About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 390758, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/390758
Research Article

Dynamic Analysis of a Pyroprocessing Coupled SFR Fuel Recycling

Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems Analysis, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Yuseong, Daejeon 305-353, Republic of Korea

Received 2 February 2012; Revised 4 April 2012; Accepted 5 April 2012

Academic Editor: Massimo Salvatores

Copyright © 2012 Fanxing Gao and Won Il Ko. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. H. Park, F. Gao, E. H. Kwon, and W. I. Ko, “Comparative study of different nuclear fuel cycle options: quantitative analysis on material flow,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 6916–6924, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Fanxing, Modeling and system analysis of different fuel cycles for nuclear power sustainability, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Quantum Energy and Chemical Engineering, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute Campus, Korea University of Science & Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2012.
  3. DANESS v1.0 Users Manual, Argonne National Laboratory Nuclear Engineering Division, 2004.
  4. B. Dixon, S. Kim, D. Shropshire, S. Piet, G. Matthern, and B. Halsey, “Dynamic systems analysis report for nuclear fuel recycle,” Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-08-15201 Rev.1, 2008.
  5. W. I. Ko, Model development for quantitative evaluation of nuclear fuel cycle alternatives and its application, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Nuclear Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2000.
  6. W. I. Ko, H. D. Kim, and M. S. Yang, “Advantages of irradiated DUPIC fuels from the perspective of environmental impact,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 123–139, 2002. View at Scopus
  7. Y. Ishiwatari, Y. Oka, and S. Koshizuka, “Breeding ratio analysis of a fast reactor cooled by supercritical light water,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 703–710, 2001. View at Scopus
  8. S. G. Hong, Y. Kim, and F. Venneri, “600 MWe sodium cooled fast reactor core designs for efficient TRU transmutation,” in Proceedings of the The Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea, May 2006.
  9. M. Cometto, P. Wydler, and R. Chawla, “A comparative physics study of alternative long-term strategies for closure of the nuclear fuel cycle,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 413–429, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Inoue, “Actinide recycling by pyro-process with metal fuel FBR for future nuclear fuel cycle system,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 547–554, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. OECD/NEA, Uranium 2009: Resources, Production and Demand, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2009.
  12. OECD/NEA, The Economics of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France, 1994.
  13. OECD/NEA, “Advanced nuclear fuel cycles and radioactive waste management,” Tech. Rep. 5990.OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Paris, France, 2006.
  14. D. Shropshire, K. A. Williams, W. B. Boore, et al., “Advanced fuel cycle cost basis,” Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-07-12107, 2007.
  15. D. Shropshire, K. A. Williams, W. B. Boore, et al., “Advanced fuel cycle cost basis,” Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-07-12107 Rev.1, 2008.
  16. D. Shropshire, K. A. Williams, W. B. Boore, et al., “Advanced fuel cycle cost basis,” Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-07-12107 Rev.2, 2009.
  17. J. Deutch and E. Moniz, The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2003.
  18. M. Bunn, B. van der Zwaan, J. P. Holdren, and S. Fetter, “The economics of reprocessing vs. direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel,” Tech. Rep. DE-FG-26-99FT4028, 2003.
  19. H. Khatib, “Review of OECD study into ‘Projected costs of generating electricity-2010 Edition’,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 5403–5408, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus