CFD Modeling of Wall Steam Condensation: Two-Phase Flow Approach versus Homogeneous Flow Approach

<table>Radial profile of the steam molar concentration and temperature at <svg height="11.0375" id="M34" style="vertical-align:-0.27588pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 74.5625 11.0375" width="74.5625" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,11.0375)">
<g transform="translate(72,-63.17)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑍</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="9.6523161" y="0">1</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="15.903816" y="0">3</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="25.618647" y="0">=</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="37.659035" y="0">3</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="43.910538" y="0">.</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="47.036285" y="0">9</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="53.287785" y="0">3</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> m  at time = 3900 s: grid convergence.</table>

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: CFD Modeling of Wall Steam Condensation: Two-Phase Flow Approach versus Homogeneous Flow Approach 