 493FIM Admit-D/C No Improvement at D/C Motor FIM Whites: 24.5 Blacks: 22.6 Cognitive FIM Whites: 4.9 Blacks: 3.7 <0.05 <0.01 Significant differences among those with severe stroke; no differences among moderate stroke Roth et al., 2011 [28 ] Patients enrolled in REGARDS study Blacks: 40 Whites: 72 BI MRS SIS MMSE Admit-1 year No Race-Adjusted Coefficients BI MMSE SIS memory SIS ADL SIS mobility SIS hand SIS social <0.05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Blacks showed greater deficits on multiple 1-year outcome measures Wang et al., 2011 [29 ] Inpatient rehabilitation hospital 2002–2006 1908 Black: 13.5% White: 63.9% Hispanic: 8.4% Asian: 14.1% FIM Admit-D/C No Improvement at D/C Severe Impairment Cognitive FIM Black (−0.09) Hispanic (0.42) Asian (−0.78) 0.7893 0.2963 0.0180 Moderate and severe strokes analyzed separately Rabadi et al., 2012 [30 ] Acute stroke rehabilitation unit Black: 115 White: 504 Hispanic: 38 Asian: 13 FIM Admit-D/C No Improvement at D/C Cognitive FIM Whites: 1.6 Blacks: 2.1 Hispanics: 3.1 Asians: 3.5 0.028 No significant differences noted in total FIM, FIM-ADL, or motor FIM Berges et al., 2012 [31 ] 11 US IP facilities Black: 150 White: 783 Hispanic: 57 FIM Admit-D/C 3 months 12 months No Improvement at D/C Blacks: 82.9 Whites: 78.8 Hispanics: 80.3 Improvement at 3-month follow-up Blacks: 101.9 Whites: 102.3 Hispanics: 92.0 Improvement at 12-month follow-up Blacks: 105.0 Whites: 105.9 Hispanics: 98.7 0.15 0.01 0.18 No significant racial differences on admission